FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > If we had stayed

If we had stayed

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville

With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oyce69Man  over a year ago

Driffield


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

Camerons reforms were worthless, and both sides lied through their back teeth, and yes, I would still vote out.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

what reforms? There weren't any. And we would vote to leave even more so now and I'm sure if another vote was held tomorrow even more would vote to leave

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

Look how the country voted by areas. London did great in the eu at the expense of areas like the northeast england. Yep we got eu funding for things but it is still crap, so i voted out as it?s worth the risk

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

Your pre-amble was totally flawed, incorrect on every statement and showed a huge bias towards 'Remain'. However that is your right but forgive me if I disagree with the picture you just painted.

Cameron was an utter disgrace both in the EU 'Reforms' (which made him look like Oliver Twist) and in the Referendum debate (which made him look desperate). And I say that as a lifelong Tory.

I watched Boris at Wembley and I saw the crowd's reaction. The man put into clear words people's fears and anxieties about the EU and more importantly their aspirations for something better. So regardless of the trivia that Cameron brought back yes we would have still had Boris.

And finally YES I would still vote Leave. And if there was a referendum today I would vote Leave again....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

Your pre-amble was totally flawed, incorrect on every statement and showed a huge bias towards 'Remain'. However that is your right but forgive me if I disagree with the picture you just painted.

Cameron was an utter disgrace both in the EU 'Reforms' (which made him look like Oliver Twist) and in the Referendum debate (which made him look desperate). And I say that as a lifelong Tory.

I watched Boris at Wembley and I saw the crowd's reaction. The man put into clear words people's fears and anxieties about the EU and more importantly their aspirations for something better. So regardless of the trivia that Cameron brought back yes we would have still had Boris.

And finally YES I would still vote Leave. And if there was a referendum today I would vote Leave again...."

Playing on people fears and anxieties is what got Boris and Farage so many votes. It's similar to Trump. No policies yet contempt, lies and media blunders.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

Your pre-amble was totally flawed, incorrect on every statement and showed a huge bias towards 'Remain'. However that is your right but forgive me if I disagree with the picture you just painted.

Cameron was an utter disgrace both in the EU 'Reforms' (which made him look like Oliver Twist) and in the Referendum debate (which made him look desperate). And I say that as a lifelong Tory.

I watched Boris at Wembley and I saw the crowd's reaction. The man put into clear words people's fears and anxieties about the EU and more importantly their aspirations for something better. So regardless of the trivia that Cameron brought back yes we would have still had Boris.

And finally YES I would still vote Leave. And if there was a referendum today I would vote Leave again....

Playing on people fears and anxieties is what got Boris and Farage so many votes. It's similar to Trump. No policies yet contempt, lies and media blunders. "

Playing on people fears and anxieties is what got Cameron and Osborne so few votes. It's similar to Trump. No policies yet contempt, lies and media blunders.

Your statement can so easily be changed to reflect the truth I couldn't resist. You confuse a Binary question Referendum where we were asked 'remain' or 'leave' with a General Election where we vote for parties offering different policies.

So you might understand what was actually said Vote Leave were offering a set of options open to any future Government of any political persuasion that were not open to them within the EU.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"

Playing on people fears and anxieties is what got Cameron and Osborne so few votes. It's similar to Trump. No policies yet contempt, lies and media blunders.

Your statement can so easily be changed to reflect the truth I couldn't resist. You confuse a Binary question Referendum where we were asked 'remain' or 'leave' with a General Election where we vote for parties offering different policies.

So you might understand what was actually said Vote Leave were offering a set of options open to any future Government of any political persuasion that were not open to them within the EU."

Once reform is made, who is to say what other ratifications would have been made by any other party (or country), further down the line. Vote leave took the referendum from a choice of in or out to party politics. It divided a nation and lied to get what it wanted. Ultimately failing in what it promised to deliver on. So how can you argue that it has given us options when our present options are driven by the same mechanisms that governed us before; those being financial security, tarns-national agreements etc etc etc

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville

It could also be argued that Corbyns efforts didn't reach the electorate, as has been widely reported, people did not know why they actually voted out.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It could also be argued that Corbyns efforts didn't reach the electorate, as has been widely reported, people did not know why they actually voted out. "

Perhaps they put the cross in the wrong box by mistake. 17 million times

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded "

I am deluded then

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tillup4funMan  over a year ago

Wakefield


"

Playing on people fears and anxieties is what got Cameron and Osborne so few votes. It's similar to Trump. No policies yet contempt, lies and media blunders.

Your statement can so easily be changed to reflect the truth I couldn't resist. You confuse a Binary question Referendum where we were asked 'remain' or 'leave' with a General Election where we vote for parties offering different policies.

So you might understand what was actually said Vote Leave were offering a set of options open to any future Government of any political persuasion that were not open to them within the EU.

Once reform is made, who is to say what other ratifications would have been made by any other party (or country), further down the line. Vote leave took the referendum from a choice of in or out to party politics. It divided a nation and lied to get what it wanted. Ultimately failing in what it promised to deliver on. So how can you argue that it has given us options when our present options are driven by the same mechanisms that governed us before; those being financial security, tarns-national agreements etc etc etc "

The referendum was nothing to do with party politics it was about staying or leaving the EU. A democratic vote was taken were every vote counted and we decided as a nation to leave.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *enard ArgenteMan  over a year ago

London and France

Like many: I shall vote " rejoin" at the next referendum.

Though it will probably not be necessary, since it is now increasingly likely that "BREXIT" will never happen.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville

The question is: imagine for a moment if we would have remained. Where would we be....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The question is: imagine for a moment if we would have remained. Where would we be...."

in the shit

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tillup4funMan  over a year ago

Wakefield


"Like many: I shall vote " rejoin" at the next referendum.

Though it will probably not be necessary, since it is now increasingly likely that "BREXIT" will never happen.

"

Why is it looking like "BREXIT" will never happen? What do you think will happen if it does,nt?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Like many: I shall vote " rejoin" at the next referendum.

Though it will probably not be necessary, since it is now increasingly likely that "BREXIT" will never happen.

"

Of corse it will happen! It has to now becaus that's the way the vote went, if for some reason the government did a U turn Juncker and his cronies would have a field day nailing every rule they wanted to the deal. Disaster!!!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then"

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will "

what price do countries who are not in the EU have to pay for full access to the single market? And in particular on services?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"Like many: I shall vote " rejoin" at the next referendum.

Though it will probably not be necessary, since it is now increasingly likely that "BREXIT" will never happen.

Why is it looking like "BREXIT" will never happen? What do you think will happen if it does,nt?"

Immigration: France move their border to Dover, we are put in the shit trying to cope with policing it.

Immigration: sending people back to war torn countries - a direct violation of human rights.

Immigration: not earning £31k send them back, seasonal workers, cleaners, temporary staff, that Brits simply do not want to do will grind to a halt.

Immigration: race crimes on the increase due to the fractious nature of Farage and his disillusioned voters.

Freedom of movement: No free trade agreements without it. We will never get decent trade agreements without freedom of movement, or there would be no need for the EU.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Like many: I shall vote " rejoin" at the next referendum.

Though it will probably not be necessary, since it is now increasingly likely that "BREXIT" will never happen.

Why is it looking like "BREXIT" will never happen? What do you think will happen if it does,nt?

Immigration: France move their border to Dover, we are put in the shit trying to cope with policing it.

Immigration: sending people back to war torn countries - a direct violation of human rights.

Immigration: not earning £31k send them back, seasonal workers, cleaners, temporary staff, that Brits simply do not want to do will grind to a halt.

Immigration: race crimes on the increase due to the fractious nature of Farage and his disillusioned voters.

Freedom of movement: No free trade agreements without it. We will never get decent trade agreements without freedom of movement, or there would be no need for the EU.

"

there wasn't and there isn't

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

what price do countries who are not in the EU have to pay for full access to the single market? And in particular on services?"

It all depends on the deal they managed to secure but norway were the example the brexit campaign used and they pay in the same per capita as we do

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

what price do countries who are not in the EU have to pay for full access to the single market? And in particular on services?

It all depends on the deal they managed to secure but norway were the example the brexit campaign used and they pay in the same per capita as we do "

Were they? I thought they said we would do our own deal.

Anyway, other countries from outside the EU have benefitted more from access to the single market than the UK has.

Do you think that paying a fee the equivalent of 7% on our exported goods to the EU is better than paying say, a 3% tariff? And it could be argued that there are no tariffs on services

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then"

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently. "

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will "

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right. "

No. And to say we were is an absolute insult to people's honesty and intelligence. See what is rewally interesting is that the 'Remoaners' like you seek to challenge those who voted to Leave as sort of 2nd class citizens, poeople who were poorly educated and opf course racists, xenophobic Little Englanders.

well with respect screw that ... and if we were 'coerced' then so were the Remainers of this world. Scared shitless by a Government engaged in a vicious and shameful 'Project Fear' campaign that is still chugging away and having an unnecessarily negative effect on people's outlook.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *igsteve43Man  over a year ago

derby


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

what price do countries who are not in the EU have to pay for full access to the single market? And in particular on services?

It all depends on the deal they managed to secure but norway were the example the brexit campaign used and they pay in the same per capita as we do "

Difference is norway do not have to pay immigrants welfare so end result isan immigration level they can cope with also they are not forced to implement any eu laws id take that deal

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right.

No. And to say we were is an absolute insult to people's honesty and intelligence. See what is rewally interesting is that the 'Remoaners' like you seek to challenge those who voted to Leave as sort of 2nd class citizens, poeople who were poorly educated and opf course racists, xenophobic Little Englanders.

well with respect screw that ... and if we were 'coerced' then so were the Remainers of this world. Scared shitless by a Government engaged in a vicious and shameful 'Project Fear' campaign that is still chugging away and having an unnecessarily negative effect on people's outlook. "

except in the shops eh

I see retail sales are well up last month on what the 'experts' predicted

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

what price do countries who are not in the EU have to pay for full access to the single market? And in particular on services?

It all depends on the deal they managed to secure but norway were the example the brexit campaign used and they pay in the same per capita as we do

Difference is norway do not have to pay immigrants welfare so end result isan immigration level they can cope with also they are not forced to implement any eu laws id take that deal"

They dont have to obey any EU law.... Other than the free movement of people, goods, services and capital... Other than making contributions in.... Other than adhering to the worktime directive employee and employers rights..... Other than maintaining the minimum standard of financial regulation and market standards

Funny to me it seems like they do lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right.

No. And to say we were is an absolute insult to people's honesty and intelligence. See what is rewally interesting is that the 'Remoaners' like you seek to challenge those who voted to Leave as sort of 2nd class citizens, poeople who were poorly educated and opf course racists, xenophobic Little Englanders.

well with respect screw that ... and if we were 'coerced' then so were the Remainers of this world. Scared shitless by a Government engaged in a vicious and shameful 'Project Fear' campaign that is still chugging away and having an unnecessarily negative effect on people's outlook.

except in the shops eh

I see retail sales are well up last month on what the 'experts' predicted "

And yet we now have a pensions crisis, an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures. A fractious sterling, major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust. The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tillup4funMan  over a year ago

Wakefield


"Like many: I shall vote " rejoin" at the next referendum.

Though it will probably not be necessary, since it is now increasingly likely that "BREXIT" will never happen.

Why is it looking like "BREXIT" will never happen? What do you think will happen if it does,nt?

Immigration: France move their border to Dover, we are put in the shit trying to cope with policing it.

Immigration: sending people back to war torn countries - a direct violation of human rights.

Immigration: not earning £31k send them back, seasonal workers, cleaners, temporary staff, that Brits simply do not want to do will grind to a halt.

Immigration: race crimes on the increase due to the fractious nature of Farage and his disillusioned voters.

Freedom of movement: No free trade agreements without it. We will never get decent trade agreements without freedom of movement, or there would be no need for the EU.

"

We were told to move our border back to Dover over 4 weeks ago but its still over in France I wonder why that is?

Refugees from war torn countries are supposed to seek asylum in the first country they go to.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right.

