FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Don't delete verifications when someone leaves.
Don't delete verifications when someone leaves.
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
By muckshooter OP Find posts by muckshooter Man
just this minute!
Nottingham
I've just noticed some of my best verifications disappeared recently when the people who wrote them decided to leave the site. This shouldn't happen in my opinion. If I was a decent guy and they thought so at the time, that verification is still useful to everyone whether the writer remains on the site or not. This should be changed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Agreed, when I was part of a couple profile we had 11 veris but only 8 showed as 3 had left site, to some this looks like we had 3 bad veris or something to hide, so we stopped showing the amount, just the remaining veris x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Thanks Jenny. It just seems like a bug in the website that needs a very easy fix.
Removing the veris someone has written for others when they leave the site is unhelpful at least, and could be seen as misleading.
Does Fab have any comment on this annoying feature of their site? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don't agree, OP. In my opinion, verifications only prove the person is (generally) genuine and would turn up when a meet is arranged. I don't need to see all their conquests and how much the people they met enjoyed meeting them. I would rather make up my own mind then, if I choose to meet them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Not surprisingly, the people least bothered by disappearing veris are those who least need them to prove they are decent people.
A verification, good or bad, counts as a verification in a summary. The fact is that being able to read the verification is key. And if the details are deleted by fab when someone choses to leave I can't see how that helps anyone.
I know some veris are graphic, but not all. If people don't want to read them then don't. But don't suggest that it's ok for other not to be able to read them surely? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *coops44Man
over a year ago
near Stansted |
I’m in agreement the varied should stay as they show reliability and can display aspects of a persons character and sincerity. Just because the vary comes from someone who has left it is still relevant for the time it was written. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don't agree, OP. In my opinion, verifications only prove the person is (generally) genuine and would turn up when a meet is arranged. I don't need to see all their conquests and how much the people they met enjoyed meeting them. I would rather make up my own mind then, if I choose to meet them. "
Oh I agree the whole verification system has been misappropriated by attention seeking ego centric bellends who post endless verifications given usually by the same people ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago
ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL |
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available."
Or remove it and take it of the summary. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available.
Or remove it and take it of the summary. "
I'd rather have my deleted ones removed from my summary too when they go... Otherwise what invariably happens is people return on new profiles, ask you to reverify them, and despite being told there's no need, feel obliged to reverify you... I've had this from a serial delete and return members who added a new meet to my summary each time they returned on a new profile, even though I may have only ever met them once at a social! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I’m in agreement the varied should stay as they show reliability and can display aspects of a persons character and sincerity. Just because the vary comes from someone who has left it is still relevant for the time it was written. "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available.
Or remove it and take it of the summary.
I'd rather have my deleted ones removed from my summary too when they go... Otherwise what invariably happens is people return on new profiles, ask you to reverify them, and despite being told there's no need, feel obliged to reverify you... I've had this from a serial delete and return members who added a new meet to my summary each time they returned on a new profile, even though I may have only ever met them once at a social! "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available.
Or remove it and take it of the summary.
I'd rather have my deleted ones removed from my summary too when they go... Otherwise what invariably happens is people return on new profiles, ask you to reverify them, and despite being told there's no need, feel obliged to reverify you... I've had this from a serial delete and return members who added a new meet to my summary each time they returned on a new profile, even though I may have only ever met them once at a social! "
It's a whole lot easier for fab not to delete a verification when someone leaves.
Anyone running Fab care to comment why this is done??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
By muckshooter OP Find posts by muckshooter Man
just this minute!
Nottingham
I've just noticed some of my best verifications disappeared recently when the people who wrote them decided to leave the site. This shouldn't happen in my opinion. If I was a decent guy and they thought so at the time, that verification is still useful to everyone whether the writer remains on the site or not. This should be changed."
yes but the profile won't exist for the people that use the verifications to judge you with so would be of no use to them, don't you think?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"
By muckshooter OP Find posts by muckshooter Man
just this minute!
Nottingham
I've just noticed some of my best verifications disappeared recently when the people who wrote them decided to leave the site. This shouldn't happen in my opinion. If I was a decent guy and they thought so at the time, that verification is still useful to everyone whether the writer remains on the site or not. This should be changed.yes but the profile won't exist for the people that use the verifications to judge you with so would be of no use to them, don't you think? "
No I don't think that is a big issue. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available.
Or remove it and take it of the summary.
I'd rather have my deleted ones removed from my summary too when they go... Otherwise what invariably happens is people return on new profiles, ask you to reverify them, and despite being told there's no need, feel obliged to reverify you... I've had this from a serial delete and return members who added a new meet to my summary each time they returned on a new profile, even though I may have only ever met them once at a social!
It's a whole lot easier for fab not to delete a verification when someone leaves.
Anyone running Fab care to comment why this is done???"
Because those who struggle to meet may be tempted to verify themselves from fake accounts which they later delete 
Not from Fab... But can see why... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
By muckshooter OP Find posts by muckshooter Man
just this minute!
