FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Mandatory pic verification
Mandatory pic verification
Jump to: Newest in thread
Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "
No. As long as people abide by the site rules, they can use this site as they wish. You do not need to interact with anyone if they do not suit your preferences. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lighty1Woman
over a year ago
You Dont Need to Know, right now |
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "
No to mandatory picture verification. I'm not putting my face or a full-body picture on Fab, as I don't want to be recognised. If you think us non-pic-verified people are fake, then just don't engage with us. Meanwhile, I will go on using my own common sense in ing out the fakes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "
Nope...no need and utterly pointless... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *at69driveMan
over a year ago
Wisbech and A47 corridor |
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "
. Surely members have enough common sense to decide for themselves if a profile is fake . All you have to do is read the profile concerned .
I don't think that fakes go to the bother of writing a good profile . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *at69driveMan
over a year ago
Wisbech and A47 corridor |
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect )
No to mandatory picture verification. I'm not putting my face or a full-body picture on Fab, as I don't want to be recognised. If you think us non-pic-verified people are fake, then just don't engage with us. Meanwhile, I will go on using my own common sense in ing out the fakes."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If I had had to upload a face/body pic when I first joined the site I would not have joined. I wanted time to view it, see what it had to offer and decide if I trusted it before I'd upload pictures. I got verified in person quite quickly as someone had recommended the site to me, so I just never bothered with the pic veri as I figured a veri from a real life person meant more. Forcing people to photo verify on sign up may deter some fakes (or you'll get the same one keep using the same name over and over then changing it), but it would also deter genuine users too.
If you don't want unverified members contacting you, use your filters and block them from doing so. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "
No, as they can be faked |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
No way ... I have had a single profile on here for four years, and Mr for two, as well as this couple profile .... we are real and don't need photo verification. I choose not to put my face on here, and I shouldn't have to, leave it as it is ... its easy enough to spot the fakes ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If it wasn't for all the fakes paying money the site would cost more. The trick is for you to spot them and not pay more for the subscription.
Just have a good old chuckle when you next have a three way with a couple of dirty women off here that some guy pulling himself off in a beer stained vest looking at pictures of your exploits payed for you too meet.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No to photo verification.to help out fakes just spot them. They aren't hard to spot. Plus we don't interact with those with just cam verifications,to us they are the easy ones to fake and pointless anyhow. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rs DCouple
over a year ago
far |
Site needs the fakes fivers but tbh its rare that they do pay.i love it when a fake messages me.the fun begins pics if any are a give aways looks like they took pics ov there sister shopping. Or porn pics are sent just google them.an dirty talk is another give away. KIK is another one ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rs DCouple
over a year ago
far |
"All it proves is you can stand up holding a piece of paper that doesn't make you any more or less likely to meet up "
i think it proves that the pics you are uploading are true profile pics.verification for profile pics is a way the site looks after its users. If some one cba to hold a piece ov paper up with there user name on it that will never be shown.its up to them.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.
There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect )
No to mandatory picture verification. I'm not putting my face or a full-body picture on Fab, as I don't want to be recognised. If you think us non-pic-verified people are fake, then just don't engage with us. Meanwhile, I will go on using my own common sense in ing out the fakes."
I think it would help yes.
If that became a rule then it would be abiding by the rules to comply...
you could then put the pic into friend folder but not private.
I don't engage with those who don't have a profile pic just like I would talk with someone who faced away while having a conversation. It's rude. I wouldn't consider meeting someone who remained faceless while engaged in intimate activity either.
It would be a step towards reducing fakes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All it proves is you can stand up holding a piece of paper that doesn't make you any more or less likely to meet up i think it proves that the pics you are uploading are true profile pics.verification for profile pics is a way the site looks after its users. If some one cba to hold a piece ov paper up with there user name on it that will never be shown.its up to them."
I've had a photo verified person contact me who wasn't who his public pics represented him to be. the trouble with photo verification is human error can take place, there's that many pics to authorised they are generally approved sometimes without cross referencing or are simply overlooked, its why you occasionall come across fisting pics that are against site rules but someone approved them or they wouldn't be there.
I couldn't be arsed to do it but I meet so people know who I am anyway |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This site is run by couples and women so it's not really a suggestion for discussion tbh. They don't need verifications to get meets....so its a no vote. But it would reduce fake profiles. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
