FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Pensioner gets radicalised
Pensioner gets radicalised
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts?" I'm sure there is probably some treatment available for ageism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts?" I just hope pensioners don’t get demonised for the actions of a tiny minority  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? I just hope pensioners don’t get demonised for the actions of a tiny minority "Well obviously they are all the same! Sponging off the rest of us on their benefits. Stuck on their cultural views and unwilling to adapt. Clearly they are all radicalised terrorists that are a threat to the British way of life. We don’t want them here so why don’t we ship them off to another country! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? I just hope pensioners don’t get demonised for the actions of a tiny minority
Well obviously they are all the same! Sponging off the rest of us on their benefits. Stuck on their cultural views and unwilling to adapt. Clearly they are all radicalised terrorists that are a threat to the British way of life. We don’t want them here so why don’t we ship them off to another country!"Controversial, but we are all entitled to our opinion (apparently) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? I just hope pensioners don’t get demonised for the actions of a tiny minority
Well obviously they are all the same! Sponging off the rest of us on their benefits. Stuck on their cultural views and unwilling to adapt. Clearly they are all radicalised terrorists that are a threat to the British way of life. We don’t want them here so why don’t we ship them off to another country!
Controversial, but we are all entitled to our opinion (apparently) "Don’t call me ageist! It was a joke | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? I just hope pensioners don’t get demonised for the actions of a tiny minority
Well obviously they are all the same! Sponging off the rest of us on their benefits. Stuck on their cultural views and unwilling to adapt. Clearly they are all radicalised terrorists that are a threat to the British way of life. We don’t want them here so why don’t we ship them off to another country!"Rwanda maybe? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? I just hope pensioners don’t get demonised for the actions of a tiny minority
Well obviously they are all the same! Sponging off the rest of us on their benefits. Stuck on their cultural views and unwilling to adapt. Clearly they are all radicalised terrorists that are a threat to the British way of life. We don’t want them here so why don’t we ship them off to another country!
Rwanda maybe?"Well apparently it is much nicer than it used to be. Lovely climate too which will be good for the ailments. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So in a recent documentary, far right predators have been seen hanging around day care centres offering them assistance to cross roads. This was the first step in radicalism. They would then befriend the pensioners and once trust is established would start exposing them to content unsuitable for people their age, such as Nigel Farage. " It is even worse than that. Proprietors of right wing propaganda publications also drive up circulation with these pensioners by including seemingly innocuous magazine inserts focused on cooking, gardening and knitwear. The unknowing pensioners then regularly buy these propaganda publications and through a steady drip of editorial become further radicalised without even knowing it is happening. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So in a recent documentary, far right predators have been seen hanging around day care centres offering them assistance to cross roads. This was the first step in radicalism. They would then befriend the pensioners and once trust is established would start exposing them to content unsuitable for people their age, such as Nigel Farage. It is even worse than that. Proprietors of right wing propaganda publications also drive up circulation with these pensioners by including seemingly innocuous magazine inserts focused on cooking, gardening and knitwear. The unknowing pensioners then regularly buy these propaganda publications and through a steady drip of editorial become further radicalised without even knowing it is happening." One publication apparently was offering gardening tips and how to join the Conservative party in the article called “how to grow daffodils and complain about immigration to your local Carlton club meeting” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored." Scary shit , I am going to keep a close eye on these pensioners from now on, report any suspicious activity | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts "And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored." Indeed and there is also worrying data to show that these silver surfers are increasingly turning to social media to find community and brotherhood. They are congregating in virtual echo chambers where the more moderate are slowly groomed to become more right wing and radical. The most worrying trend is an inability to identify this increasingly radicalised thinking in themselves due to the “slow drag to the right” in their media interactions and echo chambers meaning that anyone with a different viewpoint is now seen as a loony leftie or woke (although some do privately admit they do not actually know what “woke” means). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts
And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation "And golf clubs because behind the veneer of respectability and Pringle sweaters, they are hives of radicalised thinking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts
And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation
And golf clubs because behind the veneer of respectability and Pringle sweaters, they are hives of radicalised thinking."Retirement homes are warzones nowadays | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts
And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation
And golf clubs because behind the veneer of respectability and Pringle sweaters, they are hives of radicalised thinking."Of course, it is all making sense now, but I must stress this point again, it is important not to demonise all golfers for the actions of a tiny minority | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored. Indeed and there is also worrying data to show that these silver surfers are increasingly turning to social media to find community and brotherhood. They are congregating in virtual echo chambers where the more moderate are slowly groomed to become more right wing and radical. The most worrying trend is an inability to identify this increasingly radicalised thinking in themselves due to the “slow drag to the right” in their media interactions and echo chambers meaning that anyone with a different viewpoint is now seen as a loony leftie or woke (although some do privately admit they do not actually know what “woke” means). " Ah so is the pensioners fault this time. I suppose you need somebody to blame today | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts
And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation
And golf clubs because behind the veneer of respectability and Pringle sweaters, they are hives of radicalised thinking.
Of course, it is all making sense now, but I must stress this point again, it is important not to demonise all golfers for the actions of a tiny minority "Who said that! As if any of us are saying any such thing! Never said I don’t like golfers. In fact I know some very nice ones. Always say hello always neighbourly (I mean I don’t invite them round to mine or anything but I smile and wave when putting the bins out, can’t have them thinking I am golfist) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored. Indeed and there is also worrying data to show that these silver surfers are increasingly turning to social media to find community and brotherhood. They are congregating in virtual echo chambers where the more moderate are slowly groomed to become more right wing and radical. The most worrying trend is an inability to identify this increasingly radicalised thinking in themselves due to the “slow drag to the right” in their media interactions and echo chambers meaning that anyone with a different viewpoint is now seen as a loony leftie or woke (although some do privately admit they do not actually know what “woke” means). Ah so is the pensioners fault this time. I suppose you need somebody to blame today "You understand satire right? You understand ironic humour right? You understand using proxies to illustrate the flaws in the arguments of others! Just remember these pensioners (and the even more hardline golfing pensioners) will just think you are a cancel culture woke snowflake leftie if you don’t take a joke  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored. Indeed and there is also worrying data to show that these silver surfers are increasingly turning to social media to find community and brotherhood. They are congregating in virtual echo chambers where the more moderate are slowly groomed to become more right wing and radical. The most worrying trend is an inability to identify this increasingly radicalised thinking in themselves due to the “slow drag to the right” in their media interactions and echo chambers meaning that anyone with a different viewpoint is now seen as a loony leftie or woke (although some do privately admit they do not actually know what “woke” means). Ah so is the pensioners fault this time. I suppose you need somebody to blame today "Obviously you can’t blame all pensioners | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts
And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation
And golf clubs because behind the veneer of respectability and Pringle sweaters, they are hives of radicalised thinking.
