FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Trump win… part 2….
Trump win… part 2….
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
Just a point since the desantis sending immigrants to Martha’s Vineyard was mentioned..
What he did was ask Texas to send him some so he then turned them around… so he never had any intention of giving this group sanctuary!
The group are claiming they were not told where they were going (other than Florida originally) and there were lied and misled
Also… these people were from Venezuela…. That makes a huge difference!!
For those who don’t know… people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela Are not treated as economic migrants (section 64) .. because those 3 are classed as socialist/communist dictatorships… they come under section 8 rules which states they are classed as automatic asylum seekers (for example Cubans who make it across the water don’t get sent back!)
Ron picked his stunt with the wrong group of people and may now be in huge trouble for it! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Basically super rich and super white Martha's Vineyard is happy to vote Democrat and virtue signal about how much they care, but they don't want poor brown people spoiling their view.
Aside from Barack Obama of course, who owns a holiday home there, and who they wouldn't mind being photographed with at a dinner party to show their friends and put on the office wall. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Basically super rich and super white Martha's Vineyard is happy to vote Democrat and virtue signal about how much they care, but they don't want poor brown people spoiling their view.
Aside from Barack Obama of course, who owns a holiday home there, and who they wouldn't mind being photographed with at a dinner party to show their friends and put on the office wall. "
Actually no one is debating the people of Martha’s Vineyard treated them really well bearing in mind they had zero notice that Ron was sending them ( literally didn’t know until the plane landed! )
If the point you are making is that one state that has a republican as a governor, Charlie baker, treated them with compassion, and the other one treated them as pieces of meat for a state!! Then yey you!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Sending people across state lines on false pretences like De Santis did - seems a bit criminal to me.
Well done Martha's vineyard for responding at short notice to help people, though."
Helping people by sending them somewhere else. Heroic. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Sending people across state lines on false pretences like De Santis did - seems a bit criminal to me.
Well done Martha's vineyard for responding at short notice to help people, though.
Helping people by sending them somewhere else. Heroic. "
You know that the southern governors sent them up north while still having legal requirements to go to government appointments down south?
But yes, sure, this is all the fault of the people who scrambled to make the best out of a criminal stunt. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Basically super rich and super white Martha's Vineyard is happy to vote Democrat and virtue signal about how much they care, but they don't want poor brown people spoiling their view.
Aside from Barack Obama of course, who owns a holiday home there, and who they wouldn't mind being photographed with at a dinner party to show their friends and put on the office wall. "
You do realise this has had the opposite effect that intended, don't you? That it has immediately backfired and made Mr "oh no I'm nothing like Trump" to look like a cruel exploiter of innocent people and Martha's Vineyard to look compassionate and generous? My gods, he's stupid.
He also looks like someone who spends his time thinking up stupid stunts instead of actually doing the work.
By the way did you hear how democrats have been helping Trump nominees succeed in the nominations?
Apparently they are much easier to beat. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Basically super rich and super white Martha's Vineyard is happy to vote Democrat and virtue signal about how much they care, but they don't want poor brown people spoiling their view.
Aside from Barack Obama of course, who owns a holiday home there, and who they wouldn't mind being photographed with at a dinner party to show their friends and put on the office wall.
You do realise this has had the opposite effect that intended, don't you? That it has immediately backfired and made Mr "oh no I'm nothing like Trump" to look like a cruel exploiter of innocent people and Martha's Vineyard to look compassionate and generous? My gods, he's stupid.
He also looks like someone who spends his time thinking up stupid stunts instead of actually doing the work.
By the way did you hear how democrats have been helping Trump nominees succeed in the nominations?
Apparently they are much easier to beat."
Let's see how those mid terms go....Biden is the best President the US has ever had. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… "
Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision."
Some immigrants… what part of “you can’t do that to people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela because they are all considered to be political asylum seekers “ did you not get.. or know |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision.
Some immigrants… what part of “you can’t do that to people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela because they are all considered to be political asylum seekers “ did you not get.. or know "
Are they better off on the Cape or back in their own countries? Are the better off in overcrowded immigration facilities? Is it it ok for DHS to do it but state governors can't ? How about border patrol doing the same exact thing ? DHS proposed the same exact policies. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Basically super rich and super white Martha's Vineyard is happy to vote Democrat and virtue signal about how much they care, but they don't want poor brown people spoiling their view.
