FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Trump vs Minnesota

Trump vs Minnesota

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *abio OP   Man 15 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

Alex preddy, 37, ICU Nurse

Rip….

The videos are awful

DHS and the Government version of what happens doesn’t correlate with the video

He was directing traffic, he went to the aid of a woman who was shoved over by ICE agents

They killed him whilst 6 people were on him

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *urplebadger69Couple 15 weeks ago

Colchester

I've seen a couple of videos and slowed down footage and it looks bad.

Looks like an agent in a grey jacket fired a gun in to the ground as he was moving away and then someone else shot the person on the ground.

The investigation and cover up will be interesting.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 15 weeks ago

in Lancashire

It looks like he was held down by three or four and one was hitting him about the head area, then someone shoots him and possibly another person also does..

Several times..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 15 weeks ago

Terra Firma

I cant comment on whether the person they shot had managed to draw a weapon and that is when the shots began. What I can say is the ICE agents did not detain him efficiently considering their numbers and that led to the final incident. I can't understand how they allowed him to break free.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 15 weeks ago

Leeds

I have watched the video frame by frame. The nurse never draws his gun. It is the back of his waistband. An agent removes it and tosses it aside before the nurse is shot. Then he is shot repeatedly whilst motionless. It is totally appalling and no word can describe it other than execution.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 15 weeks ago

Leeds


"I can't understand how they allowed him to break free."

He didn't "break free"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 15 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"I cant comment on whether the person they shot had managed to draw a weapon and that is when the shots began. What I can say is the ICE agents did not detain him efficiently considering their numbers and that led to the final incident. I can't understand how they allowed him to break free."

You dont break free with that many men holding you down

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS 15 weeks ago

Bristol

It looks like the gun he was carrying (which of course is his right, especially in an open carry state) was holstered and never reached for.

Whilst he was getting beaten on the ground by six masked men, after getting sprayed with mace because he was defending two women... It looks like the ICE officer in a grey jacket was able to remove the mans gun and take it away.

The man on the ground (a nurse for vets I believe) was then shot around 10 times and murdered.

Even if the first shot somehow was fired in error (because these idiots are wildly untrained)... the subsequent nine was outright execution.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 15 weeks ago

Leeds

I have seen a new video just after he is murdered and an ICE officer kneeling next to him says "where's the gun ?"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan 15 weeks ago

London

No doubt the usual suspects will be along to explain why this was fully justified.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *wisted999Man 15 weeks ago

North Bucks

I just can’t fathom a defensible angle for that. The gun was being walked away and he was under a big pile of bodies.

Straight up execution.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 15 weeks ago

in Lancashire

If it was in Tehran..

The situation is fast approaching out of control and Senate and Congress need to say stop..

Because when you have a cold blooded murder of a person held down and the administration lie about it despite the clear and obvious truth then that's not only wrong but extremely potentially dangerous..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 15 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I cant comment on whether the person they shot had managed to draw a weapon and that is when the shots began. What I can say is the ICE agents did not detain him efficiently considering their numbers and that led to the final incident. I can't understand how they allowed him to break free.

You dont break free with that many men holding you down "

He think he did momentarily and got to what I would say, on to his knees, you can either see that or not. It is not something I'm going to argue about though as it will become more event as time goes by.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 15 weeks ago

Leeds

I saw him on his knees when they lifted his shirt and took the gun from his back belt. His head was being held. He wasn't breaking free.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 15 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

Just watched it, after the incident it looks like one of the agents was clapping in victory.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ulie.your. bottom. slutTV/TS 14 weeks ago

Near Glasgow


"No doubt the usual suspects will be along to explain why this was fully justified."

One has already tried, but not made a great case.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma

I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

"

I am guessing it could be the speed at which certain networks decided to show certain videos…

For example, from the video in the coffee shop across the road.. you notice a woman with a pink jumper recording what happened…

Now.. I was watching the local NBC affiliate, WCCO Minneapolis, coverage…. They showed the pink jumper woman’s mobile phone video ( which is the one where you see the entire incident) … CNN didn’t start showing the same video for a good 4-5 hours later

Maybe it took them a lot longer to verify and get permission to show it… but I can imagine that can help stoke a narrative

DHS were very quick to put out a version to try and set a tone and justify.. but it fulls apart with every different video that comes out

Trying to smear someone as a domestic terrorist might work if you are an immigrant… much harder is the person you are trying to smear is an ICU nurse for the VA

Bovino should go, Noem should go, Miller should go just for the smear alone!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ostInTheSupermarketMan 14 weeks ago

Central

Looks like murder to me, this administration will do its best so people ‘don’t believe their eyes & ears’.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

"

The videos were there that showed the lies being put out by the administration are simply that..

A deliberate malicious attempt to smear a person lawfully protesting who only had a phone in his hand, not his handgun which many are legally allowed to carry..

The rest was out there, not all as theres more this morning but enough to show he didnt act as Trump etc described..

Execution simple as and there has to someone accountable because at some point there will be a response..

Or is that what some in power actually want or see as the next step..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ecadentDeviantsCouple 14 weeks ago

North West


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

The videos were there that showed the lies being put out by the administration are simply that..

A deliberate malicious attempt to smear a person lawfully protesting who only had a phone in his hand, not his handgun which many are legally allowed to carry..

The rest was out there, not all as theres more this morning but enough to show he didnt act as Trump etc described..

Execution simple as and there has to someone accountable because at some point there will be a response..

Or is that what some in power actually want or see as the next step.."

Civil War / Greenland / whatever detracts from Epstein

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uckurcumMan 14 weeks ago

Bishop Auckland

America can now hardly stand as a beacon of democracy......What's equally appalling is the lack of condemnation from other heads of state !

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"America can now hardly stand as a beacon of democracy......What's equally appalling is the lack of condemnation from other heads of state !

"

Not the done thing in normal circumstances etc, let the country in question especially if its an 'ally' deal with it..

If its a regime not liked then there'll be a public condemnation etc but sometimes pointing the finger reflects as we like most ain't exactly clean hands wise..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hrill CollinsMan 14 weeks ago

The Outer Rim

donald tRöhmps sturmabteilung casually execute an american patriot on the sidewalk ... and instead of administering cpr they instead decide to count the bullet holes and start a victory clap.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 14 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

It's a deplorable event and the agents involved should be investigated, it seems they are above the law Trump's personal Gestapo .

One thing I will say AND IT'S NOT AN EXCUSE FOR WHAT HAPPENED.

So it's easy to comment when it's not our culture but if I was going to a protest knowing that these lunatics are policing it, if it's my right or not I certainly wouldn't be taking a gun, holstered or not.

I'm not sure if the victims execution had any bearing on him carrying a gun, but I personally wouldn't take one.

What's ironic is ( I got shouted down for this comment recently) Trump condemning the recent events in Iran whilst this is happening in his own country on a smaller scale.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otandDashCouple 14 weeks ago

farnham

The US is imploding from within , No point in Trump boasting the US is the most powerful military force on earth if your own people are rebelling .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 14 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

"

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year. "

There is clearly a long standing issue with ICE training and discipline that goes back decades. I believe 86 died under Obama.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"It's a deplorable event and the agents involved should be investigated, it seems they are above the law Trump's personal Gestapo .

One thing I will say AND IT'S NOT AN EXCUSE FOR WHAT HAPPENED.

So it's easy to comment when it's not our culture but if I was going to a protest knowing that these lunatics are policing it, if it's my right or not I certainly wouldn't be taking a gun, holstered or not.

I'm not sure if the victims execution had any bearing on him carrying a gun, but I personally wouldn't take one.

What's ironic is ( I got shouted down for this comment recently) Trump condemning the recent events in Iran whilst this is happening in his own country on a smaller scale.

"

Its a 'carry State' with a permit both open and concealed can be on the person..

To the Mall, to the baseball game, to the church etc..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hrill CollinsMan 14 weeks ago

The Outer Rim

it appears that ice under trump has supercharged the amount of deaths of those in their custody by almost 500%

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

"

Are they?

On here ..?

Are you sure about that..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year. "

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hrill CollinsMan 14 weeks ago

The Outer Rim


"It's a deplorable event and the agents involved should be investigated, it seems they are above the law Trump's personal Gestapo .

One thing I will say AND IT'S NOT AN EXCUSE FOR WHAT HAPPENED.

So it's easy to comment when it's not our culture but if I was going to a protest knowing that these lunatics are policing it, if it's my right or not I certainly wouldn't be taking a gun, holstered or not.

I'm not sure if the victims execution had any bearing on him carrying a gun, but I personally wouldn't take one.