Retirement homes are warzones nowadays "Battle zones  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored. Indeed and there is also worrying data to show that these silver surfers are increasingly turning to social media to find community and brotherhood. They are congregating in virtual echo chambers where the more moderate are slowly groomed to become more right wing and radical. The most worrying trend is an inability to identify this increasingly radicalised thinking in themselves due to the “slow drag to the right” in their media interactions and echo chambers meaning that anyone with a different viewpoint is now seen as a loony leftie or woke (although some do privately admit they do not actually know what “woke” means). Ah so is the pensioners fault this time. I suppose you need somebody to blame today
Obviously you can’t blame all pensioners "Except the ones who are not Golfers enough. Those ones are fair game. Their golfing values do not align to the club so should not be on the committee or even in the 19th hole. You can normally spot them as they tend to wear Lyle & Scott rather than Pringle. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also a recent raid of terrorist cell which the police have dubbed as a “knitting circle” foiled a plot of far right pensioners in distributing scarfs for reform UK. The police spokesman said that pensioner related radicalism is on the rise, mainly due to the fact that relatives do not interact with them and they are isolated, so they are easy targets and these far right groups offer a place where they can easily express their rage at being ignored. Indeed and there is also worrying data to show that these silver surfers are increasingly turning to social media to find community and brotherhood. They are congregating in virtual echo chambers where the more moderate are slowly groomed to become more right wing and radical. The most worrying trend is an inability to identify this increasingly radicalised thinking in themselves due to the “slow drag to the right” in their media interactions and echo chambers meaning that anyone with a different viewpoint is now seen as a loony leftie or woke (although some do privately admit they do not actually know what “woke” means). Ah so is the pensioners fault this time. I suppose you need somebody to blame today
Obviously you can’t blame all pensioners
Except the ones who are not Golfers enough. Those ones are fair game. Their golfing values do not align to the club so should not be on the committee or even in the 19th hole. You can normally spot them as they tend to wear Lyle & Scott rather than Pringle."True, unfortunately these radical golfers are giving ‘pure breed’ golfers a bad name | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts?" How can we protect young concert goers from bombings by radicalised immigrants should surely be more of a concern? I’ll debate this with the lads in the clubhouse later as it’s pissing down with rain. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? How can we protect young concert goers from bombings by radicalised immigrants should surely be more of a concern? I’ll debate this with the lads in the clubhouse later as it’s pissing down with rain. " Irony is wasted on some people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts? How can we protect young concert goers from bombings by radicalised immigrants should surely be more of a concern? I’ll debate this with the lads in the clubhouse later as it’s pissing down with rain. Irony is wasted on some people." Or not? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation!" I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . " It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think that a fair finger of suspicion can be pointed at the propaganda publications that these so called pensioners read. The hate filled periodicals such as the people's friend, reader's digest and No78 bus timetable must shoulder some responsibility for codgers and biddies choosing the dark pathway to radicalism. Wasn't like this when I were a young 'un. It was all just fields round 'ere y'know... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Start by closing all the bingo halls. That's usually where it all starts
And tap rooms, they are breeding grounds for this type of radicalisation
And golf clubs because behind the veneer of respectability and Pringle sweaters, they are hives of radicalised thinking.
Retirement homes are warzones nowadays
Battle zones "Yes. That's the phrase! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good!" Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . " They were appalled by the smell of stale urine as you often admit to PMSL | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think that a fair finger of suspicion can be pointed at the propaganda publications that these so called pensioners read. The hate filled periodicals such as the people's friend, reader's digest and No78 bus timetable must shoulder some responsibility for codgers and biddies choosing the dark pathway to radicalism. Wasn't like this when I were a young 'un. It was all just fields round 'ere y'know... " You are clearly only joking calling them codgers and biddies though right because otherwise the woke will cancel your free speech! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think that a fair finger of suspicion can be pointed at the propaganda publications that these so called pensioners read. The hate filled periodicals such as the people's friend, reader's digest and No78 bus timetable must shoulder some responsibility for codgers and biddies choosing the dark pathway to radicalism. Wasn't like this when I were a young 'un. It was all just fields round 'ere y'know... You are clearly only joking calling them codgers and biddies though right because otherwise the woke will cancel your free speech! " Only if they are snowflakes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks " Did have a nice tan  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks Did have a nice tan "Nothing to do with the tan, many of these pensioners are SAGA louts getting boozed up on cruises in the Med, although admittedly their tans are more angry pink than brown. It was your lack of grey hair. You just don’t fit in so they can’t trust you. Besides they don’t like to integrate with the rest of us! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks Did have a nice tan
Nothing to do with the tan, many of these pensioners are SAGA louts getting boozed up on cruises in the Med, although admittedly their tans are more angry pink than brown. It was your lack of grey hair. You just don’t fit in so they can’t trust you. Besides they don’t like to integrate with the rest of us!"The problem is. How do you know which are the good ones, and which are the ones who are here to harm us? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks Did have a nice tan
Nothing to do with the tan, many of these pensioners are SAGA louts getting boozed up on cruises in the Med, although admittedly their tans are more angry pink than brown. It was your lack of grey hair. You just don’t fit in so they can’t trust you. Besides they don’t like to integrate with the rest of us!