No. And to say we were is an absolute insult to people's honesty and intelligence. See what is rewally interesting is that the 'Remoaners' like you seek to challenge those who voted to Leave as sort of 2nd class citizens, poeople who were poorly educated and opf course racists, xenophobic Little Englanders.

well with respect screw that ... and if we were 'coerced' then so were the Remainers of this world. Scared shitless by a Government engaged in a vicious and shameful 'Project Fear' campaign that is still chugging away and having an unnecessarily negative effect on people's outlook.

except in the shops eh

I see retail sales are well up last month on what the 'experts' predicted

And yet we now have a pensions crisis, an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures. A fractious sterling, major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust. The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability? "

a pensions crisis? All because of a referendum a few weeks ago?

So which businesses are looking to relocate and who has gone bust?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

YAWN. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" And yet we now have a pensions crisis"

Well not quite. Given the Stock Exchange FTSEs are at 53 week highs the Pension funds that buy those Stocks and Shares are seeing a profit and potentially some good dividends.


" an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures."

Do you understand what 'poor returns' on GILTs means exactly? It means the Government can issue any amount of debt it needs and be charged very low 'Yields' (interest to you and me) and there is a strong demand for those GILTs. They actually turned negative the other week. And so a firm decides to look for higher profits. So what?


" A fractious sterling "

Not quite. It has dropped about 10% Trade Weighted the day after Brexit and has floated around the £1.31 to the $ ever since and it is just under £1.32 today. And that is both good (for Farmers and exporters) and bad (for items bought from aboard).


" major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust."

You do not make your case batter by fabricating untruths mate. So who has relocated or is even looking to relocate? None that I know of but I can show you companies who have decided to re-locate TO the UK post Brexit. Including the German Bourse!

And who has gone bust because of Brexit? And please don't say BHS ...


" The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability?"

Not in the slightest ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right.

No. And to say we were is an absolute insult to people's honesty and intelligence. See what is rewally interesting is that the 'Remoaners' like you seek to challenge those who voted to Leave as sort of 2nd class citizens, poeople who were poorly educated and opf course racists, xenophobic Little Englanders.

well with respect screw that ... and if we were 'coerced' then so were the Remainers of this world. Scared shitless by a Government engaged in a vicious and shameful 'Project Fear' campaign that is still chugging away and having an unnecessarily negative effect on people's outlook.

except in the shops eh

I see retail sales are well up last month on what the 'experts' predicted "

Exactly.

And the employment rate keeps improving and is now at 1.64 Million or 4.9% figures up to end of June.

Wages excluding bonuses rose 2.3% in the three months to June according to the ONS.

The number of people on the claimant count in July, the first month since the Referendum, was 763,600, down 8,600 from June.

And remember all the 'Experts' who were giving 'forecasts'?

Hargreaves Lansdown economist Ben Brettell said today that while forward-looking surveys to gauge business confidence had suggested the Brexit vote had delivered a shock, "surveys are driven by sentiment, and can therefore overreact".

"The dramatic fall in confidence may not ultimately be borne out by activity, and today's claimant count number is a tentative sign that things might not turn out as bad as many predicted," he said.

So Project fear wasn't frightening business after all...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm somewhat 50/50 on whether we will leave or not. I think a lot of people feel as though the momentum to leave is slowing (at least a lot of leave voters I have spoke to feel this way), now that the US, Canada, Singapore and the Eastern block EU countries have given the brexit comittee a bit of a stomp on the foot in terms or what we want against what we might get from them in terms of a realistic trade deal.

Obviously that non-binding referendum should be upheld and we should try to leave to respect what we must take as public opinion.

However we should have a binding public vote to ratify the 'model' (arrangements that Britain has with not just the EU but global community) that Britain would be operating by.

I'm quite interested in actually seeing which other country's model we base ours upon and change to suit us.

Most people rule out Norway as Norwegian politics operates around a population of roughly Manchester and Leeds/Bradford areas combined, alongside high taxation. Something a lot of politicians think would work here. Plus, I think that free movement of capital and labour would be a deal breaker.

Liechtenstein is gaining popularity again as they have a services based economy much like the one which underpins us now.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right.

No. And to say we were is an absolute insult to people's honesty and intelligence. See what is rewally interesting is that the 'Remoaners' like you seek to challenge those who voted to Leave as sort of 2nd class citizens, poeople who were poorly educated and opf course racists, xenophobic Little Englanders.

well with respect screw that ... and if we were 'coerced' then so were the Remainers of this world. Scared shitless by a Government engaged in a vicious and shameful 'Project Fear' campaign that is still chugging away and having an unnecessarily negative effect on people's outlook.

except in the shops eh

I see retail sales are well up last month on what the 'experts' predicted

Exactly.

And the employment rate keeps improving and is now at 1.64 Million or 4.9% figures up to end of June.

Wages excluding bonuses rose 2.3% in the three months to June according to the ONS.

The number of people on the claimant count in July, the first month since the Referendum, was 763,600, down 8,600 from June.

And remember all the 'Experts' who were giving 'forecasts'?

Hargreaves Lansdown economist Ben Brettell said today that while forward-looking surveys to gauge business confidence had suggested the Brexit vote had delivered a shock, "surveys are driven by sentiment, and can therefore overreact".

"The dramatic fall in confidence may not ultimately be borne out by activity, and today's claimant count number is a tentative sign that things might not turn out as bad as many predicted," he said.

So Project fear wasn't frightening business after all...

"

Whilst I appreciate that you gave evidence, most of the reputable economic forecasts were talking two to five years in the future. I was not wholely sold on remaining or leaving but I think that until a 'model' for post brexit britain is draw up and we have new formal trade agreements, and until we actually leave, neither side should actually sit easy.

Ultimately, I suppose it comes down which public polices and trade policies are put in place as to how Britain will be out of the EU.

I think a lot of fears currently are that wages might have to freeze or decrease in order for companies to remain competitive. But once again, I can appreciate that this might not be the case.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


" And yet we now have a pensions crisis

Well not quite. Given the Stock Exchange FTSEs are at 53 week highs the Pension funds that buy those Stocks and Shares are seeing a profit and potentially some good dividends.

an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures.

Do you understand what 'poor returns' on GILTs means exactly? It means the Government can issue any amount of debt it needs and be charged very low 'Yields' (interest to you and me) and there is a strong demand for those GILTs. They actually turned negative the other week. And so a firm decides to look for higher profits. So what?

A fractious sterling

Not quite. It has dropped about 10% Trade Weighted the day after Brexit and has floated around the £1.31 to the $ ever since and it is just under £1.32 today. And that is both good (for Farmers and exporters) and bad (for items bought from aboard).

major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust.

You do not make your case batter by fabricating untruths mate. So who has relocated or is even looking to relocate? None that I know of but I can show you companies who have decided to re-locate TO the UK post Brexit. Including the German Bourse!

And who has gone bust because of Brexit? And please don't say BHS ...

The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability?

Not in the slightest ..."

Great effort. Now would you reconsider a more diluted answer to if the 17,000,000 electorate was in any way swayed by utter garbage in their voting? Or, will you still take this personally as you voted out so have to defend that decision.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Great effort. Now would you reconsider a more diluted answer to if the 17,000,000 electorate was in any way swayed by utter garbage in their voting?"

I already answered that above. And no we weren't any more than Remainers were 'swayed'.


" Or, will you still take this personally as you voted out so have to defend that decision."

Can you not differentiate between a detailed response to what is a complicated question and someone 'taking it personally'? And I have no problems defending the Brexit decision as it was totally the right decision....

Diluted enough?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

On the 23rd June I went into the voting booth and put my cross into the leave box. I did this with around a 60% feeling of certainty that I was doing the right thing. Given everything that has happened since, political turmoil, Cameron resigning, labour in meltdown, weeping and hysteria from remainers. I now feel that if asked to vote again, I would vote leave again this time with a feeling of 90% certainty that it is the right thing to do.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"On the 23rd June I went into the voting booth and put my cross into the leave box. I did this with around a 60% feeling of certainty that I was doing the right thing. Given everything that has happened since, political turmoil, Cameron resigning, labour in meltdown, weeping and hysteria from remainers. I now feel that if asked to vote again, I would vote leave again this time with a feeling of 90% certainty that it is the right thing to do."

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I however have a different opinion. I would vote leave again and I would have a feeling of 100% certainty it is the right thing to do

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I just love how people use statistics from when Britain are in the EU as an example to highlight how leaving the EU isn't going to cause any problems.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"The question is: imagine for a moment if we would have remained. Where would we be...."

£70 billion richer for a start as we wouldn't have had to do QE.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *an_WoodMan  over a year ago

Stafford

Can we restart this debate when we actually leave ?

Or when there is hint of what the BREXIT deal looks like.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I just love how people use statistics from when Britain are in the EU as an example to highlight how leaving the EU isn't going to cause any problems. "

the way people use statistics from when Britain are in the EU as an example to highlight how leaving the EU will cause problems?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we."

Perhaps the "obsession" with it is that it is worth about 4% or £73 billion per year to our economy?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we.

Perhaps the "obsession" with it is that it is worth about 4% or £73 billion per year to our economy? "

Had this on another thread when the unnaminous conclusion was it was all 'if' and 'could' not 'will' and 'would'. Or put another way. You was talking shit

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we.

Perhaps the "obsession" with it is that it is worth about 4% or £73 billion per year to our economy?

Had this on another thread when the unnaminous conclusion was it was all 'if' and 'could' not 'will' and 'would'. Or put another way. You was talking shit "

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said it. I know how much you like to tell everyone that you know more than anyone else about any topic, but we all know its not true.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"On the 23rd June I went into the voting booth and put my cross into the leave box. I did this with around a 60% feeling of certainty that I was doing the right thing. Given everything that has happened since, political turmoil, Cameron resigning, labour in meltdown, weeping and hysteria from remainers. I now feel that if asked to vote again, I would vote leave again this time with a feeling of 90% certainty that it is the right thing to do.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I however have a different opinion. I would vote leave again and I would have a feeling of 100% certainty it is the right thing to do "

Well 1.2m regretted their decision

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-news-second-eu-referendum-leave-voters-regret-bregret-choice-in-millions-a7113336.html

But that data is from the Vote Leave campaign themselves and we know what a bunch of liars they are!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?"

There is no point asking that on here, all you'll get is get at the most, 12 different opinions on whether free movement of capital and labour are worth access to the single market, or whether we should just go by WTO regulations and tariffs.

And then a people saying "we wont have a Norwegian or Swiss style model, Britain will get special exemptions and we will have a British model for Brexit."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

There is no point asking that on here, all you'll get is get at the most, 12 different opinions on whether free movement of capital and labour are worth access to the single market, or whether we should just go by WTO regulations and tariffs.

And then a people saying "we wont have a Norwegian or Swiss style model, Britain will get special exemptions and we will have a British model for Brexit.""

I wasn't trying to get them to agree about what it SHOULD look like, just that what it WILL look like, isn't certain at this stage.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

There is no point asking that on here, all you'll get is get at the most, 12 different opinions on whether free movement of capital and labour are worth access to the single market, or whether we should just go by WTO regulations and tariffs.

And then a people saying "we wont have a Norwegian or Swiss style model, Britain will get special exemptions and we will have a British model for Brexit."

I wasn't trying to get them to agree about what it SHOULD look like, just that what it WILL look like, isn't certain at this stage. "

I agree, but I've learnt from trying to have this discussion that the leave camp varies from 'I wanted out no matter the cost' through to 'I just think we will have better fortunes out of the EU' to 'leaving was the lesser of two evils'.

Basically, the phrase, Brexit means Brexit, seems to sum it up for some people, whilst others, like you and I are well aware that nothing is set in stone yet.

Asking people to admit that we don't know what it will look like, just stokes a very angry fire on both sides of the topic right now and I'm getting fed up of people shouting a few select things back and forth now.

If people were actively trying to discuss what the UK needs from the EU and the world, bringing in our industry and population size, then I'd encourage it, but right now, we are still just getting one liners.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You do not need free movement of capital and labour to access the single market, that was covered earlier.

Now can anyone say why trade deals are so important?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"On the 23rd June I went into the voting booth and put my cross into the leave box. I did this with around a 60% feeling of certainty that I was doing the right thing. Given everything that has happened since, political turmoil, Cameron resigning, labour in meltdown, weeping and hysteria from remainers. I now feel that if asked to vote again, I would vote leave again this time with a feeling of 90% certainty that it is the right thing to do.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I however have a different opinion. I would vote leave again and I would have a feeling of 100% certainty it is the right thing to do

Well 1.2m regretted their decision

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-news-second-eu-referendum-leave-voters-regret-bregret-choice-in-millions-a7113336.html

But that data is from the Vote Leave campaign themselves and we know what a bunch of liars they are! "

Had to laugh at that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"You do not need free movement of capital and labour to access the single market, that was covered earlier.