What's ironic is ( I got shouted down for this comment recently) Trump condemning the recent events in Iran whilst this is happening in his own country on a smaller scale.

Its a 'carry State' with a permit both open and concealed can be on the person..

To the Mall, to the baseball game, to the church etc..

"

now that bad guys with guns have openly murdered a good guy with a gun, should somebody tell wayne la pierre that he got it wrong?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

Are they?

On here ..?

Are you sure about that.. "

Yes, because I've checked. The OP for example.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

There is clearly a long standing issue with ICE training and discipline that goes back decades. I believe 86 died under Obama."

There's cases ongoing over deaths in custody which under both the administrations since ICE was brought in has been by far the majority..

Street execution, (some saying two) in three weeks is clearly another low level and an indication as Senior justice officials country wide have said is the lack of training for them..

Its an issue that needs addressing but the current lot seem intent on letting them run about unchecked and that's not sensible or right..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties."

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

Are they?

On here ..?

Are you sure about that..

Yes, because I've checked. The OP for example."

One then..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

I am guessing it could be the speed at which certain networks decided to show certain videos…

For example, from the video in the coffee shop across the road.. you notice a woman with a pink jumper recording what happened…

Now.. I was watching the local NBC affiliate, WCCO Minneapolis, coverage…. They showed the pink jumper woman’s mobile phone video ( which is the one where you see the entire incident) … CNN didn’t start showing the same video for a good 4-5 hours later

Maybe it took them a lot longer to verify and get permission to show it… but I can imagine that can help stoke a narrative

DHS were very quick to put out a version to try and set a tone and justify.. but it fulls apart with every different video that comes out

Trying to smear someone as a domestic terrorist might work if you are an immigrant… much harder is the person you are trying to smear is an ICU nurse for the VA

Bovino should go, Noem should go, Miller should go just for the smear alone!

"

I have seen a new angle that appears to show the agent who took the gun from Alex Pretti, discharge it, I assume by accident. A second agent who had drawn his weapon on seeing Pretti had a gun shoots him when the first agent fired Pretti's gun.

What an awful outcome, so many things could have been avoided.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

There is clearly a long standing issue with ICE training and discipline that goes back decades. I believe 86 died under Obama.

There's cases ongoing over deaths in custody which under both the administrations since ICE was brought in has been by far the majority..

Street execution, (some saying two) in three weeks is clearly another low level and an indication as Senior justice officials country wide have said is the lack of training for them..

Its an issue that needs addressing but the current lot seem intent on letting them run about unchecked and that's not sensible or right..

"

It not help the situation if local law enforcement carried out the actions again illegal migrants, but many Democratic States and Cities do not allow that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

Are they?

On here ..?

Are you sure about that..

Yes, because I've checked. The OP for example.

One then.."

The threads are there for you or anyone else to check, I'm not going to derail this one naming and shaming.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far."

Again as yesterday you or anyone can not dictate how and when people post on a subject..

That's the mods job and even they dont go about trying to stifle or deflect others posts based upon what you are trying to do..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far.

Again as yesterday you or anyone can not dictate how and when people post on a subject..

That's the mods job and even they dont go about trying to stifle or deflect others posts based upon what you are trying to do..

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far.

Again as yesterday you or anyone can not dictate how and when people post on a subject..

That's the mods job and even they dont go about trying to stifle or deflect others posts based upon what you are trying to do..

"

Weird way to debate. Didn't see your post on this subject so what you say doesn't count.

Not all of us spend every waking hour on fabs politics forum.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

Are they?

On here ..?

Are you sure about that..

Yes, because I've checked. The OP for example.

One then..

The threads are there for you or anyone else to check, I'm not going to derail this one naming and shaming."

Good cos that's not allowed..

Possibly Tall you missed out 'even more so than I usually do', after shaming..

Tbh someone who is from that country, has family there and possibly friends in the areas being affected by this issue doesn't need to 'justify' to anyone how and what they have previously posted ..

Thonk the term is 'skin in the game'.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far.

Again as yesterday you or anyone can not dictate how and when people post on a subject..

That's the mods job and even they dont go about trying to stifle or deflect others posts based upon what you are trying to do..

Weird way to debate. Didn't see your post on this subject so what you say doesn't count.

Not all of us spend every waking hour on fabs politics forum."

I was responding to Tall..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far.

Again as yesterday you or anyone can not dictate how and when people post on a subject..

That's the mods job and even they dont go about trying to stifle or deflect others posts based upon what you are trying to do..

Weird way to debate. Didn't see your post on this subject so what you say doesn't count.

Not all of us spend every waking hour on fabs politics forum.

I was responding to Tall..

"

Apologies, my response was aimed at his response also.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"I mean, who doesn't take a handgun to a peaceful protest ?

Clearly totally unnecessary killing by ICE and hopefully consequences will follow but the context is well funded far left activism against Federal action to remove illegal and criminal migrants, with a clear tactic to provoke confrontation that will inevitably lead to tragedies like this.

No outrage of course about the 1000s of murders, r@pes and other crimes committed by people with no right to be in the US. No outrage about the refusal of Democrat States to co-operate with the legal removal of those people. No mention about the many deaths related to ICE action that occurred under Obama and Biden.

And of course most of the people outraged by two tragic deaths in Minnesota are totally silent on 50,000 deaths of peaceful protesters in Iran. What a mystery that is..

35 deaths last year of people in Ice custody I think it's 4 already this year.

Don't think Tallstories cares as long as the victims are all non white or lefties.

I've posted more than anyone about the mass killings in Iran where the victims were certainly 'non white'. I've looked for your comments on that issue but no luck so far.

Again as yesterday you or anyone can not dictate how and when people post on a subject..

That's the mods job and even they dont go about trying to stifle or deflect others posts based upon what you are trying to do..

Weird way to debate. Didn't see your post on this subject so what you say doesn't count.

Not all of us spend every waking hour on fabs politics forum.

I was responding to Tall..

Apologies, my response was aimed at his response also. "

No worries..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

I am guessing it could be the speed at which certain networks decided to show certain videos…

For example, from the video in the coffee shop across the road.. you notice a woman with a pink jumper recording what happened…

Now.. I was watching the local NBC affiliate, WCCO Minneapolis, coverage…. They showed the pink jumper woman’s mobile phone video ( which is the one where you see the entire incident) … CNN didn’t start showing the same video for a good 4-5 hours later

Maybe it took them a lot longer to verify and get permission to show it… but I can imagine that can help stoke a narrative

DHS were very quick to put out a version to try and set a tone and justify.. but it fulls apart with every different video that comes out

Trying to smear someone as a domestic terrorist might work if you are an immigrant… much harder is the person you are trying to smear is an ICU nurse for the VA

Bovino should go, Noem should go, Miller should go just for the smear alone!

I have seen a new angle that appears to show the agent who took the gun from Alex Pretti, discharge it, I assume by accident. A second agent who had drawn his weapon on seeing Pretti had a gun shoots him when the first agent fired Pretti's gun.

What an awful outcome, so many things could have been avoided. "

On current evidence this seems the most likely explanation. Badly trained officers under pressure reacting to a gunshot.

There needs to be de-escalation on both sides here. ICE need to be reigned in and told to withdraw from certain situations, and Democratic politicians and NGOs need to stop encouraging and funding protesters to confront armed officers doing their job. I don't have much hope either will happen.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

I am guessing it could be the speed at which certain networks decided to show certain videos…

For example, from the video in the coffee shop across the road.. you notice a woman with a pink jumper recording what happened…

Now.. I was watching the local NBC affiliate, WCCO Minneapolis, coverage…. They showed the pink jumper woman’s mobile phone video ( which is the one where you see the entire incident) … CNN didn’t start showing the same video for a good 4-5 hours later

Maybe it took them a lot longer to verify and get permission to show it… but I can imagine that can help stoke a narrative

DHS were very quick to put out a version to try and set a tone and justify.. but it fulls apart with every different video that comes out

Trying to smear someone as a domestic terrorist might work if you are an immigrant… much harder is the person you are trying to smear is an ICU nurse for the VA

Bovino should go, Noem should go, Miller should go just for the smear alone!

I have seen a new angle that appears to show the agent who took the gun from Alex Pretti, discharge it, I assume by accident. A second agent who had drawn his weapon on seeing Pretti had a gun shoots him when the first agent fired Pretti's gun.

What an awful outcome, so many things could have been avoided.

On current evidence this seems the most likely explanation. Badly trained officers under pressure reacting to a gunshot.

