FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Isreali's impunity
Isreali's impunity
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? " Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself " Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is there anything the UK can do that will make any meaningful difference to the situation in Gaza. Most I can see is voting accordingly at any UN meetings but they in themselves don't seem to mean much. Military sales from the UK to Israel are tiny so can't use that as a leverage. The U.S. and Germany could but as far as I know have still not done so and continue to send weapons. " This ??We can talk the talk and vote against Israel in the UN but that is it. Cutting our military equipment sales won’t be noticeable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself " So there's videos of the Israeli govt saying they commented genocide and war crimes ? I didn't find those. I'm not saying they did or they didn't, I really don't have a clue but any of the videos and articles I look a lot like propaganda. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A lot of posts have been made regarding the Isreal - Gaza conflict. I've titled the thread as I see it due to a few facts. After the latest round of violence of 7 October by hamas, the Isreali government did it was going to do the following, which in each case is a war crime: The removal of all rules of engagement when firing on Gazans suspected of being hamas members by Galant. Who also said there will be no military courts, Cut off the electric, water and food supplies Describing the Gazans as animals.. So.. this isn't something leaked, or from a journalist, this was actually openly said by the Israeli leadership. Isreal's actions to date has delivered on those threats, and also successfully cut off all aid agencies in the short term at least, after an "accidental" attack on the aid convoy. And the supposed sacking of a major.. which I very much doubt given the statements made by Galant. In the meantime, the west has not only stood by but continued to assist in the genocide aided by us all.. while being bullshitted by Isreal and the USA So how does the West have any moral high ground to judge or criticise Putin and anyone else who participates in genocide? Now or in the future? All I have seen so far is limp leadership by Biden, Sunak. And scholz or whatever his name is (German chancellor) Blindly supplying war criminals to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Do the Isrealis need to attack rafha? Or are they besieging the city (another war crime) To starve them all to death. How can the west criticise any other regime when this happens ? " I would also include the targeting of women and children, as to deter reproduction. When a race of people cannot reproduce due to women being murdered, or hospitals being raised to the ground, that population will soon cease to exist. No hospitals mean no treatments for everyday illnesses, no treatment for say cancer. Jailing young viral men also means no reproduction. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is there anything the UK can do that will make any meaningful difference to the situation in Gaza. Most I can see is voting accordingly at any UN meetings but they in themselves don't seem to mean much. Military sales from the UK to Israel are tiny so can't use that as a leverage. The U.S. and Germany could but as far as I know have still not done so and continue to send weapons. This ??We can talk the talk and vote against Israel in the UN but that is it. Cutting our military equipment sales won’t be noticeable. " We could put the same sanctions on Israel that we put on Russia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is there anything the UK can do that will make any meaningful difference to the situation in Gaza. Most I can see is voting accordingly at any UN meetings but they in themselves don't seem to mean much. Military sales from the UK to Israel are tiny so can't use that as a leverage. The U.S. and Germany could but as far as I know have still not done so and continue to send weapons. " Sunak was clear ‘ I hope you win’ 4 months later; 33k dead of which 70% women and children, 75k injured of which 70% women and children, a million homeless and their homes destroyed, 1.4 million starving. He has not offered uk to take any of the 19,000 orphans. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x" Since the 7 October more than 13,800 children have been killed to date by IDF terrorists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x Since the 7 October more than 13,800 children have been killed to date by IDF terrorists." UNICEF estimates that a thousand children in Gaza have become amputees since the conflict began in October. “This is the biggest cohort of pediatric amputees in history. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x Since the 7 October more than 13,800 children have been killed to date by IDF terrorists. UNICEF estimates that a thousand children in Gaza have become amputees since the conflict began in October. “This is the biggest cohort of pediatric amputees in history." “Two sources said that during the early weeks of the war they were permitted to kill 15 or 20 civilians during airstrikes on low-ranking militants. Attacks on such targets were typically carried out using unguided munitions known as “dumb bombs”, the sources said, destroying entire homes and killing all their occupants. Because we usually carried out the attacks with dumb bombs, and that meant literally dropping the whole house on its occupants. But even if an attack is averted, you don’t care – you immediately move on to the next target. Because of the system, the targets never end. You have another 36,000 waiting.” “We were constantly being pressured: ‘Bring us more targets.’ They really shouted at us,” said one intelligence officer. “We were told: now we have to fuck up Hamas, no matter what the cost. Whatever you can, you bomb.” “There was a completely permissive policy regarding the casualties of [bombing] operations,” one source said. “A policy so permissive that in my opinion it had an element of revenge.” “So you’re willing to take the margin of error of using artificial intelligence, risking collateral damage and civilians dying, and risking attacking by mistake, and to live with it,” they added. ‘It’s much easier to bomb a family’s home’ Guardian 03 April 2024 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Israel’s policies violate international rules, and the situation with nuclear weapons is no different, Amihai Eliyahu’s statement that “a nuclear bomb on Gaza is a possibility”. Crimes committed by Israel against civilians in Gaza Strip and the West Bank, it is the international community’s especially USA and European allies duty to deprive Israel of nuclear weapons and secure them away from Satanyahu regime." Israeli nuclear arsenal is their own and not dependant on tye USA, so good luck trying to deprive them of it, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is there anything the UK can do that will make any meaningful difference to the situation in Gaza. Most I can see is voting accordingly at any UN meetings but they in themselves don't seem to mean much. Military sales from the UK to Israel are tiny so can't use that as a leverage. The U.S. and Germany could but as far as I know have still not done so and continue to send weapons. This ??We can talk the talk and vote against Israel in the UN but that is it. Cutting our military equipment sales won’t be noticeable. We could put the same sanctions on Israel that we put on Russia." I agree  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"God gave Israel the land, why is it wrong to eliminate the population, wipe out Gaza, we wiped out Sodom and Gomorrah" Oh good grief. And welcome to the land of make believe  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"God gave Israel the land, why is it wrong to eliminate the population, wipe out Gaza, we wiped out Sodom and Gomorrah" I said it before and ill say it again, some people just want to see the world burn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is there anything the UK can do that will make any meaningful difference to the situation in Gaza. Most I can see is voting accordingly at any UN meetings but they in themselves don't seem to mean much. Military sales from the UK to Israel are tiny so can't use that as a leverage. The U.S. and Germany could but as far as I know have still not done so and continue to send weapons. This ??We can talk the talk and vote against Israel in the UN but that is it. Cutting our military equipment sales won’t be noticeable. We could put the same sanctions on Israel that we put on Russia." That crossed my mind and is probably do able though not sure in isolation it would have any meaningful impact. It needs lots of countries to participate to have any effect. Countries like Germany may resist given how much weapons they sell into Israel | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. " I dont think any terrorist organisation follow the rules of war | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"God gave Israel the land, why is it wrong to eliminate the population, wipe out Gaza, we wiped out Sodom and Gomorrah" Which god? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"God gave Israel the land, why is it wrong to eliminate the population, wipe out Gaza, we wiped out Sodom and Gomorrah" Problem with Zionists are as soon as they open their mouth, they expose their real selves and evil religious ideology to the world. Chosen people lol. Chosen to commit genocide by your imaginary friend? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Israel’s policies violate international rules, and the situation with nuclear weapons is no different, Amihai Eliyahu’s statement that “a nuclear bomb on Gaza is a possibility”. Crimes committed by Israel against civilians in Gaza Strip and the West Bank, it is the international community’s especially USA and European allies duty to deprive Israel of nuclear weapons and secure them away from Satanyahu regime.Israeli nuclear arsenal is their own and not dependant on tye USA, so good luck trying to deprive them of it, Mrs x" If they fail to comply then we can deploy sanctions 
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. " Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons 
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. "What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with? Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x"Israeli terrorism and Hamas terrorism are two different beasts and can't be dealt with in any blanket way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x"Giving them more reasons to hate you isn't going to work. Every innocent life taken potentially gives the terrorists dozens of Israeli haters to enlist replacements from. I'm sorry to say that there's no way to totally stop terrorism. When you create a state that is surrounded by peoples intent on its destruction, its always going to be a problem. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Giving them more reasons to hate you isn't going to work. Every innocent life taken potentially gives the terrorists dozens of Israeli haters to enlist replacements from.