Now can anyone say why trade deals are so important?"

Coz I like shaggin and my johnnis are made in Poland. If Poland increase their prices - I'm ginna have to go bareback or even stop altogether. Or let the NHS pick up my STD bill

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You do not need free movement of capital and labour to access the single market, that was covered earlier.

Now can anyone say why trade deals are so important?

Coz I like shaggin and my johnnis are made in Poland. If Poland increase their prices - I'm ginna have to go bareback or even stop altogether. Or let the NHS pick up my STD bill "

I'm sure other countries outside the EU make really small ones too. Relax

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"

Can you not differentiate between a detailed response to what is a complicated question and someone 'taking it personally'?"

I asked a simple question.
"

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right. "

The reporting is widespread, re. the campaign the Leave took. Yet, I gained a response equal to that an awkward duck, waddling along the street looking for a pond. It is not a complicated question to answer. Unless you are wholly unaware of the lies told during the campaign.

Being able to see aspects of an argument enables better judgement. At the moment you do not realise that the remainers do not care about leaving - we want it and want to get on with it. Leavers still seem to be smarting that they won, when it wasn't a fight!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk

And then we have a Scottish perspective

UK Govt and parties rallied together to say remain in UK to remain in EU. Wee white lie there

UK PM voted to remain but now has to lead "us" out because of an unqualified vote based on misconceptions and lies - while many EU people living and working here with children who hold UK passports had no say.

The entire thing was fucked. Run by halfwits who had no idea what would happen and, as a consequence of victory, all fucked off - Farage, Boris and their crew. And we have a labour leader who didn't want to stay but said he did and unconvincingly tried to convince others to remain has totally screwed the only credible opposition to mad May.

Honest to fuck. No wonder we Scots drink!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"You do not need free movement of capital and labour to access the single market, that was covered earlier.

Now can anyone say why trade deals are so important?

Coz I like shaggin and my johnnis are made in Poland. If Poland increase their prices - I'm ginna have to go bareback or even stop altogether. Or let the NHS pick up my STD bill

I'm sure other countries outside the EU make really small ones too. Relax "

If you know they do then why ask about deals.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"And then we have a Scottish perspective

UK Govt and parties rallied together to say remain in UK to remain in EU. Wee white lie there

UK PM voted to remain but now has to lead "us" out because of an unqualified vote based on misconceptions and lies - while many EU people living and working here with children who hold UK passports had no say.

The entire thing was fucked. Run by halfwits who had no idea what would happen and, as a consequence of victory, all fucked off - Farage, Boris and their crew. And we have a labour leader who didn't want to stay but said he did and unconvincingly tried to convince others to remain has totally screwed the only credible opposition to mad May.

Honest to fuck. No wonder we Scots drink!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk

And then we have this nonsense from fuckwits who cannot differentiate between immigration and a humanitarian refugee crisis that we and our American buddies caused.

For years our people have sauntered and lived all around Europe and beyond. Enjoying the fruits of their labours and establishing homes and businesses.

We have for many years welcomed people from parts of the world we colonised and they have - after years of inequality and abuse - become central figures in how we live and what we do. But almost every interview I have seen involving our neighbours from India, Pakistan and wherever has shown a commitment to leaving the EU to keep these bad Polish and Eastern Europeans out as they will take the jobs and hospital treatment they are entitled to! Gimme peace.

And as for the fuckwits that voted leave because dispossessed Syrians, Libyians and folk from Iraq are stealing our houses - they need to realise these countries are not in the EU. This is the result of the wars that we have illegally waged and we have a moral and economic duty to support them.

And then we have the Welsh who voted out despite getting more EU funding per capita than anyone. Explain that to me!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You do not need free movement of capital and labour to access the single market, that was covered earlier.

Now can anyone say why trade deals are so important?"

Cause trade isn't the simple process of some dude racking up to a city he doesn't live in with a wagon of olive oil, wheat and bronze, heading to the market square, then setting his stall up to sell stuff locals can't normally get.

Even people on the Brexit committee admit that if we trade by the World Trade Organisation, not only will there be an extra £9 billion atleast in tariff fees for buyers and consumers, but also that letting someone trade through the organisation has to ratified by all other trading partners, then all those partners have to have an individual trade agreement with the new member - these trade agreements often are used as leverage between countries to obtain other 'favours'.

Simply put, it the way of trade, the WTO could be seen as almost as clunky as the EU. Just with less health and safety legislation involved to protect consumer rights.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"And then we have a Scottish perspective

UK Govt and parties rallied together to say remain in UK to remain in EU. Wee white lie there

UK PM voted to remain but now has to lead "us" out because of an unqualified vote based on misconceptions and lies - while many EU people living and working here with children who hold UK passports had no say.

The entire thing was fucked. Run by halfwits who had no idea what would happen and, as a consequence of victory, all fucked off - Farage, Boris and their crew. And we have a labour leader who didn't want to stay but said he did and unconvincingly tried to convince others to remain has totally screwed the only credible opposition to mad May.

Honest to fuck. No wonder we Scots drink!"

No white or any other coloured lies anywhere at all. You Scots knew about 18 months before YOUR Referendum that there would be a Referendum in the whole of the UK on staying in or leaving the EU. So who misled who there then? Maybe you swallowed the SNP bullshit that the Uk would never leave the EU just as the 'Remain' campaign tried to have us believe but the WHOLE of the UK voted to Leave. Whether you like the result or not to say you were lied to by the UK Prime Minister is actually totally incorrect.

And as it happens over a million Scots also voted to Leave. So again for the Leader of the SNP to say 'the whole of Scotland voted to Remain' is utter bullshit. Forgetting of course that it was a Binary question on a UK wide basis where one vote counted the same as another and not a regional, sub national, Constituency or any other sort of vote.

As for those you say had no say it was a vote by British (and Irish) citizens what is so difficult about that? I might add that in September 2014 there was a Referendum vote to decide on the future of the whole UK and I, a British citizen never had a vote in that did I?

As for the rest of your sour grapes I lost interest ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Even people on the Brexit committee admit that if we trade by the World Trade Organisation, not only will there be an extra £9 billion atleast in tariff fees for buyers and consumers "

Care to give us the source of that statement so we can see the full context and you haven't been somewhat selective? I do not recall being briefed by anyone in Vote Leave that leaving the EU would would cost us £9 Billion in trade Tariffs. Because for a start the WTO does not levy Tariffs. they are agreed by the two parties concerned ...

And given the EU costs us £61 Bn a year in foreign currency as we run a trade deficit any Tariffs levied by the EU will be returned by the UK and show the UK Treasury and therefore us a profit ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

Too late for Ifs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk

Missing the point - as so many of you do. The major parties misled the Scottish electorate on the basis that to remain within the UK was to remain within the EU. We had a General Election thereafter and an EU vote to appease the English Tory fuckwits that Cameron never thought he would lose.

How can you have a vote to kick the guy next door out who has children as British as you without him having a say? Seriously??

But Brits abroad can vote?

The entire thing was fucked. As you seem to be!

I don't see this split happening

Time for leaders to lead

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

In answer to an earlier question here is what 'Brexit' means to me:

* The UK Supreme Court will be in London.

* We will save a nett £31 Billion a year in EU membership fees.

* the UK Parliament will once more be the Supreme legislature in the UK.

* The UK will trade with the 27 remaining countries of the EU under a new Bilateral Trade Agreement.

* The UK will regain its seat at the WTO thus protecting us from penal or excessive or illegal Tariffs and barriers to free trade by the EU or anyone else.

* The UK will continue trading with the rest of the non-EU world as it does now but with reduced Tariffs.

* The Uk will discover new ways to create wealth, jobs and commerce being next door to the EU but actually in the rest of the world.

* Project Fear will be utterly discredited.

* British farmers will be supported by direct UK grants to farm more efficiently, make more profits and to bring back into use millions of acres of 'set aside' land to feed the UK with the best food in the world.

* British fishermen will be hugely assisted back into new fleets of boats built in yards up and down the UK to create the income from their heritage fishing grounds that THEY can now look after. And feed the UK the best fish in the world.

* British industry will surge ahead unfettered by unnecessary meddling and regulation from people who don't live or invest here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Missing the point - as so many of you do. The major parties misled the Scottish electorate on the basis that to remain within the UK was to remain within the EU. We had a General Election thereafter and an EU vote to appease the English Tory fuckwits that Cameron never thought he would lose.

How can you have a vote to kick the guy next door out who has children as British as you without him having a say? Seriously??

But Brits abroad can vote?

The entire thing was fucked. As you seem to be!

I don't see this split happening

Time for leaders to lead"

Are you responding to me?

If so I am not 'fucked' thank you but ignoring the personal shit all I will say is that you Scots were told by Cameron over 18 months before YOUR referendum there would be a UK wide referendum on the EU.

No one is having anyone 'kicked out' and with respect if he / she / they do not hold a British passport they are NOT as British as me. But regardless of that pointless statement of yours people resident here now will NOT be asked to leave provided the EU has the same regard for British residents in the EU.

Those are the historical facts so stop trying to rewrite the facts to suit your bigotted ideas... Oh wait you are an SNP member right?.. OK we get that now .. Bye ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk


"In answer to an earlier question here is what 'Brexit' means to me:

* The UK Supreme Court will be in London.

* We will save a nett £31 Billion a year in EU membership fees.

* the UK Parliament will once more be the Supreme legislature in the UK.

* The UK will trade with the 27 remaining countries of the EU under a new Bilateral Trade Agreement.

* The UK will regain its seat at the WTO thus protecting us from penal or excessive or illegal Tariffs and barriers to free trade by the EU or anyone else.

* The UK will continue trading with the rest of the non-EU world as it does now but with reduced Tariffs.

* The Uk will discover new ways to create wealth, jobs and commerce being next door to the EU but actually in the rest of the world.

* Project Fear will be utterly discredited.

* British farmers will be supported by direct UK grants to farm more efficiently, make more profits and to bring back into use millions of acres of 'set aside' land to feed the UK with the best food in the world.

* British fishermen will be hugely assisted back into new fleets of boats built in yards up and down the UK to create the income from their heritage fishing grounds that THEY can now look after. And feed the UK the best fish in the world.

* British industry will surge ahead unfettered by unnecessary meddling and regulation from people who don't live or invest here."

And then you woke up!

So fucking deluded I doubt you've ever had your hole

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"In answer to an earlier question here is what 'Brexit' means to me:

* The UK Supreme Court will be in London.

* We will save a nett £31 Billion a year in EU membership fees.

* the UK Parliament will once more be the Supreme legislature in the UK.

* The UK will trade with the 27 remaining countries of the EU under a new Bilateral Trade Agreement.

* The UK will regain its seat at the WTO thus protecting us from penal or excessive or illegal Tariffs and barriers to free trade by the EU or anyone else.

* The UK will continue trading with the rest of the non-EU world as it does now but with reduced Tariffs.

* The Uk will discover new ways to create wealth, jobs and commerce being next door to the EU but actually in the rest of the world.

* Project Fear will be utterly discredited.

* British farmers will be supported by direct UK grants to farm more efficiently, make more profits and to bring back into use millions of acres of 'set aside' land to feed the UK with the best food in the world.

* British fishermen will be hugely assisted back into new fleets of boats built in yards up and down the UK to create the income from their heritage fishing grounds that THEY can now look after. And feed the UK the best fish in the world.

* British industry will surge ahead unfettered by unnecessary meddling and regulation from people who don't live or invest here.

And then you woke up!

So fucking deluded I doubt you've ever had your hole"

Whatever .. what the fuck ever ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk


"Are you responding to me?

If so I am not 'fucked' thank you but ignoring the personal shit all I will say is that you Scots were told by Cameron over 18 months before YOUR referendum there would be a UK wide referendum on the EU.

No one is having anyone 'kicked out' and with respect if he / she / they do not hold a British passport they are NOT as British as me. But regardless of that pointless statement of yours people resident here now will NOT be asked to leave provided the EU has the same regard for British residents in the EU.