There needs to be de-escalation on both sides here. ICE need to be reigned in and told to withdraw from certain situations, and Democratic politicians and NGOs need to stop encouraging and funding protesters to confront armed officers doing their job. I don't have much hope either will happen."

There is no middle ground, both sides are focused only on their outcomes. The sad part is it is a politically led and the people at the top of the pile will be milking another death for all its worth, that is both sides.

I'm not sure why people would turn up with guns to a protest that is more likely than not to end in physical clashes with agents that are not the brightest! I know it is their right, but it is also their right to not carry in that situation. In fact, I think it could be a great move to decalre they are not carrying

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hrill CollinsMan 14 weeks ago

The Outer Rim

it seems the agent who murdered renee good has now been paid a 1million dollar bounty for his handy work, the bulk of which has been awarded to him by billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

I am guessing it could be the speed at which certain networks decided to show certain videos…

For example, from the video in the coffee shop across the road.. you notice a woman with a pink jumper recording what happened…

Now.. I was watching the local NBC affiliate, WCCO Minneapolis, coverage…. They showed the pink jumper woman’s mobile phone video ( which is the one where you see the entire incident) … CNN didn’t start showing the same video for a good 4-5 hours later

Maybe it took them a lot longer to verify and get permission to show it… but I can imagine that can help stoke a narrative

DHS were very quick to put out a version to try and set a tone and justify.. but it fulls apart with every different video that comes out

Trying to smear someone as a domestic terrorist might work if you are an immigrant… much harder is the person you are trying to smear is an ICU nurse for the VA

Bovino should go, Noem should go, Miller should go just for the smear alone!

I have seen a new angle that appears to show the agent who took the gun from Alex Pretti, discharge it, I assume by accident. A second agent who had drawn his weapon on seeing Pretti had a gun shoots him when the first agent fired Pretti's gun.

What an awful outcome, so many things could have been avoided.

On current evidence this seems the most likely explanation. Badly trained officers under pressure reacting to a gunshot.

There needs to be de-escalation on both sides here. ICE need to be reigned in and told to withdraw from certain situations, and Democratic politicians and NGOs need to stop encouraging and funding protesters to confront armed officers doing their job. I don't have much hope either will happen.

There is no middle ground, both sides are focused only on their outcomes. The sad part is it is a politically led and the people at the top of the pile will be milking another death for all its worth, that is both sides.

I'm not sure why people would turn up with guns to a protest that is more likely than not to end in physical clashes with agents that are not the brightest! I know it is their right, but it is also their right to not carry in that situation. In fact, I think it could be a great move to decalre they are not carrying"

Its in their constitution..

And when its a nutter killing kids the outcry for greater gun control by anyone is drowned out by that fact from the NFA and overwhelmingly those on the right of the politics..

Trying to mandate that in a permit free carrying State by anyone isn't going to go well..

Also dictating how citizens can lawfully and peaceful protest ditto, just because they're 'liberals'..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

I wondered how long it would take for tall stories to come out and either play defence or try to Jedi mind trick by deflecting or derailing the conversation…

Don’t…fall….for…..it!!!

So… morning after the night before.. where do I start?

Trump and ICE/DHS are trampling over the 1st amendment, the 2nd amendment, the 4th amendment, The 6th Amendment… and I think I could go on

I think we can now say with 100% confidence the statement put out by DHS, and the pressers by bovino and noem were pure fabrication

A couple of interesting things… the DHS said they could not ID the victim as he had none on him… literally 10 minutes later the states press conference said they had! How could this be?

Minnesota is a CCP state (conceal carry with a permit) .. so that blows the why did he have a gun distraction.. he was legally allowed to do so!

So… how was he Identified so quickly by the Minnesota police…. He had his concealed carry permit with him, which he is legally required to do!

The other thing In both Bovino and Noem press conferences is the were both asked the question “did he ever brandish the gun?”

Both refused to answer the question (probably I think the only thing saving them both from some sort of corporate charge)

The Feds are not cooperating with the state on the crime scene investigation… state investigators were turned away… came back 15 minutes later with a search warrant from a local judge… Feds still refuse to let them into the crime scene!

It is all as innocent as it seems… why block everyone out?

Also.. it looks the DOJ sent a letter to the governor yesterday saying they ICE would pull out of Minnesota if 3 demands were met

1) state police will cooperate with federal agents

2) all states sanctuary laws are revoked

3) the voter rolls for the state must be turned over to the Trump administration

Why do they want the election voter rolls?

We know he never brandished the gun, we know it was taken by an agent just before the shooting started

I wonder if DHS gives up the names of the agents or they try and claim federal immunity

There is a hell of either a criminal or civil case coming against the government…

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *avagliamMan 14 weeks ago

London


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

The videos were there that showed the lies being put out by the administration are simply that..

A deliberate malicious attempt to smear a person lawfully protesting who only had a phone in his hand, not his handgun which many are legally allowed to carry..

The rest was out there, not all as theres more this morning but enough to show he didnt act as Trump etc described..

Execution simple as and there has to someone accountable because at some point there will be a response..

Or is that what some in power actually want or see as the next step..

Civil War / Greenland / whatever detracts from Epstein"

^^^^^^

^^^^^^

Bunch of (powerful) pedophiles

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

It not help the situation if local law enforcement carried out the actions again illegal migrants, but many Democratic States and Cities do not allow that."

Here is the thing, that is not quite true …. They actually do help!

Where they have already been arrested and/or jailed/or about to be released from jail the state do cooperate with the federal authorities (how do you think DHS and ICE pad their figures for removals!)

What local police don’t help ICE with are the random raids and for people with no criminal records

If you are going through the immigration process, you are NOT illegal

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan 14 weeks ago

nearby

One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"I have now seen several angles of this tragedy and I honestly cant see how it ended in gun fire.

I was also initially unaware that there was more than 1 person ICE was dealing with in the melee that unfolded. I'm curious to know how people in this thread came to their conclusions so quickly? Is little evidence enough to hang your flag to the pole, and do you believe what "you" see is enough to come to a decision so quickly?

I am guessing it could be the speed at which certain networks decided to show certain videos…

For example, from the video in the coffee shop across the road.. you notice a woman with a pink jumper recording what happened…

Now.. I was watching the local NBC affiliate, WCCO Minneapolis, coverage…. They showed the pink jumper woman’s mobile phone video ( which is the one where you see the entire incident) … CNN didn’t start showing the same video for a good 4-5 hours later

Maybe it took them a lot longer to verify and get permission to show it… but I can imagine that can help stoke a narrative

DHS were very quick to put out a version to try and set a tone and justify.. but it fulls apart with every different video that comes out

Trying to smear someone as a domestic terrorist might work if you are an immigrant… much harder is the person you are trying to smear is an ICU nurse for the VA

Bovino should go, Noem should go, Miller should go just for the smear alone!

I have seen a new angle that appears to show the agent who took the gun from Alex Pretti, discharge it, I assume by accident. A second agent who had drawn his weapon on seeing Pretti had a gun shoots him when the first agent fired Pretti's gun.

What an awful outcome, so many things could have been avoided.

On current evidence this seems the most likely explanation. Badly trained officers under pressure reacting to a gunshot.

There needs to be de-escalation on both sides here. ICE need to be reigned in and told to withdraw from certain situations, and Democratic politicians and NGOs need to stop encouraging and funding protesters to confront armed officers doing their job. I don't have much hope either will happen.

There is no middle ground, both sides are focused only on their outcomes. The sad part is it is a politically led and the people at the top of the pile will be milking another death for all its worth, that is both sides.

I'm not sure why people would turn up with guns to a protest that is more likely than not to end in physical clashes with agents that are not the brightest! I know it is their right, but it is also their right to not carry in that situation. In fact, I think it could be a great move to decalre they are not carrying"

Very well said. Trump and Governor Waltz (who's having to stand down because he's heavily implicated in massive fraud) are both encouraging 'their' side from a safe distance with little regard for safety of either the protesters or ICE agents.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

[Removed by poster at 25/01/26 11:40:33]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this. "

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hrill CollinsMan 14 weeks ago

The Outer Rim

and yet the rightwings posterboy Kyle Ritenhouse was fine turning up to a protest with ar-15 semi-automatic assault rifle 🤷

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"and yet the rightwings posterboy Kyle Ritenhouse was fine turning up to a protest with ar-15 semi-automatic assault rifle 🤷"

I wouldn't be surprised, if same the same people accusing, Alex Pretti of escalating the situation by carrying a gun in his holster. Were on the opposite side of the fence when it came armed Capitol hill protesters marching on the Capitol building.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷"

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point! "

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction! "

You are apparently a last word merchant. Even when it adds nothing.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS 14 weeks ago

Bristol


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction! "

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 14 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction! "

I have a friend in Texas who puts her gun in her handbag in the same way I put my phone in mine. 🤷‍♀️

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions? "

No, and No.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

If you want an idea as to why people on the right and the left have different views on what happened here… for example, these were the times the “lady in the pink jumper” mobile phone footage was shown

The shooting happened at 10.05 et

Online the footage via drop site news, had been 1pm et

NBC News, via their Minnesota affiliate, showed the footage at 2pm et

CNN first showed the footage at 7pm et

Fox News first showed the footage at 10.30et

So now you can see why the original narrative pushed and how it was debunked are so wildly different

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No."