The problem is. How do you know which are the good ones, and which are the ones who are here to harm us?"I don’t know, should we just presume they are all bad to be on the safe side? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So in a recent documentary, far right predators have been seen hanging around day care centres offering them assistance to cross roads. This was the first step in radicalism. They would then befriend the pensioners and once trust is established would start exposing them to content unsuitable for people their age, such as Nigel Farage. " Nice one hiding your profile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks Did have a nice tan
Nothing to do with the tan, many of these pensioners are SAGA louts getting boozed up on cruises in the Med, although admittedly their tans are more angry pink than brown. It was your lack of grey hair. You just don’t fit in so they can’t trust you. Besides they don’t like to integrate with the rest of us!
The problem is. How do you know which are the good ones, and which are the ones who are here to harm us?
I don’t know, should we just presume they are all bad to be on the safe side? "Well obviously
Can’t be too careful or before you know it we won’t be able to walk down the highstreet without getting crushed by the ever growing number of mobility scooters! They are lethal and just have no place in this country.
A mate of one my drinking buddies says he was told by someone he knows that one of these pensioners ignored the traffic lights and zipped across the road on their mobility scooter. It meant they could jump the queue at the Post Office. Makes you think! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think that a fair finger of suspicion can be pointed at the propaganda publications that these so called pensioners read. The hate filled periodicals such as the people's friend, reader's digest and No78 bus timetable must shoulder some responsibility for codgers and biddies choosing the dark pathway to radicalism. Wasn't like this when I were a young 'un. It was all just fields round 'ere y'know... You are clearly only joking calling them codgers and biddies though right because otherwise the woke will cancel your free speech! " I'm only using the language that they themselves use to describe each other. The the same way gangsta-rappers use the 'N' word to 'bust some rhymes' on stage and in pop videos | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks Did have a nice tan
Nothing to do with the tan, many of these pensioners are SAGA louts getting boozed up on cruises in the Med, although admittedly their tans are more angry pink than brown. It was your lack of grey hair. You just don’t fit in so they can’t trust you. Besides they don’t like to integrate with the rest of us!
The problem is. How do you know which are the good ones, and which are the ones who are here to harm us?
I don’t know, should we just presume they are all bad to be on the safe side?
Well obviously
Can’t be too careful or before you know it we won’t be able to walk down the highstreet without getting crushed by the ever growing number of mobility scooters! They are lethal and just have no place in this country.
A mate of one my drinking buddies says he was told by someone he knows that one of these pensioners ignored the traffic lights and zipped across the road on their mobility scooter. It meant they could jump the queue at the Post Office. Makes you think!"Just send them all to Rwanda and process them there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The more I think about it the more annoyed I get. I mean, why do these pensioners get special treatment? Why, for example, do they get their own special seats on public transport? Why do they get their own shop full of stuff only they really want to buy? I mean sure, any of us can venture in, but you try getting a seat in the cafe of a lunch time, it’s bloody full of ‘em drinking their tea and eating cakes in their huddles wearing quilted coats radicalising each other! I just don’t feel comfortable in there! And what value, culturally, have they added to the country? Ok apart from some nice music and maybe spotted dick, sponge pudding, apple crumble and the like, their culinary influence has not really enriched us as a nation! I know, I walked past a ‘gang’ of these pensioners loitering outside a bingo hall and felt scared, makes you wonder what they are up to . It does make you wonder! I have never been in to see what goes on, but I am sure it cannot be good! Definitely not, tbh I didn’t have a nice tan from a recent holiday so that may have been the reason they were giving me funny looks Did have a nice tan
Nothing to do with the tan, many of these pensioners are SAGA louts getting boozed up on cruises in the Med, although admittedly their tans are more angry pink than brown. It was your lack of grey hair. You just don’t fit in so they can’t trust you. Besides they don’t like to integrate with the rest of us!
The problem is. How do you know which are the good ones, and which are the ones who are here to harm us?
I don’t know, should we just presume they are all bad to be on the safe side?
Well obviously
Can’t be too careful or before you know it we won’t be able to walk down the highstreet without getting crushed by the ever growing number of mobility scooters! They are lethal and just have no place in this country.
A mate of one my drinking buddies says he was told by someone he knows that one of these pensioners ignored the traffic lights and zipped across the road on their mobility scooter. It meant they could jump the queue at the Post Office. Makes you think!
Just send them all to Rwanda and process them there."Yeah, that sounds like a really good idea | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? " It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion?" Only when it suits, obviously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion?" BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Be careful people, I think we have a member of the knitting crew infiltrating this thread " As long as they don’t try to be one of us though then that is ok. No matter how long we let them remain here in this thread, no matter how much of a valuable they make to the thread, they will never be one of us and will need to go back from where they came from once they have served their purpose. I mean, they are obviously only on this thread for personal gain! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My pensioner girlfriend thinks that my opinions on sending all pensioners to Rwanda are too soft." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My pensioner girlfriend thinks that my opinions on sending all pensioners to Rwanda are too soft." To be fair though, a few people will likely question whether your pensioner girlfriend is real! So nice try | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Be careful people, I think we have a member of the knitting crew infiltrating this thread As long as they don’t try to be one of us though then that is ok. No matter how long we let them remain here in this thread, no matter how much of a valuable they make to the thread, they will never be one of us and will need to go back from where they came from once they have served their purpose. I mean, they are obviously only on this thread for personal gain! " Can anyone name anything apart from music that these pensioners have contributed to Britain? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends?" This is true, terrorists attacks on asylum seekers accommodation has increased by 100% in the last 7 days, it’s like a battle zone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends?" Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My pensioner girlfriend thinks that my opinions on sending all pensioners to Rwanda are too soft. To be fair though, a few people will likely question whether your pensioner girlfriend is real! So nice try "Disingenuous. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Be careful people, I think we have a member of the knitting crew infiltrating this thread As long as they don’t try to be one of us though then that is ok. No matter how long we let them remain here in this thread, no matter how much of a valuable they make to the thread, they will never be one of us and will need to go back from where they came from once they have served their purpose. I mean, they are obviously only on this thread for personal gain! Can anyone name anything apart from music that these pensioners have contributed to Britain?" Tartan slippers? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. " Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse!" He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner." He used to be “military age” and if he is over here then he must have passed through a dozen countries offering a decent pension package already! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. He used to be “military age” and if he is over here then he must have passed through a dozen countries offering a decent pension package already!" It’s one thing arriving in the UK by boat but this Jesus fella arrived in people hearts! Makes you think! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner." I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? " It was very good | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good "I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists "Although  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although "It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are."All bought with their own hard earned money. A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are."True, but only a small minded , bigoted moron would blame an entire group of people fur the actions of a few, however, I don’t understand why they get preferential treatment and government hand outs but that is for another thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’ "What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving? How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