I'm sorry to say that there's no way to totally stop terrorism.
When you create a state that is surrounded by peoples intent on its destruction, its always going to be a problem. "Israel's current policy of bombing and starving the already oppressed people is definitely generating more terrorists. They know this, and presumably it's part of the plan. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Israel’s policies violate international rules, and the situation with nuclear weapons is no different, Amihai Eliyahu’s statement that “a nuclear bomb on Gaza is a possibility”. Crimes committed by Israel against civilians in Gaza Strip and the West Bank, it is the international community’s especially USA and European allies duty to deprive Israel of nuclear weapons and secure them away from Satanyahu regime." Isreal is only 1 of 4 states not signed up to the NNPT (!nuclear nonproliferation treaty) The other 3 are North Korea, India and Pakistan…. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x"Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters. Big, big difference at law. Oct 7 happened in occupied territory. The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel."Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law. Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel."Israel is a legally recognised state. Palestine has never been recognised in any such way. Hamas' actions are terrorism. Big difference. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Giving them more reasons to hate you isn't going to work. Every innocent life taken potentially gives the terrorists dozens of Israeli haters to enlist replacements from.
I'm sorry to say that there's no way to totally stop terrorism.
When you create a state that is surrounded by peoples intent on its destruction, its always going to be a problem. "So you've said why Israel must stop but said terrorism is not going to. So are you saying that Israel must put up with terrorist attacks on its nation and civilians and not retaliate in any way? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
"Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel "Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Giving them more reasons to hate you isn't going to work. Every innocent life taken potentially gives the terrorists dozens of Israeli haters to enlist replacements from.
I'm sorry to say that there's no way to totally stop terrorism.
When you create a state that is surrounded by peoples intent on its destruction, its always going to be a problem. So you've said why Israel must stop but said terrorism is not going to.
So are you saying that Israel must put up with terrorist attacks on its nation and civilians and not retaliate in any way?
Mrs x"So you are saying that Iran must not put up with the terrorist attack on its consulate and nation and not retaliate in any way? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Giving them more reasons to hate you isn't going to work. Every innocent life taken potentially gives the terrorists dozens of Israeli haters to enlist replacements from.
I'm sorry to say that there's no way to totally stop terrorism.
When you create a state that is surrounded by peoples intent on its destruction, its always going to be a problem. So you've said why Israel must stop but said terrorism is not going to.
So are you saying that Israel must put up with terrorist attacks on its nation and civilians and not retaliate in any way?
Mrs x
So you are saying that Iran must not put up with the terrorist attack on its consulate and nation and not retaliate in any way? "Iran are a corrupt regime, paying for terrorist groups. I cannot say how they will respond. But if they are harbouring terrorists they are taking the risk that victims of terrorism may come to try and take that threat out. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel "I didn't defend anyone, nor did I state any embassies weren't 'sovereign'... The point was 'defending makes them resistance fighters' which is wrong because they weren't defending when they entered Israel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 " Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So you are saying that Iran must not put up with the terrorist attack on its consulate and nation and not retaliate in any way? "Is this the same argument Israel has after Oct 7th? The consulate in Syria is not Iranian territory. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x" On the contrary. Why relocate to be surrounded by enemy states. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x" Where’s the queue offering new safe environments for 2 million homeless Palestinians. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x On the contrary. Why relocate to be surrounded by enemy states. " Because that's there 'home". The English are surrounded by their historical 'enemies, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Spain, France, Holland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, shall we relocate? And as for your other point, I never said I knew of a country that would welcome a state relocating within your borders, you did that. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x Where’s the queue offering new safe environments for 2 million homeless Palestinians. " The other Arab nations definitely don't want them. Jordan has actually kicked them out previously, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x" Not sure how any of this justifies the actions Israel is taking. Painting their only option as mass killing civilians, women and children is silly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x Not sure how any of this justifies the actions Israel is taking. Painting their only option as mass killing civilians, women and children is silly." Unfortunately killing of innocents happens in armed conficts, doesn't mean its terrorism. Let me say that I don't agree with any innocents being killed but I can understand why retaliation occurs. But you do not have a suggestion on what Israel should do, only what they shouldn't. However you don't say what Hamas should be doing either. Telling someone not to do something, without giving any other options is silly? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x Not sure how any of this justifies the actions Israel is taking. Painting their only option as mass killing civilians, women and children is silly.Unfortunately killing of innocents happens in armed conficts, doesn't mean its terrorism. " The word used to describe the mass killings of civilians isn't the problem, it's the act. " Let me say that I don't agree with any innocents being killed but I can understand why retaliation occurs. " Fair enough, it's well beyond retaliation though. " But you do not have a suggestion on what Israel should do, only what they shouldn't. However you don't say what Hamas should be doing either. Telling someone not to do something, without giving any other options is silly? Mrs x" I'm not directly communicating with the Israeli government, so I'm not telling them what not to do. Do we have to provide a detailed alternative to the problem before we're allowed to criticise what's happening? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
I didn't defend anyone, nor did I state any embassies weren't 'sovereign'...
