FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Bonnie Blue
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
"The question is did you ?" Haha ,Definitely not ,but it did raise the thought in my head . | |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? " Yes I watched it as well. Did I? No. Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not? | |||
| |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? Yes I watched it as well. Did I? No. Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?" Your not old. But she would because she said she wants to fuck any man, on their 18th birthday upwards | |||
![]() | |||
| |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? Yes I watched it as well. Did I? No. Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not? Your not old. But she would because she said she wants to fuck any man, on their 18th birthday upwards" You've just made an old farts day. Mwah. ![]() | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process." Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳 | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳" Nah I agree with you, if Bonnie was a bloke targeting female Freshers there would be a lot more objections. Double standards piss me off big time. One minute we say boys mature slower than girls yet with regards to sex they magically are more so. Make it make sense or at least be consistent. | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳" Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no. Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever. I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame. | |||
![]() | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() Should the moral compass not be on those fathers/sons....they make the decision to get their dick wet. | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() I said on my thread the attitude is wives aren't good enough, and don't get me started on the disabled comment she said out loud ![]() ![]() | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() Yes, them too, but it is her couldn't give a fuck attitude about anyone/anything, or the people she is hurting in her quest for money and fame | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() Sadly she isn't the first and definitely won't be the last person to do this and I fear it will only get worse. I do wish young women/men had more respect for themselves. | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() I agree with some of this, I think she is exploiting very young men and women who may live to regret their actions when they grow a bit older. They have little life experience and the person you are at 19/20 is very different from the person you are at 35 etc. But the very grown, adult men know exactly what they are doing and are making informed, consenting decisions to cheat on their wives. She isn't manipulating them into anything. The responsibility for their "hurt" caused to their partners is on them. I may not like her attitude or her shock tactics to make money, but adult men have their own agency and can make their own decisions on whether to cheat on their partners. That's on them, not her. | |||
| |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() Yes, I also agree with you to a certain extent. But as I have always said on any threads on here about cheating, I blame the 'enabler' equally, ie having sex with someone who you know is married or has a partner, even if you are single, is just as bad as the person cheating, in my eyes anyway | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() The blame lies squarely at the "cheaters" feet. They are the ones who entered a committed relationship but this is now going of topic.... | |||
| |||
![]() | |||
"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm ![]() Yes we are going off topic. We'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. | |||
| |||
"I think we, as a society, have to accept some responsibility for creating and enabling this. Specifically more so, men and their thirst regarding porn and how certain platforms almost enable them to direct their own scenario. It grows from there " Well said 👏 | |||
| |||
"Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂" Oh, me too. I don't even pretend otherwise 😂 I'm not a prude when it comes to porn either, as long as it's ethical and nobody is being exploited. There's nothing wrong with sex work imo, and sex work is work. I do find her marketing tactics distasteful imo, the purposefully inflammatory things she says to get views etc. It's made her plenty of money though, and I respect the grift. | |||
"Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂 Oh, me too. I don't even pretend otherwise 😂 I'm not a prude when it comes to porn either, as long as it's ethical and nobody is being exploited. There's nothing wrong with sex work imo, and sex work is work. I do find her marketing tactics distasteful imo, the purposefully inflammatory things she says to get views etc. It's made her plenty of money though, and I respect the grift. " Sex will always sell...oldest profession in the book. Unfortunately content is just going to get more controversial as time goes on until these sites start banning people | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂 Oh, me too. I don't even pretend otherwise 😂 I'm not a prude when it comes to porn either, as long as it's ethical and nobody is being exploited. There's nothing wrong with sex work imo, and sex work is work. I do find her marketing tactics distasteful imo, the purposefully inflammatory things she says to get views etc. It's made her plenty of money though, and I respect the grift. Sex will always sell...oldest profession in the book. Unfortunately content is just going to get more controversial as time goes on until these sites start banning people " I must admit the marketing of it is the part that can annoy me at times, slightly off topic, but being an ex trucker who used to have a truck at the shows, there was a few advertising the fact they done OF while half hanging out their tops taking pics with teenage kids. Like handing a onlyfans sticker to a 15 year old is excessive , | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳 Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no. Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever. I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame." I don't believe a brain of an 18 year old is as logical as the brain of a 30/40/50 year old...that's why it's so easy for someone like Andrew Tate to say to a young girl "come be my girlfriend and do cam work you'll be rich and famous " ...a grown woman would easily say no to that, a barely 18 year old will be much more naive...same when Bonnie tells an 18 year old boy "come have sex with me on camera, you'll have the best sex of your life and become tik tok famous". I also don't understand it when people say " I wouldn't do the things she is doing, because it doesn't seem right, but I don't care if she does, because it's not illegal" - It's such a morally ambiguous argument. When ever the topic of Bonnie Blue appears, there is a handful of women that always make excuses for her behaviour, which is strange as they would be the first to call out a man that does it. My argument is that when it comes to using barely legal teens for monetary gains and fame, both Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue are guilty of that...they are two sides of the same coin - and that coin is a huge problem in our society | |||
| |||
"Who is Bonnie Blue ?" That girl over there 👉...on the Internet | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳 Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no. Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever. I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame. I don't believe a brain of an 18 year old is as logical as the brain of a 30/40/50 year old...that's why it's so easy for someone like Andrew Tate to say to a young girl "come be my girlfriend and do cam work you'll be rich and famous " ...a grown woman would easily say no to that, a barely 18 year old will be much more naive...same when Bonnie tells an 18 year old boy "come have sex with me on camera, you'll have the best sex of your life and become tik tok famous". I also don't understand it when people say " I wouldn't do the things she is doing, because it doesn't seem right, but I don't care if she does, because it's not illegal" - It's such a morally ambiguous argument. When ever the topic of Bonnie Blue appears, there is a handful of women that always make excuses for her behaviour, which is strange as they would be the first to call out a man that does it. My argument is that when it comes to using barely legal teens for monetary gains and fame, both Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue are guilty of that...they are two sides of the same coin - and that coin is a huge problem in our society " I'm certainly not making excuses for her, I don't advocate what she does in the slightest. From what you said....do you think it's right for barely legal teens to be on here? | |||
"But at 18 they are allowed to go to war, fight and potentially die for their country,but apparently not mature enough to decide who they are allowed to have sex with!!!! What age is considered responsible?? Look I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with what she did and as has already been pointed out of this was a guy people's heads would be exploding with anger. I'm merely pointing out legally she's done nothing wrong." Legally no, but she's targeting Freshers. Which to me is preditory behaviour. These are 18/19 year old freshly moved away from home. Who are trying to impress their new friends, exposed to peer pressure and add to that copious amount of drink. Freshers weeks are a train wreck. Do I think it's ok for 18 year olds to do this yes if they want, do I think targeting Freshers week students is morally wrong absolutely. | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳 Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no. Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever. I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame. I don't believe a brain of an 18 year old is as logical as the brain of a 30/40/50 year old...that's why it's so easy for someone like Andrew Tate to say to a young girl "come be my girlfriend and do cam work you'll be rich and famous " ...a grown woman would easily say no to that, a barely 18 year old will be much more naive...same when Bonnie tells an 18 year old boy "come have sex with me on camera, you'll have the best sex of your life and become tik tok famous". I also don't understand it when people say " I wouldn't do the things she is doing, because it doesn't seem right, but I don't care if she does, because it's not illegal" - It's such a morally ambiguous argument. When ever the topic of Bonnie Blue appears, there is a handful of women that always make excuses for her behaviour, which is strange as they would be the first to call out a man that does it. My argument is that when it comes to using barely legal teens for monetary gains and fame, both Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue are guilty of that...they are two sides of the same coin - and that coin is a huge problem in our society I'm certainly not making excuses for her, I don't advocate what she does in the slightest. From what you said....do you think it's right for barely legal teens to be on here?" I don't think anyone under 21 should be here...hell I think the legal age (of anything including voting) should be pushed to at least 21...but I am a bit of a "radical" when it comes to age - and truly believe the human brain develops and matures fully in the mid 20s. I still see people in their early 20s and late teens as kids really, regardless of their achievements in life to that point... | |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? Yes I watched it as well. Did I? No. Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?" | |||
| |||
![]() | |||
| |||
![]() | |||
| |||
| |||
"People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄" The thread is about her, not anyone else. I have just as much distaste for the men that cheat as I have for her. Just because it may be 'someone else', doesn't make it ok. Just because it's 'her body', doesn't make it ok when she's targeting 'barely legal' teens or virgins, and saying the wives or partners are asking for it, or should do better!! I despair ![]() | |||