So if you say the answer is no.. and no… just exactly are you trying to say

Because he had it legally.. and he never brandished it

If you are driving with a CCP for example , you don’t leave the gun in the car!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷"

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

Murder is a legal term that certainly hasn't been established in this case, nor with Renee Good. The OP correctly refers to 'killing'.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No."

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No.

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'.."

I've answered as clearly as possible. If you want to project opinions onto me which I don't hold, that's not something I can control.🤷

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No.

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'..

I've answered as clearly as possible. If you want to project opinions onto me which I don't hold, that's not something I can control.🤷"

Its how you are coming across and whilst you are trying to 'cleverly phrase things' it is pretty bloody obvious to see, as several posters have done..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

I’m surprised no one here has pointed out the point of the 2nd amendment yet which was to defend their country from govt over reach.

Civil war in America is coming, destabilisation by foreign powers has cooked the US. We’re slowly following.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No.

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'..

I've answered as clearly as possible. If you want to project opinions onto me which I don't hold, that's not something I can control.🤷

Its how you are coming across and whilst you are trying to 'cleverly phrase things' it is pretty bloody obvious to see, as several posters have done..

"

Well Fabio has called me a village idiot now you're calling me 'clever', I guess that's balanced at least! 🤣🤣

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *wosmilersCouple 14 weeks ago

Heathrowish


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No.

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'..

I've answered as clearly as possible. If you want to project opinions onto me which I don't hold, that's not something I can control.🤷

Its how you are coming across and whilst you are trying to 'cleverly phrase things' it is pretty bloody obvious to see, as several posters have done..

Well Fabio has called me a village idiot now you're calling me 'clever', I guess that's balanced at least! 🤣🤣"

Better balanced, than unbalanced

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No.

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'..

I've answered as clearly as possible. If you want to project opinions onto me which I don't hold, that's not something I can control.🤷

Its how you are coming across and whilst you are trying to 'cleverly phrase things' it is pretty bloody obvious to see, as several posters have done..

Well Fabio has called me a village idiot now you're calling me 'clever', I guess that's balanced at least! 🤣🤣"

Actually far too clever by half to the point where you are an idiot….

I think you troll for your own shits and giggles….

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 14 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

[Removed by poster at 25/01/26 16:45:36]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking it’s fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

1) the “gun control” bird flew the moment that the Republicans couldn’t even agree to modest reform after 20 5 year olds were killed at sandy hook

2) again, he did nothing illegal! So don’t put it on him! He had a permit for it! He never brandished his weapon at any point!

As has been said, the legal right to bear arms is not an instruction!

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make...

Are you saying that because he had a gun on him, getting shot and killed was deserved or expected?

Are you blaming his death on his actions?

No, and No.

Are you sure?

Because what you've said sounds very much like you are despite all the available evidence that his carrying had nothing to do with him being shot multiple times?

Very similar to someone saying 'well she was dr#nk or she was wearing a short skirt'..

I've answered as clearly as possible. If you want to project opinions onto me which I don't hold, that's not something I can control.🤷

Its how you are coming across and whilst you are trying to 'cleverly phrase things' it is pretty bloody obvious to see, as several posters have done..

Well Fabio has called me a village idiot now you're calling me 'clever', I guess that's balanced at least! 🤣🤣"

I'm not, if you think that's the case then he has a point

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

"

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 14 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control. "

I get what you mean but these are supposed to be government agent's trained and be able to keep a cool head and react in a professional manner.

What we are seeing is a rabble acting like a bunch of thug's.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

BBC website has 6 stories on this one tragic death and none on 50,000 killed in Iran.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

I get what you mean but these are supposed to be government agent's trained and be able to keep a cool head and react in a professional manner.

What we are seeing is a rabble acting like a bunch of thug's. "

I agree, the ICE agents are not in control.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control. "

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma

[Removed by poster at 25/01/26 18:42:55]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide.."

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control. "

It would not be “1st degree murder” as you are right, that would require intent..

However you could absolutely argue it would be “2nd degree murder” or the UK equivalent of manslaughter against all the agents who shot into him… government are going to argue federal immunity.. doesn’t mean the state themselves couldn’t make the charge under state law

You could also argue a corporate “2nd degree murder” charge against the us government (DHS/ICE) for unlawful killing .. a civil case the payout would be huge if the government was found liable

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

It would not be “1st degree murder” as you are right, that would require intent..

However you could absolutely argue it would be “2nd degree murder” or the UK equivalent of manslaughter against all the agents who shot into him… government are going to argue federal immunity.. doesn’t mean the state themselves couldn’t make the charge under state law

You could also argue a corporate “2nd degree murder” charge against the us government (DHS/ICE) for unlawful killing .. a civil case the payout would be huge if the government was found liable "

The US technicalities are vast, but if I look at this from what I know here in the UK this would as you say be manslaughter, in my opinion.

Some will think murder / manslaughter is semantics but it is important to acknowledge intent as you mentioned. The prosecution of wrong doing must be in line with the crime, and manslaughter can be an accident.

What appears to be missing is a levelheaded view and an authority that can hold both sides of this ongoing issue accountable, does this exists in US law?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS 14 weeks ago

Bristol

I could understand manslaughter if only one or two bullets were fired...

Continuing to shoot a man on the ground who is already lifeless...

Even if the first shots were fired in panick (over what I don't know as the man posed little to no threat before the first shot was fired)

The subsequent 8/9 shots can certainly be described as with intent to kill

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action. "

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"I could understand manslaughter if only one or two bullets were fired...

Continuing to shoot a man on the ground who is already lifeless...

Even if the first shots were fired in panick (over what I don't know as the man posed little to no threat before the first shot was fired)

The subsequent 8/9 shots can certainly be described as with intent to kill "

The trouble is that for a murder/murder 1 charge to stick you are going to need to argue some sort of premeditation .. that’s going to be awfully difficult

You would have a much stronger case for manslaughter/murder 2.. where you could absolutely argue their actions killed him either recklessly or accidentally

The case against a government corporate charge would be interesting as you can argue that it’s the guidelines or failure to adhere to them that caused the incident… unlawful killing… it would be interesting as you could name bovino, noem, and miller as parties to the case

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

"

Reports are the ICE agent that took the weapon discharged it. I was hoping this was known to you as you have such a strong opinion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I could understand manslaughter if only one or two bullets were fired...

Continuing to shoot a man on the ground who is already lifeless...

Even if the first shots were fired in panick (over what I don't know as the man posed little to no threat before the first shot was fired)

The subsequent 8/9 shots can certainly be described as with intent to kill "

The first shot and any subsequent were reactive, not premeditated.

The amount of shots fired and the discipline is in question. The response is hard to understand in any perspective being UK based in my opinion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS 14 weeks ago

Bristol


"I could understand manslaughter if only one or two bullets were fired...

Continuing to shoot a man on the ground who is already lifeless...

Even if the first shots were fired in panick (over what I don't know as the man posed little to no threat before the first shot was fired)

The subsequent 8/9 shots can certainly be described as with intent to kill

The first shot and any subsequent were reactive, not premeditated.

The amount of shots fired and the discipline is in question. The response is hard to understand in any perspective being UK based in my opinion. "

Not saying they were premeditated...

But shooting a mans lifeless body several more times after already firing 4/5 shots in to him definitely passed the point of being reactive and a choice was made to continue shooting him

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I could understand manslaughter if only one or two bullets were fired...

Continuing to shoot a man on the ground who is already lifeless...

Even if the first shots were fired in panick (over what I don't know as the man posed little to no threat before the first shot was fired)

The subsequent 8/9 shots can certainly be described as with intent to kill

The first shot and any subsequent were reactive, not premeditated.

The amount of shots fired and the discipline is in question. The response is hard to understand in any perspective being UK based in my opinion.