Aside from Barack Obama of course, who owns a holiday home there, and who they wouldn't mind being photographed with at a dinner party to show their friends and put on the office wall.
You do realise this has had the opposite effect that intended, don't you? That it has immediately backfired and made Mr "oh no I'm nothing like Trump" to look like a cruel exploiter of innocent people and Martha's Vineyard to look compassionate and generous? My gods, he's stupid.
He also looks like someone who spends his time thinking up stupid stunts instead of actually doing the work.
By the way did you hear how democrats have been helping Trump nominees succeed in the nominations?
Apparently they are much easier to beat."
It's put on a show for people who want to own the libs. Law, narrative, facts have nothing to do with anything. They got some footage.
It's all a bit brain dead |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision.
Some immigrants… what part of “you can’t do that to people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela because they are all considered to be political asylum seekers “ did you not get.. or know Are they better off on the Cape or back in their own countries? Are the better off in overcrowded immigration facilities? Is it it ok for DHS to do it but state governors can't ? How about border patrol doing the same exact thing ? DHS proposed the same exact policies."
Thank you for showing you do not understand and are showing ignorance of the process.. and why the country or origin makes a difference…
If someone comes from one of those 3 countries, they are dealt with under section 8, which means that they make themselves known as coming from for example Cuba, they are then considered as claiming political asylum, are asked if they know anyone in the USA, if the answer is yes they are given an appointment with an immigration judge in that city and are allowed to go on their way!!!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision.
Some immigrants… what part of “you can’t do that to people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela because they are all considered to be political asylum seekers “ did you not get.. or know Are they better off on the Cape or back in their own countries? Are the better off in overcrowded immigration facilities? Is it it ok for DHS to do it but state governors can't ? How about border patrol doing the same exact thing ? DHS proposed the same exact policies.
Thank you for showing you do not understand and are showing ignorance of the process.. and why the country or origin makes a difference…
If someone comes from one of those 3 countries, they are dealt with under section 8, which means that they make themselves known as coming from for example Cuba, they are then considered as claiming political asylum, are asked if they know anyone in the USA, if the answer is yes they are given an appointment with an immigration judge in that city and are allowed to go on their way!!!
"
where you been? Migrants have been released without court dates. Now all of a sudden it matters.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision.
Some immigrants… what part of “you can’t do that to people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela because they are all considered to be political asylum seekers “ did you not get.. or know Are they better off on the Cape or back in their own countries? Are the better off in overcrowded immigration facilities? Is it it ok for DHS to do it but state governors can't ? How about border patrol doing the same exact thing ? DHS proposed the same exact policies.
Thank you for showing you do not understand and are showing ignorance of the process.. and why the country or origin makes a difference…
If someone comes from one of those 3 countries, they are dealt with under section 8, which means that they make themselves known as coming from for example Cuba, they are then considered as claiming political asylum, are asked if they know anyone in the USA, if the answer is yes they are given an appointment with an immigration judge in that city and are allowed to go on their way!!!
where you been? Migrants have been released without court dates. Now all of a sudden it matters. "
What part of the difference between section 64 (economic migrants) and section 8 (asylum seekers) do you not understand…..
People from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela come under section 8
These people Ron is playing political points scoring with came from Venezuela!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don’t think Ron realises Martha’s Vineyard is in Massachusetts, which for as democratic as it may align, actually has a republican governor!!!
The reason why you don’t hear much about him is that Charlie baker is a moderate which is about as opposite as Ron desantis and Greg Abbott
Charlie actually works with democrats to get stuff done in the state rather than grandstand
For example baker and former mayor of Boston Marty Walsh, who is now in the Biden administration as secretary of labour might not see eye to eye ideologically, bet managed to work civilly enough so that everyone wins!
Probably why the trump wing hates him… Do you really think republicans are going to be swayed because some immigrants were dropped off in elitist territory? They are we cheering his decision.
Some immigrants… what part of “you can’t do that to people from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela because they are all considered to be political asylum seekers “ did you not get.. or know Are they better off on the Cape or back in their own countries? Are the better off in overcrowded immigration facilities? Is it it ok for DHS to do it but state governors can't ? How about border patrol doing the same exact thing ? DHS proposed the same exact policies.