The point was 'defending makes them resistance fighters' which is wrong because they weren't defending when they entered Israel. "When push came to shove, you were left high and dry with no one to defend you. You were the only person to come back and continue debate, you didn't wait a couple of days you came back others did not, do not forget that. You now know the type of people your siding with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x Not sure how any of this justifies the actions Israel is taking. Painting their only option as mass killing civilians, women and children is silly.Unfortunately killing of innocents happens in armed conficts, doesn't mean its terrorism. Let me say that I don't agree with any innocents being killed but I can understand why retaliation occurs. But you do not have a suggestion on what Israel should do, only what they shouldn't. However you don't say what Hamas should be doing either. Telling someone not to do something, without giving any other options is silly? Mrs x" These are the type of comments that allow Israel to continue to kill unarmed people, including aid workers who are put their lives at risk to aid the helpless, let them do what they do and say what they say, us trying to debate with such thinking only adds fuel to their fire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
I didn't defend anyone, nor did I state any embassies weren't 'sovereign'...
The point was 'defending makes them resistance fighters' which is wrong because they weren't defending when they entered Israel.
When push came to shove, you were left high and dry with no one to defend you.
You were the only person to come back and continue debate, you didn't wait a couple of days you came back others did not, do not forget that.
You now know the type of people your siding with."You back again to have some sort of personal argument? Allow my self out of your head mate, because I'm not paying
I've told you before, if you want to debate what I say, by all means do, if you just wanna get personal, then do one (kiss) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In 1947, 805,000 Jews relocated to the territory known as Israel. Sandwiched between Arab states. Since then the Jews have thieved land by force on the West Bank to create illegal settlements for their now 9.8 million population. The 1947 resettlement could have been to a safer country, Canada has 10 million Km2 Jews have been in Israel for thousands of years, they returned to what they consider their homeland. Israel has historically existed as a country, Palestine has not. Using your argument, why not give parts of Canada to the Palestinians? And Canada has no objections to this? It seems that most of the arguments given have a whiff of anti semitism. Why is it that the Jews have to stop, be moved, wiped out? That's happened throughout their history, it seems like a prejudice view. Mrs x Not sure how any of this justifies the actions Israel is taking. Painting their only option as mass killing civilians, women and children is silly.Unfortunately killing of innocents happens in armed conficts, doesn't mean its terrorism. The word used to describe the mass killings of civilians isn't the problem, it's the act. Let me say that I don't agree with any innocents being killed but I can understand why retaliation occurs. Fair enough, it's well beyond retaliation though. But you do not have a suggestion on what Israel should do, only what they shouldn't. However you don't say what Hamas should be doing either. Telling someone not to do something, without giving any other options is silly? Mrs x I'm not directly communicating with the Israeli government, so I'm not telling them what not to do. Do we have to provide a detailed alternative to the problem before we're allowed to criticise what's happening?" I said I don't agree with killing of any innocents, on either side, but maybe the attacks in October were the final straw. Terrorist attacks against Israel have been going on for years, since the creation of the state of Israel. Almost 80 years of attacks, atwhat point is enough, enough? They are not targeting civilians, they are targeting g terrorists. Unfortunately these terrorists are hiding behind civilians. Hamas are using civilian lives as a tactic to avoid retribution. As for the level of retaliation, I'm not necessarily in agreement with it buy if you have been constantly attacked for as long as Israel has been then maybe you might want to put an end to this. If you punch a guy in the face first, you can't complain if the other guy has bigger fists and punches harder. Hamas are playing a massive problem in the amount of casualties inflicted. Israel, drop leaflets, make phones calls to say they are about to attack certain locations. It's Hamas who refuse to allow civilians to flee from these locations. Israeli actions are to protect their citizens, whilst Hamas are putting theirs in harms way to protect themselves. Fundamental difference. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x"Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime… So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best! If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
I didn't defend anyone, nor did I state any embassies weren't 'sovereign'...
The point was 'defending makes them resistance fighters' which is wrong because they weren't defending when they entered Israel.
When push came to shove, you were left high and dry with no one to defend you.
You were the only person to come back and continue debate, you didn't wait a couple of days you came back others did not, do not forget that.
You now know the type of people your siding with.
You back again to have some sort of personal argument?
Allow my self out of your head mate, because I'm not paying
I've told you before, if you want to debate what I say, by all means do, if you just wanna get personal, then do one (kiss)"Nothing personal, just reminding you that others left you high and dry, that's all. if that wasn't a session to be learnt, then please continue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
I didn't defend anyone, nor did I state any embassies weren't 'sovereign'...
The point was 'defending makes them resistance fighters' which is wrong because they weren't defending when they entered Israel.
When push came to shove, you were left high and dry with no one to defend you.
You were the only person to come back and continue debate, you didn't wait a couple of days you came back others did not, do not forget that.
You now know the type of people your siding with.
You back again to have some sort of personal argument?
Allow my self out of your head mate, because I'm not paying
I've told you before, if you want to debate what I say, by all means do, if you just wanna get personal, then do one (kiss)
Nothing personal, just reminding you that others left you high and dry, that's all.
if that wasn't a session to be learnt, then please continue."No one left me anywhere, I'm on these forums as an individual, not as part of some 'team'. As such, my views are my views, not anyone else's. The sooner you understand this, the sooner you can let it go. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…"You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation. Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x" Your reply is interesting.. its second hand he said she said rumours passed about. No doubt children will have been involved.. Though that does not condone or justify committing reciprocal war crimes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is there anything the UK can do that will make any meaningful difference to the situation in Gaza. Most I can see is voting accordingly at any UN meetings but they in themselves don't seem to mean much. Military sales from the UK to Israel are tiny so can't use that as a leverage. The U.S. and Germany could but as far as I know have still not done so and continue to send weapons. " It could put pressure on the USA and Germany. Canada have done so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself So there's videos of the Israeli govt saying they commented genocide and war crimes ? I didn't find those. I'm not saying they did or they didn't, I really don't have a clue but any of the videos and articles I look a lot like propaganda." I was looking at actual video of the defence minister (Galant I think his name is) saying that. Also on the days after 7 October, water and electricity was cut off to the entire population of Gaza. I know what you mean about fake news and propoganda and so don't take 2nd hand news seriously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x"So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses. Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see. Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x Your reply is interesting.. its second hand he said she said rumours passed about. No doubt children will have been involved.. Though that does not condone or justify committing reciprocal war crimes" So you didn't look at the evidence I sent you, didn't think you would. So the invasion of terrorists into your country, the taking of hostages and murder of your civilians and, yes, burning babies alive, is not a cause for retaliation then what is? It's OK if it happens to Jews but not ok if it happens to others?, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation."So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous??? Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x Your reply is interesting.. its second hand he said she said rumours passed about. No doubt children will have been involved.. Though that does not condone or justify committing reciprocal war crimesSo you didn't look at the evidence I sent you, didn't think you would. So the invasion of terrorists into your country, the taking of hostages and murder of your civilians and, yes, burning babies alive, is not a cause for retaliation then what is? It's OK if it happens to Jews but not ok if it happens to others?, Mrs x" Send it again.. however. If true still does not justify reciprocal war crimes. Re: invasion of terrorists into your country: this has already been done by Isreal.. illegal expansions of settlements, pushing palisitinians out in an aparhied Isreal. Re ; Retaliation: yes I would want those responsible brought to account dead or alive ..but.. I wouldn't want innocent people killed to pay for someone else's crimes. re: it's OK if it happens to Jews but not ok if it happens to others?, No it isn't.. and that's a universal statement from me. What hamas did was wrong, and what the IDF are doing is also wrong. As is Putin, By saying it's okay to kill others who had no part in 7 October attacks is also wrong | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x"My motivation is based on what's morally and ethically right. I was in Bosnia defending Muslims against genocidal acts. Was I wrong to do that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x"No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off. Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
