FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Kimi badenoch vs

Kimi badenoch vs

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *mateur100 OP   Man 9 weeks ago

nr faversham

The former head of the post office

Surely he just needs to name the senior civil servant or she needs to produce documentation that shows that he had/was been under investigation for inappropriate behaviour????

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *mateur100 OP   Man 9 weeks ago

nr faversham

Sorry, Kemi Badenoch

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *wosmilersCouple 9 weeks ago

Heathrowish

In the words of Clubber Lang "I predict pain"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 9 weeks ago

in Lancashire

It's a strange one, he's been a top level businessman in several different companies for as long as she's been alive and he gets sacked after a year..

Then the article in the times and after that 'issues over his behaviour'..

It'll come out whose not being truthful but in the meantime the sub Post masters the victims are being further delayed in their very justified compensation..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 9 weeks ago

Badenoch has an uncomfortable relationship with the truth. I know who my money’s on.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan 9 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

I wonder who it was kemi vs this week….

I thought it was Michael sheen after his comments with regards to the port talbot job losses…

There isn’t a culture wars issue she couldn’t plod her foot in…

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *melie LALWoman 9 weeks ago

Peterborough

Sacked as a scapegoat?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 9 weeks ago

in Lancashire

Very interesting piece on BBC website about who knew what in relation to the issues under Cameron's tenure..

That perjury may have occured by the post office but that the government department who oversee it on behalf of UK plc also knew ..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0

0