Thank you for showing you do not understand and are showing ignorance of the process.. and why the country or origin makes a difference…
If someone comes from one of those 3 countries, they are dealt with under section 8, which means that they make themselves known as coming from for example Cuba, they are then considered as claiming political asylum, are asked if they know anyone in the USA, if the answer is yes they are given an appointment with an immigration judge in that city and are allowed to go on their way!!!
where you been? Migrants have been released without court dates. Now all of a sudden it matters.
What part of the difference between section 64 (economic migrants) and section 8 (asylum seekers) do you not understand…..
People from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela come under section 8
These people Ron is playing political points scoring with came from Venezuela!!! "
What part do you not understand that border patrol is doing the same exact thing by releasing and moving people to sleep on the streets. Venezuelans included. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some. "
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?"
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/09/20/migrants-el-paso-texas-shelter/
It's needs to stay in the national attention no matter who keeps making it political. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ? "
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles."
the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it."
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it.
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you."
problematic how it's in the news. So your fine with people sleeping on the streets.. I am not.. a governor keeps it in the spotlight you scream foul. Political or not they are people. It's ok when feds do it a right wing governor does you all lose your minds. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it.
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you. problematic how it's in the news. So your fine with people sleeping on the streets.. I am not.. a governor keeps it in the spotlight you scream foul. Political or not they are people. It's ok when feds do it a right wing governor does you all lose your minds. "
Lol ok |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it.
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you. problematic how it's in the news. So your fine with people sleeping on the streets.. I am not.. a governor keeps it in the spotlight you scream foul. Political or not they are people. It's ok when feds do it a right wing governor does you all lose your minds.
Lol ok"
you did  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it.
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you. problematic how it's in the news. So your fine with people sleeping on the streets.. I am not.. a governor keeps it in the spotlight you scream foul. Political or not they are people. It's ok when feds do it a right wing governor does you all lose your minds.
Lol ok you did "
When your replies bear any serious relation to what I've said, then I'll worry. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it.
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you. problematic how it's in the news. So your fine with people sleeping on the streets.. I am not.. a governor keeps it in the spotlight you scream foul. Political or not they are people. It's ok when feds do it a right wing governor does you all lose your minds.
Lol ok you did
When your replies bear any serious relation to what I've said, then I'll worry."
I am spot on with local feelings your excuse is ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"People sleeping on the streets in El Paso with children.
Governor's send people to other states so they can control the influx better.
Idiots lose their minds even though they are proclaimed sanctuaries. Funny how them sleeping on the streets is a much better option for some.
A sanctuary city under US law is one that won't comply with ICE.
DeSantis used millions of what appears to be federal money for his little stunt, in ways that weren't authorised.
There are criminal laws he might have broken (I was going to be specific but it's a fab forbidden word)
Might be relevant that the governor who moved the refugees off Martha's vineyard is a republican.
But. Facts, eh? Who needs them when you have a publicity stunt?
They sleeping on streets are you fine with that ? Why not move them ?
I didn't say that people couldn't be moved. I said that this particular instance is problematic in a number of ways, and that the right wing propagation machine misses the point from multiple angles. the left doing the same exact thing. The right is not hiding it.
Right. And I've got a bridge to sell you. problematic how it's in the news. So your fine with people sleeping on the streets.. I am not.. a governor keeps it in the spotlight you scream foul. Political or not they are people. It's ok when feds do it a right wing governor does you all lose your minds.
Lol ok you did
When your replies bear any serious relation to what I've said, then I'll worry. I am spot on with local feelings your excuse is ? "
nothing you read and quote the same BS according to the " news". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh and trump lost the SCOTUS case about the classified documents today as well….
Oh happy days… "
And his sooper klever plot to hide assets in the genius organisation Trump Org 2 has been spotted in New York.
Truly the dizzying heights of American intellect, this one |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences?"
and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ? "
On a thread about Trump? Nope. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope."
Then have at it  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it "
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad?"
it was inevitable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable."
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail?"
can't say have to wait on the decisions. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions."
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell."
Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see."
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites."
Maybe bigfoot too . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too ."
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness."
yup you have. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ? "
Can we discuss more than one topic at a time?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
Can we discuss more than one topic at a time?
"
Enjoy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see."
I think so too, with extremely well paid lawyers, he's probably got a few aces. At least to waste time for a few more years. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have."
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
Can we discuss more than one topic at a time?
Enjoy "
Thanks mate.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor?"
He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see "
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers?"
is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion."
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka."
and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice ."
