FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Age Assurance 18+ feedback thread
Age Assurance 18+ feedback thread
Jump to: Newest in thread
Just used the AI image/camera age verification (3rd option?) And it was quick and easy, got the token within a couple seconds of starting the process, no drama. 
Would have used the mobile data method but Three is down for me at mo... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'm offshore at the moment, so I used the 3rd option which I could do without the need for a phone signal. It was effortless, quick, simple no one could possibly complain about having to do that once.
Well done  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I purchased a SIM card/minimal data package and didn't apply to have the adult content filter unlocked. This was to test that the service could identify unverified accounts.
I then tried the verify by mobile data connection and text options and both correctly stated that the age was not verified on the account.
Hope that helps.
Cx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Tested the mobile network option.
- Tried to fool it and stayed connected to WiFi (good that it notifies that can’t perform when still connected).
- Process is fast and took seconds to confirm.
- Only concern is the reusable token in case of rejoining. Are there additional securities in place to make that unique to an individual/prevent from being passed round and invalidating the process?
Based on it being a simple process and only taking seconds to validate, is a reusable token completely necessary? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *j_mark OP Couple 5 days ago
Forum Mod Totteridge/Whetstone |
"I purchased a SIM card/minimal data package and didn't apply to have the adult content filter unlocked. This was to test that the service could identify unverified accounts.
I then tried the verify by mobile data connection and text options and both correctly stated that the age was not verified on the account.
Hope that helps.
Cx"
Perfect thanks
Admin |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *j_mark OP Couple 5 days ago
Forum Mod Totteridge/Whetstone |
"
- Only concern is the reusable token in case of rejoining. Are there additional securities in place to make that unique to an individual/prevent from being passed round and invalidating the process?
"
Yes, something we're still finalising.
Admin |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andSxxCouple 5 days ago
Birmingham |
We chose the facial recognition part from the 4 options. Experience. Fast, stable operation. Does not ask for any personal data. The process went quickly. After successful verification, we received a secret Fab age token. With which we can later enter the site without verification. Nice work, Thank you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The network check worked fine and was not overly intrusive.
Uncertain why a reusable token is necessary once the account as a whole is verified once - users won't be getting younger and will forget them!
Would prefer to be able to use this method for both my party going and personal accounts which I access using the same phone.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *j_mark OP Couple 5 days ago
Forum Mod Totteridge/Whetstone |
"Used mobile verification, does NOT work with apple icloud private relay enabled.
disabled it in settings icloud Private relay
Then it worked first time. "
We can detect this and improve the feedback loop to the user, thanks for the heads-up
Admin |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Tried the photo verification for 25+. Seems similar to other sites who already use this technology, easy and straightforward.
First attempt it said it could not verify (I think the glasses sometimes throw it off) but then allowed me to easily try again, and no issues second time round. 2 attempts took probably less than 2 minutes to verify successfully.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I have tested using the AI face check and it worked smoothly for me.
I am not sure about the check using mobile data as a number of under 18s will get mobile phones in their parents name and except the parent have setup or requested the network to set up that it's for an under 18 then the method is subject to error. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *j_mark OP Couple 5 days ago
Forum Mod Totteridge/Whetstone |
"I have tested using the AI face check and it worked smoothly for me.
I am not sure about the check using mobile data as a number of under 18s will get mobile phones in their parents name and except the parent have setup or requested the network to set up that it's for an under 18 then the method is subject to error."
OFCOM have given this as a recommended method in their guidance because it doesn't work like that. Any new phone connection is by default adult blocked due to an industry-wide agreement with OFCOM from all the network operators to work this way. For the connection to be opened to adult it would have required explicit action by an adult e.g. going into shop with ID or using a credit card at the mobile network site with the explicit intention of removing the adult block.
Admin |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Could not use the mobile data option as it stated that the WiFi was still on even though being off on iPhone and not in range of any WiFi, 2nd option by sending a text worked immediately and I had no issues using. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have tested using the AI face check and it worked smoothly for me.
I am not sure about the check using mobile data as a number of under 18s will get mobile phones in their parents name and except the parent have setup or requested the network to set up that it's for an under 18 then the method is subject to error.
OFCOM have given this as a recommended method in their guidance because it doesn't work like that. Any new phone connection is by default adult blocked due to an industry-wide agreement with OFCOM from all the network operators to work this way. For the connection to be opened to adult it would have required explicit action by an adult e.g. going into shop with ID or using a credit card at the mobile network site with the explicit intention of removing the adult block.
Admin"
Giving a child under the age of 18 with the content lock switched off is classed as a criminal offence in the uk and will lead to the termination of your account with EE I’m assuming the same with other network providers.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have tested using the AI face check and it worked smoothly for me.
I am not sure about the check using mobile data as a number of under 18s will get mobile phones in their parents name and except the parent have setup or requested the network to set up that it's for an under 18 then the method is subject to error."
That's a parental issue. They are responsible for giving their child an unlocked phone and it is against the law in the uk to do so. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Just used the AI image/camera age verification, it was quick and easy, received the token within a couple of seconds after completing the process, the token is a good idea. Very impressed with how simple it was 👍 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If only one phone is used for a couple is there a risk that one party is underage? I see the value for singles but am not sure this adds reassurance for couples. That said I suspect unless coercion is present that underage parties in a couple wouldn’t happen. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