True, but only a small minded , bigoted moron would blame an entire group of people fur the actions of a few, however, I don’t understand why they get preferential treatment and government hand outs but that is for another thread "Some people on this post have surprised me with a keen sense of humour. And gone up in my estimation. Who knew it? Others of course stick to their nasty bigoted wierd agendas. Perhaps this is what people morph into when they realise they can’t even get a shag on a swingers website? Takes all sorts I guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life! "Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind. "Just a quick look at the news reports of the guys coming out of their homes. The level of abuse is much higher than reported. In 2019, an ex head of the local Coop said there is more than one million pensioners in the UK, and rising at over 150,000 each year. Estimated cost to the NHS - £330 million! Our good nature, proud history of compassion & British values being abused indeed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’ "Dear oh lord. Tedious and doesn’t make any sense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
Dear oh lord. Tedious and doesn’t make any sense."Indeed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind. "How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV? Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you? **P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
Dear oh lord. Tedious and doesn’t make any sense."What’s that? It’s the playtime bell. Come on children, leave the playground, back to class. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before."Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap. Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back. I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before."What about pensioners that leave the UK and still claim their pensions abroad, where is their commitment to Britain? Are they British enough to claim a British pension | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before."But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take. I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday "Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You have had a horrid cancer battle, lost your son, and your marriage has fallen apart. You are probably also having financial worries, prices are rising too. Throw in being socially ostracised as an older single male. Now bring in mainstream media reporting all the people arriving and being put up in hotels...It really is not hard to see how anybody who is in a lonely and desperate situation would think 'fudge it I'll show them'. The sad thing is media has already stage managed things so it isnt even clear how the man died. Was it police bullets, armed forces bullets, migrants, the public, or himself? If you want to know who radicalised him it won't be any far right group. It will be society as a whole for allowing the situation to continue." So a bit like brown terrorists then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap.
Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back.
I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate. "Can’t we get back to the humour, it is much more fun! Of course the state pension is a ponzi/pyramid scheme. There is no pension pot you or I have paid into. You know that right? It is nothing like a private pension. It is 100% funded from current taxation. Ergo if you have fewer workers or workers earning less to tax you have less money to fund the state pension of those who are retired. If you have more pensioners and living longer then you need more money paying the current state pension. Only solutions are: 1) Pay smaller pension 2) Pay higher tax from those currently working 3) Get more workers so they can pay tax Right that’s the serious stuff, now I want to get back to our highstreets starting to be taken over by rabid gangs of purple haired pensioners on mobility scooters. It is getting too intimidating to walk our own streets! It’s like Mad Max out there. Well Mad Maude anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up."I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up. Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are. "Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society."Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are. "Disingenuous | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society.
Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum"But he is entitled to an opinion and may only have been joking! Older people using words like that just shows how society is breaking down. These golfing pensioners are having a negative impact on the youngsters. I mean what other language are they using in their clubs that we don’t know about? Who knows where it will end! Worrying no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap.
Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back.
I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate.
Can’t we get back to the humour, it is much more fun!
Of course the state pension is a ponzi/pyramid scheme. There is no pension pot you or I have paid into. You know that right? It is nothing like a private pension. It is 100% funded from current taxation. Ergo if you have fewer workers or workers earning less to tax you have less money to fund the state pension of those who are retired. If you have more pensioners and living longer then you need more money paying the current state pension. Only solutions are:
1) Pay smaller pension
2) Pay higher tax from those currently working
3) Get more workers so they can pay tax
Right that’s the serious stuff, now I want to get back to our highstreets starting to be taken over by rabid gangs of purple haired pensioners on mobility scooters. It is getting too intimidating to walk our own streets! It’s like Mad Max out there. Well Mad Maude anyway."This came up on another thread. Point 3 is self defeating as those extra workers will one day be pensioners themselves. Not only does it kick the can down the road it also makes the future problem worse. Anyway on the theme of this thread I say just arrest Mr Kippling, he is clearly the hate cleric and seducing his followers with marzipan | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society.
Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum
But he is entitled to an opinion and may only have been joking! Older people using words like that just shows how society is breaking down. These golfing pensioners are having a negative impact on the youngsters. I mean what other language are they using in their clubs that we don’t know about? Who knows where it will end! Worrying no?"A lot of people could learn a lot, and society would be better with golf etiquette. Safely though, to master golf it takes a bit of talent and a lot of hard work. Attributes that have been lost in the last decade or so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Disingenuous "I hope all pensioners don’t use that type of language, shocking | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Disingenuous "Right on cue, and true to form. Excellent post and a terrific contribution | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap.
Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back.
I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate.
Can’t we get back to the humour, it is much more fun!
Of course the state pension is a ponzi/pyramid scheme. There is no pension pot you or I have paid into. You know that right? It is nothing like a private pension. It is 100% funded from current taxation. Ergo if you have fewer workers or workers earning less to tax you have less money to fund the state pension of those who are retired. If you have more pensioners and living longer then you need more money paying the current state pension. Only solutions are:
1) Pay smaller pension
2) Pay higher tax from those currently working
3) Get more workers so they can pay tax
Right that’s the serious stuff, now I want to get back to our highstreets starting to be taken over by rabid gangs of purple haired pensioners on mobility scooters. It is getting too intimidating to walk our own streets! It’s like Mad Max out there. Well Mad Maude anyway.