| |||
"People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄 The thread is about her, not anyone else. I have just as much distaste for the men that cheat as I have for her. Just because it may be 'someone else', doesn't make it ok. Just because it's 'her body', doesn't make it ok when she's targeting 'barely legal' teens or virgins, and saying the wives or partners are asking for it, or should do better!! I despair ![]() Yes, there is a bigger conversation but this is a flippant post , I wasn’t trying to character assassinate the girl or psychoanalyse her or the participants (there’s enough material there for a convention). it’s her life and definitely has her head screwed on £ wise. She’s admits she is going for the shock effect ‘ barely legal ‘ , ‘Hubbies’ etc and I’d imagine a successful working girl would have seen more than a 1000 guys but not in one sitting, who’d have thought that was physically possible. I was looking from a blokes perspective, and observation on behaviours. what would the thoughts be with ticket no 500 in your hand knowing 499 before you and another 500 behind you, the floor strewn with used rubbers-Still fancy it ? I was surprised when a Hubby popped up, who’d have thought 🤷♂️ ££££££. | |||
| |||
"There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money." Is there something equally eerie about the men who participated? How do you suppose they rationalise the part they played? | |||
| |||
| |||
"There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money. Is there something equally eerie about the men who participated? How do you suppose they rationalise the part they played?" Hard to say as none of them were interviewed (unless you mean her support team rather than the gangbangers). It would have been interesting if they had been but it would have been a very different documentary. I thought her live-in videographer was similar though with his praise for her and Andrew Tate as marketing "geniuses" that glossed over the transgressive nature of their content. | |||
"There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money. Is there something equally eerie about the men who participated? How do you suppose they rationalise the part they played? Hard to say as none of them were interviewed (unless you mean her support team rather than the gangbangers). It would have been interesting if they had been but it would have been a very different documentary. I thought her live-in videographer was similar though with his praise for her and Andrew Tate as marketing "geniuses" that glossed over the transgressive nature of their content." She's clever, it's clear to see. But the way she speaks about other women and her controversy is calculated. With that level and lack of emotion and empathy if she wasn't going to be a porn performer she was going to be a serial killer....at least no men died I guess. She loves the attention, negative or positive. It matters not to her. I mean, the woman has no bearing on my life I just worry about the young minds being influenced by her motives and actions.... | |||
| |||
"Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!! " There was a women on her payroll that was timing it. She said about 40 secs per person | |||
| |||
| |||
"I’d get involved. But probably be wracked with guilt for 3 or 4 days afterwards… hey ho " She’a a hoe.. Calculated and rich admittedly.. | |||
"Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!! There was a women on her payroll that was timing it. She said about 40 secs per person " Longer than I usually get. 😁 | |||
| |||
| |||
"People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄 The thread is about her, not anyone else. I have just as much distaste for the men that cheat as I have for her. Just because it may be 'someone else', doesn't make it ok. Just because it's 'her body', doesn't make it ok when she's targeting 'barely legal' teens or virgins, and saying the wives or partners are asking for it, or should do better!! I despair ![]() It's constant on here, and it's weird cos this is literally a sex site. We have threads on here where men and women literally admit to fucking 18 year olds, and not once have i ever seen anyone saying anything to them. Why is that? People only say all this stuff about her online but would never say it to her face. It's actually mad. 🙄 | |||
"Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!! There was a women on her payroll that was timing it. She said about 40 secs per person Longer than I usually get. 😁" TBH you're surrounded by hundreds of people and being filmed so it's hardly surprising | |||
| |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? " Because it's always the "woman's fault" Totally agree with everything you've said....If it were a guy lining up a 1000 "barely legal female teens" he would be seen as some kind of stud! | |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? " Exactly this. They will never hold the men accountable and they will always coddle men no matter how old they are. | |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? " I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around. It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever. | |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around. It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever." But is she really exploiting anyone?? The guys who film with her aren't that dumb or niave surely! | |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around. It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever. But is she really exploiting anyone?? The guys who film with her aren't that dumb or niave surely! " I think they really are, girls too who have never done anything like this before, nervous and flustered, that's part of their appeal for her. | |||
| |||
"Her being what passes for many as pretty and a young white female is aiding and abetting the most awful moral decline. " Are you saying her, or women like her are responsible for this decline? | |||
| |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. " Very much, yes. | |||
"Her being what passes for many as pretty and a young white female is aiding and abetting the most awful moral decline. Are you saying her, or women like her are responsible for this decline?" Absolutely not. | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. " 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. | |||