Nottingham
I've just noticed some of my best verifications disappeared recently when the people who wrote them decided to leave the site. This shouldn't happen in my opinion. If I was a decent guy and they thought so at the time, that verification is still useful to everyone whether the writer remains on the site or not. This should be changed.yes but the profile won't exist for the people that use the verifications to judge you with so would be of no use to them, don't you think?
No I don't think that is a big issue. "
of course it is what's the point of a veri from a faceless profile, I don't actually like veris but if you have them then the point of them is to see who verified you imo |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I agree that they should stay. We have lost quite a few due to people leaving.
I always read verifications to make up my mind about people. B "
I couldn't agree more. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *anky_PankyWoman
over a year ago
Filthy Fuckeryville |
"I've lost some wonderfully funny veris through people leaving.
The difference between the summary number and the amount shown can be misleading, people think they're hidden and therefore bad veris.
IMHO it would be better to leave the veri but have it marked as UNLOS.
*Other opinions are available."
Agreed. This |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Verifications belong to the sender not the recipient if the sender leaves the site any verifications leave with them, quite rightly in my opinion.  "
That's nonsense actually. The veris belong to both. The sender and the recipient. After all, both of them engaged in the sex (or social) act xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Verifications belong to the sender not the recipient if the sender leaves the site any verifications leave with them, quite rightly in my opinion.
That's nonsense actually. The veris belong to both. The sender and the recipient. After all, both of them engaged in the sex (or social) act xx "
Of course they did but the verification still belongs to the sender, perhaps they are leaving the lifestyle to start anew, for reasons of discretion the verification is deleted. I applaud Fabswingers for taking this stance.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *SAchickWoman
over a year ago
Hillside desolate |
"Verifications belong to the sender not the recipient if the sender leaves the site any verifications leave with them, quite rightly in my opinion.
That's nonsense actually. The veris belong to both. The sender and the recipient. After all, both of them engaged in the sex (or social) act xx
Of course they did but the verification still belongs to the sender, perhaps they are leaving the lifestyle to start anew, for reasons of discretion the verification is deleted. I applaud Fabswingers for taking this stance.
"
But all their forum posts still remain. So should they be deleted too? The verifications could still be there with "UNLOS" as the username,just as the forum posts are. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Verifications belong to the sender not the recipient if the sender leaves the site any verifications leave with them, quite rightly in my opinion.
That's nonsense actually. The veris belong to both. The sender and the recipient. After all, both of them engaged in the sex (or social) act xx
Of course they did but the verification still belongs to the sender, perhaps they are leaving the lifestyle to start anew, for reasons of discretion the verification is deleted. I applaud Fabswingers for taking this stance.
"
All the verification needs to say is something like (user no longer on site) or similar. You do see that a lot. It's just a shame for some of the people above who have lost good veris about them which helps to provide a picture of what they are like as a person x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Verifications belong to the sender not the recipient if the sender leaves the site any verifications leave with them, quite rightly in my opinion.
That's nonsense actually. The veris belong to both. The sender and the recipient. After all, both of them engaged in the sex (or social) act xx "
This. ^ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lan157Man
over a year ago
a village near Haywards Heath in East Sussex |
if the verifier has left the site then the verification is worthless because it cannot be read in conjunction with a review of the sender.The verification system would quickly be abused . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We only show some of our most recent veris. So does not bother us in the slightess if they leave and the veri vanishes.
We won't re veri a returner on a new profile without remeeting them. The warning is clear if they deleate their account. They made the decission to leave. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I agree that they should stay. We have lost quite a few due to people leaving.
I always read verifications to make up my mind about people. B "
Agreed! They should stay
Lost loads of really good veri’s on here over the yrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'm always curious how this would benefit anyone?
It's the equivalent of having a verification from a blank profile which is an immediate red flag for most.
Most people follow the verification trail which can't be done if the person giving the verification has left so it seems a bit pointless.
I'm fully in agreement with them disappearing because with the rate that people leave the site some profiles would be displaying lots of verifications from unlos which doesn't really reflect well on them.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If someone has varies hidden I would never assume it was a bad verification because who leaves a bad verification for someone it's pointless all you have done is given them a extra verification they don't deserve that they will never display
I assume that hidden verification are either a bit private or a cam veri (I don't display them) or a double veri from someone who they have met a number of times
I would be more concerned if someone had a number of users leave after meeting them  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Was verified but not now she left the site so finding it hard now "
If you had been verified you would still have the green tick even if she left the site and would be a verified profile.You just wouldn't be able to display the verification.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What if your new to the site and the guy who's left was the guy who originally verified you do you loose verification?"
No you would still have the green tick.would still say Verified Genuine Profile and the summary would still be there.
The only thing you would lose is the actual text verification.
so those claiming they no longer have the meet/cam green tick and they lost it when a user left are either lying or Admin removed it for being false. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man 27 weeks ago
Newcastle |
"This would open the flood gates for people to create fake veris then delete the fake profiles "
But if every user was photo verified it'll work but then the site would also know how many accounts each one has  that's lied about their age  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