This came up on another thread. Point 3 is self defeating as those extra workers will one day be pensioners themselves. Not only does it kick the can down the road it also makes the future problem worse. Anyway on the theme of this thread I say just arrest Mr Kippling, he is clearly the hate cleric and seducing his followers with marzipan "And don’t forget that many of women of a certain age were shafted when they increased the retirement age from sixty to sixty seven. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are. "Did somebody call my name | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap.
Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back.
I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate.
Can’t we get back to the humour, it is much more fun!
Of course the state pension is a ponzi/pyramid scheme. There is no pension pot you or I have paid into. You know that right? It is nothing like a private pension. It is 100% funded from current taxation. Ergo if you have fewer workers or workers earning less to tax you have less money to fund the state pension of those who are retired. If you have more pensioners and living longer then you need more money paying the current state pension. Only solutions are:
1) Pay smaller pension
2) Pay higher tax from those currently working
3) Get more workers so they can pay tax
Right that’s the serious stuff, now I want to get back to our highstreets starting to be taken over by rabid gangs of purple haired pensioners on mobility scooters. It is getting too intimidating to walk our own streets! It’s like Mad Max out there. Well Mad Maude anyway.
This came up on another thread. Point 3 is self defeating as those extra workers will one day be pensioners themselves. Not only does it kick the can down the road it also makes the future problem worse. Anyway on the theme of this thread I say just arrest Mr Kippling, he is clearly the hate cleric and seducing his followers with marzipan
And don’t forget that many of women of a certain age were shafted when they increased the retirement age from sixty to sixty seven. "You had me at " women of a certain age were shafted " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Disingenuous
I hope all pensioners don’t use that type of language, shocking "Shouldn't we send them all to Rwanda, just to be on the safe side. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap.
Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back.
I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate.
Can’t we get back to the humour, it is much more fun!
Of course the state pension is a ponzi/pyramid scheme. There is no pension pot you or I have paid into. You know that right? It is nothing like a private pension. It is 100% funded from current taxation. Ergo if you have fewer workers or workers earning less to tax you have less money to fund the state pension of those who are retired. If you have more pensioners and living longer then you need more money paying the current state pension. Only solutions are:
1) Pay smaller pension
2) Pay higher tax from those currently working
3) Get more workers so they can pay tax
Right that’s the serious stuff, now I want to get back to our highstreets starting to be taken over by rabid gangs of purple haired pensioners on mobility scooters. It is getting too intimidating to walk our own streets! It’s like Mad Max out there. Well Mad Maude anyway.
This came up on another thread. Point 3 is self defeating as those extra workers will one day be pensioners themselves. Not only does it kick the can down the road it also makes the future problem worse. Anyway on the theme of this thread I say just arrest Mr Kippling, he is clearly the hate cleric and seducing his followers with marzipan
And don’t forget that many of women of a certain age were shafted when they increased the retirement age from sixty to sixty seven.
You had me at " women of a certain age were shafted ""Naughty! It did cross my mind as I typed it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
Sometimes people come out with total shit & bollocks that you have to take a deep breath and just hope they are not that thick or simply being disingenuous to try and make a point. Mind you, we do know some on here that Fabricate total crap.
Of course pensions are not a ‘ponzi scheme’. Ridiculous statement - take it back.
I’m happy to be part of a community that takes care of fellow citizens less fortunate.
Can’t we get back to the humour, it is much more fun!
Of course the state pension is a ponzi/pyramid scheme. There is no pension pot you or I have paid into. You know that right? It is nothing like a private pension. It is 100% funded from current taxation. Ergo if you have fewer workers or workers earning less to tax you have less money to fund the state pension of those who are retired. If you have more pensioners and living longer then you need more money paying the current state pension. Only solutions are:
1) Pay smaller pension
2) Pay higher tax from those currently working
3) Get more workers so they can pay tax
Right that’s the serious stuff, now I want to get back to our highstreets starting to be taken over by rabid gangs of purple haired pensioners on mobility scooters. It is getting too intimidating to walk our own streets! It’s like Mad Max out there. Well Mad Maude anyway.
This came up on another thread. Point 3 is self defeating as those extra workers will one day be pensioners themselves. Not only does it kick the can down the road it also makes the future problem worse. Anyway on the theme of this thread I say just arrest Mr Kippling, he is clearly the hate cleric and seducing his followers with marzipan
And don’t forget that many of women of a certain age were shafted when they increased the retirement age from sixty to sixty seven.
You had me at " women of a certain age were shafted "
Naughty! It did cross my mind as I typed it"It's still in my mind having read it lol. And it's been 15 minutes ago ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society.
Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum
But he is entitled to an opinion and may only have been joking! Older people using words like that just shows how society is breaking down. These golfing pensioners are having a negative impact on the youngsters. I mean what other language are they using in their clubs that we don’t know about? Who knows where it will end! Worrying no?
A lot of people could learn a lot, and society would be better with golf etiquette.
Safely though, to master golf it takes a bit of talent and a lot of hard work. Attributes that have been lost in the last decade or so."Seb don’t put yourself down. We all have friends who are not up to scratch. I’m sure you regular 4 Ball are happy to carry you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society.
Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum
But he is entitled to an opinion and may only have been joking! Older people using words like that just shows how society is breaking down. These golfing pensioners are having a negative impact on the youngsters. I mean what other language are they using in their clubs that we don’t know about? Who knows where it will end! Worrying no?
A lot of people could learn a lot, and society would be better with golf etiquette.
Safely though, to master golf it takes a bit of talent and a lot of hard work. Attributes that have been lost in the last decade or so.
Seb don’t put yourself down. We all have friends who are not up to scratch. I’m sure you regular 4 Ball are happy to carry you "“Regular 4 ball”? You seem to know a lot about golf - come on, out of the locker room, Pringles at the ready. And I’m not talking potato based snacks. You are a golfer sir! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society.
Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum
But he is entitled to an opinion and may only have been joking! Older people using words like that just shows how society is breaking down. These golfing pensioners are having a negative impact on the youngsters. I mean what other language are they using in their clubs that we don’t know about? Who knows where it will end! Worrying no?
A lot of people could learn a lot, and society would be better with golf etiquette.
Safely though, to master golf it takes a bit of talent and a lot of hard work. Attributes that have been lost in the last decade or so.