"So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself So there's videos of the Israeli govt saying they commented genocide and war crimes ? I didn't find those. I'm not saying they did or they didn't, I really don't have a clue but any of the videos and articles I look a lot like propaganda." Not in the past tense.. but the plan on committing war crimes. Cutting off 100% of the populations food water etc.. is a war crime as Galant stated rhnplan of what they intended doing.. coupled with fucking up aid agencies they've delivered on Galant's statements. https://youtu.be/ZbPdR3E4hCk?si=1GXNF7iBuZXWRfTf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x"My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses. Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? " Galant stating his intentions of committing war crimes. https://youtu.be/ZbPdR3E4hCk?si=1GXNF7iBuZXWRfTf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Facts, or someone's opinion of facts ? Videos of statements by the Isreali government. You can find them yourself Did you find the burnt baby evidence I gave you? Mrs x Your reply is interesting.. its second hand he said she said rumours passed about. No doubt children will have been involved.. Though that does not condone or justify committing reciprocal war crimesSo you didn't look at the evidence I sent you, didn't think you would. So the invasion of terrorists into your country, the taking of hostages and murder of your civilians and, yes, burning babies alive, is not a cause for retaliation then what is? It's OK if it happens to Jews but not ok if it happens to others?, Mrs x Send it again.. however. If true still does not justify reciprocal war crimes. Re: invasion of terrorists into your country: this has already been done by Isreal.. illegal expansions of settlements, pushing palisitinians out in an aparhied Isreal. Re ; Retaliation: yes I would want those responsible brought to account dead or alive ..but.. I wouldn't want innocent people killed to pay for someone else's crimes. re: it's OK if it happens to Jews but not ok if it happens to others?, No it isn't.. and that's a universal statement from me. What hamas did was wrong, and what the IDF are doing is also wrong. As is Putin, By saying it's okay to kill others who had no part in 7 October attacks is also wrong " There are no Jews in Gaza, not since 2005. You seem to have conveniently forgotten the images of the IDF literally dragging Israelis from their homes in Gaza when they had over stayed their deadline for resettlement. Invasion of terrorists? I assume you mean the West Bank. While this is not legal and has been rightly condemned it is not an act of terrorism. There has actually been cases of the Israeli Supreme Court finding in favour of Palestimians remaining in homes that were previously owned by Israelis. Not an act of sanctioning expansion of its citizens. As a member of our forces I would assume you would know that civilian casualties are an extremely tragic consequence of armed conflict. And you are trying to twist my words to suit your narrative. I have never said it was 'OK' to kill any civilians, I just realise that this happens. As for me resending evidence I'm not going to do that considering you didn't view it the first time. I'll use your response and tell you to lookit up. However I will give you a clue in that the evidence I supplied came from two world reknown news sources and the leading authority on AI produce imagery. Hamas did burn babies and it has been independently verified, not he said, she said as you state. Hope this helps, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty."I'm not saving anything of the sort. Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made. You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up. We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil. These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened. Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Questions for Mrs X. 1. Are all the palisitinians "animals" 2. Was I in the wrong for defending Muslims in Bosnia 3. Should I have been killed defending Muslims in Bosnia? Iraqi Afghanistan? I'm Just curious." No they are not animals. You weren't wrong going to perform your duty in any of those places. But unless you were a mercenary you were ordered to do so. Its not a higher moral position if you have to do so because you were ordered. Well done and thank you for your service. Particularly in Iraq, we're you went under false pretences. Hope you didn't have to defend yourself and kill innocent Iraqis. Act of terrorism by your standards, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith? Mrs x" Stop playing a victim card. It’s not working anymore. You sound like a scratch CD. After October 7th world sees the real face of Zionism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x"None of the embassies of the Israeli regime are safe anymore, a top military adviser to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei has warned. Oh dear! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x"Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists? It’s simple answer Yes or No | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith? Mrs x Stop playing a victim card. It’s not working anymore. You sound like a scratch CD. After October 7th world sees the real face of Zionism. " Why am I a victim here, I'm Irish and was a Catholic? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
None of the embassies of the Israeli regime are safe anymore, a top military adviser to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei has warned.
Oh dear!
"They said similar in 67 and 73 and every opportunity since. Its the opening stance. They only want the eradication of Israel and the genocide of the Jews, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or No"Who are these IDF terrorists you speak of? I don't agree with killing any innocents. Do you agree with burning babies? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x"Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid. This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith? Mrs x Stop playing a victim card. It’s not working anymore. You sound like a scratch CD. After October 7th world sees the real face of Zionism. Why am I a victim here, I'm Irish and was a Catholic? Mrs x" You can be any nationality and religion and choose to be a Zionist. I have amazing Jewish friends who despise Israel. It’s not about being Jewish or religion. It’s about the evil religious ideology behind Zionism | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
None of the embassies of the Israeli regime are safe anymore, a top military adviser to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei has warned.
Oh dear!
They said similar in 67 and 73 and every opportunity since. Its the opening stance. They only want the eradication of Israel and the genocide of the Jews,
Mrs x"Go back and read your post. You still don’t see it’s a direct reaction to bombing of Iranian consulate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
"It was simple yes and No I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
"It's not whataboutery, why are you obviously not that upset about terrorist act by Arab terrorists on your home soil. Seems quite obvious really, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first."Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x"what is the military aim ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do Hamas or other terrorist organisations follow rules of engagement/ rules of war or what ever you describe it as. Hamas don’t have nuclear weapons
Israel nuclear assets aren’t safe under this religious fanatics government who literally believe that they are God’s chosen people and committing heinous crimes behind this evil religious ideology. What about the evil religious ideology they are in conflict with?
Lots of views on how Israel should be dealt with here but how do you deal with terrorism?
Mrs x
Defending against an occupier means they are not actually terrorists, they are resistance fighters.
Big, big difference at law.
Oct 7 happened in occupied territory.
The media is spinning a false narrative in support of Israel.
Going into another recognised state on the offensive is terrorism, big big difference in law.
Unless you're saying Israel isn't actually Israel, in which case, you'd be wrong.
Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs xwhat is the military aim ?"The removal of Irans top military personal? I might be wrong though, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists? It’s simple answer Yes or No" This is a reoccurring theme asking "do you condemn".. Can I ask you if there is anything you would condemn in this war that has been carried out by Hamas? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
"As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security. If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
My motivation is based on what's morally and ethically right.
I was in Bosnia defending Muslims against genocidal acts. Was I wrong to do that?
"Did you do that by choice or was you instructed and paid to do that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Questions for Mrs X. 1. Are all the palisitinians "animals" 2. Was I in the wrong for defending Muslims in Bosnia 3. Should I have been killed defending Muslims in Bosnia? Iraqi Afghanistan? I'm Just curious.No they are not animals. You weren't wrong going to perform your duty in any of those places. But unless you were a mercenary you were ordered to do so. Its not a higher moral position if you have to do so because you were ordered. Well done and thank you for your service. Particularly in Iraq, we're you went under false pretences. Hope you didn't have to defend yourself and kill innocent Iraqis. Act of terrorism by your standards, Mrs x" Thanks, no I was in the royal army medical corps but could shoot in self defence | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
It's not whataboutery, why are you obviously not that upset about terrorist act by Arab terrorists on your home soil. Seems quite obvious really,
Mrs x"My countrymen come first, those who go out and risk three lies for my liberty come first I would never defend any country who target my countrymen and murder them for supplying aid never. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are? "No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Questions for Mrs X. 1. Are all the palisitinians "animals" 2. Was I in the wrong for defending Muslims in Bosnia 3. Should I have been killed defending Muslims in Bosnia? Iraqi Afghanistan? I'm Just curious.No they are not animals. You weren't wrong going to perform your duty in any of those places. But unless you were a mercenary you were ordered to do so. Its not a higher moral position if you have to do so because you were ordered. Well done and thank you for your service. Particularly in Iraq, we're you went under false pretences. Hope you didn't have to defend yourself and kill innocent Iraqis. Act of terrorism by your standards, Mrs x Thanks, no I was in the royal army medical corps but could shoot in self defence " Self defense? My brother was in the Medical corps, they are front line troops and have won more VCs than any other Corp. Not just self defence. He served for Nato in Bosnia and in bothe of the other 2 arenas you talk about. Definitely not just self defense, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen."But not arsed about Yvonne Fletcher, Iranian embassy or Locjerbie it seems, not really that arsed are you unless your countrymen are killed by Jews. Anti semitic at heart, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x"You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised. Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words. https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen."You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so. I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers? I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl"You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.But not arsed about Yvonne Fletcher, Iranian embassy or Locjerbie it seems, not really that arsed are you unless your countrymen are killed by Jews.
Anti semitic at heart,
Mrs x"I am unsure if you are British, I am British and defend my country through words on this thread, I would never defend anyone who killed my countrymen never. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas."Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl"Repeat a lie enough times and it becomes Israel  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer."I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen. Never | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.But not arsed about Yvonne Fletcher, Iranian embassy or Locjerbie it seems, not really that arsed are you unless your countrymen are killed by Jews.
Anti semitic at heart,
Mrs x
I am unsure if you are British, I am British and defend my country through words on this thread, I would never defend anyone who killed my countrymen never."So you are against most of the countries on earth? But you don't condemn those examples I gave before, pathetic. You can't have it both ways, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x"Provide us with proof and names? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
"Can you provide documented proof that 'not a single baby was burnt'? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen."You can't back up your claims yet again? This is becoming a recurring theme | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
"So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes? If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never"I understand this, you have said it many times. You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any. If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x"When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
Can you provide documented proof that 'not a single baby was burnt'?"You are the one making claim so onus is on you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies. "Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
Can you provide documented proof that 'not a single baby was burnt'?
You are the one making claim so onus is on you "I didn't make any claim. You made a claim that 'not a single baby burnt on Oct 7th'. Your words, not mine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?"Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies. "Major news outlets say it isn't. Independent from Israel but you choose not to believe it, pathetic considering you expect everyone to accept your evidence, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide."Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide."From that response it is clear you are not open to the realities of the events of this war. I asked you earlier if there was anything you would condemn, terrorism or crimes hamas has been responsible for, you didn't answer I understand why now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
From that response it is clear you are not open to the realities of the events of this war.
I asked you earlier if there was anything you would condemn, terrorism or crimes hamas has been responsible for, you didn't answer I understand why now.
"You won’t condemn IDF terrorists atrocities and I understand why now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.But not arsed about Yvonne Fletcher, Iranian embassy or Locjerbie it seems, not really that arsed are you unless your countrymen are killed by Jews.
Anti semitic at heart,
Mrs x
I am unsure if you are British, I am British and defend my country through words on this thread, I would never defend anyone who killed my countrymen never. So you are against most of the countries on earth?
But you don't condemn those examples I gave before, pathetic.
You can't have it both ways,
Mrs x"I will never defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, never. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies. Major news outlets say it isn't. Independent from Israel but you choose not to believe it, pathetic considering you expect everyone to accept your evidence, Mrs x"Your response is pathetic. I ask one more time for names of babies? You can’t provide it because it never happened. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.But not arsed about Yvonne Fletcher, Iranian embassy or Locjerbie it seems, not really that arsed are you unless your countrymen are killed by Jews.
Anti semitic at heart,
Mrs x
I am unsure if you are British, I am British and defend my country through words on this thread, I would never defend anyone who killed my countrymen never. So you are against most of the countries on earth?
But you don't condemn those examples I gave before, pathetic.
You can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
I will never defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, never."You defend Hamas. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! "They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?"You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty. You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms. That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies. Major news outlets say it isn't. Independent from Israel but you choose not to believe it, pathetic considering you expect everyone to accept your evidence, Mrs x
Your response is pathetic. I ask one more time for names of babies? You can’t provide it because it never happened. "But reputable news outlets said it did, you just choose to ignore it. It doesn't fit into your obvious anti Jewish narrative. You'll be telling me there are no Muslim terrorist organisations next, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing."But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you. It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x"Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x"Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. "You were never this vocal regarding the Britons that Hamas have killed in Israel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies. Major news outlets say it isn't. Independent from Israel but you choose not to believe it, pathetic considering you expect everyone to accept your evidence, Mrs x
Your response is pathetic. I ask one more time for names of babies? You can’t provide it because it never happened. But reputable news outlets said it did, you just choose to ignore it.
It doesn't fit into your obvious anti Jewish narrative. You'll be telling me there are no Muslim terrorist organisations next,
Mrs x"Anti Jewish? Funny you say that. You don’t know me and my background. Anti Zionist, Definitely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country.
You were never this vocal regarding the Britons that Hamas have killed in Israel. "I’m only here to give you taste of your own medication. Without geniuses like you these threads will be boring | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. "So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army? You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one. These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed. Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country.