| |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme." While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. " reality is in social science it is often both / cyclical, she sex in the standard of what’s acceptable, by taking it just a little bit further. The feelings/reactions this woman causes in people says more about them than her. | |||
| |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? " Sooner wank A dead eyed disturbed skank | |||
| |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. " Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point. | |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. " Without the 1000 plus men who participated, there would be no discussion of her. | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. " It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry" Why isn't anyone stepping in? | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry Why isn't anyone stepping in? " I thought 1000+ stepped in? ![]() | |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. " Well, why wouldn't people bring up the men participating? Who is she having sex with? Men? Like.....cmon | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry Why isn't anyone stepping in? I thought 1000+ stepped in? ![]() ![]() | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry Why isn't anyone stepping in? " Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry Why isn't anyone stepping in? Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner" Money will be why the people close to the situation are supporting these events. More widely though if people believe there's exploitation of naive youngsters going on why are we all watching without attempting to stop it whether it's legal or not? | |||
| |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. Well, why wouldn't people bring up the men participating? Who is she having sex with? Men? Like.....cmon" Nah, I won't cmon. I've got my views, you've got yours, everyone's got views, we don't have to agree | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry Why isn't anyone stepping in? Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner Money will be why the people close to the situation are supporting these events. More widely though if people believe there's exploitation of naive youngsters going on why are we all watching without attempting to stop it whether it's legal or not? " Again, I don't know. I mean what could anyone do? I have seen many critical of her though and the exploitation. Apparently a journalist watched the documentary with her father, and he was looking away and uncomfortable (obviously) and yet allegedly he is her biggest supporter | |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? " I watched it last night. She's open about the fact that most of her posts are deliberate 'rage bait', especially the references to wives and partners. Likewise the age references are designed to shock. It's marketing. Her target audience isnt the women she's 'insulting' on camera. It's the men, whether young guys who are horny singletons or married men looking for a quick fix cheap thrill. She stated exactly that and that it's her niche. And seemingly those men lap it up. If they didn't, and she didnt get the responses, clicks and subscriptions she'd probably have looked for another angle. Even the abuse she gets online drives the exposure further and gives more free publicity. If there was no demand for her content we'd never have heard of her. If people (ok men) had no interest in watching what she created then there'd be no content made, no headlines in the press and she'd fade into obscurity like many before her have done. Do I agree with what she does? In terms of content, no. But she's evidently found a very successful angle, is raking in money and will be set for life in the next year or so. The content may not be to the taste of many, but that's no different with much that's produced and shown in porn or content creation websites. It's not compulsory to watch, enjoy or participate in, and whether you feel some involved are too young or not, at least there's full consent given in all cases and anonymity offered if desired for any participants. The only thing I found particularly disturbing in the documentary was her going to do an interview with Tate and the fact she said she'd fuck him. But then it was obviously being done simply for more exposure and with an estimated billion views she wasn't wrong on that. I won't judge her for her choices so long as everything she does is consensual. I have zero interest in watching her content though, the same as I have none in 90% of adult content ever created. To cold hard truth is she's providing content men evidently want to watch and getting very rich doing so. If she wasn't, there'd be someone else to fill the gap in a heartbeat. As another forum regular frequently posts....."Don't hate the player, hate the game". 🤷♂️ | |||
"She's a symptom not the cause. 💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme. While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned. The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry Why isn't anyone stepping in? Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner Money will be why the people close to the situation are supporting these events. More widely though if people believe there's exploitation of naive youngsters going on why are we all watching without attempting to stop it whether it's legal or not? Again, I don't know. I mean what could anyone do? I have seen many critical of her though and the exploitation. Apparently a journalist watched the documentary with her father, and he was looking away and uncomfortable (obviously) and yet allegedly he is her biggest supporter " I would rather that one if my kids didn't have sex with 1000 people and stream it. I'd do my best to talk them out of it for all sorts of reasons but if they went ahead I would support them but not the actions. If I thought they were exploiting anyone I would do my damndest to prevent that by any means possible. | |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around. It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever." The only difference I see with a club setting is that they [young students+ virgins] are not filmed - I would imagine for most participants it's a trophy and will become their 'interesting fact' in later life. | |||