Those are the historical facts so stop trying to rewrite the facts to suit your bigotted ideas... Oh wait you are an SNP member right?.. OK we get that now .. Bye ... "

Not a member of SNP and with no desire to be

Cameron never thought he would lose and neither did his opponents. Hence the focus on the English pound if we voted to leave.

Children of the European Nationals who live, work and have committed their lives to this country who have UK passports are as British as you. Whether you like it or not.

But these people had no vote and neither did their parents

They won't be forced to leave? So why at the UK Border are we seeking to refuse entry to Europeans who may live here but have criminal records. You can guarantee nothing

No doubt you have moved to the front of the NHS queue. Your salary has tripled and savings quadrupled - shares gone through the roof. Your petrol has halved. UK produce now costs buttons, your children go to half empty classrooms and there is no crime. The streets are full of empty council houses for Brits to occupy and drink imported is so cheap you can't believe it.

What a world!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Did someone just fart?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk


"Did someone just fart? "
Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk


"Did someone just fart? "

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we.

Perhaps the "obsession" with it is that it is worth about 4% or £73 billion per year to our economy?

Had this on another thread when the unnaminous conclusion was it was all 'if' and 'could' not 'will' and 'would'. Or put another way. You was talking shit

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said it. I know how much you like to tell everyone that you know more than anyone else about any topic, but we all know its not true. "

It was based on 'if' and 'could'. My goodness you are a fuckwit

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"In answer to an earlier question here is what 'Brexit' means to me:

* The UK Supreme Court will be in London.

* We will save a nett £31 Billion a year in EU membership fees.

* the UK Parliament will once more be the Supreme legislature in the UK.

* The UK will trade with the 27 remaining countries of the EU under a new Bilateral Trade Agreement.

* The UK will regain its seat at the WTO thus protecting us from penal or excessive or illegal Tariffs and barriers to free trade by the EU or anyone else.

* The UK will continue trading with the rest of the non-EU world as it does now but with reduced Tariffs.

* The Uk will discover new ways to create wealth, jobs and commerce being next door to the EU but actually in the rest of the world.

* Project Fear will be utterly discredited.

* British farmers will be supported by direct UK grants to farm more efficiently, make more profits and to bring back into use millions of acres of 'set aside' land to feed the UK with the best food in the world.

* British fishermen will be hugely assisted back into new fleets of boats built in yards up and down the UK to create the income from their heritage fishing grounds that THEY can now look after. And feed the UK the best fish in the world.

* British industry will surge ahead unfettered by unnecessary meddling and regulation from people who don't live or invest here."

Are you high

1. The brittish court is the supreme governing body we are bound by the european parliment to uphold certain standards what you dont seem to realsise is our national standards far exceed the european standards anyway the thing people get most upset by is an inability to kick out terrorist sympathisers because of the european bill on human rights but guess what.... Thats nothing to do with the EU we will still be bound to it

2. How will we save 31 billion are you seriously so deluded you think we will not continue to pay in

3. We will trade with europe under a new bi-lateral trade agreement most probably binding us to free movement, contributions and financial regulation along with all the laws that everyone who trades with them has to abide by (yes even the yanks have to maintain certain minimum standards in employment and financial law)

4. You want to escape the beurocratic noncense of the EU and you dont see that the WTO is equally if not more corrupt lol

5. We may get reduced tarrifs but if the cost of trade to the EU goes up for business's what good is it to us? nearlly half our trade goes to the EU remember the phrase dont shit where you eat i think it sums up brexit fairly well

6. "Project fear" or what the intellectuals call the advice from every major think tank, study or expert in the world but yeah i see what you mean its just fear mongering boris and nigel must be right.... Fuck me

7. As a derbyshire man from a family of farmers who have farmed for the last 200yrs let me tell you the EU has been fantastic for small business farmers i doubt the government will continue to subsidise the industry in the same way

8. I agree our fisheries may get a chance to flourish once more.... Thats of course after we have paid out huge sums of money in compensation to the other countries who now have long term lease agreements to the waters and livestock

9. Brittish industry hasnt gone to shit because of the EU it has gone to shit through lack of investment, infastructure and big business being able to cut costs by having manufacture abroad

Bottom line you can blame all our countries problems on the EU but its smoke and mirrors its what our government wants you too think cos it takes the blame away from where it should be and thats westminster ironically the same group of people your giving more power to so for that i say thankyou and well done (cue sarcastic clapping)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we.

Perhaps the "obsession" with it is that it is worth about 4% or £73 billion per year to our economy?

Had this on another thread when the unnaminous conclusion was it was all 'if' and 'could' not 'will' and 'would'. Or put another way. You was talking shit

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said it. I know how much you like to tell everyone that you know more than anyone else about any topic, but we all know its not true.

It was based on 'if' and 'could'. My goodness you are a fuckwit "

You think you know more about the economy than the IFS, Bank of England, PwC etc.

You think you know more about defence than NATO.

You think you know more about climate change than the BAS, the UN, NASA etc.

You think you know more about research than Stephen Hawking and Royal Society.

And you think I’m the fuckwit?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

There is no point asking that on here, all you'll get is get at the most, 12 different opinions on whether free movement of capital and labour are worth access to the single market, or whether we should just go by WTO regulations and tariffs.

And then a people saying "we wont have a Norwegian or Swiss style model, Britain will get special exemptions and we will have a British model for Brexit."

I wasn't trying to get them to agree about what it SHOULD look like, just that what it WILL look like, isn't certain at this stage.

I agree, but I've learnt from trying to have this discussion that the leave camp varies from 'I wanted out no matter the cost' through to 'I just think we will have better fortunes out of the EU' to 'leaving was the lesser of two evils'.

Basically, the phrase, Brexit means Brexit, seems to sum it up for some people, whilst others, like you and I are well aware that nothing is set in stone yet.

Asking people to admit that we don't know what it will look like, just stokes a very angry fire on both sides of the topic right now and I'm getting fed up of people shouting a few select things back and forth now.

If people were actively trying to discuss what the UK needs from the EU and the world, bringing in our industry and population size, then I'd encourage it, but right now, we are still just getting one liners."

No, you were right. I had some hope that we could find consensus, but you’re right, it was futile.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You do not need free movement of capital and labour to access the single market, that was covered earlier.

Now can anyone say why trade deals are so important?

Cause trade isn't the simple process of some dude racking up to a city he doesn't live in with a wagon of olive oil, wheat and bronze, heading to the market square, then setting his stall up to sell stuff locals can't normally get.

Even people on the Brexit committee admit that if we trade by the World Trade Organisation, not only will there be an extra £9 billion atleast in tariff fees for buyers and consumers, but also that letting someone trade through the organisation has to ratified by all other trading partners, then all those partners have to have an individual trade agreement with the new member - these trade agreements often are used as leverage between countries to obtain other 'favours'.

Simply put, it the way of trade, the WTO could be seen as almost as clunky as the EU. Just with less health and safety legislation involved to protect consumer rights."

Simply put, the importance of trade deals and tariffs in todays world is exaggerated when compared to fluctuations in currencies. But ok I'll go along with it, so if trade deals are so good/important, how come the EU is so bad at making them and has so few?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Blair and his team of liars are the main architects of Brexit. He failed to deliver his promise of a referendum on the terms of the Lisbon treaty, hardly surprising as he knew the British people would have rejected it. However had we had the opportunity to reject Lisbon it could be argued we would have been more likely to stay with what inevitably would have been a less 'federal' and looser arrangement of nation states without the cruel and economically fatal eurozone. Sadly for eurphiles the genie is out of the bottle and the Brexit vote has set in train a series of events which will culminate in several years time with a disintegration of the EU as we know it. Hopefully the EU will be replaced by a far more realistic and workable cooperation between sovereign nations across Europe, including GB, Norway, Switzerland and who knows even Russia!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Blair and his team of liars are the main architects of Brexit. He failed to deliver his promise of a referendum on the terms of the Lisbon treaty, hardly surprising as he knew the British people would have rejected it. However had we had the opportunity to reject Lisbon it could be argued we would have been more likely to stay with what inevitably would have been a less 'federal' and looser arrangement of nation states without the cruel and economically fatal eurozone. Sadly for eurphiles the genie is out of the bottle and the Brexit vote has set in train a series of events which will culminate in several years time with a disintegration of the EU as we know it. Hopefully the EU will be replaced by a far more realistic and workable cooperation between sovereign nations across Europe, including GB, Norway, Switzerland and who knows even Russia!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" And yet we now have a pensions crisis

Well not quite. Given the Stock Exchange FTSEs are at 53 week highs the Pension funds that buy those Stocks and Shares are seeing a profit and potentially some good dividends.

an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures.

Do you understand what 'poor returns' on GILTs means exactly? It means the Government can issue any amount of debt it needs and be charged very low 'Yields' (interest to you and me) and there is a strong demand for those GILTs. They actually turned negative the other week. And so a firm decides to look for higher profits. So what?

A fractious sterling

Not quite. It has dropped about 10% Trade Weighted the day after Brexit and has floated around the £1.31 to the $ ever since and it is just under £1.32 today. And that is both good (for Farmers and exporters) and bad (for items bought from aboard).

major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust.

You do not make your case batter by fabricating untruths mate. So who has relocated or is even looking to relocate? None that I know of but I can show you companies who have decided to re-locate TO the UK post Brexit. Including the German Bourse!

And who has gone bust because of Brexit? And please don't say BHS ...

The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability?

Not in the slightest ...

Great effort. Now would you reconsider a more diluted answer to if the 17,000,000 electorate was in any way swayed by utter garbage in their voting? Or, will you still take this personally as you voted out so have to defend that decision. "

OP, do you really think that people could not tell what lies and exagerations were being presented (by both sides of the campaign)? If so, you have a very low opinion of the public.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


" And yet we now have a pensions crisis

Well not quite. Given the Stock Exchange FTSEs are at 53 week highs the Pension funds that buy those Stocks and Shares are seeing a profit and potentially some good dividends.

an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures.

Do you understand what 'poor returns' on GILTs means exactly? It means the Government can issue any amount of debt it needs and be charged very low 'Yields' (interest to you and me) and there is a strong demand for those GILTs. They actually turned negative the other week. And so a firm decides to look for higher profits. So what?

A fractious sterling

Not quite. It has dropped about 10% Trade Weighted the day after Brexit and has floated around the £1.31 to the $ ever since and it is just under £1.32 today. And that is both good (for Farmers and exporters) and bad (for items bought from aboard).

major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust.

You do not make your case batter by fabricating untruths mate. So who has relocated or is even looking to relocate? None that I know of but I can show you companies who have decided to re-locate TO the UK post Brexit. Including the German Bourse!

And who has gone bust because of Brexit? And please don't say BHS ...

The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability?

Not in the slightest ...

Great effort. Now would you reconsider a more diluted answer to if the 17,000,000 electorate was in any way swayed by utter garbage in their voting? Or, will you still take this personally as you voted out so have to defend that decision.

OP, do you really think that people could not tell what lies and exagerations were being presented (by both sides of the campaign)? If so, you have a very low opinion of the public."

I was more thinking of Lowcosttravelgroup in going bust affecting 150,000+ people at the height of summer (from memory). Though it is not my opinion, it is maintained fact as mentioned in this thread. That 1.2m would not have voted leave if they would have known what they know now.

My opinion is that I suspect it would be a whole lot higher if people understood the totality of their mark, instead of voting against the establishment (again as is widely reported).

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" And yet we now have a pensions crisis

Well not quite. Given the Stock Exchange FTSEs are at 53 week highs the Pension funds that buy those Stocks and Shares are seeing a profit and potentially some good dividends.

an announcement yesterday from the biggest investment fund management company in the world (Norwegian) pulling £1.7bn from UK gilts as they do not have good futures.

Do you understand what 'poor returns' on GILTs means exactly? It means the Government can issue any amount of debt it needs and be charged very low 'Yields' (interest to you and me) and there is a strong demand for those GILTs. They actually turned negative the other week. And so a firm decides to look for higher profits. So what?

A fractious sterling

Not quite. It has dropped about 10% Trade Weighted the day after Brexit and has floated around the £1.31 to the $ ever since and it is just under £1.32 today. And that is both good (for Farmers and exporters) and bad (for items bought from aboard).

major business looking to relocate and one or two already gone bust.

You do not make your case batter by fabricating untruths mate. So who has relocated or is even looking to relocate? None that I know of but I can show you companies who have decided to re-locate TO the UK post Brexit. Including the German Bourse!