You were never this vocal regarding the Britons that Hamas have killed in Israel.
I’m only here to give you taste of your own medication. Without geniuses like you these threads will be boring "You do struggle without the personal shit don't you. I don't care that your on the side of Hamas but let's quit with the projection. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army?
You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one.
These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed.
Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide,
Mrs x"My religion
What makes you think that I have a religion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army?
You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one.
These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed.
Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide,
Mrs x
My religion
What makes you think that I have a religion "Happy to start another thread on religion just for you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x"I would never defend anyone or country who kill or put our countrymen, in harms way any-other words are yours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons "I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen."But you won't condemn them either, Mrs c | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen."You defend Hamas and Palestine (even though its not a country) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army?
You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one.
These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed.
Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide,
Mrs x
My religion
What makes you think that I have a religion "Your vehemently anti semitic views maybe, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army?
You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one.
These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed.
Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide,
Mrs x
My religion
What makes you think that I have a religion
Happy to start another thread on religion just for you "bored of your Jew haring rhetoric really, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country.
You were never this vocal regarding the Britons that Hamas have killed in Israel. "For pities sake you might as well be Hamas as your doing there job for them by not defending our -your countrymen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen.
You defend Hamas and Palestine (even though its not a country)"You are British are you not I pursume you are but need to check. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing."I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have. You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow. I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen.
You defend Hamas and Palestine (even though its not a country)
You are British are you not I pursume you are but need to check."What the fuck does that have to do with you defending Hamas? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen.
You defend Hamas and Palestine (even though its not a country)
You are British are you not I pursume you are but need to check."I am Irish but married an English guy and have lived here since a child, dies that count for your purposes? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
"To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that. But if you want to leave it as that so be it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen.
You defend Hamas and Palestine (even though its not a country)
You are British are you not I pursume you are but need to check.I am Irish but married an English guy and have lived here since a child, dies that count for your purposes?
Mrs x"Was just wondering if you are, if you weren't I would understand why you do not stand with your country, that is why I asked. Thanks for clearing that up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing. But you don't condemn the three examples I gave you.
It's OK for muslim terrorists to kill our countrymen on our home soil is it then? Mrs x
Its also OK for Hamas to kill Britons
I will not defend anyone or country who kill or put in harms way our countrymen.
You defend Hamas and Palestine (even though its not a country)
You are British are you not I pursume you are but need to check.I am Irish but married an English guy and have lived here since a child, dies that count for your purposes?
Mrs x
Was just wondering if you are, if you weren't I would understand why you do not stand with your country, that is why I asked.
Thanks for clearing that up."I do but I don't view this as terrorism. I asked you the same question in three specific examples of Islamic terrorist regimes on our country men, committed on home soil. You have chosen not to answer them, leading to the belief that you are anti semitic, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that.
But if you want to leave it as that so be it."You are responding to a few posters at the same time, and you might have me mixed up with others from your last response to me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you are sure your accusation of me calling you antisemitic and that I have defended a regime that killed our countrymen, please show me what I said and I will apologise. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that.
But if you want to leave it as that so be it.
You are responding to a few posters at the same time, and you might have me mixed up with others from your last response to me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you are sure your accusation of me calling you antisemitic and that I have defended a regime that killed our countrymen, please show me what I said and I will apologise. "Your right I am confused, confused as to your loyalties to my countrymen, who risk their lives for me and you and when they come to harm you defend those who kill them. must be clips | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. It’s not treason is it." I’m not sure you are reading these posts correctly at all, not one person has defended the deaths of these aid workers and their security. I have even asked you to provide the justification the Israeli government provided as you said it did, if I can see that justification my view of that government would be considered tarnished. What is it specifically you are taking umbrage with from my comments? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. Its not treason is it." Yes that's it, you've cracked it we are all treasonous lol, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. It’s not treason is it. I’m not sure you are reading these posts correctly at all, not one person has defended the deaths of these aid workers and their security. I have even asked you to provide the justification the Israeli government provided as you said it did, if I can see that justification my view of that government would be considered tarnished. What is it specifically you are taking umbrage with from my comments? " The Colombo reference is my musing as to why there are other defending the killing of my countrymen, not a part of the thread, so lets get back to the thread, your right I have purged you all into one. So lets get things clear for my confusion do you condemn the killing by Israel of British and foreign aid workers by Israel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. Its not treason is it.Yes that's it, you've cracked it we are all treasonous lol, Mrs x" I wouldn't know I was musing,. Do you condemn the killing of British and foriegn aid workers by Israel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. Its not treason is it.Yes that's it, you've cracked it we are all treasonous lol, Mrs x I wouldn't know I was musing,. Do you condemn the killing of British and foriegn aid workers by Israel." Of course I do, I condemn all killing of innocents but you still won't answer my questions as it does not aid in your anti semitic narrative, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. It’s not treason is it. I’m not sure you are reading these posts correctly at all, not one person has defended the deaths of these aid workers and their security. I have even asked you to provide the justification the Israeli government provided as you said it did, if I can see that justification my view of that government would be considered tarnished. What is it specifically you are taking umbrage with from my comments? The Colombo reference is my musing as to why there are other defending the killing of my countrymen, not a part of the thread, so lets get back to the thread, your right I have purged you all into one. So lets get things clear for my confusion do you condemn the killing by Israel of British and foreign aid workers by Israel." Of course I do. I condemn Hamas for their terrorism and butchery that has brought hell on earth to innocents. I also condemn Israel for losing control of its forces, who have also killed indiscriminately. I think you would be hard pressed to find a person who doesn’t agree with this, that is a rational thinker | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This thread is a perfect example of why there can never be peace. People stick their fingers in their ears, close their eyes, then shout at each other saying it is all your fault. The human race is truly truly shit!" There won't be peace due to the three 'No's' adopted by the Arab States in 1967. These have been used to walk out of every talks or treaties since they were adopted. How do you negotiate with people who are committed to No negotiation with Israel, No recognition of Israel and No peace with Israel. So what's the solution? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that.
But if you want to leave it as that so be it.
You are responding to a few posters at the same time, and you might have me mixed up with others from your last response to me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you are sure your accusation of me calling you antisemitic and that I have defended a regime that killed our countrymen, please show me what I said and I will apologise.