Not saying they were premeditated...

But shooting a mans lifeless body several more times after already firing 4/5 shots in to him definitely passed the point of being reactive and a choice was made to continue shooting him"

They are not trained well is my observation, but again in hindsight. I'm not sure if it was 1 agent or multiple that fired, that detail needs to be established.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

Reports are the ICE agent that took the weapon discharged it. I was hoping this was known to you as you have such a strong opinion."

I dont 'know it' as the videos do not show it..

The CNN compilation plus NyT and others do not show it but they do show the agents draw their own side arms and aim them and then shoot..

None of the videos show a weapon similar to the one he was carrying being held or used..

The one thing you do not do if you believe you or your colleagues are at risk is to think of using a weapon that isn't yours especially as you have your own on your belt..

The one you know is loaded and is in safe mode, the one with the mag on you loaded and you know works..

Not something you dont have a clue about its status..

What reports have you seen?

The claims from the administration are clearly false..

There are sworn avidavits BTW that say what all the videos show..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire

Oh and Notme, its after one of the agents shouts 'gun gun' that the first shot is fired, some eight seconds after the words..

Then the second agent opens fire..

As they all move away one continues firing, five further shots into the victim who wasn't moving at this point..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma

[Removed by poster at 25/01/26 21:43:54]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

Reports are the ICE agent that took the weapon discharged it. I was hoping this was known to you as you have such a strong opinion.

I dont 'know it' as the videos do not show it..

The CNN compilation plus NyT and others do not show it but they do show the agents draw their own side arms and aim them and then shoot..

None of the videos show a weapon similar to the one he was carrying being held or used..

The one thing you do not do if you believe you or your colleagues are at risk is to think of using a weapon that isn't yours especially as you have your own on your belt..

The one you know is loaded and is in safe mode, the one with the mag on you loaded and you know works..

Not something you dont have a clue about its status..

What reports have you seen?

The claims from the administration are clearly false..

There are sworn avidavits BTW that say what all the videos show..

"

The gun went off as the agent took it, not an agent using it to shoot to kill.

What this highlights is different levels of understanding, I could be correct in my summary, I could be wrong however I'm not blinkered to that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

Reports are the ICE agent that took the weapon discharged it. I was hoping this was known to you as you have such a strong opinion.

I dont 'know it' as the videos do not show it..

The CNN compilation plus NyT and others do not show it but they do show the agents draw their own side arms and aim them and then shoot..

None of the videos show a weapon similar to the one he was carrying being held or used..

The one thing you do not do if you believe you or your colleagues are at risk is to think of using a weapon that isn't yours especially as you have your own on your belt..

The one you know is loaded and is in safe mode, the one with the mag on you loaded and you know works..

Not something you dont have a clue about its status..

What reports have you seen?

The claims from the administration are clearly false..

There are sworn avidavits BTW that say what all the videos show..

The gun went off as the agent took it, not an agent using it to shoot to kill.

What this highlights is different levels of understanding, I could be correct in my summary, I could be wrong however I'm not blinkered to that."

Again what is your source, if that is the case where is it shown ..?

I said to the 'boss' it could be they're so poorly trained that when they took it from him one of them (like an amateur) picked it up and a negligent discharge occurred which in that situation is beyond stupid and that set them off..

Im open to anything that sheds a different light, with respect fella nothing I've found on everything I've looked on tells me different to what I've said so far..

Interestingly neither has the administration because you and i both know it wouldbe all over the channels by now..

(bovino) from ICE has now said an investigation is needed which is a change in tone and sickly ironic when DHS stopped local law enforcement from carrying out their own or a joint one..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otMe66Man 14 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

Reports are the ICE agent that took the weapon discharged it. I was hoping this was known to you as you have such a strong opinion.

I dont 'know it' as the videos do not show it..

The CNN compilation plus NyT and others do not show it but they do show the agents draw their own side arms and aim them and then shoot..

None of the videos show a weapon similar to the one he was carrying being held or used..

The one thing you do not do if you believe you or your colleagues are at risk is to think of using a weapon that isn't yours especially as you have your own on your belt..

The one you know is loaded and is in safe mode, the one with the mag on you loaded and you know works..

Not something you dont have a clue about its status..

What reports have you seen?

The claims from the administration are clearly false..

There are sworn avidavits BTW that say what all the videos show..

The gun went off as the agent took it, not an agent using it to shoot to kill.

What this highlights is different levels of understanding, I could be correct in my summary, I could be wrong however I'm not blinkered to that.

Again what is your source, if that is the case where is it shown ..?

I said to the 'boss' it could be they're so poorly trained that when they took it from him one of them (like an amateur) picked it up and a negligent discharge occurred which in that situation is beyond stupid and that set them off..

Im open to anything that sheds a different light, with respect fella nothing I've found on everything I've looked on tells me different to what I've said so far..

Interestingly neither has the administration because you and i both know it wouldbe all over the channels by now..

(bovino) from ICE has now said an investigation is needed which is a change in tone and sickly ironic when DHS stopped local law enforcement from carrying out their own or a joint one.."

Let's see how this actually plays out, I have been more than open that what I know maybe wrong, but more importantly I'm not pinning everything on what I don't know.

Once the evidence comes to light, let's pick up again.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"One more murder by firearm (15,000+ last year)

Two by ICE

Assassination attempts on Trump

100,000 tonnes USA munitions dropped on Gaza

Every TV cop show involves either a firearm or a murder.

An estimated 400,000,000 firearms in USA

Largest defence budget on the globe by some margin

This latest incident should be of no surprise

Only USA can resolve this.

Very important context. It's surprising to hear people who rightly call for more gun control thinking its fine to rock up to a peaceful protest with a powerful weapon! 🤷

Its totally fine..

In this murder the guys firearm played absolutely no part in how he was challenged by ICE..

Maced by them as he tried to help a woman already assaulted by ICE and when he was wrestled and beaten by them before the single shot which couldn't have physically been him as the weapon was removed from him by ICE..

And it played no part in someone from ICE firing multiple shots into him for no reason that he could have given as any sort of legally protected justified use of lethal force..

So whilst you might be 'surprised' that's literally down to you trying to make something out of nothing when several people have already told you what the Law permits in that State..

I think the gun he had on his person did play a tragic part in the events that unfolded, they may not have been instigated by Pretti, but the gun was the catalyst. The removal of the gun and the discharging of that gun resulted in the tragic death of this man, it should not have happened but it did, and I think it is important to understand why and ensure it is not repeated again and again.

I would also question if it was murder as you say, do you really believe the ICE agent set out to kill him? I don't, I don't think anyone involved set out that day with any intention of murder.

What I saw a catastrophic outcome from many moving parts that collided out of control.

Where has it been said it was his own gun that was discharged..

It wasn't by him as his hands were in front of him as the gun was removed by the agent..

The level of violence shown towards the woman he went to help up and then him being maced then wrestled to the floor and beaten as they were on him is as clear an indication as anyone can see that they were out to inflict harm on peaceful protesters who are protected under the laws of the land..

I agree they didnt wake up thinking I know what,today if we mace someone because they dare to use their constitutional rights then when they are on the ground and dare to struggle as one of us hits them even if they dont strike back..

And, if someone else discharges a weapon in the vicinity and we dont even know where the actual threat is..

Or whose weapon or who fired it then hell yeah it'll be a good response to fire multiple shots into the person still on the ground who doesn't have a weapon..

You can say a car backfiring might be a catalyst or something dropped from height and tbh the decision that was taken as yet from what is known by two Ice agents is unjustified..

There's a difference and anyone with any experience of carrying weapons will tell you about being in a position with rounds coming in your direction and a situation such as this..

He didnt have his legally owned and permitted to carry weapon on his person, he wasn't reaching for it or trying to take an agents weapon all or either of which would have justified the use of potentially lethal force in response..

Someone meant to be highly trained lost it and an innocent man is dead, three in his back according to the doctor who tried to render aid..

That to me is murder, it might not be premeditated but it reaches the threshold of a homicide..

If no gun was found, there would have been no intervention with the gun and the discharging of the gun would not have happened. However this is presented the gun on Pretti began a series of events that sadly led to his death.

The ICE agents appear poorly trained from my perception, but there is a caveat. Our law enforcement doesn't as a rule, need to deal with people in charged protest situations carrying firearms. I'm not sure how our enforcement agents would cope under the same pressures, my gut feeling is not well and probably no different.

The US has as you say provides rights to carry in some state, and with it comes a hell of a lot of responsibility, and we should be able to acknowledge that although something is legal it isn't always the best course of action.