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see."
Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?"
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? "
Has all the evidence been presented? I don't see your logic. You condemning without a defense just satisfy your needs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? Has all the evidence been presented? I don't see your logic. You condemning without a defense just satisfy your needs. "
You literally saw the Ripper kill that lady of the night, remember. And now you're saying you're not sure if he did the thing you clearly saw him doing? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? Has all the evidence been presented? I don't see your logic. You condemning without a defense just satisfy your needs.
You literally saw the Ripper kill that lady of the night, remember. And now you're saying you're not sure if he did the thing you clearly saw him doing?"
so you take prosecution evidence as the endall in a court case ? Instant guilty... Seems that way. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? Has all the evidence been presented? I don't see your logic. You condemning without a defense just satisfy your needs.
You literally saw the Ripper kill that lady of the night, remember. And now you're saying you're not sure if he did the thing you clearly saw him doing? so you take prosecution evidence as the endall in a court case ? Instant guilty... Seems that way. "
Just asking if you'll admit to what you clearly witnessed. It seems you will not.
You saw the Ripper up close doing his dastardly work, but you won't admit to seeing what he did.
You saw Trump whip up his morons to storm the Capitol & lie many times about the election being stoooolen. You won't admit to seeing that either.
See the link? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? Has all the evidence been presented? I don't see your logic. You condemning without a defense just satisfy your needs.
You literally saw the Ripper kill that lady of the night, remember. And now you're saying you're not sure if he did the thing you clearly saw him doing? so you take prosecution evidence as the endall in a court case ? Instant guilty... Seems that way.
Just asking if you'll admit to what you clearly witnessed. It seems you will not.
You saw the Ripper up close doing his dastardly work, but you won't admit to seeing what he did.
You saw Trump whip up his morons to storm the Capitol & lie many times about the election being stoooolen. You won't admit to seeing that either.
See the link?"
No I will not because I think everyone deserves thier day in court. You the one unbiased not me. If he guilty then he is . If innocent than he is. Just because you love mob mentality is not my approach to justice and you can't understand that it's your issue not mine. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The US congressional committee investigating last year's Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify.
Also, I see Bannon got four months. Will Trump face any consequences? and ? Shouldn't you be more concerned about a new PM ?
On a thread about Trump? Nope. Then have at it
Right you are. What do you think about Trump being subpoenad? it was inevitable.
Good thing/bad thing? Will he go to jail? can't say have to wait on the decisions.
You reckon he's guilty or innocent? Given, you know, the overwhelming evivence we've seen so far that shows he's guilty as hell. Yet he might have a ace up his sleeve. Have to wait and see.
Hmmm maybe he has proof the guy inciting the loonies wasn't him. He could possibly prove it was Hillary Clinton in a fat suit, wearing a Trump mask. + possibly he may also prove he only lied about the election being stoooolen because aliens from Nagroth 9 were controlling his brain via secret satellites. Maybe bigfoot too .
There ya go. Embrace the madness.
Hmm that could be Trump's next slogan if he runs: embrace the madness. yup you have.
Just taking the piss.
If you still haven't made up your mind on Trump, what would it take? Trump singing about how much he loves overthrowing democracy live on Xfactor? He is supeoned guess you will have to wait and see
It was a question to you. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump?
How about footage of him making up some hang Mike Pence signs while giggling & wanking his little cock with a pair of tweezers? is it a supeona to testify ? That's how our courts work not public opinion.
I'm asking your opinion. What will it take for you to make up your mind on Trump? So far, we've seen him whip up his morons to storm the Capitol. We've seen him lie over and over again about the election being stooolen too. That obviously doesn't do it for you. So what will it take?
How about this? A confession written by Trump, in gold sharpie of course, where he admits he did it all and he'll do it again if some1 will give him $50 and some sexy snaps of Ivanka. and I am telling you that everyone deserves thier day in court. Seems like you love mob justice .
I'm v simply asking your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence we have all seen. It speaks volumes tht you won't give it.
Here's what your stance is like...
Picture the scene. You're in London in the 1900s. You clearly see a man dart out and kill a lady of the night. Grinning, he carves her up. Blood splashes all over you as he sings: I'm Jack the Ripper, I am. Then he runs off into the night.
When the coppers turn up, they ask if the dastardly Ripper killed her. And you answer: dunno. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Again the evidence presented by the defense. There has been other cases on here you all screamed guilty. Yet the defendant was innocent. What is different here ?