And who has gone bust because of Brexit? And please don't say BHS ...

The alternative being what I said in my OP being the status quo, only with revisions to EU policy. Would that not have increased UK interest and stability?

Not in the slightest ...

Great effort. Now would you reconsider a more diluted answer to if the 17,000,000 electorate was in any way swayed by utter garbage in their voting? Or, will you still take this personally as you voted out so have to defend that decision.

OP, do you really think that people could not tell what lies and exagerations were being presented (by both sides of the campaign)? If so, you have a very low opinion of the public.

I was more thinking of Lowcosttravelgroup in going bust affecting 150,000+ people at the height of summer (from memory). Though it is not my opinion, it is maintained fact as mentioned in this thread. That 1.2m would not have voted leave if they would have known what they know now.

My opinion is that I suspect it would be a whole lot higher if people understood the totality of their mark, instead of voting against the establishment (again as is widely reported). "

"Maintained fact."

"Widely reported."

Hmmmm. I smell cows there.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 19/08/16 13:31:29]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I suspect that a re run of the referendum would result in a higher vote to leave for various reasons. one reason being the totally catastrophic refusal to accept the democratic result by the remainiacs and the accusations of stupidity and racism levelled at leave voters and the contempt for ordinary people shown by the Gaurdianistas, the BBC, ITN, Blairites, Nicola Sturgeon and the squealing liberal elite of London. Bring it on I say, a vote of greater than 60% to leave might finally ram home the point that for the majority of people in this country the EU represents waste, self interest, lack of democracy and failure to defend Europes borders and culture.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I suspect that a re run of the referendum would result in a higher vote to leave for various reasons. one reason being the totally catastrophic refusal to accept the democratic result by the remainiacs and the accusations of stupidity and racism levelled at leave voters and the contempt for ordinary people shown by the Gaurdianistas, the BBC, ITN, Blairites, Nicola Sturgeon and the squealing liberal elite of London. Bring it on I say, a vote of greater than 60% to leave might finally ram home the point that for the majority of people in this country the EU represents waste, self interest, lack of democracy and failure to defend Europes borders and culture."

You know; that's absolutely spot on and very true

I bet many who had not even registered to vote would also register to ensure a leave vote

I sure as hell would be voting to leave once more

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

Our biggest export is services and nearlly 50% of our total exports go to the EU we legally cannot negotiate trade deals with anyone else until we are out of the EU that means securing full access to the single market is paramount and all the think tanks and experts have said the same

Full access to the single market comes at a price its just the way it is even the leading brexit campaigners are now saying that taking back control of immigration isnt going to happen why should anyone believe it will

You clearly didn't know that the 'Single Market' in Services has not been completed yet. It doesn't actually exist. And when it does those in it will have to pay an EU Transaction Tax which would have hit the UK especially hard as it does more 'transactions' being the biggest markets. And there is more to 'Services' than the City of London by the way. How does a UK haulier compete against the EU subsidised Polish hauliers?

What is this obsession with 'full access to the Single Market'? It is only a Single Market WITHIN the EU! To everyone outside its a bunch of countries in a protective Customs Union. Does the USA trade with Germany? Yes. Does it have free movement of people, pay a £13 Bn a year fee and have its laws made in Brussels? NO.... And neither will we.

Perhaps the "obsession" with it is that it is worth about 4% or £73 billion per year to our economy?

Had this on another thread when the unnaminous conclusion was it was all 'if' and 'could' not 'will' and 'would'. Or put another way. You was talking shit

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said it. I know how much you like to tell everyone that you know more than anyone else about any topic, but we all know its not true.

It was based on 'if' and 'could'. My goodness you are a fuckwit

You think you know more about the economy than the IFS, Bank of England, PwC etc.

You think you know more about defence than NATO.

You think you know more about climate change than the BAS, the UN, NASA etc.

You think you know more about research than Stephen Hawking and Royal Society.

And you think I’m the fuckwit? "

The key words in the report you used were 'if' and 'could'. It was the opinion of someone based on a forecast based on someone elses opinion. It wasn't a fact and it hasn't happened and may never happen.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The EU is nothing more than a transient political entity which at its heart aspired to empire in the form of European Union. There is a long and sorry history of attempts at European Union, all of which have ended badly. The EU will similarly end badly and we have taken the correct decision to paddle our own canoe once again.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" 2. How will we save 31 billion are you seriously so deluded you think we will not continue to pay in"

I will reply only to this part of your grossly inaccurate and somewhat assumptive reply to what was just how I see things going in response to an earlier question. It is my opinion it is not fact as none of it has happened yet. Just as your reply was equally opinionated and devoid of fact but opinions are great ....

I made a f**ck up typo. The figure is actually £13.2 Billion average a year for the last 5 years. I didn't check my typing so I apologise. Mind I could have added the £61 Billion a year it costs us in foreign currency trading with the EU as we run a Trade deficit. So that is actually £74.2 Billion a year.

But I won't play games. I screwed up and did it in public ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I suspect that a re run of the referendum would result in a higher vote to leave for various reasons. one reason being the totally catastrophic refusal to accept the democratic result by the remainiacs and the accusations of stupidity and racism levelled at leave voters and the contempt for ordinary people shown by the Gaurdianistas, the BBC, ITN, Blairites, Nicola Sturgeon and the squealing liberal elite of London. Bring it on I say, a vote of greater than 60% to leave might finally ram home the point that for the majority of people in this country the EU represents waste, self interest, lack of democracy and failure to defend Europes borders and culture.

You know; that's absolutely spot on and very true

I bet many who had not even registered to vote would also register to ensure a leave vote

I sure as hell would be voting to leave once more"

Back of the net guys ..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"I suspect that a re run of the referendum would result in a higher vote to leave for various reasons. one reason being the totally catastrophic refusal to accept the democratic result by the remainiacs and the accusations of stupidity and racism levelled at leave voters and the contempt for ordinary people shown by the Gaurdianistas, the BBC, ITN, Blairites, Nicola Sturgeon and the squealing liberal elite of London. Bring it on I say, a vote of greater than 60% to leave might finally ram home the point that for the majority of people in this country the EU represents waste, self interest, lack of democracy and failure to defend Europes borders and culture.

You know; that's absolutely spot on and very true

I bet many who had not even registered to vote would also register to ensure a leave vote

I sure as hell would be voting to leave once more"

The whole of Cornwall and Wales may well swing the decision there

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?"

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?


" And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf"

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottybhoyMan  over a year ago

falkirk


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

"

Call the mods - someone disagrees with me lol. I stand by my comments.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

"

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If we had stayed we would be a significantly diminished nation, shackled to a failing political institution which would be hell bent on federalisation with renewed vigour, buoyed by the eurosceptic British finally bending the knee in surrender to the superiority of the EU elite! Just my opinion of course.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


"If we had stayed we would be a significantly diminished nation, shackled to a failing political institution which would be hell bent on federalisation with renewed vigour, buoyed by the eurosceptic British finally bending the knee in surrender to the superiority of the EU elite! Just my opinion of course."

You dont think reforms of any kind would have been granted or made any difference to how we would have operated within the EU?

Our position at the moment has destabilised banks showing how fragile it is, though within and with immigration reforms, would this not have strengthened our position exponentially ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If we had stayed we would be a significantly diminished nation, shackled to a failing political institution which would be hell bent on federalisation with renewed vigour, buoyed by the eurosceptic British finally bending the knee in surrender to the superiority of the EU elite! Just my opinion of course.

You dont think reforms of any kind would have been granted or made any difference to how we would have operated within the EU?

Our position at the moment has destabilised banks showing how fragile it is, though within and with immigration reforms, would this not have strengthened our position exponentially ? "

I suspect Merkel et al are extremely sorry that they did not offer some serious reforms to Cameron. He may then have had an outside chance of keeping us in. As it is the reforms he achieved were materially insignificant and we would not have noticed any difference. Furthermore the EU federalists would have perceived a UK remain vote to be the thumbs up for an acceleration of the rush to full on federal arrangements. I believe we would have been finished as a sovereign nation, we have escaped by the skin of our teeth.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd. "

What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world. We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE. We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down. We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed. We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget. We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes. So we would have been much better off really.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics "

But we are shit when it comes to the super bowl or baseball world series though.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If we had stayed we would be a significantly diminished nation, shackled to a failing political institution which would be hell bent on federalisation with renewed vigour, buoyed by the eurosceptic British finally bending the knee in surrender to the superiority of the EU elite! Just my opinion of course.

You dont think reforms of any kind would have been granted or made any difference to how we would have operated within the EU?

Our position at the moment has destabilised banks showing how fragile it is, though within and with immigration reforms, would this not have strengthened our position exponentially ? "

If they had made any meaningful offers for reform, it would have been different. They didn't.

And, yes, the EU structure is very fragile and getting more so. Another reason to leave.

It is founded on extremely dodgy philosophy. It can't survive indefinitely.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd.

What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world. We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE. We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down. We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed. We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget. We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes. So we would have been much better off really. "

none of that has happened, you don't understand QE and I would say at the moment we are the envy of the world, but keep thinking the worst if it makes you happy

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics

But we are shit when it comes to the super bowl or baseball world series though."

pssst.... the EU aren't in the Olympics

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd.

What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world. We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE. We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down. We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed. We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget. We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes. So we would have been much better off really.

none of that has happened, you don't understand QE and I would say at the moment we are the envy of the world, but keep thinking the worst if it makes you happy "

Spot on

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd.

What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world. We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE. We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down. We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed. We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget. We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes. So we would have been much better off really.

none of that has happened, you don't understand QE and I would say at the moment we are the envy of the world, but keep thinking the worst if it makes you happy "

You seem to live in a Post-Truth fantasy land. ALL of the above has happened. Fact, truth, in reality, its all happened. You can deny it all you want but it has happened.

Lets just look at 1 of the things that I have mentioned. The delaying of Hinckley Point. Widely reported in the news that it has been delayed. You say that it hasn't. Do you think that the contracts really have been signed and the media were just lying about it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics

But we are shit when it comes to the super bowl or baseball world series though.

pssst.... the EU aren't in the Olympics "

Psst, they are talking about the medals won by the member states of the EU

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics

But we are shit when it comes to the super bowl or baseball world series though.

pssst.... the EU aren't in the Olympics

Psst, they are talking about the medals won by the member states of the EU"

Psst, the member states of the EU aren't competing under the EU banner. They are competing as independent countries.

The EU eagerly await the day that will no longer be possible though and have shown their true colours by making such an idiotic statement.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world."

Cameron made two major errors and would still have had to go. As for laughing stock? Oh yeah who says so? You and your 'experts' who make 'forecasts' that aren't worth diddley?


" We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE."

The B of E has said it will put that money aside for possible purchases of Bonds but given the very high demand ('low yields') on Government Bonds (GILTs) there has been no need to buy Government Bonds. Although the last time it did that it made a substantial profit. So it is an investment in our future. It is not an external spend like the EU membership fee or total loss spend. Have a read and learn what QE actually is:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15198789


" We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down."

So what 'slowdown' is that then? Retail sales are up 1.4% month on month in July and 6% up year on year. Employment has risen to the highest level in years and that was in the month of the Referendum. FTSEs are up at 53 week highs showing where the REAL investor confidence money has gone.


" We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. "

Can you name any? And who says the research the EU wants is research WE want for the UK? Forgetting of course that it is UK money being recycled back into our universities. Who apparently do far less R & D than the private sector.....


" We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed."

Can you name any that have been 'mothballed'? I can't. And please don't say Hinckley Point....


" We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget."

the £ has fallen about 10% Trade Weighted which has been a massive bonus to UK Farmers for one group. You also forget the currency isn't the bellweather of a country's economy. The Stock exchange is. Currency markets are profit centres for speculators like IHS who are still running down the economy for corporate profit. And what 'black hole' is that in the UK Defence budget? You think they do not hedge forward currency purchases and have contracts catering for currency fluctuations? The current budget is some £37Bn. So even if that £700 Mn is right it is about 1.8% of the total budget...


" We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes."

I wondered when that race thing would re-surface in your posts. It always does and its a bloody insult to every voter who supported 'leave' to somehow blame them. Ever thought that the festering reason for the rise was people fed up with uncontrolled immigration? Any hate crime is still wrong and despicable and unnecessary but to blame UK voters is just even more wrong. Look at the causes not the effects.