I asked you at the start of my previous reply to you where has it said thst it was his gun that was fired and by whom?

You've repeated it again here so again if I may ask you?

There are several eye witnesses that do not say the same and some print media are saying the agents drew and fired their weapons..

I dont think in law it absolves them, the agents who shot him of their culpability..

Reports are the ICE agent that took the weapon discharged it. I was hoping this was known to you as you have such a strong opinion.

I dont 'know it' as the videos do not show it..

The CNN compilation plus NyT and others do not show it but they do show the agents draw their own side arms and aim them and then shoot..

None of the videos show a weapon similar to the one he was carrying being held or used..

The one thing you do not do if you believe you or your colleagues are at risk is to think of using a weapon that isn't yours especially as you have your own on your belt..

The one you know is loaded and is in safe mode, the one with the mag on you loaded and you know works..

Not something you dont have a clue about its status..

What reports have you seen?

The claims from the administration are clearly false..

There are sworn avidavits BTW that say what all the videos show..

The gun went off as the agent took it, not an agent using it to shoot to kill.

What this highlights is different levels of understanding, I could be correct in my summary, I could be wrong however I'm not blinkered to that.

Again what is your source, if that is the case where is it shown ..?

I said to the 'boss' it could be they're so poorly trained that when they took it from him one of them (like an amateur) picked it up and a negligent discharge occurred which in that situation is beyond stupid and that set them off..

Im open to anything that sheds a different light, with respect fella nothing I've found on everything I've looked on tells me different to what I've said so far..

Interestingly neither has the administration because you and i both know it wouldbe all over the channels by now..

(bovino) from ICE has now said an investigation is needed which is a change in tone and sickly ironic when DHS stopped local law enforcement from carrying out their own or a joint one..

Let's see how this actually plays out, I have been more than open that what I know maybe wrong, but more importantly I'm not pinning everything on what I don't know.

Once the evidence comes to light, let's pick up again."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

Is it a coincidence that both these awful killings have happened in Minnesota? This is a State where colossal levels of fraud mostly linked to the Somalian community have been discovered/are under investigation. Local Democratic politicians have alleged personal and financial links to the fraud and Governor Walz unexpectedly announced he would not run again for office after new examples were revealed. Clearly there is a strong motivation to keep any form of Federal agency away from the State, and to encourage dangerously confrontational tactics and a hostile environment by protesters as a means to do so.

None of that excuses the actions of ICE agents in the two killings but it does raise very serious questions about the responsibilities of local politicians in escalating rather than defusing a dangerous atmosphere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

(bovino) from ICE has now said an investigation is needed which is a change in tone and sickly ironic when DHS stopped local law enforcement from carrying out their own or a joint one.."

Oh it’s even worse than that…..

Under normal circumstances any police shooting would be a cooperative activity between the local state police and the Feds (FBI)

In the case of Renee Good… the FBI which would be the lead agency, refused to work with the local police

In this case, again this time the FBI refused to work with the local police In.. this time the state were prepared and went to a court judge asking them for a search warrant so they could be part of the investigation… they succeeded!

Local police went back to the FBI with mandated search warrant…. FBI still refused to work with them

In the end the state went back to federal court and got an injunction against the FBI ordering they could not tamper with, remove or destroy any evidence

Any back to who would normally be the lead agency investigating.. The FBI, well they have actually turned over lead duties for the investigation to….. DHS

Basically DHS are in effect investigating themselves…. Hmm.. sound fishy????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Is it a coincidence that both these awful killings have happened in Minnesota? This is a State where colossal levels of fraud mostly linked to the Somalian community have been discovered/are under investigation. Local Democratic politicians have alleged personal and financial links to the fraud and Governor Walz unexpectedly announced he would not run again for office after new examples were revealed. Clearly there is a strong motivation to keep any form of Federal agency away from the State, and to encourage dangerously confrontational tactics and a hostile environment by protesters as a means to do so.

None of that excuses the actions of ICE agents in the two killings but it does raise very serious questions about the responsibilities of local politicians in escalating rather than defusing a dangerous atmosphere."

Complete red herring!

If fraud was really the excuse…. Would you actually not send in accountants! Or the DA financial crime department

DOJ kinda gave the game away last night

They said they would remove ICE agents from Minnesota if 3 conditions were met

1) state had to supply all Medicaid and child benefit programs such as SNAP

2) state had to revoke all sanctuary laws

3) state had to hand over all election voter rolls data to the Trump administration

Why would they want those? They are setting up the fraud excuse for the midterms

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 14 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"

(bovino) from ICE has now said an investigation is needed which is a change in tone and sickly ironic when DHS stopped local law enforcement from carrying out their own or a joint one..

Oh it’s even worse than that…..

Under normal circumstances any police shooting would be a cooperative activity between the local state police and the Feds (FBI)

In the case of Renee Good… the FBI which would be the lead agency, refused to work with the local police

In this case, again this time the FBI refused to work with the local police In.. this time the state were prepared and went to a court judge asking them for a search warrant so they could be part of the investigation… they succeeded!

Local police went back to the FBI with mandated search warrant…. FBI still refused to work with them

In the end the state went back to federal court and got an injunction against the FBI ordering they could not tamper with, remove or destroy any evidence

Any back to who would normally be the lead agency investigating.. The FBI, well they have actually turned over lead duties for the investigation to….. DHS

Basically DHS are in effect investigating themselves…. Hmm.. sound fishy????"

No, not fishy ..

Predictable tbh..

His new heads, FBI, Justice, DHS etc are all there to do what he says..

Troubling yes..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

I think the most damming part is that Feds/DHS say they have his mobile phone.. but notice that his mobile footage has not been released…

If it supported the government “story” then I am sure that would have been “leaked” to friendly media.. like in the Renee good murder.. by now

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *m3232Man 14 weeks ago

maidenhead

He brought it on by himself simple.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

What a sad and inaccurate point of view. He tried to intervene in a woman being manhandled by masked thugs. He was then gassed and assaulted for his troubles before multiple big brave ICE agents wrestled him to the ground. The end is unfortunately now well known. Being shot multiple times in the back by trigger happy cowboys.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *m3232Man 14 weeks ago

maidenhead


"What a sad and inaccurate point of view. He tried to intervene in a woman being manhandled by masked thugs. He was then gassed and assaulted for his troubles before multiple big brave ICE agents wrestled him to the ground. The end is unfortunately now well known. Being shot multiple times in the back by trigger happy cowboys."

This is the problem. They are not masked thugs they are law enforcement officers carrying out their job. Do not interfere with them and there is no problem.

I haven’t got shot recently lol but I do abide by the law.

We need to same here and remove the invading army.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

For alleged law enforcement officers they appear to be very poorly trained. Legitimate police units do not need to be masked. Also the blocking of investigations into both shootings suggests that their management has something to hide or cover up. The replacement of career, professional heads of DHS, FBI and DOJ by politically appointed, untrained, unprofessional sycophants means that the truth is unlikely ever to be revealed.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 14 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.


"What a sad and inaccurate point of view. He tried to intervene in a woman being manhandled by masked thugs. He was then gassed and assaulted for his troubles before multiple big brave ICE agents wrestled him to the ground. The end is unfortunately now well known. Being shot multiple times in the back by trigger happy cowboys.

This is the problem. They are not masked thugs they are law enforcement officers carrying out their job. Do not interfere with them and there is no problem.

I haven’t got shot recently lol but I do abide by the law.

We need to same here and remove the invading army. "

WOW 😳 what's concerning is you're probably one of many with this opinion.

Sad times.

😞

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"He brought it on by himself simple. "

Sometimes it’s little things that when you look for potential playmates, can be so telling .. red flags so to speak… criteria that we use

Compassion…. Common decency… a heart

And anytime someone wants to do some research into a potential playmate.. they will be able to click on the lovely green arrow.. and this will appear

Callous…. Unsympathetic… such turn ons

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *m3232Man 14 weeks ago

maidenhead


"He brought it on by himself simple.

Sometimes it’s little things that when you look for potential playmates, can be so telling .. red flags so to speak… criteria that we use

Compassion…. Common decency… a heart

And anytime someone wants to do some research into a potential playmate.. they will be able to click on the lovely green arrow.. and this will appear

Callous…. Unsympathetic… such turn ons

"

I have no problem expressing my views which are actually correct.

Anyone currently supporting the illegals are part of the problem with why this world is so messed up.

Those people are happy with criminals and the crimes they commit.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"He brought it on by himself simple.