So you'd reckon the Ripper was innocent if you clearly witnessed the above? Has all the evidence been presented? I don't see your logic. You condemning without a defense just satisfy your needs.
You literally saw the Ripper kill that lady of the night, remember. And now you're saying you're not sure if he did the thing you clearly saw him doing? so you take prosecution evidence as the endall in a court case ? Instant guilty... Seems that way.
Just asking if you'll admit to what you clearly witnessed. It seems you will not.
You saw the Ripper up close doing his dastardly work, but you won't admit to seeing what he did.
You saw Trump whip up his morons to storm the Capitol & lie many times about the election being stoooolen. You won't admit to seeing that either.
See the link? No I will not because I think everyone deserves thier day in court. You the one unbiased not me. If he guilty then he is . If innocent than he is. Just because you love mob mentality is not my approach to justice and you can't understand that it's your issue not mine."
Hmmm I think you'll find Trump is the 1 who loves mob law.
You truly are a gift to the republicans.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent."
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent.
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country."
political optics . Midterms coming up. My county is a battleground if Trump announces he is a candidate it might save him and boost the republican base here for midterms. Guess we have to see in the coming weeks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent.
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country. political optics . Midterms coming up. My county is a battleground if Trump announces he is a candidate it might save him and boost the republican base here for midterms. Guess we have to see in the coming weeks."
Might be worse here if Johnson gets back in. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent.
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country. political optics . Midterms coming up. My county is a battleground if Trump announces he is a candidate it might save him and boost the republican base here for midterms. Guess we have to see in the coming weeks.
Might be worse here if Johnson gets back in."
lol I got admonished for mentioning Boris in a trump thread. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent.
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country. political optics . Midterms coming up. My county is a battleground if Trump announces he is a candidate it might save him and boost the republican base here for midterms. Guess we have to see in the coming weeks.
Might be worse here if Johnson gets back in. lol I got admonished for mentioning Boris in a trump thread. "
Because you mentioned it as a distraction away from Trump. But there are certainly comparisons to be made between the two men. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent.
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country. political optics . Midterms coming up. My county is a battleground if Trump announces he is a candidate it might save him and boost the republican base here for midterms. Guess we have to see in the coming weeks.
Might be worse here if Johnson gets back in. lol I got admonished for mentioning Boris in a trump thread.
Because you mentioned it as a distraction away from Trump. But there are certainly comparisons to be made between the two men."
I agree |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If Trump's team is smart they should announce his 3024 presidential canadicy. I guess we shall see. Btw I am a independent.
Oh they should announce. Then they can lie all Trump's legal woes are politically motivated. As opposed to, you know, holding a guy to account for trying to overthrow democracy in his country. political optics . Midterms coming up. My county is a battleground if Trump announces he is a candidate it might save him and boost the republican base here for midterms. Guess we have to see in the coming weeks."
Would this political move effect his legal problems? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
Oooh… so much in here in a few hours, can I come in and say a few things…
A) jan 6th committee… it’s 7 democrats and 2 republicans
B) only reason why the number is lobsided is that in the original negotiations about the committee there was negotiation on how it would be handled and the democrats gave the republicans every single demand they wanted… equal representation no current members both sides would have veto over subpoena power and access to potential witnesses ect.
C) the senate agreed to the plan, it went to the house and the day before the vote everything was agreed until Trump released a statement saying he was against it.. that is when house republicans changed their mind and pulled out!
Okay… will Trump comply with the subpoena… I bet in public he will say he will do it as long as it’s on live television…. In private he will get his lawyers to run out the clock!!!
For those who say Trump should announce now… he won’t for the fact the midterms then become about him… and he is not seen as a positive!!
He will run because I think he thinks it will keep himself out of jail, and he can claim political martyrdom!
I am best guessing he is charged in Georgia with trying to tamper in a federal election, and that the DOJ charges him with obstruction over the classified files, because they can’t be seen to say a president is above the law especially when it looks like he was holding files for leverage! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee."
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts."
It's a strategy when the ones on the committee are being unbiased. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts."
They actually have the option of transferring it to the senate if needed but I think The report will be done by December……
The question is do the house republicans want to do their own version of the report, bearing in mind that all the major witnesses have actually all been republicans |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts.