| |||
"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it. I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ? I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18. They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ? I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag]. 1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? I watched it last night. She's open about the fact that most of her posts are deliberate 'rage bait', especially the references to wives and partners. Likewise the age references are designed to shock. It's marketing. Her target audience isnt the women she's 'insulting' on camera. It's the men, whether young guys who are horny singletons or married men looking for a quick fix cheap thrill. She stated exactly that and that it's her niche. And seemingly those men lap it up. If they didn't, and she didnt get the responses, clicks and subscriptions she'd probably have looked for another angle. Even the abuse she gets online drives the exposure further and gives more free publicity. If there was no demand for her content we'd never have heard of her. If people (ok men) had no interest in watching what she created then there'd be no content made, no headlines in the press and she'd fade into obscurity like many before her have done. Do I agree with what she does? In terms of content, no. But she's evidently found a very successful angle, is raking in money and will be set for life in the next year or so. The content may not be to the taste of many, but that's no different with much that's produced and shown in porn or content creation websites. It's not compulsory to watch, enjoy or participate in, and whether you feel some involved are too young or not, at least there's full consent given in all cases and anonymity offered if desired for any participants. The only thing I found particularly disturbing in the documentary was her going to do an interview with Tate and the fact she said she'd fuck him. But then it was obviously being done simply for more exposure and with an estimated billion views she wasn't wrong on that. I won't judge her for her choices so long as everything she does is consensual. I have zero interest in watching her content though, the same as I have none in 90% of adult content ever created. To cold hard truth is she's providing content men evidently want to watch and getting very rich doing so. If she wasn't, there'd be someone else to fill the gap in a heartbeat. As another forum regular frequently posts....."Don't hate the player, hate the game". 🤷♂️" If I could like this post, I would 👍👍 | |||
| |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point." When is it bin day ? | |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point. When is it bin day ?" Ah shit I forgot the bins!! Thanks Granny 😉 | |||
| |||
"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her. If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not. Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point. When is it bin day ?" Mine is tomorrow ![]() | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Am I the only person who literally couldn't an iota of fuck about Bonnie Blue? Not sure why she keeps getting publicity." Nope ..I don't give a shiny shit about her... Or a dull shit either come to think about it 🤣🤣 | |||
"Am I the only person who literally couldn't an iota of fuck about Bonnie Blue? Not sure why she keeps getting publicity." I only found out about her from fab! | |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? " I’d never watch channel 4. 😏 | |||
| |||
![]() | |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? Yes I watched it as well. Did I? No. Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not? Your not old. But she would because she said she wants to fuck any man, on their 18th birthday upwards" One of the perks of royalty, a real birthday and an official birthday! | |||
"If I discovered one of my kids or anyone I knew was planning on going ahead with something like this I would be having very serious conversations with them " I'd tell mine, "You have autonomy over your own body. Do what thou wilt." | |||
| |||
![]() | |||
![]() | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Is it just me or is she actually really quite beautiful? " No you're not the only one. Pretty face, gorgeous body, what's not to like. | |||
"Is it just me or is she actually really quite beautiful? No you're not the only one. Pretty face, gorgeous body, what's not to like. " She is beautiful. Reminds me of a very young Katie Price | |||
![]() | |||
| |||
| |||
"It seems that people jump on her about targeting 18 year olds, but this happens in the industry anyway. There are plenty of scenes featuring women older than her with men who have barely reached adulthood, and the same with the genders flipped. I'm not saying it's right, but I honestly don't get why it's so controversial for her to do it, but not for others? " I think in part it's because she committing that most heinous of British crimes, she's an 'attention seeker'. People don't like that, often the same people who are giving her attention 🤷♀️ | |||
| |||
| |||
"It seems that people jump on her about targeting 18 year olds, but this happens in the industry anyway. There are plenty of scenes featuring women older than her with men who have barely reached adulthood, and the same with the genders flipped. I'm not saying it's right, but I honestly don't get why it's so controversial for her to do it, but not for others? I think in part it's because she committing that most heinous of British crimes, she's an 'attention seeker'. People don't like that, often the same people who are giving her attention 🤷♀️" Ha I think you could be right there ![]() | |||