Sometimes it’s little things that when you look for potential playmates, can be so telling .. red flags so to speak… criteria that we use

Compassion…. Common decency… a heart

And anytime someone wants to do some research into a potential playmate.. they will be able to click on the lovely green arrow.. and this will appear

Callous…. Unsympathetic… such turn ons

I have no problem expressing my views which are actually correct.

Anyone currently supporting the illegals are part of the problem with why this world is so messed up.

Those people are happy with criminals and the crimes they commit. "

Those people you are defending broke the 1st amendment, the 2nd amendment, the 4th amendment, the 6th Amendment, the 10th Amendment and I can make an argument that they broke the 14th amendment

The moment that gentleman became a Good Samaritan and tried to help the woman shoved to the ground by the ICE agent his fate was sealed…..

He didn’t interfere in an operation.. he legally filmed what was happening from a distance with his mobile phone

Good trouble…

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *m3232Man 14 weeks ago

maidenhead


"He brought it on by himself simple.

Sometimes it’s little things that when you look for potential playmates, can be so telling .. red flags so to speak… criteria that we use

Compassion…. Common decency… a heart

And anytime someone wants to do some research into a potential playmate.. they will be able to click on the lovely green arrow.. and this will appear

Callous…. Unsympathetic… such turn ons

I have no problem expressing my views which are actually correct.

Anyone currently supporting the illegals are part of the problem with why this world is so messed up.

Those people are happy with criminals and the crimes they commit.

Those people you are defending broke the 1st amendment, the 2nd amendment, the 4th amendment, the 6th Amendment, the 10th Amendment and I can make an argument that they broke the 14th amendment

The moment that gentleman became a Good Samaritan and tried to help the woman shoved to the ground by the ICE agent his fate was sealed…..

He didn’t interfere in an operation.. he legally filmed what was happening from a distance with his mobile phone

Good trouble… "

He wasn’t a Good Samaritan he was interfering with a police officer trying to do their duty.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

Shoving a woman out of the way for trying to defend the Constitution. What next - being clubbed for walking too slow, looking at ICE thugs in an unsympathetic way. There is no defence for Gestapo style bullying.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

He wasn’t a Good Samaritan he was interfering with a police officer trying to do their duty. "

So which bit do you object to?

That he had the audacity to film what was going on with his mobile phone!

Or

That he absolutely had the nerve to try and help a woman who had been vigorously shoved to the ground!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

As Forrest Gump said " stupid is as stupid does ".

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *estivalMan 14 weeks ago

borehamwood


"He brought it on by himself simple.

Sometimes it’s little things that when you look for potential playmates, can be so telling .. red flags so to speak… criteria that we use

Compassion…. Common decency… a heart

And anytime someone wants to do some research into a potential playmate.. they will be able to click on the lovely green arrow.. and this will appear

Callous…. Unsympathetic… such turn ons

"

you do realise the majority of people on this site don't go anywhere near the forums don't you? And the people with the same views you hold on the forums are a very small portion of the people who post on here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross


"He brought it on by himself simple.

Sometimes it’s little things that when you look for potential playmates, can be so telling .. red flags so to speak… criteria that we use

Compassion…. Common decency… a heart

And anytime someone wants to do some research into a potential playmate.. they will be able to click on the lovely green arrow.. and this will appear

Callous…. Unsympathetic… such turn ons

you do realise the majority of people on this site don't go anywhere near the forums don't you? And the people with the same views you hold on the forums are a very small portion of the people who post on here"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

Clearly it would be better for all concerned if local police protected ICE agents from harassment and ensured the safety of peaceful protesters. But as I understand it this is not allowed by the Democratic authorities in Sanctuary Cities, so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross

Even though he had " open carry" to obtain and carry a Firearm

.

You Don't Take A Firearm To A Protest.

.

Maybe this will be a lesson to others.

And meanwhile at home... Stella Braverman moves over to REFORM ❤️ 😍 💖

Far better news

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 14 weeks ago

Border of London


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained."

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work."

Can you list the training criteria please

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 14 weeks ago

Border of London


"

.

You Don't Take A Firearm To A Protest.

.

"

The whole purpose of the second amendment is exactly to allow citizens to take a firearm to a protest, to curb government overreach. You may not agree with the wisdom of this, but it's exactly the type of thing that the funding fathers wanted.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 14 weeks ago

Border of London


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work.

Can you list the training criteria please "

Huh?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross


"

.

You Don't Take A Firearm To A Protest.

.

The whole purpose of the second amendment is exactly to allow citizens to take a firearm to a protest, to curb government overreach. You may not agree with the wisdom of this, but it's exactly the type of thing that the funding fathers wanted."

Behave lol - funding fathers,

Perhaps way way way back then but not today

Look where Being foolish ended him.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work.

Can you list the training criteria please

Huh?"

You said... if their not sufficiently trained, im asking what is the training criteria?

I take it you don't know?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"What a sad and inaccurate point of view. He tried to intervene in a woman being manhandled by masked thugs. He was then gassed and assaulted for his troubles before multiple big brave ICE agents wrestled him to the ground. The end is unfortunately now well known. Being shot multiple times in the back by trigger happy cowboys.

This is the problem. They are not masked thugs they are law enforcement officers carrying out their job. Do not interfere with them and there is no problem.

I haven’t got shot recently lol but I do abide by the law.

We need to same here and remove the invading army. "

Of course we do. Just remember when they run out of the non whites and the woke lefties to terrorise.

The next will be trans, LBGT and people looking for sex with this group. People like you and me.

But hey you will be like that Brexit guy complaining afterwards, this is not what I voted for.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work.

Can you list the training criteria please

Huh?

You said... if their not sufficiently trained, im asking what is the training criteria?

I take it you don't know?"

Tall stories said they aren't sufficiently trained. Not the person you are responding to.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Even though he had " open carry" to obtain and carry a Firearm

.

You Don't Take A Firearm To A Protest.

"

A) he didn’t do anything illegal, he never brandished it, he had his permit on him!

B) the NRA and other 2A advocate groups would like a word…….

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work."

I would assume they are not properly trained to deal with the public as protesters/agitators in the way that normal local police are. ICE should be able to go about the work they are trained for without harassment and leave local police to deal with the public, but for political reasons they are not allowed to do so.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

KKK and Proud Boys in masks?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 14 weeks ago

Border of London


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work.

Can you list the training criteria please

Huh?

You said... if their not sufficiently trained, im asking what is the training criteria?

I take it you don't know?"

You will need to go up one post and ask the originator of that term.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"...so ICE have no filter between themselves and the public, and end up dealing with situations for which they're not sufficiently trained.

If they're not sufficiently trained, they should not be doing this very dangerous work.

I would assume they are not properly trained to deal with the public as protesters/agitators in the way that normal local police are. ICE should be able to go about the work they are trained for without harassment and leave local police to deal with the public, but for political reasons they are not allowed to do so. "

Actually… im glad that there were people there recording with mobile phones, as then the administration can’t get away with the smear campaign, and the debunking of the version of events they tried to put out to control the narrative

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross

I wonder how many hear in the UK need to be rounded up and sent back to their country of origin

Many Many more than we imagine

Plus those of whom do not want to follow our British way of life.

There should be a Culling of immigrants in my view before things get out of hand like they are in London

Just my opinion ofcourse although I suspect many others would agree

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

After talking with Trump, Walz has sent State Police in to deal with protesters/activists. If he'd done this from day one things could have been very different.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"After talking with Trump, Walz has sent State Police in to deal with protesters/activists. If he'd done this from day one things could have been very different. "

Actually… again… not quite true…

They have been deployed because the local police have been so overstretched that even though they are all doing mandatory overtime, it’s still not enough because of the amount of incidents

Minneapolis population is 500,000… trump sent 3000 federal agents…

1 agent for every 17 people of the population

Overkill much?????

Anyway the national guard have been sent to places like the wipple building (where the ICE centre is based) and the memorial to Alex pretti to relieve the local people so at least they can at least get some relief…

Also the national guard are wearing fluorescent bibs over the uniform to distinguish themselves from ICE and BPD agents…. And have been handing out food and warm drinks

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge


"I wonder how many hear in the UK need to be rounded up and sent back to their country of origin

Many Many more than we imagine

Plus those of whom do not want to follow our British way of life.

There should be a Culling of immigrants in my view before things get out of hand like they are in London

Just my opinion ofcourse although I suspect many others would agree "

Culling - the reduction of a population by selective slaughter.

Bit extreme even for some surely?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"I wonder how many hear in the UK need to be rounded up and sent back to their country of origin

Many Many more than we imagine

Plus those of whom do not want to follow our British way of life.