Your right I am confused, confused as to your loyalties to my countrymen, who risk their lives for me and you and when they come to harm you defend those who kill them.
must be clips "what was the question | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. It’s not treason is it. I’m not sure you are reading these posts correctly at all, not one person has defended the deaths of these aid workers and their security. I have even asked you to provide the justification the Israeli government provided as you said it did, if I can see that justification my view of that government would be considered tarnished. What is it specifically you are taking umbrage with from my comments? The Colombo reference is my musing as to why there are other defending the killing of my countrymen, not a part of the thread, so lets get back to the thread, your right I have purged you all into one. So lets get things clear for my confusion do you condemn the killing by Israel of British and foreign aid workers by Israel. Of course I do. I condemn Hamas for their terrorism and butchery that has brought hell on earth to innocents. I also condemn Israel for losing control of its forces, who have also killed indiscriminately. I think you would be hard pressed to find a person who doesn’t agree with this, that is a rational thinker" Agree
Anyone trying to say this situation is the fault of only one side is a simple moron! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This thread is a perfect example of why there can never be peace. People stick their fingers in their ears, close their eyes, then shout at each other saying it is all your fault. The human race is truly truly shit!" Some people who are part of the human race, not the human race…. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army?
You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one.
These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed.
Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide,
Mrs x
My religion
What makes you think that I have a religion
Happy to start another thread on religion just for you bored of your Jew haring rhetoric really,
Mrs x"You know it’s not working. Quote me if in any of my previous post I said I hate Jews. I have friends who are Jews and they are lovely people . Zionists on the other hand are exploiting religion to commit genocide in occupied Palestinian land.
I make it easier for you but you won’t get it because you are blinded by your own ignorance. I condemn Hamas as much as you condemn IDF terrorists. I condemn killing of Jews as much as you Condemn killing of Muslims. I condemn killing of innocent civilians on 7th October as much as you condemn killing of innocent Palestinian since 7th October.
Are you Islamophobe? Does it make you happy when Palestinian kids are killed? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that.
But if you want to leave it as that so be it.
You are responding to a few posters at the same time, and you might have me mixed up with others from your last response to me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you are sure your accusation of me calling you antisemitic and that I have defended a regime that killed our countrymen, please show me what I said and I will apologise.
Your right I am confused, confused as to your loyalties to my countrymen, who risk their lives for me and you and when they come to harm you defend those who kill them.
must be clips
what was the question"Again insults, and pile on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that.
But if you want to leave it as that so be it.
You are responding to a few posters at the same time, and you might have me mixed up with others from your last response to me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you are sure your accusation of me calling you antisemitic and that I have defended a regime that killed our countrymen, please show me what I said and I will apologise.
Your right I am confused, confused as to your loyalties to my countrymen, who risk their lives for me and you and when they come to harm you defend those who kill them.
must be clips
what was the question
Again insults,
and pile on."designed to lose the meaning of this thread, I salute you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. It’s not treason is it. I’m not sure you are reading these posts correctly at all, not one person has defended the deaths of these aid workers and their security. I have even asked you to provide the justification the Israeli government provided as you said it did, if I can see that justification my view of that government would be considered tarnished. What is it specifically you are taking umbrage with from my comments? The Colombo reference is my musing as to why there are other defending the killing of my countrymen, not a part of the thread, so lets get back to the thread, your right I have purged you all into one. So lets get things clear for my confusion do you condemn the killing by Israel of British and foreign aid workers by Israel. Of course I do. I condemn Hamas for their terrorism and butchery that has brought hell on earth to innocents. I also condemn Israel for losing control of its forces, who have also killed indiscriminately. I think you would be hard pressed to find a person who doesn’t agree with this, that is a rational thinker Agree
Anyone trying to say this situation is the fault of only one side is a simple moron!"Finally. Someone with common sense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This thread is a perfect example of why there can never be peace. People stick their fingers in their ears, close their eyes, then shout at each other saying it is all your fault. The human race is truly truly shit! Some people who are part of the human race, not the human race…." Yes bit sadly, as this thread demonstrates, far too many! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
My countrymen are not terrorists they were servicemen who wanted to continue to aid others in need and Israel murdered them because of that along with 190+ other aid workers and teachers, doctors and nurses.
Sounds like your condoning this murder of my countrymen, who served for me and my liberty.I'm not saving anything of the sort.
Casualties are a tragedy of any armed conflict and mistakes are made.
You sound outraged and can certainly be. But not sure you are outraged to do something about it and join up.
We're you this outraged about Yvonne Fletcher, the Iranian Embassy hostages, Lockerbie? All Islamic terrorists killings committed on your countrymen on home soil.
These victims were just carrying on with their ordinary lives, whilst the aid workers volunteered to go to an area with several known risks involved. Not that I'm condoning what happened.
Or is your wrath saved only for those of the Jewish faith?
Mrs x
Whataboutary cannot cut it I am afraid.
This is what Israel does to justify killing my countrymen, I note you have returned after being programmed with justifications, that it took a couple of days before you turn up with these excuses of why my countrymen are being murdered.
As far as I am aware Israel has said nothing to try and justify the killing of aide workers and their security.
If I have missed the excuses can you please let me know what they are?
No I cannot, and if you are defending their actions which it seems you are then you should be already clued up, as it is you defending the murder of my countrymen.
You are overly defensive, if you can't answer the question just say so.
I would also like you to explain your answer here, namely what I said that made you say I am defending the deaths of the charity workers?
I have a feeling you will rant rather than answer.
I would never defend any country who killed my countrymen.
Never
I understand this, you have said it many times.
You also said Israel had justified the attack on the aid workers, I simply asked you what the justification was as I had not seen any.
If they have tried to justify the killings it would be an awful thing to do and something I would not be happy with. Im now confused because you said you can't show me?
You will not get me to repeat their excuses, all I have to say and will continue to say as I have said nothing else is I will not defend anyone or country who kill my countrymen, especially those who have served to protect my liberty.
You can throw in whatever else you like insult me anyway you like for loving my country and respecting and guarding the protection of those who put their lives before their own for my sake and freedoms.
That green button has caught you out before and you have learned nothing.
I’m going to give up on you buddy, you make no sense. I have not insulted you once and here you are throwing around accusations that I have.
You answer questions not asked, to shoehorn in some references to the green arrow.
I’ve been here long enough to know when the person I’m responding to is authentic and honest, I’ve also learnt not to keep responding to those who are not.
To throw around religion, and say I am anti Semitic much I see as insults, I also see as insults the need to defend a regime that's kills my countrymen and then see others defend that.
But if you want to leave it as that so be it.
You are responding to a few posters at the same time, and you might have me mixed up with others from your last response to me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you are sure your accusation of me calling you antisemitic and that I have defended a regime that killed our countrymen, please show me what I said and I will apologise.