They actually have the option of transferring it to the senate if needed but I think The report will be done by December……
The question is do the house republicans want to do their own version of the report, bearing in mind that all the major witnesses have actually all been republicans "
You think Mcarthy going allow that ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts.
They actually have the option of transferring it to the senate if needed but I think The report will be done by December……
The question is do the house republicans want to do their own version of the report, bearing in mind that all the major witnesses have actually all been republicans You think Mcarthy going allow that ?"
That would be political suicide on his part. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts. It's a strategy when the ones on the committee are being unbiased. "
Fair enough.
I'm interested in your opinion. Should Trump be found guilty and charged, and even locked up. How will his supporters react? Will they accept it, or think it was a stitch up? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts. It's a strategy when the ones on the committee are being unbiased.
Fair enough.
I'm interested in your opinion. Should Trump be found guilty and charged, and even locked up. How will his supporters react? Will they accept it, or think it was a stitch up?"
7-2 in political optics it does look like a stitch up in the committees current state. Looks like a witch hunt when one side is stacked. Kinda like SCOTUS. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All his legal team needs to do is last until January. Then the House republicans breaks up the committee.
Is that a good thing? Earlier on you were championing him having a fair hearing in the courts. It's a strategy when the ones on the committee are being unbiased.
Fair enough.
I'm interested in your opinion. Should Trump be found guilty and charged, and even locked up. How will his supporters react? Will they accept it, or think it was a stitch up? 7-2 in political optics it does look like a stitch up in the committees current state. Looks like a witch hunt when one side is stacked. Kinda like SCOTUS."
Is it the committee that would preside over the legal hearings?
Sorry, I don't know how the courts work there. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"7-2 in political optics it does look like a stitch up in the committees current state. Looks like a witch hunt when one side is stacked. Kinda like SCOTUS."
It’s a mistake that didn’t need to happen for the house republicans when the democrats agreed to every single demand republicans made to them.. and just because Trump said no, they said no!
SCOTUS is a different animal since senate republicans held up the Obama nominee for 15 months, but managed to rush trumps 3rd nominee in 45 days and basically went against everything they said 4 years before… |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Is it the committee that would preside over the legal hearings?
Sorry, I don't know how the courts work there. "
No… the house committee basically deals with anything legislatively that can do so it never happens and what if any rules need to be closed or tightened so it never happens again
The DOJ deals with criminality that came about as part of January 6th, the before, during and after |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is it the committee that would preside over the legal hearings?
Sorry, I don't know how the courts work there.
No… the house committee basically deals with anything legislatively that can do so it never happens and what if any rules need to be closed or tightened so it never happens again
The DOJ deals with criminality that came about as part of January 6th, the before, during and after "
So if he's found guilty and charged. It won't be anything political, just legal? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Is it the committee that would preside over the legal hearings?
Sorry, I don't know how the courts work there.
No… the house committee basically deals with anything legislatively that can do so it never happens and what if any rules need to be closed or tightened so it never happens again
The DOJ deals with criminality that came about as part of January 6th, the before, during and after
So if he's found guilty and charged. It won't be anything political, just legal?"
The house committee don’t do the charging.. they can make recommendations if they feel it is egregious…
The DOJ are the people who do the criminal charging…..
Think of 2 different paths side by side.. they also swap information if needed |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I see some constitutional hurdles.
As matter relates to the time when Trump was President, as I read the constitution, a President has immunity except from impeachment.
However, Trump has already been impeached in relation to this matter and acquitted. So any attempt to do over would fall foul of double jeopardy.
I suspect an attempt by the DoJ to bring any charges relating to Trump's time in office would be ultra vires.
The best the committee can do is make the process the punishment. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abio OP Man
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"I see some constitutional hurdles.
As matter relates to the time when Trump was President, as I read the constitution, a President has immunity except from impeachment.
However, Trump has already been impeached in relation to this matter and acquitted. So any attempt to do over would fall foul of double jeopardy.
I suspect an attempt by the DoJ to bring any charges relating to Trump's time in office would be ultra vires.
The best the committee can do is make the process the punishment. "
Yes and no….
Its is federal charges, It’s a general convention that you don’t prosecute a sitting president… so you would wait till after if he isn’t charged before (they will absolutely in this case make a decision before)
If it’s a state case those rules don’t apply…
So where a sitting president can be pardoned in a federal case, he can’t in a state case!
The Georgia case of the potential election tampering is a state case! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