" So we would have been much better off really."

Apart from the fact you were wrong in every one of your reasons for being 'better off'. So I will take it we would not have been better off ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics

But we are shit when it comes to the super bowl or baseball world series though.

pssst.... the EU aren't in the Olympics

Psst, they are talking about the medals won by the member states of the EU

Psst, the member states of the EU aren't competing under the EU banner. They are competing as independent countries.

The EU eagerly await the day that will no longer be possible though and have shown their true colours by making such an idiotic statement."

Back of the net mate

Unlike our footballers ..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


" What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world.

Cameron made two major errors and would still have had to go. As for laughing stock? Oh yeah who says so? You and your 'experts' who make 'forecasts' that aren't worth diddley?

We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE.

The B of E has said it will put that money aside for possible purchases of Bonds but given the very high demand ('low yields') on Government Bonds (GILTs) there has been no need to buy Government Bonds. Although the last time it did that it made a substantial profit. So it is an investment in our future. It is not an external spend like the EU membership fee or total loss spend. Have a read and learn what QE actually is:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15198789

We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down.

So what 'slowdown' is that then? Retail sales are up 1.4% month on month in July and 6% up year on year. Employment has risen to the highest level in years and that was in the month of the Referendum. FTSEs are up at 53 week highs showing where the REAL investor confidence money has gone.

We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled.

Can you name any? And who says the research the EU wants is research WE want for the UK? Forgetting of course that it is UK money being recycled back into our universities. Who apparently do far less R & D than the private sector.....

We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed.

Can you name any that have been 'mothballed'? I can't. And please don't say Hinckley Point....

We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget.

the £ has fallen about 10% Trade Weighted which has been a massive bonus to UK Farmers for one group. You also forget the currency isn't the bellweather of a country's economy. The Stock exchange is. Currency markets are profit centres for speculators like IHS who are still running down the economy for corporate profit. And what 'black hole' is that in the UK Defence budget? You think they do not hedge forward currency purchases and have contracts catering for currency fluctuations? The current budget is some £37Bn. So even if that £700 Mn is right it is about 1.8% of the total budget...

We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes.

I wondered when that race thing would re-surface in your posts. It always does and its a bloody insult to every voter who supported 'leave' to somehow blame them. Ever thought that the festering reason for the rise was people fed up with uncontrolled immigration? Any hate crime is still wrong and despicable and unnecessary but to blame UK voters is just even more wrong. Look at the causes not the effects.

So we would have been much better off really.

Apart from the fact you were wrong in every one of your reasons for being 'better off'. So I will take it we would not have been better off ... "

Its all happened, you know its happened, I know its happened, the media know its happened. You continue living in your post-truth, self constructed Brexit fantasy, but I am going to live in the real world.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Just read that the knobs in Brussels are claiming that the EU is in 2nd place in the medals table at the Olympics

But we are shit when it comes to the super bowl or baseball world series though.

pssst.... the EU aren't in the Olympics

Psst, they are talking about the medals won by the member states of the EU

Psst, the member states of the EU aren't competing under the EU banner. They are competing as independent countries.

The EU eagerly await the day that will no longer be possible though and have shown their true colours by making such an idiotic statement."

Psst, no one said that they were!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world.

Cameron made two major errors and would still have had to go. As for laughing stock? Oh yeah who says so? You and your 'experts' who make 'forecasts' that aren't worth diddley?

We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE.

The B of E has said it will put that money aside for possible purchases of Bonds but given the very high demand ('low yields') on Government Bonds (GILTs) there has been no need to buy Government Bonds. Although the last time it did that it made a substantial profit. So it is an investment in our future. It is not an external spend like the EU membership fee or total loss spend. Have a read and learn what QE actually is:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15198789

We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down.

So what 'slowdown' is that then? Retail sales are up 1.4% month on month in July and 6% up year on year. Employment has risen to the highest level in years and that was in the month of the Referendum. FTSEs are up at 53 week highs showing where the REAL investor confidence money has gone.

We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled.

Can you name any? And who says the research the EU wants is research WE want for the UK? Forgetting of course that it is UK money being recycled back into our universities. Who apparently do far less R & D than the private sector.....

We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed.

Can you name any that have been 'mothballed'? I can't. And please don't say Hinckley Point....

We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget.

the £ has fallen about 10% Trade Weighted which has been a massive bonus to UK Farmers for one group. You also forget the currency isn't the bellweather of a country's economy. The Stock exchange is. Currency markets are profit centres for speculators like IHS who are still running down the economy for corporate profit. And what 'black hole' is that in the UK Defence budget? You think they do not hedge forward currency purchases and have contracts catering for currency fluctuations? The current budget is some £37Bn. So even if that £700 Mn is right it is about 1.8% of the total budget...

We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes.

I wondered when that race thing would re-surface in your posts. It always does and its a bloody insult to every voter who supported 'leave' to somehow blame them. Ever thought that the festering reason for the rise was people fed up with uncontrolled immigration? Any hate crime is still wrong and despicable and unnecessary but to blame UK voters is just even more wrong. Look at the causes not the effects.

So we would have been much better off really.

Apart from the fact you were wrong in every one of your reasons for being 'better off'. So I will take it we would not have been better off ...

Its all happened, you know its happened, I know its happened, the media know its happened. You continue living in your post-truth, self constructed Brexit fantasy, but I am going to live in the real world."

Welcome to the real world! A world outside of the crumbling, fumbling, incompetent, anti democratic political institution known as the EU.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

"

What reforms did Cameron get?

Boris may be a buffoon sometimes but he is able to reach out to the general public so yes he is an asset.

I would vote leave again. And some people I know who voted remain only did so out of fear and would now vote leave in hindsight.

People voted to leave as in leave the union and the single market. The public aren't stupid and vote not for what may happen to some economic figure but on what impacts them personally. One of my family members voted remain as he didnt want interest rates to rise as he couldn't afford his mortgage. The country votes leave and his mortgage rate falls!

I would bet a months salary that May and Corbyn voted leave in the privacy of the voting booth x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Apart from the fact you were wrong in every one of your reasons for being 'better off'. So I will take it we would not have been better off ... "

Its all happened, you know its happened, I know its happened, the media know its happened. You continue living in your post-truth, self constructed Brexit fantasy, but I am going to live in the real world."

No it has NOT happened. NONE of anything you described has happened in any way. So NO the media or anyone else knows it hasn't happened either... Except in your sad little mind that really can't accept a democratic and historic vote.

And for the record the Hinckley Point delay (and is but a delay not a cancellation) is NOTHING to do with Brexit as all the foreign investment has been confirmed in writing. Sorry to disappoint you as you try to find crumbs of comfort in your depressing wish to deny history and run the UK down at every opportunity.

Very sad ... very sad ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

What reforms did Cameron get?

Boris may be a buffoon sometimes but he is able to reach out to the general public so yes he is an asset.

I would vote leave again. And some people I know who voted remain only did so out of fear and would now vote leave in hindsight.

People voted to leave as in leave the union and the single market. The public aren't stupid and vote not for what may happen to some economic figure but on what impacts them personally. One of my family members voted remain as he didnt want interest rates to rise as he couldn't afford his mortgage. The country votes leave and his mortgage rate falls!

I would bet a months salary that May and Corbyn voted leave in the privacy of the voting booth x"

you are so right and the person I most admire on this site

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd.

What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world. We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE. We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down. We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed. We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget. We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes. So we would have been much better off really.

none of that has happened, you don't understand QE and I would say at the moment we are the envy of the world, but keep thinking the worst if it makes you happy "

Who is envying us?

I like my Union Jack under ware too, but mind backing anything you say up at least once?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Who is envying us?

I like my Union Jack under ware too, but mind backing anything you say up at least once?"

OK according to opinion polls these countries wish to hold an EU referendum because the populations of these countries are as fed up as we were with the failed political project that is the EU:

Italy

France

Greece

Portugal

Spain

Holland

Denmark

I suspect that countries with 50% youth unemployment, 10% overall unemployment, stagnant growth (or recessions like France) and banks that have been crippled by the Euro must be looking at us with historically low youth unemployment, 4.9% overall unemployment, Fastest growth in the G7 and the most secure banks in the world with whom to do business and asking 'when us Dear Lord. When us?'

I think that defines 'envy'.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" "Did someone just fart? "

Yeah. I'm sure it came from your mouth? Sorry - that was your attempt at an intelligent response

You too busy moving house, counting money or evicting neighbours whose children have British passports Adolf?

No I was giving your personally abusive shit the response it deserved Soft Lad... And Adolf?

And then I realised the fuckwit can't spell "discreet". This meaning careful and prudent.

Though as an anti-EU fuckwit perhaps "discrete" is just about right Adolf

I am not sure I used the word 'discrete' but hey ho I see the Grammar Nazis are back .. oops sorry it was the 'Adolf' thing again that threw me ...

And a 'fuckwit' because I see through the SNP / EU / Remoaner bullshit? Well there are now officially 17.4 million 'fuckwits' in the UK now then ...

I have this feeling a certain UK hating ex pat Brit, based on some islands somewhere off the coast of Spain, who likes to use the Hitler / Goebbels analogy linking someone who voted Brexit with people who murdered 6 million Jews has found a back door into the Forum after being banned ....

Any Mods about?

You do realise I started this thread with the question a certain imaginary question: What if we stayed.

You not only answer for everyone that voted leave but dont realise the question being asked. The question asked was where would we be - what situation would we be in - would Camerons four legislative pledges be held up. (Would our economy be in a better place)

NOT - The same old Brexit churn you have been talking about since June 23rd.

What would have happened? We would still have Cameron (not really sure if that would be good or bad yet). We wouldn't be the laughing stock of the world. We wouldn't have had to spend £70 billion on QE. We wouldn't have seen an economic slow down. We wouldn't have seen funding and research grants being pulled. We wouldn't have seen seen massive infrastructure projects being mothballed. We wouldn't have seen the £ crash or opened up a £700m black hole in the defence budget. We wouldn't have seen a massive rise in hate crimes. So we would have been much better off really.

none of that has happened, you don't understand QE and I would say at the moment we are the envy of the world, but keep thinking the worst if it makes you happy

Who is envying us?

I like my Union Jack under ware too, but mind backing anything you say up at least once?"

I live in Spain for at least half of the year now and all my Spanish friends support Brexit. Go there and see how many Spanish now wear union jack t shirts

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


" Apart from the fact you were wrong in every one of your reasons for being 'better off'. So I will take it we would not have been better off ... "

Its all happened, you know its happened, I know its happened, the media know its happened. You continue living in your post-truth, self constructed Brexit fantasy, but I am going to live in the real world.

No it has NOT happened. NONE of anything you described has happened in any way. So NO the media or anyone else knows it hasn't happened either... Except in your sad little mind that really can't accept a democratic and historic vote.

And for the record the Hinckley Point delay (and is but a delay not a cancellation) is NOTHING to do with Brexit as all the foreign investment has been confirmed in writing. Sorry to disappoint you as you try to find crumbs of comfort in your depressing wish to deny history and run the UK down at every opportunity.

Very sad ... very sad ..."

It has all happened! Why do you keep denying it? Just because you don't want it to be true it doesn't mean it will be wished away.

You really think that the £ hasn't crashed? You think all of the website and media outlets are lying about the rate before the referendum and the rate now? You think the MOD are lying to everyone about the impact on their budget?

The rise in hate crimes (I know you REALLY want to wish this one away), do you think the police are lying about the figures?

Hinkley Point has been delayed, FACT. This is as a result of Brexit. Without Brexit Cameron would still be PM, and the contracts would have been signed by now.

Why do you think the whole world is lying to you, and no one know what is really going on but you?

You are trying to live in a post-truth world where you can ignore facts if you don't like them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Apart from the fact you were wrong in every one of your reasons for being 'better off'. So I will take it we would not have been better off ... "

Its all happened, you know its happened, I know its happened, the media know its happened. You continue living in your post-truth, self constructed Brexit fantasy, but I am going to live in the real world.

No it has NOT happened. NONE of anything you described has happened in any way. So NO the media or anyone else knows it hasn't happened either... Except in your sad little mind that really can't accept a democratic and historic vote.