Your right I am confused, confused as to your loyalties to my countrymen, who risk their lives for me and you and when they come to harm you defend those who kill them.
must be clips
what was the question
Again insults,
and pile on."You're responding to your own post saying it's insulting and calling a pile on when you've engaged in one on Mrs Norty all afternoon | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once saw a episode of Colombo, were the murder, brainwashed his victim by use of subliminal clips, I am going to slow down the IDF video posts to see if they have used these clips as I cannot believe people are putting a regime before my countrymen. There must be a reason. It’s not treason is it. I’m not sure you are reading these posts correctly at all, not one person has defended the deaths of these aid workers and their security. I have even asked you to provide the justification the Israeli government provided as you said it did, if I can see that justification my view of that government would be considered tarnished. What is it specifically you are taking umbrage with from my comments? The Colombo reference is my musing as to why there are other defending the killing of my countrymen, not a part of the thread, so lets get back to the thread, your right I have purged you all into one. So lets get things clear for my confusion do you condemn the killing by Israel of British and foreign aid workers by Israel. Of course I do. I condemn Hamas for their terrorism and butchery that has brought hell on earth to innocents. I also condemn Israel for losing control of its forces, who have also killed indiscriminately. I think you would be hard pressed to find a person who doesn’t agree with this, that is a rational thinker Agree
Anyone trying to say this situation is the fault of only one side is a simple moron!
Finally. Someone with common sense "What you're really saying here is Notme has common sense (seeing as Birldn agreed with him) when you don't actually believe that judging by your posts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Bombing and targeting of embassies and consulates in foreign countries on offensive is terrorism, big difference in the law
Unless you’re saying Syria isn’t actually Syria, and Iranian consulate isn’t Iran territory in Syria in which case, you’d be wrong.
See where you end up now defending this terrorist entity called Israel
Its not terrorism if its for a military aim. It might not be right but has been done by lots of nations throughout history and this is not regarded as terrorism. Mrs x
Actually…. Under international law, the first person is right… bombing an embassy/consulate is diplomatically is big a no no as you can get! In fact you are looking again as a war crime…
So the Israeli government excuse of “it’s a consulate not an embassy so normal rules don’t apply!” Is feeble at best!
If embassies are now legitimate targets… then Israel just sent the war local…You are right, consulates, embassies are considered soil of the country they represent but Israel will be aware of this and must have considered the risk and reward of such a situation.
Bit similar to US incursion into Pakistan to get Bin Laden,
Mrs x
So when Bin Laden was killed they also bombed their embassy on the way out, or did they stealthily enter their land did what they did causing as little damage as possible then leave with no excuses.
Pakistan couldn't really protest as they would have been seen harbouring the worlds most wanted terrorist, plus the US had proof and videoed the whole exercise, for us to see.
Plus the region is not in danger of destabilisation. So the incursion into a foreign country, killing of innocents, to kill a terrorist is OK, so long as Jews aren't doing this, then its outrageous???
Seems a person's religious beliefs are a major factor in your beliefs,
Mrs x
No not at all, it is quite simple for me, anyone who kills my countrymen, can quite simply fu*k right off.
Anyone who kills my countrymen, and then say it was a mistake, can quite simply fu8k right off.
So in your fucking off response, it's OK for Israel to fuck off terrorists then, because that's what they are doing?
Mrs x
Do you condemn the targeted killing of three brave British ex servicemen by IDF terrorists?
It’s simple answer
Yes or NoWho are these IDF terrorists you speak of?
I don't agree with killing any innocents.
Do you agree with burning babies?
Mrs x
It was simple yes and No
I’ll come to burning babies if you answer my question first.Thought I had answered in the positive. I don't agree with any innocent deaths,
Mrs x
You are not going to condemn but I’m not surprised.
Not a single baby burned on October 7th if you have proof and names please do share. This lie is all based on Zaka leader yossi landau account but when investigated by journalists suddenly babies become 18/20 years old adults. I doubt this will make any difference to you but here is a link. Zaka leader Yossi Landau in his own words.
https://youtu.be/6ZzPA2OfUKc?si=mQbRIfIDTp6YlvEl You obviously not seen France 24, read the Arlington Post or seen the evidence from the top AI imaging specialists. All confirmed baby burning by Hamas. Documentary by Al Jazerra, very impartial,
Mrs x
Provide us with proof and names?
So are you suggesting Israel took their own babies, then burnt them for propaganda purposes?
If you think they did how do you know what Hamas is saying isn't just propaganda too, can't have it both ways,
Mrs x
When did I say that? But I wouldn’t pass this from Satanyahu regime
There is no evidence that babies were burnt. It’s all lies.
Denial of crimes and atrocities is a 2 way street is seems, what makes your way the correct way if both sides are denying what they have done?
Denial of crime? What you are on about. Fabricated stories by Satanyahu regime to justify brutal war against innocent civilians of Gaza and commit genocide.
Do you know when 2000 pound bombs are dropped on most populated area on the planet and on a family homes by IDF terrorists, what they do? They burn everyone insides including children and babies. Do you condemn the killing of 13,800 children by IDF terrorists? I think I already know the answer! They are soldiers not terrorists. The terrorists took hostages and burnt babies, not the IDF,
Mrs x
Nazis were soldiers too. Not only IDF terrorists are behaving like Nazis committing genocide in occupied Palestine but killing three British brave citizens who served and fought wars for this country. So you are comparing the genocidal objects of a few Nazis, because the majority of the German army were not Nazis as you are trying to portray them, gassing to death innocent Jews, with the Israeli army?
You do know that in the five Israeli wars since the creation of Israel, they have not started a single one.
These soldiers are not terrorists and are not after wiping all Palestinians from the face of the earth. Unlike Hamas who states in their constitution that all Jews must be killed and Israel must be destroyed.
Not in the same league, your religion is being weaponised to commit genocide,
Mrs x
My religion
What makes you think that I have a religion
Happy to start another thread on religion just for you bored of your Jew haring rhetoric really,
Mrs x
You know it’s not working. Quote me if in any of my previous post I said I hate Jews. I have friends who are Jews and they are lovely people . Zionists on the other hand are exploiting religion to commit genocide in occupied Palestinian land.
I make it easier for you but you won’t get it because you are blinded by your own ignorance. I condemn Hamas as much as you condemn IDF terrorists. I condemn killing of Jews as much as you Condemn killing of Muslims. I condemn killing of innocent civilians on 7th October as much as you condemn killing of innocent Palestinian since 7th October.
Are you Islamophobe? Does it make you happy when Palestinian kids are killed?"The difference is Hamas are using their kids to hide behind, they have no regard for their own citizens just for their murderous ideology. Israel is retaliating due to terrorist attacks, its trying to protect its citizens from future attacks. There is a difference and innocents are paying the price which is a terrible tragedy. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This thread is a perfect example of why there can never be peace. People stick their fingers in their ears, close their eyes, then shout at each other saying it is all your fault. The human race is truly truly shit!There won't be peace due to the three 'No's' adopted by the Arab States in 1967. These have been used to walk out of every talks or treaties since they were adopted. How do you negotiate with people who are committed to No negotiation with Israel, No recognition of Israel and No peace with Israel. So what's the solution? Mrs x" Get rid of Satanyahu. He is the only one who’s an obstacle to peace just to save his own corrupt arse. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