"It seems that people jump on her about targeting 18 year olds, but this happens in the industry anyway. There are plenty of scenes featuring women older than her with men who have barely reached adulthood, and the same with the genders flipped. I'm not saying it's right, but I honestly don't get why it's so controversial for her to do it, but not for others? " Possibly because she is so public about the barely legal. I can't comment on others as hers was the only documentary that I watched | |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? Yes I watched it as well. Did I? No. Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?" You'd be surprised, these OnlyFans whores will give most things a go for views. ITs like a competition to them to see how they can outdo each other. Lilly Phillips was filmed being gang banged by a bunch of old men. | |||
| |||
"Read online that there may be further changes in the UK laws following the documentary " What…. Make it illegal to have sex ? | |||
"Read online that there may be further changes in the UK laws following the documentary What…. Make it illegal to have sex ? " Certain things portrayed in the doc esp the age of some of the people | |||
| |||
| |||
"It seems that people jump on her about targeting 18 year olds, but this happens in the industry anyway. There are plenty of scenes featuring women older than her with men who have barely reached adulthood, and the same with the genders flipped. I'm not saying it's right, but I honestly don't get why it's so controversial for her to do it, but not for others? I think in part it's because she committing that most heinous of British crimes, she's an 'attention seeker'. People don't like that, often the same people who are giving her attention 🤷♀️ Ha I think you could be right there ![]() There is a jealousy about wealth creation in this country where so many hate to see success in any form. The U.S. ain’t perfect but success is rewarded and applauded and that’s what makes America great and powerful while this country just whinges. | |||
| |||
"Ive just googled her. She looks an attractive woman. Didn't see how old she was. Its a but of sensations to say the guys she sleeps with are barely legal then go on to say she will sleep will anyone on their 18th birthday. As far as im aware unless the law has changed, 16 is the age you can legally have sex. So their not "barely legal" and so what if they are she's doing nothing illegal. Im afraid im team Bonnie. As I said earlier her family and friends know what she does I can't see a single thing wrong with what she is doing even though I wouldn't do it." Just because something is legal, doesn't make it a good thing...and just because something is illegal, doesn't make it a bad thing...many things that are now legal, were illegal at some point, and some things that are now illegal were in fact legal in the past (such as owning people)...is the legality of an action really the only thing that matters? I personally see it as wrong when someone uses young impressionable 18 year olds for sex and than uploads the videos on the Internet for monetary gain (not that different to those porn movie producers using 18 year old girls , promising them fame and a good time). Also why the need to let people know that you wouldn't do something like this, if you're OK with what she's doing? Why even add it the conversation? 🤔 | |||
"Ive just googled her. She looks an attractive woman. Didn't see how old she was. Its a but of sensations to say the guys she sleeps with are barely legal then go on to say she will sleep will anyone on their 18th birthday. As far as im aware unless the law has changed, 16 is the age you can legally have sex. So their not "barely legal" and so what if they are she's doing nothing illegal. Im afraid im team Bonnie. As I said earlier her family and friends know what she does I can't see a single thing wrong with what she is doing even though I wouldn't do it. Just because something is legal, doesn't make it a good thing...and just because something is illegal, doesn't make it a bad thing...many things that are now legal, were illegal at some point, and some things that are now illegal were in fact legal in the past (such as owning people)...is the legality of an action really the only thing that matters? I personally see it as wrong when someone uses young impressionable 18 year olds for sex and than uploads the videos on the Internet for monetary gain (not that different to those porn movie producers using 18 year old girls , promising them fame and a good time). Also why the need to let people know that you wouldn't do something like this, if you're OK with what she's doing? Why even add it the conversation? 🤔 " So this conversation is just for those that disagree with what she does. Arnt people with a different opinion allowed a say. Just remember not all 18 year olds are sweet and innocent. | |||
"Ive just googled her. She looks an attractive woman. Didn't see how old she was. Its a but of sensations to say the guys she sleeps with are barely legal then go on to say she will sleep will anyone on their 18th birthday. As far as im aware unless the law has changed, 16 is the age you can legally have sex. So their not "barely legal" and so what if they are she's doing nothing illegal. Im afraid im team Bonnie. As I said earlier her family and friends know what she does I can't see a single thing wrong with what she is doing even though I wouldn't do it. Just because something is legal, doesn't make it a good thing...and just because something is illegal, doesn't make it a bad thing...many things that are now legal, were illegal at some point, and some things that are now illegal were in fact legal in the past (such as owning people)...is the legality of an action really the only thing that matters? I personally see it as wrong when someone uses young impressionable 18 year olds for sex and than uploads the videos on the Internet for monetary gain (not that different to those porn movie producers using 18 year old girls , promising them fame and a good time). Also why the need to let people know that you wouldn't do something like this, if you're OK with what she's doing? Why even add it the conversation? 🤔 So this conversation is just for those that disagree with what she does. Arnt people with a different opinion allowed a say. Just remember not all 18 year olds are sweet and innocent." Absolutely people are allowed to have an opinion...but this is the nature of the forums and threads, where people will challenge your opinions. My reply to your comment shouldn't make you think or feel you can't speak on this matter, but what my reply is doing is questioning your morality based on your opinion and I'm arguing against your argument. Again, this is the nature of the forums...and if you do not wish to debate anyone, you can simply post your comments and just ignore any replies. | |||