And for the record the Hinckley Point delay (and is but a delay not a cancellation) is NOTHING to do with Brexit as all the foreign investment has been confirmed in writing. Sorry to disappoint you as you try to find crumbs of comfort in your depressing wish to deny history and run the UK down at every opportunity.

Very sad ... very sad ...

It has all happened! Why do you keep denying it? Just because you don't want it to be true it doesn't mean it will be wished away.

You really think that the £ hasn't crashed? You think all of the website and media outlets are lying about the rate before the referendum and the rate now? You think the MOD are lying to everyone about the impact on their budget?

The rise in hate crimes (I know you REALLY want to wish this one away), do you think the police are lying about the figures?

Hinkley Point has been delayed, FACT. This is as a result of Brexit. Without Brexit Cameron would still be PM, and the contracts would have been signed by now.

Why do you think the whole world is lying to you, and no one know what is really going on but you?

You are trying to live in a post-truth world where you can ignore facts if you don't like them. "

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" It has all happened! Why do you keep denying it? Just because you don't want it to be true it doesn't mean it will be wished away."

What part of 'No it hasn't happened' are you having difficulty with? You group every small piece of news about the economy and twist it to be 'Because of Brexit'. And yet we never see you discussing the positives that have happened since. It is YOU in denial and fantasy land.


" You really think that the £ hasn't crashed? You think all of the website and media outlets are lying about the rate before the referendum and the rate now?"

No and stop being so sarcastic. I never said it hadn't dropped in value I just countered your exaggeration and gave the factual drop in Trade Weighted terms. I also said it was both good and bad which it is. You just see it as bad and 'proof' of something no one else sees.


" You think the MOD are lying to everyone about the impact on their budget?"
. Did I say that? No so stop manufacturing arguments. I just gave the context if the number you gave was correct. Not that you gave any sources as usual. I should think the increase in £ value of all the F-35 assemblies we manufacture alone has more than outweighed any other losses. Oh wait no you only do negatives sorry ...


" Hinkley Point has been delayed, FACT. This is as a result of Brexit. Without Brexit Cameron would still be PM, and the contracts would have been signed by now."

OK simple question: Give us the proof with sources that Hinckley Point has been delayed purely because of Brexit. Go for it ... We won't hold our breath.


" Why do you think the whole world is lying to you, and no one know what is really going on but you?

You are trying to live in a post-truth world where you can ignore facts if you don't like them."

Oh right. So now us Brexiters are paranoid as well as racist, xenophobic little Englanders? Pathetic.

I do not ignore any true facts at all and I am happy to give sources as well. I accept things as they are unlike you who turns and twists every small detail or 'forecast' to fit your pre-determined opinion that Brexit is a disaster and those who caused it are now also mentally ill.... As I said: PATHETIC!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

"

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodmess OP   Man  over a year ago

yumsville


" Who is envying us?

I like my Union Jack under ware too, but mind backing anything you say up at least once? OK according to opinion polls these countries wish to hold an EU referendum because the populations of these countries are as fed up as we were with the failed political project that is the EU:

Italy

France

Greece

Portugal

Spain

Holland

Denmark

I suspect that countries with 50% youth unemployment, 10% overall unemployment, stagnant growth (or recessions like France) and banks that have been crippled by the Euro must be looking at us with historically low youth unemployment, 4.9% overall unemployment, Fastest growth in the G7 and the most secure banks in the world with whom to do business and asking 'when us Dear Lord. When us?'

I think that defines 'envy'."

We had the the most secure banks as a result of banking reforms post 2007 financial crisis, as a result of European trade, as a result of our membership.

This is sharply contrasted now to RBS and Barclays having share prices slashed alongside other major banks being stressed, investment and growth predictions down due to our passports with 27 countries being uncertain.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear. "

All that has happened at Hinckley Point is the Government has asked for a final revue which was expected in September but EDF called the numbers earlier. There is not ONE connection between the Brexit vote and this revue. The change of Prime Minister is totally irrelevant.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

[Removed by poster at 20/08/16 13:58:18]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

All that has happened at Hinckley Point is the Government has asked for a final revue which was expected in September but EDF called the numbers earlier. There is not ONE connection between the Brexit vote and this revue. The change of Prime Minister is totally irrelevant.

"

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-cancellation-eu-cuts-government-a7106961.html

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3663424/Nuclear-power-station-likely-18billion-casualty-Brexit-vote-says-government-advisor.html

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/brexit-and-uks-china-challenge#

"But as the delay in approving the French and Chinese-invested Hinkley Point nuclear plant shows, Theresa May, the new prime minister, may have doubts about some of the deals struck by her predecessor.

Underlying this uncertainty, and brought to the fore by Brexit, are several interrelated strategic challenges facing London in formulating policy towards China."

Again, what you are saying is completely untrue. Here are two papers from the opposite ends of the political spectrum saying the same thing about the impact of Brexit on HP.

Chatham House also saying that the delay has been brought by the new MP and as a result of Brexit.

fortune.com/2016/08/18/uk-economy-brexit-jobless-confidence/

"At the same time, the new government under Theresa May has all but abandoned its plan for balancing the budget, heading off fears that an ideologically driven austerity would compound the effects of Brexit.

What May’s government hasn’t done yet, however, is to send a clear signal on its own willingness to sustain investment through the coming weak patch. Its signals have been decidedly mixed: May slammed the brakes on the massively expensive new, part-Chinese owned Hinkley Point nuclear power station, potentially jeopardizing other inward Chinese investment."

www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/21/brexit-could-force-multibillion-pound-projects-to-be-scrapped-says-nao-chief

"Britain’s most senior auditor gave his alarming verdict on Whitehall’s readiness as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure from European leaders to start talks on the UK’s exit from the EU as soon as possible.

“It’s a tidal wave coming up the beach,” he said. “It is an emergency. If we don’t get it right, it will affect our economy and standards of life in this country. To say we are going to carry on and do everything we did before – I just don’t think that’s going to be sustainable.”"

These are just a handful of stories from a whole flood of them saying the same thing. Are you really saying yet again that the UK media have got it wrong, foreign policy experts have got it wrong, international media have got it wrong, the auditor general of the National Audit Offuce has got it wrong, but that you know what's Really going on? That you are smarter than all of them combinded?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear. "

You really are clutching at straws now aren't you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

You really are clutching at straws now aren't you "

Obviously I am. Me, the media, think tanks, the Chinese, the national audit office, all clutching at straws, but You know whats REALLY going on don't you?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

All that has happened at Hinckley Point is the Government has asked for a final revue which was expected in September but EDF called the numbers earlier. There is not ONE connection between the Brexit vote and this revue. The change of Prime Minister is totally irrelevant.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-cancellation-eu-cuts-government-a7106961.html

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3663424/Nuclear-power-station-likely-18billion-casualty-Brexit-vote-says-government-advisor.html

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/brexit-and-uks-china-challenge#

"But as the delay in approving the French and Chinese-invested Hinkley Point nuclear plant shows, Theresa May, the new prime minister, may have doubts about some of the deals struck by her predecessor.

Underlying this uncertainty, and brought to the fore by Brexit, are several interrelated strategic challenges facing London in formulating policy towards China."

Again, what you are saying is completely untrue. Here are two papers from the opposite ends of the political spectrum saying the same thing about the impact of Brexit on HP.

Chatham House also saying that the delay has been brought by the new MP and as a result of Brexit.

fortune.com/2016/08/18/uk-economy-brexit-jobless-confidence/

"At the same time, the new government under Theresa May has all but abandoned its plan for balancing the budget, heading off fears that an ideologically driven austerity would compound the effects of Brexit.

What May’s government hasn’t done yet, however, is to send a clear signal on its own willingness to sustain investment through the coming weak patch. Its signals have been decidedly mixed: May slammed the brakes on the massively expensive new, part-Chinese owned Hinkley Point nuclear power station, potentially jeopardizing other inward Chinese investment."

www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/21/brexit-could-force-multibillion-pound-projects-to-be-scrapped-says-nao-chief

"Britain’s most senior auditor gave his alarming verdict on Whitehall’s readiness as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure from European leaders to start talks on the UK’s exit from the EU as soon as possible.

“It’s a tidal wave coming up the beach,” he said. “It is an emergency. If we don’t get it right, it will affect our economy and standards of life in this country. To say we are going to carry on and do everything we did before – I just don’t think that’s going to be sustainable.”"

These are just a handful of stories from a whole flood of them saying the same thing. Are you really saying yet again that the UK media have got it wrong, foreign policy experts have got it wrong, international media have got it wrong, the auditor general of the National Audit Offuce has got it wrong, but that you know what's Really going on? That you are smarter than all of them combinded?"

so what exactly are they saying? What is the problem? Do you understand what you have written/quoted?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

You really are clutching at straws now aren't you

Obviously I am. Me, the media, think tanks, the Chinese, the national audit office, all clutching at straws, but You know whats REALLY going on don't you? "

Yes REALLY I'm living in a parallel Brexit utopia

It's a lovely place x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-cancellation-eu-cuts-government-a7106961.html"

Hmm .. well the piece was from the 28th June and the headline was:

"Brexit could mean cancellation of Hinkley Point nuclear power station, Government adviser says"

Repeat 'could' and this 'advisor' said:

"Paul Dorfman said it was "extremely unlikely" that French energy giant EDF would continue with its plans, which have already been hit by a series of delays."

About 3 weeks later EDF gave full and unqualified funding to the project.

Oops No 1


"www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3663424/Nuclear-power-station-likely-18billion-casualty-Brexit-vote-says-government-advisor.html"

Same date, same 'expert' making the same 'forecast' and completely wrong as noted above. Oh and you forgot to mention that Dr Dorfman is a member of the European Nuclear Energy Forum. No bias there then...

Oops No 2


"https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/brexit-and-uks-china-challenge#

"But as the delay in approving the French and Chinese-invested Hinkley Point nuclear plant shows, Theresa May, the new prime minister, may have doubts about some of the deals struck by her predecessor.

Underlying this uncertainty, and brought to the fore by Brexit, are several interrelated strategic challenges facing London in formulating policy towards China."

Yes an excellent article from some very credible people. BUT: Nowhere does it say the delay on Hinckley has anything to do with Brexit! (Do you actually read what you source?) As the headline for the article said:

" The debate over the Hinkley Point reactor highlights broader questions over the future of the UK-China relationship."

Nothing to do with Brexit at all just our future relationships.

Oops No 3


" Again, what you are saying is completely untrue. Here are two papers from the opposite ends of the political spectrum saying the same thing about the impact of Brexit on HP.

Chatham House also saying that the delay has been brought by the new MP and as a result of Brexit."

Nah. All they showed was three consistent 'Oops' moments for you like always when we look closely at your so called 'facts'....


"fortune.com/2016/08/18/uk-economy-brexit-jobless-confidence/

"At the same time, the new government under Theresa May has all but abandoned its plan for balancing the budget, heading off fears that an ideologically driven austerity would compound the effects of Brexit.

What May’s government hasn’t done yet, however, is to send a clear signal on its own willingness to sustain investment through the coming weak patch. Its signals have been decidedly mixed: May slammed the brakes on the massively expensive new, part-Chinese owned Hinkley Point nuclear power station, potentially jeopardizing other inward Chinese investment."

Oh dear. Again an interesting article whose Headline reads:

"The first hard data have been better than expected"

An article that was a very positive about the UK economy post Brexit and echoed what I have been saying aboput the 'forecasts' by 'experts' saying:

"The GfK consumer confidence barometer had had its biggest drop in over 26 years in July. Reality bore no resemblance."

An article that does not link Brexit in any way with the delay in Hinckley Point.

Oops No 4


"www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/21/brexit-could-force-multibillion-pound-projects-to-be-scrapped-says-nao-chief

"Britain’s most senior auditor gave his alarming verdict on Whitehall’s readiness as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure from European leaders to start talks on the UK’s exit from the EU as soon as possible.

“It’s a tidal wave coming up the beach,” he said. “It is an emergency. If we don’t get it right, it will affect our economy and standards of life in this country. To say we are going to carry on and do everything we did before – I just don’t think that’s going to be sustainable."

Ah yes The Guardian. Always worth a smile. So this is a man who is 'warning', 'forecasting' and otherwise casting doom and gloom about absolutely everything. He was part of 'Project Fear' pre the Referendum and is now trying to fulfil his prophecies. I guess his theory is if you say every major capital project like:

Hinckley

Heathrow

HS2

Refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster

Crossrail 2

The Northern Powerhouse

are going to be cancelled you may just get something right. He may indeed be right but judging by what the PM and Chancellor have said so far he is stupidly wrong.