There should be a Culling of immigrants in my view before things get out of hand like they are in London

Just my opinion ofcourse although I suspect many others would agree

Culling - the reduction of a population by selective slaughter.

Bit extreme even for some surely?"

I always find it fascinating that people of a certain “ilk” always pick on London….

As someone who lived in east London, multicultural London works just fine…

I think they always pick on London because they know they would not win a single constituency in Greater London…. And they feel so butthurt!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"

Minneapolis population is 500,000… trump sent 3000 federal agents…

1 agent for every 17 people of the population

"

Might want to check your maths on that 🤭

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

Another valuable and insightful comment. Thanks.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"Another valuable and insightful comment. Thanks."

You're welcome

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ellowyellowXMan 14 weeks ago

cardiff

Why was he even there bothering armed agents with his cosplay tactical gear and gun?! Thrown his life away for some foreign criminals who are probably laughing at his death. The level of mental illness in these activists is incredible

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *igblackdomTV/TS 14 weeks ago

West Midlands

[Removed by poster at 27/01/26 11:09:38]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Why was he even there bothering armed agents with his cosplay tactical gear and gun?! Thrown his life away for some foreign criminals who are probably laughing at his death. The level of mental illness in these activists is incredible"

He wasn’t there in tactical gear.. it was minus 30 f in Minnesota and everyone dresses like the Michelin man with 5 layers on!

Anyway…. Love your interpretation.. were you watching a different video?

He was filming from a distance with his mobile phone… not illegal

They approached him!

They violently shoved over the woman and he went to help her…and then an agent pepper sprayed them both!

Minnesota is a conceal carry state.. he had his permit on him!

The only time his gun left his back holster was when the agent removed it before he was shot!

They also lied about The person who they were after … the only thing he actually had were driving tickets!

I feel almost sorry for you that you have been so gaslighted….

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Minneapolis population is 500,000… trump sent 3000 federal agents…

1 agent for every 17 people of the population

Might want to check your maths on that 🤭"

Forgot a zero… point stands… overkill

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ellowyellowXMan 14 weeks ago

cardiff

He got what he deserved, same as that lady in the truck. Back law abiding people in to a corner long enough, making them watch their countries be destroyed and this will be the norm

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"He got what he deserved, same as that lady in the truck. Back law abiding people in to a corner long enough, making them watch their countries be destroyed and this will be the norm"

1) wow………

2) wow………

3) are they really “law abiding” if they are shooting an unarmed man in the back 9 times

4 ) if helping a woman who was shoved over is such a heinous act.. shoot me too!

5) how is a person who only legal misdemeanour on his record were “driving tickets” ruining the country

I mean….. life in prison if you don’t return a library book!!! Amma right????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ellowyellowXMan 14 weeks ago

cardiff

Just my opinion of course, when people get sick of the same BS here from 3rd world trash it will pop of in the UK

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

Will there be enough masks to go round for all flag shagging plastic patriots awaiting their call to purge Britain of the undesirables. And when they have all gone who do you turn on next?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"Will there be enough masks to go round for all flag shagging plastic patriots awaiting their call to purge Britain of the undesirables. And when they have all gone who do you turn on next?"

The Trans, the gays, the disabled, the benefit scroungers. Whoever next the media tycoon tell them is to blame for their problems.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law. "

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?"

It has been claimed several times on this thread that he was legally carrying a gun, but that has not been clarified. Facts are important.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 14 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?"

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant "

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

"

Decide what..?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 14 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

"

If the killing was legal, most certainly but I said what I said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

Decide what..?"

The exact circumstances around the death of Alex Pretti.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

Decide what..?

The exact circumstances around the death of Alex Pretti. "

Ill hold my breath.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 14 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

Decide what..?

The exact circumstances around the death of Alex Pretti.

Ill hold my breath. "

Don't!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *erryspringerMan 14 weeks ago

Glasgow


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

Did they ask for him to show it..? Is the punishment for not carrying his gun permit, death..?

These killings aren't punishments they're designed as detterents and to instill terror. The 'crime' is irrelevant

Perhaps the legal process should decide that ?

"

Well maybe the legal process will decide if he was carrying his gun permit too.

But that didn't stop you speculating about it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law. "

It was….Which is why DHS originally put out that he was a 51 yr old immigrant with No ID to justify the story….only for the Minneapolis police department in their press conference 10 minutes later to say they had confirmed who he was…. Because he had his gun permit on him!!!

But you keep clutching at those straws for excuses and gaslight people

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 14 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

I think even if he only had a mobile phone they would have said it was an gin.

Or his hand looked gun like

Or

He looked at them funny and they felt threatened.

I'm not trying to make light of the situation but rather expose the dumb stupidity of the agents, who are so brave they don't even show their faces

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"I think even if he only had a mobile phone they would have said it was an gin.

Or his hand looked gun like

Or

He looked at them funny and they felt threatened.

I'm not trying to make light of the situation but rather expose the dumb stupidity of the agents, who are so brave they don't even show their faces "

They don't show their faces because they and their families are subject to constant harassment and violence from far left activists.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

It was….Which is why DHS originally put out that he was a 51 yr old immigrant with No ID to justify the story….only for the Minneapolis police department in their press conference 10 minutes later to say they had confirmed who he was…. Because he had his gun permit on him!!!

But you keep clutching at those straws for excuses and gaslight people "

Do you have a link for that? I understood they said he had a permit, not that he was carrying one.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abio OP   Man 14 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

It was….Which is why DHS originally put out that he was a 51 yr old immigrant with No ID to justify the story….only for the Minneapolis police department in their press conference 10 minutes later to say they had confirmed who he was…. Because he had his gun permit on him!!!

But you keep clutching at those straws for excuses and gaslight people

Do you have a link for that? I understood they said he had a permit, not that he was carrying one. "

You always need to carry your permit with you if you are outside with a gun on all occasion.. be that if you are in a car, or just outside

The police department found his permit on him when they were accompanying him in an ambulance on route from the scene to the hospital where he was pronounced dead!

If he didn’t have it with him that would have come out.. and the government would be using that as an excuse! They are not!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago


"To clarify, it hasn't been established if Pretti had his gun permit and ID on him, which is required by law.

It was….Which is why DHS originally put out that he was a 51 yr old immigrant with No ID to justify the story….only for the Minneapolis police department in their press conference 10 minutes later to say they had confirmed who he was…. Because he had his gun permit on him!!!

But you keep clutching at those straws for excuses and gaslight people

Do you have a link for that? I understood they said he had a permit, not that he was carrying one.

You always need to carry your permit with you if you are outside with a gun on all occasion.. be that if you are in a car, or just outside

The police department found his permit on him when they were accompanying him in an ambulance on route from the scene to the hospital where he was pronounced dead!

If he didn’t have it with him that would have come out.. and the government would be using that as an excuse! They are not! "

Again, a link for this claim please as I can't find it anywhere online.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross


"He got what he deserved, same as that lady in the truck. Back law abiding people in to a corner long enough, making them watch their countries be destroyed and this will be the norm

1) wow………

2) wow………

3) are they really “law abiding” if they are shooting an unarmed man in the back 9 times

4 ) if helping a woman who was shoved over is such a heinous act.. shoot me too!

5) how is a person who only legal misdemeanour on his record were “driving tickets” ruining the country

I mean….. life in prison if you don’t return a library book!!! Amma right???? "

In your item 3, you state he was an unarmed man, again utter nonsense, he had one handgun fully on display and holstered, which was removed from him

If he carries one gun, how did they know that he never had another which could have been hidden anyplace on his body or in his clothing?

ICE were tackling him and he was obviously fighting back or it wouldn't have taken so many to ground him.

Thankfully they removed one gun from him, but they had no idea if he had another, so ICE took precautions to save their men and all the public around them.

How can you criticise these men who were clearly looking after the surrounding public.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

Reports from Pretti's family that he never carried his gun and they'd been worried about his behaviour since joining activist groups.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ayKellyMan 14 weeks ago

Kinross


"Reports from Pretti's family that he never carried his gun and they'd been worried about his behaviour since joining activist groups.

"

If he plays with fire........

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 14 weeks ago

Very interesting to see the huge numbers of deportations under Obama and other Presidents, all without any significant protests.

Yet as soon as Trump is elected a very well organised and funded activist campaign begins and operates all over the US, massively increasing the conflict level with agents.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By *e-OptimistMan 14 weeks ago

Stalybridge

Where is my tin foil hat?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.6406

0