FabSwingers.com > Forums > London > Understanding Kink and BDSM
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"There is not enough teaching unfortunately. For instance my bdsm is completely different to your bdsm and although yours may intrigue me slightly, no I wouldn't bother to learn about it. Oh and good to see you back OP " What you know you know, what you don’t know you don’t miss. Thank you for the welcome. | |||
"There is not enough teaching unfortunately. For instance my bdsm is completely different to your bdsm and although yours may intrigue me slightly, no I wouldn't bother to learn about it. Oh and good to see you back OP " Absolutely. I’m hesitant to call myself “kinky” as people are too quick to put their own definitions on other people. I have kinks but not really BDSM type ones, and nor do i conform to the stereotype of a “domme” no matter how many men message me asking me to be the domme they want | |||
"There is not enough teaching unfortunately. For instance my bdsm is completely different to your bdsm and although yours may intrigue me slightly, no I wouldn't bother to learn about it. Oh and good to see you back OP Absolutely. I’m hesitant to call myself “kinky” as people are too quick to put their own definitions on other people. I have kinks but not really BDSM type ones, and nor do i conform to the stereotype of a “domme” no matter how many men message me asking me to be the domme they want " I do agree that labels seem to want to compartmentalise ourselves. We are sophisticated creatures with fine nuances. I do use Dom as a self description as it’s a starting point for conversation. | |||
"There is not enough teaching unfortunately. For instance my bdsm is completely different to your bdsm and although yours may intrigue me slightly, no I wouldn't bother to learn about it. Oh and good to see you back OP Absolutely. I’m hesitant to call myself “kinky” as people are too quick to put their own definitions on other people. I have kinks but not really BDSM type ones, and nor do i conform to the stereotype of a “domme” no matter how many men message me asking me to be the domme they want I do agree that labels seem to want to compartmentalise ourselves. We are sophisticated creatures with fine nuances. I do use Dom as a self description as it’s a starting point for conversation. " I use Daddy as it definitely fits me better, and it invites more questions. Usually. But I do still get men messaging me saying “Oh goddess please stomp on my balls I’ll do anything” as an opener and it’s extremely offputting | |||
"There is not enough teaching unfortunately. For instance my bdsm is completely different to your bdsm and although yours may intrigue me slightly, no I wouldn't bother to learn about it. Oh and good to see you back OP Absolutely. I’m hesitant to call myself “kinky” as people are too quick to put their own definitions on other people. I have kinks but not really BDSM type ones, and nor do i conform to the stereotype of a “domme” no matter how many men message me asking me to be the domme they want I do agree that labels seem to want to compartmentalise ourselves. We are sophisticated creatures with fine nuances. I do use Dom as a self description as it’s a starting point for conversation. I use Daddy as it definitely fits me better, and it invites more questions. Usually. But I do still get men messaging me saying “Oh goddess please stomp on my balls I’ll do anything” as an opener and it’s extremely offputting " I can certainly see why the daddy label would raise questions, because it’s uncommon. For me, If I’m asked questions I’d welcome the opportunity to reply. So long as it’s respectfully asked. I concur if people messaging and ignoring your profile (typical male behaviour sadly) and simply prioritise their wishes upon you, then thats plain rude. | |||