"Ive just googled her. She looks an attractive woman. Didn't see how old she was. Its a but of sensations to say the guys she sleeps with are barely legal then go on to say she will sleep will anyone on their 18th birthday. As far as im aware unless the law has changed, 16 is the age you can legally have sex. So their not "barely legal" and so what if they are she's doing nothing illegal. Im afraid im team Bonnie. As I said earlier her family and friends know what she does I can't see a single thing wrong with what she is doing even though I wouldn't do it. Just because something is legal, doesn't make it a good thing...and just because something is illegal, doesn't make it a bad thing...many things that are now legal, were illegal at some point, and some things that are now illegal were in fact legal in the past (such as owning people)...is the legality of an action really the only thing that matters? I personally see it as wrong when someone uses young impressionable 18 year olds for sex and than uploads the videos on the Internet for monetary gain (not that different to those porn movie producers using 18 year old girls , promising them fame and a good time). Also why the need to let people know that you wouldn't do something like this, if you're OK with what she's doing? Why even add it the conversation? 🤔 So this conversation is just for those that disagree with what she does. Arnt people with a different opinion allowed a say. Just remember not all 18 year olds are sweet and innocent. Absolutely people are allowed to have an opinion...but this is the nature of the forums and threads, where people will challenge your opinions. My reply to your comment shouldn't make you think or feel you can't speak on this matter, but what my reply is doing is questioning your morality based on your opinion and I'm arguing against your argument. Again, this is the nature of the forums...and if you do not wish to debate anyone, you can simply post your comments and just ignore any replies." Oh im quite happy to have my say and noone will stop me whether I agree with them or not. All im saying is I can't see what she is doing wrong even though my choice would be not to do it. She's not hurting anyone and these guys are not "barely legal" that's just sensationalist. I know many guys that have had their friends pay for them to see a sex worker on their 18th.As I've repeatedly said her friends and family know what she is doing. She's setting herself up financially for a very long time as do a lot of sex workers and only fans members. All I say is good look to her as long as shes looking after herself | |||
| |||
"So shes 26, hardly old herself. 8 years older than an 18 year old. " No one truly knows how old she is...she is claiming to be 26, but even so...the brain doesn't fully develop until your mid 20s (more specifically the frontal lobe and prefrontal cortex, which is used for planning, decision-making, and impulse control)...that's why we still consider these 18 year olds as immature...so psychologically she has an advantage over them...and she is also in a position of power given that she is rich and famous, and these teens "work" ( because they have to sign a contract to be on camera...also for free) under her guidance (and authority) during these encounters (as she is in charge of these videos) | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process." This 100 % . Have not seen thr documentary.. dont think what she claims was actually done. I wouldn't do her but if I could guarantee to stay anonymous, id 100% have a go at the previous record That one was properly adjudicator etc Cali | |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. This 100 % . Have not seen thr documentary.. dont think what she claims was actually done. I wouldn't do her but if I could guarantee to stay anonymous, id 100% have a go at the previous record That one was properly adjudicator etc Cali " In that case I would take ticket No 1 please 😊 | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process. This 100 % . Have not seen thr documentary.. dont think what she claims was actually done. I wouldn't do her but if I could guarantee to stay anonymous, id 100% have a go at the previous record That one was properly adjudicator etc Cali " I think watching the documentary would help you make an informed opinion. | |||
"It seems that people jump on her. .. " That has to be the understatement of the century so far. 😂 | |||
| |||
| |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild." I find it hilarious how people are losing their minds because she is just doing her thing and not sugar coating anything. | |||
"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night . So would you or did you ? " I haven't watched the documentary, and have no real interest in doing so. I think she’s awful, and I would love to be the ‘Only Man Who Hasn’t’ 😎 | |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild." People have a problem with her having sex with 18 year olds (using their inexperience and naivety to market herself and make money)...the same people speak up against 30-40 year old men sleeping with 18 year old girls (and many of us don't think 18 year olds should be on fab in the first place)...we don't have a problem just with her doing it, we have a problem with all who do it...it's just that this thread is specifically about her. If she would have sex only with people her age or over (or with other content creators who would equally benefit from the videos) we wouldn't have an issue...but she is using this "I sleep with barely legals" as a marketing tactic, promoting herself and this behaviour (because she wouldn't be as known if she didn't). It is the sole reason we speak up against her and not other O F models or adult workers...it is also the reason we speak up against someone like Andrew Tate for using 18 year