Seb don’t put yourself down. We all have friends who are not up to scratch. I’m sure you regular 4 Ball are happy to carry you
“Regular 4 ball”? You seem to know a lot about golf - come on, out of the locker room, Pringles at the ready. And I’m not talking potato based snacks. You are a golfer sir! "Well Jesus was born in a stable, it doesn’t make him a horse! Sorry couldn’t resist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"While this does make for a funny read, it also shows the true colours of some for taking the suicide of someone that clearly had mental health issues as a source of humour. Not as WOKE as you like to think perhaps? It was just a joke. Some people! Are we not allowed an opinion? BTW you seem to be making a connection to an individual. Can’t see any specific mention. We have been talking generally about the serious threat to the security and culture of our country posed by radical pensioners. It is on the rise and we are just raising what we have see (or what a friend of mine’s sister’s auntie’s brother-in-law was told). Are we not allowed to talk about these worrying trends? Well the OP did refer specifically to the guy at Dover. As I said, it’s a funny read and of course it’s not a ‘worrying trend’ - was that a joke? What is funny is that certain posters that don’t have a sense of humour suddenly think they have. I have a fantastic sense of humour by the way. Jesus was born in a stable, doesn’t make him a horse! He's over 2000 years old at this point, so definitely a pensioner. I’m doubled up in pain laughing at that one. Who knew you and your cabal had a sense of humour ? It was very good
I hope we have all learnt something here, allykpuhh pensioners are responsible for every terror attack on asylum seekers accommodation, not all pensioners are terrorists
Although
It is hard to believe when you see these pensioners with designer clothes & trainers waving & smiling as they come out of their houses. Others with heads down & hoods up of course. We have no idea who they are.
All bought with their own hard earned money.
A generation to be admired - unlike todays youth who seem to think that paying for a phone is ‘optional’
What all of them? Are you saying they are all the same? That’s a bit of a sweeping generalisation! What about the radicalised ones? What about all those examples we have been giving?
How do you know they bought with their own hard earned money? Their pensions are funded by us taxpayers so they can just swan around playing golf. Haven’t they all served their purpose anyway, contributed to the economy sure, but for their own gain obviously, so shouldn’t they now toddle off now we don’t want them. They’re all just open to radicalisation anyway and that will harm the British way of life!
Paid many times over for their own pensions if you don’t mind.
How do you know they paid in? Could have been on benefits whole life? Are you happy that your taxes paid for lazy pensioners to sit at home ordering takeaways while watching TV?
Anyway you are going off topic! We are talking about dodgy radicalised pensioners. Does this not worry you?
**P.S. you know of course that when it comes to state pension, you have not paid a penny towards yours. That is not how it works. It is a ponzi scheme. New joiners (ie current workers) are paying for state pension if recipients now. You paid for generation before.
But we are not talking about dangerous radicalised pensioners. This was clearly a lighthearted thread, in poor taste in my opinion but it’s turned into the usual rabid pack piss take.
I’m more worried about Chelsea on Sunday
Oh dear. Seb this is still most certainly a lighthearted thread to illustrate the type of argument used about other types of people. Are you taking any of this seriously? It’s just banter. Stop being all woke and cancel culture. Lighten up.
I have seen the funny side of it and a few points made me laugh. Sadly the usual gang of bullies have to steam in and hijack it for their own agenda or just a wind up.
Thankfully others can see them for the narrow minded twisted cunts that they are.
Now now we don’t like language like that around here thanks. It might be acceptable amongst the Pringle wearing 19th hole pensioners, but this is a nice place and language like that is not a good way to integrate with the fab forum society.
Yeah, potty mouth but you know who I mean. And we wonder why more people don’t take part in the forum
But he is entitled to an opinion and may only have been joking! Older people using words like that just shows how society is breaking down. These golfing pensioners are having a negative impact on the youngsters. I mean what other language are they using in their clubs that we don’t know about? Who knows where it will end! Worrying no?
A lot of people could learn a lot, and society would be better with golf etiquette.
Safely though, to master golf it takes a bit of talent and a lot of hard work. Attributes that have been lost in the last decade or so.
Seb don’t put yourself down. We all have friends who are not up to scratch. I’m sure you regular 4 Ball are happy to carry you
“Regular 4 ball”? You seem to know a lot about golf - come on, out of the locker room, Pringles at the ready. And I’m not talking potato based snacks. You are a golfer sir! "Well Jesus was born in a stable, it doesn’t make him a horse! Sorry couldn’t resist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well guess we know that the pensioner who threw incendiary devices at the immigration centre in Dover was radicalised by the far right to carry out this attack. Is it time we blocked pensioners from the internet? Apart from being scammed regularly, should we be adding parental controls or time limits to their internet usage. Or should we been teaching them to use the internet responsibly? Like how to post properly on instagram or how to know set up an email account without asking someone else? Do we need to protect our old folk from themselves just as we teach our kids to wary of strangers? Why isn’t the government doing a campaign to protect old people from online far right grooming gangs. Should we expect them to be eating butterscotch candy? and living the rest of their lives in blissful ignorance and make them happy by replaying episodes of some mother do have em or faulty towers? How can we protect our old folk, from far right predators? What are your thoughts?" no if we do that then also the young should be barred not seen many oap jihad's | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Things are stirring. Plans of pensioners to march to Manston demanding that they get sent to five star hotels for the winter. Heating & three meals a day. You heard it here first" They should be careful as these can be dangerous places. BBC say now that a teenage boy has been rxpxd and another touched inappropriately by these asylum seekers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Things are stirring. Plans of pensioners to march to Manston demanding that they get sent to five star hotels for the winter. Heating & three meals a day. You heard it here first" Well at least we have the Public Order Bill. All these badly behaved pensioners will end up being arrested and tagged. The person organising it is no doubt already under surveillance. And if any of them plan on using those walking sticks or mobility scooters as weapons, well the police can pre-empt that and just assume they intend to and arrest them anyway! Also the sight of all those dodgy, possibly radicalised, pensioners could cause distress to two or more people, so again the police can take action. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Things are stirring. Plans of pensioners to march to Manston demanding that they get sent to five star hotels for the winter. Heating & three meals a day. You heard it here first Well at least we have the Public Order Bill. All these badly behaved pensioners will end up being arrested and tagged. The person organising it is no doubt already under surveillance. And if any of them plan on using those walking sticks or mobility scooters as weapons, well the police can pre-empt that and just assume they intend to and arrest them anyway! Also the sight of all those dodgy, possibly radicalised, pensioners could cause distress to two or more people, so again the police can take action." The police would be the least of their worries. If they turn up at all, by the time they have worked out (or done a risk assessment?) whether to take the knee or dance the Macarena the pensioners will have struck. Mission accomplished, break out the thermos flasks! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Things are stirring. Plans of pensioners to march to Manston demanding that they get sent to five star hotels for the winter. Heating & three meals a day. You heard it here first Well at least we have the Public Order Bill. All these badly behaved pensioners will end up being arrested and tagged. The person organising it is no doubt already under surveillance. And if any of them plan on using those walking sticks or mobility scooters as weapons, well the police can pre-empt that and just assume they intend to and arrest them anyway! Also the sight of all those dodgy, possibly radicalised, pensioners could cause distress to two or more people, so again the police can take action. The police would be the least of their worries. If they turn up at all, by the time they have worked out (or done a risk assessment?) whether to take the knee or dance the Macarena the pensioners will have struck. Mission accomplished, break out the thermos flasks!" Police are not failing. They've been overwhelmed by unwanted uninvited pensioners taking advantage | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Things are stirring. Plans of pensioners to march to Manston demanding that they get sent to five star hotels for the winter. Heating & three meals a day. You heard it here first Well at least we have the Public Order Bill. All these badly behaved pensioners will end up being arrested and tagged. The person organising it is no doubt already under surveillance. And if any of them plan on using those walking sticks or mobility scooters as weapons, well the police can pre-empt that and just assume they intend to and arrest them anyway! Also the sight of all those dodgy, possibly radicalised, pensioners could cause distress to two or more people, so again the police can take action. The police would be the least of their worries. If they turn up at all, by the time they have worked out (or done a risk assessment?) whether to take the knee or dance the Macarena the pensioners will have struck. Mission accomplished, break out the thermos flasks! Police are not failing. They've been overwhelmed by unwanted uninvited pensioners taking advantage" I guess you are auditioning to be the Oscar Wilde of Fab. Failing hopelessly though I’m afraid. Wit needs to bear some resemblance to the point in hand. Not just garbled nonsense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above." Oh I get it now, you silly billy, you are simply trying in a childish manner to irritate. How childish | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above. Oh I get it now, you silly billy, you are simply trying in a childish manner to irritate. How childish " It's pretty funny how you called all your own posts "garbled nonsense" etc. You see the point? Your insane anti-immigrant rants don't make any sense, and don't have any bearing on reality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above. Oh I get it now, you silly billy, you are simply trying in a childish manner to irritate. How childish It's pretty funny how you called all your own posts "garbled nonsense" etc. You see the point? Your insane anti-immigrant rants don't make any sense, and don't have any bearing on reality. " I am not ‘anti immigrant’ if you don’t mind. Please stick to the truth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above. Oh I get it now, you silly billy, you are simply trying in a childish manner to irritate. How childish It's pretty funny how you called all your own posts "garbled nonsense" etc. You see the point? Your insane anti-immigrant rants don't make any sense, and don't have any bearing on reality. I am not ‘anti immigrant’ if you don’t mind. Please stick to the truth. " If you're not anti-immigrant, why do you post so many anti-immigrant rants? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above. Oh I get it now, you silly billy, you are simply trying in a childish manner to irritate. How childish It's pretty funny how you called all your own posts "garbled nonsense" etc. You see the point? Your insane anti-immigrant rants don't make any sense, and don't have any bearing on reality. I am not ‘anti immigrant’ if you don’t mind. Please stick to the truth. If you're not anti-immigrant, why do you post so many anti-immigrant rants?" I don’t. I raise legitimate concerns but I’m not anti immigrant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above." That gave me a chuckle this morning | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Planned sensible pensioners = good. We all get that don’t we? We have a proud history of welcoming pensioners and have at times provided refuge to those in need. Uncontrolled mass pensioners - bad. Especially when it was politically driven as per Tony Blair’s wish to ‘stick it up the Tories in the shores’. This ultimately led to the disaster of Brexit. Who is in favour of mass uncontrolled pensioners? Illegal pensioners- bad. People from wherever turning up on our shores, finding dangerous & illegal ways to gain entry. Overwhelmingly old men. History repeatedly shows that where you have an excess of old men you get social unrest. People abusing our compassion & good nature. Who thinks this is good? We have seen the consequences before of disillusioned or failed pensioners going on to commit horrific crimes. Just in the last few days things have gone from bad to much worse. We are seeing incidents of child sexual abuse & r@pe. We saw the other day a number of old men left on a coach in Victoria, they found themselves without accommodation or food but why is that the responsibility of the British authorities, they should have been grateful that they hadn’t been kicked out back to France which they left of their own accord. Stoke centre is according to locals becoming a no go zone due to gangs of pensioners. Already this influx is being felt in the courts. So, planned pensioners good. Mass uncontrolled pensioners bad. Illegal pensioners bad. Put aside the usual cries of ‘ageist’ ‘pensionist’, and tell me why you disagree with the above. That gave me a chuckle this morning "Care to share why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues." Chill out woody, the guy was a terrorist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues." We're making fun of someone closer to home. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home." Yes , I read a bit of the bullying going on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. Yes , I read a bit of the bullying going on." Why are you supporting a terrorist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. Yes , I read a bit of the bullying going on." Good humoured banter. You should read the direct insults he throws at others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. Yes , I read a bit of the bullying going on. Good humoured banter. You should read the direct insults he throws at others." And he has a sense of humour | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues." Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. Yes , I read a bit of the bullying going on." Bullying!? Jesus was born in a stable that doesn’t make him a horse! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think?" Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. " Yes, I think you're getting it now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. " He was a terrorist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. " I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells" There you go, he has a sense of humour after all, why are you defending a terrorist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells" I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American?" Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American?" He’s a pensioner | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? He’s a pensioner "Damn. I've been outed  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells" More personal attacks and insults. Poor show. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win." I don't think all Americans will be insulted by being compared to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win. I don't think all Americans will be insulted by being compared to you." Gee , thanks for that. I think....... But I think a hell of a lot would. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home." No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? He’s a pensioner