old girls on Web cam to make his large amount of money...we speak up against all who do this | |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild. People have a problem with her having sex with 18 year olds (using their inexperience and naivety to market herself and make money)...the same people speak up against 30-40 year old men sleeping with 18 year old girls (and many of us don't think 18 year olds should be on fab in the first place)...we don't have a problem just with her doing it, we have a problem with all who do it...it's just that this thread is specifically about her. If she would have sex only with people her age or over (or with other content creators who would equally benefit from the videos) we wouldn't have an issue...but she is using this "I sleep with barely legals" as a marketing tactic, promoting herself and this behaviour (because she wouldn't be as known if she didn't). It is the sole reason we speak up against her and not other O F models or adult workers...it is also the reason we speak up against someone like Andrew Tate for using 18 year old girls on Web cam to make his large amount of money...we speak up against all who do this " Gah! A woman in control, making the money and calling the shots it becomes “exploitation.” Suddenly we’re all worried about brain development and prefrontal cortexes as if that’s ever stopped anyone on here from sliding into a barely legal (but importantly legal!) DM. And let’s not with the Andrew Tate comparison. One’s an actual predator. The other’s doing legal consensual work with people who signed up for it. Yes they are 18, but that IS legal. Big difference really. I mean Andrew Tate has multiple serious allegations of r*pe, trafficking and coercive control, has been accused of manipulating vulnerable women into sex work under false pretences (lover boy grooming). He’s also faced legal action for running a network that allegedly exploited women for profit, and not forgetting the vile promotion of misogyny and control and dehumanising women in his content and interviews, and anything else I may have forgotten to mention! Bonnie Blue? Has sex with adults (18+), on camera, with legal consent and paperwork. Is upfront about what she does and uses it to make money. May be provocative, may use youth as a marketing hook, but does it legally and transparently. So how exactly is that different from people on here uploading their own porn featuring someone who’s presumably of age, presumably consented, and who definitely wasn’t paid? Just the numbers, really. | |||
| |||
"Id definately play with her, will give the doc a watch. Fair play to her, all legally consenting stuff and shes found something she enjoys and makes millions doing it " Living her best life, fair play to her | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild." It's not the attention that she gets that's bothering me. It's the remarks on disabled people, people that may not have the mental capacity to know, and the disrespectful speak about wives/ women. | |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild. It's not the attention that she gets that's bothering me. It's the remarks on disabled people, people that may not have the mental capacity to know, and the disrespectful speak about wives/ women. " Totally fair if the concern is about things she’s said, especially around disability etc. That deserves scrutiny. But that’s a different issue to the one being hammered earlier by other posters, which was all about her having legal, consensual sex with 18-year-olds on camera, which was what my post was really addressing. | |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild. It's not the attention that she gets that's bothering me. It's the remarks on disabled people, people that may not have the mental capacity to know, and the disrespectful speak about wives/ women. Totally fair if the concern is about things she’s said, especially around disability etc. That deserves scrutiny. But that’s a different issue to the one being hammered earlier by other posters, which was all about her having legal, consensual sex with 18-year-olds on camera, which was what my post was really addressing. " ![]() ![]() | |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild. It's not the attention that she gets that's bothering me. It's the remarks on disabled people, people that may not have the mental capacity to know, and the disrespectful speak about wives/ women. " This is my issue with her too. Add to that the potential influence on young impressionable minds who are learning about sex and relationships | |||
"Funny how some people can film themselves having sex, pop it on here or another porn site then suddenly grow a conscience when a woman does it without dressing it up as performance art. If everyone signed the consent forms (which I’m sure she had in order to cover herself legally) and knew what they were doing, then let’s be honest it’s probably not the ethics bothering you, it’s the fact she’s owning it and getting attention for it. Meanwhile, you’re doing the same thing. Just on a smaller scale. And how does the viewer of your content (generalised you) know your partner’s over 18? Wild. It's not the attention that she gets that's bothering me. It's the remarks on disabled people, people that may not have the mental capacity to know, and the disrespectful speak about wives/ women. This is my issue with her too. Add to that the potential influence on young impressionable minds who are learning about sex and relationships" If the issue is with her comments then yeah fair enough. They do deserve scrutiny. She could definitely use a decent PR team but I’m guessing she’s only saying it to get the publicity, which will probably work against her in the long run. My issue is with those getting tetchy about her actual sex antics. We’re all on a site right now that enables sex meets, gang bangs and everything in between and you can join from 18. Sure, it might feel icky to us personally to sleep with someone that young, but it’s legal. The outrage seems oddly selective to me is all. She’s visible, she’s female, she’s making money, and she’s unapologetic about it. She could be applauded for being an astute business woman, instead she’s labelled a predatory female. | |||
| |||