Damn. I've been outed "Yeah, I hope you haven’t been radicalised like Andrew Leak | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. " It’s how they get their kicks. A silly childish little gang. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win. I don't think all Americans will be insulted by being compared to you. Gee , thanks for that. I think....... But I think a hell of a lot would. " Lol. Join the club | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth." What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. It’s how they get their kicks. A silly childish little gang." Like most gangs , they only have strength in numbers. Don't agree with them ? They bully you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant?" Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. It’s how they get their kicks. A silly childish little gang. Like most gangs , they only have strength in numbers. Don't agree with them ? They bully you. " They are after blood as they got their arses kicked earlier. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. It’s how they get their kicks. A silly childish little gang. Like most gangs , they only have strength in numbers. Don't agree with them ? They bully you. They are after blood as they got their arses kicked earlier. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win." Nice try but it doesn’t quite work. Americans are fairly notorious for not understanding sarcasm and satire, which are cornerstones of British humour. It is one of the reasons we have the saying “two countries divided by a common language”. China on the other hand is a completely different culture. Do they get satire and sarcasm? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win." Don't worry about us Americans taking offense. The source of the insult you have to take in consideration. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please." Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win. Don't worry about us Americans taking offense. The source of the insult you have to take in consideration. "touche
I love Americans, well some of them. Great people, well some them. Bit like any country and nationality really. Good and bad in all. But be honest, a lot of Americans are very literal and struggle with sarcasm and satire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. " But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. Making distasteful and potentially offensive comments is actively encouraged by some on here who are then regularly claiming they were joking. Is it more offensive because someone is claimed to have mental health issues* (you missed out the word “health” it matters) than if they have darker skin or speak another language? Or are those people fair game? *BTW has anyone noticed the pattern? If the terrorist is white and right wing, they always seem to have mental health issues. Everyone else are just evil bastards! Makes you think? Are you aware of the facts regarding the guy that I'm not ? Other than his ethnicity. Oh wait. Yes you are . His age. So thats another thing to laugh about. Yes, I think you're getting it now. I think i got your humour a while back, Johnny twobraincells I don’t think you understand either satire or sarcasm? Are you American? Thats 360 million people you insulted. Good effort but I think I can beat that. You have a narrow vision of this subject , are you Chinese? 1.4 billion. I win. Nice try but it doesn’t quite work. Americans are fairly notorious for not understanding sarcasm and satire, which are cornerstones of British humour. It is one of the reasons we have the saying “two countries divided by a common language”. China on the other hand is a completely different culture. Do they get satire and sarcasm?" They loved Monty Python. The Chinese have a great sense of humour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? " Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top." Can you not distinguish between immigrants and illegal immigrants? Clearly not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top." Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest" Cooked by immigrants. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest Cooked by immigrants." Good chance. My go to restaurants here are run and staffed by some lovely people. All from overseas, all fabulous. They all fear the Albanians though. Your friends though I guess? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest Cooked by immigrants. Good chance. My go to restaurants here are run and staffed by some lovely people. All from overseas, all fabulous. They all fear the Albanians though. Your friends though I guess? " Your local restaurant staff are all as confused and angry as you? I'm not friends with all Albanians. To be honest, I've probably met less than 0.01% of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest Cooked by immigrants. Good chance. My go to restaurants here are run and staffed by some lovely people. All from overseas, all fabulous. They all fear the Albanians though. Your friends though I guess? Your local restaurant staff are all as confused and angry as you? I'm not friends with all Albanians. To be honest, I've probably met less than 0.01% of them. " I’m starting to think you are perhaps not the brightest pixie in the forest. Do you accept there is a difference in immigration and illegal immigration? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest Cooked by immigrants. Good chance. My go to restaurants here are run and staffed by some lovely people. All from overseas, all fabulous. They all fear the Albanians though. Your friends though I guess? Your local restaurant staff are all as confused and angry as you? I'm not friends with all Albanians. To be honest, I've probably met less than 0.01% of them. I’m starting to think you are perhaps not the brightest pixie in the forest. Do you accept there is a difference in immigration and illegal immigration? " Yes or course. "Illegal immigration is the migration of people into a country in violation of the immigration laws of that country or the continued residence without the legal right to live in that country. Illegal immigration tends to be financially upward, from poorer to richer countries." Whats this got to do with your foreigner based confusion and anger? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A load of morons thinking they're comedians. Attempting humour over the death of someone with mental issues. We're making fun of someone closer to home. No problem with that but keep It real. You make a post about me that is untrue then claim I’m denying what I said. Try stocking G to the truth. What about the anti-immigrant thread you started, which you then filled up with posts about not being anti-immigrant? Read it again. I said I am not anti immigration. You choose not to distinguish between immigration and illegal immigration. You are not thick so I assume you are doing it for other reasons Anti British perhaps? So - I’m correcting a falsehood that you persist with, not denying anything. Keep it real please. Yes! You're getting it. You said you're not anti-immigration after your anti-immigrant rants. That's exactly what we discuss. But there simply wasn’t an anti immigrant rant. I am not anti immigrant. Are you thick or a fantasist? Green arrow yourself there. You'll find the anti-immigrant thread you started with your rant at the very top. Takeaway curry for one. Don’t spill it on your vest Cooked by immigrants. Good chance. My go to restaurants here are run and staffed by some lovely people. All from overseas, all fabulous. They all fear the Albanians though. Your friends though I guess? " Well who can blame them for fearing the ever increasing Albanian gangs which today we learn from the BBC are paying the crossing fees for those that will join their criminal gangs. That comes after we learn also on the BBC that 2 youngsters have been sexually assaulted (1 rap@d) by those claiming to be in need of our help. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