Oops No 5


"These are just a handful of stories from a whole flood of them saying the same thing. Are you really saying yet again that the UK media have got it wrong, foreign policy experts have got it wrong, international media have got it wrong, the auditor general of the National Audit Offuce has got it wrong, but that you know what's Really going on? That you are smarter than all of them combinded?"

No I am not saying I am smarter than them. Just smarter than you. And I have just shown you why ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-cancellation-eu-cuts-government-a7106961.html

Hmm .. well the piece was from the 28th June and the headline was:

"Brexit could mean cancellation of Hinkley Point nuclear power station, Government adviser says"

Repeat 'could' and this 'advisor' said:

"Paul Dorfman said it was "extremely unlikely" that French energy giant EDF would continue with its plans, which have already been hit by a series of delays."

About 3 weeks later EDF gave full and unqualified funding to the project.

Oops No 1

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3663424/Nuclear-power-station-likely-18billion-casualty-Brexit-vote-says-government-advisor.html

Same date, same 'expert' making the same 'forecast' and completely wrong as noted above. Oh and you forgot to mention that Dr Dorfman is a member of the European Nuclear Energy Forum. No bias there then...

Oops No 2

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/brexit-and-uks-china-challenge#

"But as the delay in approving the French and Chinese-invested Hinkley Point nuclear plant shows, Theresa May, the new prime minister, may have doubts about some of the deals struck by her predecessor.

Underlying this uncertainty, and brought to the fore by Brexit, are several interrelated strategic challenges facing London in formulating policy towards China.

Yes an excellent article from some very credible people. BUT: Nowhere does it say the delay on Hinckley has anything to do with Brexit! (Do you actually read what you source?) As the headline for the article said:

" The debate over the Hinkley Point reactor highlights broader questions over the future of the UK-China relationship."

Nothing to do with Brexit at all just our future relationships.

Oops No 3

Again, what you are saying is completely untrue. Here are two papers from the opposite ends of the political spectrum saying the same thing about the impact of Brexit on HP.

Chatham House also saying that the delay has been brought by the new MP and as a result of Brexit.

Nah. All they showed was three consistent 'Oops' moments for you like always when we look closely at your so called 'facts'....

fortune.com/2016/08/18/uk-economy-brexit-jobless-confidence/

"At the same time, the new government under Theresa May has all but abandoned its plan for balancing the budget, heading off fears that an ideologically driven austerity would compound the effects of Brexit.

What May’s government hasn’t done yet, however, is to send a clear signal on its own willingness to sustain investment through the coming weak patch. Its signals have been decidedly mixed: May slammed the brakes on the massively expensive new, part-Chinese owned Hinkley Point nuclear power station, potentially jeopardizing other inward Chinese investment.

Oh dear. Again an interesting article whose Headline reads:

"The first hard data have been better than expected"

An article that was a very positive about the UK economy post Brexit and echoed what I have been saying aboput the 'forecasts' by 'experts' saying:

"The GfK consumer confidence barometer had had its biggest drop in over 26 years in July. Reality bore no resemblance."

An article that does not link Brexit in any way with the delay in Hinckley Point.

Oops No 4

www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/21/brexit-could-force-multibillion-pound-projects-to-be-scrapped-says-nao-chief

"Britain’s most senior auditor gave his alarming verdict on Whitehall’s readiness as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure from European leaders to start talks on the UK’s exit from the EU as soon as possible.

“It’s a tidal wave coming up the beach,” he said. “It is an emergency. If we don’t get it right, it will affect our economy and standards of life in this country. To say we are going to carry on and do everything we did before – I just don’t think that’s going to be sustainable.

Ah yes The Guardian. Always worth a smile. So this is a man who is 'warning', 'forecasting' and otherwise casting doom and gloom about absolutely everything. He was part of 'Project Fear' pre the Referendum and is now trying to fulfil his prophecies. I guess his theory is if you say every major capital project like:

Hinckley

Heathrow

HS2

Refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster

Crossrail 2

The Northern Powerhouse

are going to be cancelled you may just get something right. He may indeed be right but judging by what the PM and Chancellor have said so far he is stupidly wrong.

Oops No 5

These are just a handful of stories from a whole flood of them saying the same thing. Are you really saying yet again that the UK media have got it wrong, foreign policy experts have got it wrong, international media have got it wrong, the auditor general of the National Audit Offuce has got it wrong, but that you know what's Really going on? That you are smarter than all of them combinded?

No I am not saying I am smarter than them. Just smarter than you. And I have just shown you why ... "

Is it smart to sit on a swingers forum all day wasting time

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *igsteve43Man  over a year ago

derby


"And then we have a Scottish perspective

UK Govt and parties rallied together to say remain in UK to remain in EU. Wee white lie there

UK PM voted to remain but now has to lead "us" out because of an unqualified vote based on misconceptions and lies - while many EU people living and working here with children who hold UK passports had no say.

The entire thing was fucked. Run by halfwits who had no idea what would happen and, as a consequence of victory, all fucked off - Farage, Boris and their crew. And we have a labour leader who didn't want to stay but said he did and unconvincingly tried to convince others to remain has totally screwed the only credible opposition to mad May.

Honest to fuck. No wonder we Scots drink!"

We know you all drink youve got jimmy krankie as your first minister

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Is it smart to sit on a swingers forum all day wasting time"

I don't know you tell me as you are on here more than me ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

Camerons reforms were worthless, and both sides lied through their back teeth, and yes, I would still vote out."

We would have still voted out, and what this recession the remoteness are on about

I can't get houses to renovate as everybody is paying too much cash, the auctions are at bursting point. And my order books are full until Christmas

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-cancellation-eu-cuts-government-a7106961.html

Hmm .. well the piece was from the 28th June and the headline was:

"Brexit could mean cancellation of Hinkley Point nuclear power station, Government adviser says"

Repeat 'could' and this 'advisor' said:

"Paul Dorfman said it was "extremely unlikely" that French energy giant EDF would continue with its plans, which have already been hit by a series of delays."

About 3 weeks later EDF gave full and unqualified funding to the project.

Oops No 1

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3663424/Nuclear-power-station-likely-18billion-casualty-Brexit-vote-says-government-advisor.html

Same date, same 'expert' making the same 'forecast' and completely wrong as noted above. Oh and you forgot to mention that Dr Dorfman is a member of the European Nuclear Energy Forum. No bias there then...

Oops No 2

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/brexit-and-uks-china-challenge#

"But as the delay in approving the French and Chinese-invested Hinkley Point nuclear plant shows, Theresa May, the new prime minister, may have doubts about some of the deals struck by her predecessor.

Underlying this uncertainty, and brought to the fore by Brexit, are several interrelated strategic challenges facing London in formulating policy towards China.

Yes an excellent article from some very credible people. BUT: Nowhere does it say the delay on Hinckley has anything to do with Brexit! (Do you actually read what you source?) As the headline for the article said:

" The debate over the Hinkley Point reactor highlights broader questions over the future of the UK-China relationship."

Nothing to do with Brexit at all just our future relationships.

Oops No 3

Again, what you are saying is completely untrue. Here are two papers from the opposite ends of the political spectrum saying the same thing about the impact of Brexit on HP.

Chatham House also saying that the delay has been brought by the new MP and as a result of Brexit.

Nah. All they showed was three consistent 'Oops' moments for you like always when we look closely at your so called 'facts'....

fortune.com/2016/08/18/uk-economy-brexit-jobless-confidence/

"At the same time, the new government under Theresa May has all but abandoned its plan for balancing the budget, heading off fears that an ideologically driven austerity would compound the effects of Brexit.

What May’s government hasn’t done yet, however, is to send a clear signal on its own willingness to sustain investment through the coming weak patch. Its signals have been decidedly mixed: May slammed the brakes on the massively expensive new, part-Chinese owned Hinkley Point nuclear power station, potentially jeopardizing other inward Chinese investment.

Oh dear. Again an interesting article whose Headline reads:

"The first hard data have been better than expected"

An article that was a very positive about the UK economy post Brexit and echoed what I have been saying aboput the 'forecasts' by 'experts' saying:

"The GfK consumer confidence barometer had had its biggest drop in over 26 years in July. Reality bore no resemblance."

An article that does not link Brexit in any way with the delay in Hinckley Point.

Oops No 4

www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/21/brexit-could-force-multibillion-pound-projects-to-be-scrapped-says-nao-chief

"Britain’s most senior auditor gave his alarming verdict on Whitehall’s readiness as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure from European leaders to start talks on the UK’s exit from the EU as soon as possible.

“It’s a tidal wave coming up the beach,” he said. “It is an emergency. If we don’t get it right, it will affect our economy and standards of life in this country. To say we are going to carry on and do everything we did before – I just don’t think that’s going to be sustainable.

Ah yes The Guardian. Always worth a smile. So this is a man who is 'warning', 'forecasting' and otherwise casting doom and gloom about absolutely everything. He was part of 'Project Fear' pre the Referendum and is now trying to fulfil his prophecies. I guess his theory is if you say every major capital project like:

Hinckley

Heathrow

HS2

Refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster

Crossrail 2

The Northern Powerhouse

are going to be cancelled you may just get something right. He may indeed be right but judging by what the PM and Chancellor have said so far he is stupidly wrong.

Oops No 5

These are just a handful of stories from a whole flood of them saying the same thing. Are you really saying yet again that the UK media have got it wrong, foreign policy experts have got it wrong, international media have got it wrong, the auditor general of the National Audit Offuce has got it wrong, but that you know what's Really going on? That you are smarter than all of them combinded?

No I am not saying I am smarter than them. Just smarter than you. And I have just shown you why ... "

Let be honest the minute the Chinese think there is Bob to be made they will be right back in there fir an offer of link up

HS2 is too expensive and delivers nothing for the everyday commuter

Cross rail, hasnt London had its fair share of investment already

As for foreign investment and the EU, it was the EU who funded The ford transit factory in Turkey, and hence caused the closure of the U.K. Operation

The EU is grossly exaggerated as a wonderful being, but let's be honest, more than half of the member nations are either bust, or have never had any cash to invest, so I ain't worry about going it alone

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

You really are clutching at straws now aren't you

Obviously I am. Me, the media, think tanks, the Chinese, the national audit office, all clutching at straws, but You know whats REALLY going on don't you?

Yes REALLY I'm living in a parallel Brexit utopia

It's a lovely place x"

I'm loving. The leaving feeling xxx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-cancellation-eu-cuts-government-a7106961.html

Hmm .. well the piece was from the 28th June and the headline was:

"Brexit could mean cancellation of Hinkley Point nuclear power station, Government adviser says"

Repeat 'could' and this 'advisor' said:

"Paul Dorfman said it was "extremely unlikely" that French energy giant EDF would continue with its plans, which have already been hit by a series of delays."

About 3 weeks later EDF gave full and unqualified funding to the project.

Oops No 1

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3663424/Nuclear-power-station-likely-18billion-casualty-Brexit-vote-says-government-advisor.html

Same date, same 'expert' making the same 'forecast' and completely wrong as noted above. Oh and you forgot to mention that Dr Dorfman is a member of the European Nuclear Energy Forum. No bias there then...

Oops No 2

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/brexit-and-uks-china-challenge#

"But as the delay in approving the French and Chinese-invested Hinkley Point nuclear plant shows, Theresa May, the new prime minister, may have doubts about some of the deals struck by her predecessor.

Underlying this uncertainty, and brought to the fore by Brexit, are several interrelated strategic challenges facing London in formulating policy towards China.

Yes an excellent article from some very credible people. BUT: Nowhere does it say the delay on Hinckley has anything to do with Brexit! (Do you actually read what you source?) As the headline for the article said:

" The debate over the Hinkley Point reactor highlights broader questions over the future of the UK-China relationship."

Nothing to do with Brexit at all just our future relationships.

Oops No 3

Again, what you are saying is completely untrue. Here are two papers from the opposite ends of the political spectrum saying the same thing about the impact of Brexit on HP.

Chatham House also saying that the delay has been brought by the new MP and as a result of Brexit.

Nah. All they showed was three consistent 'Oops' moments for you like always when we look closely at your so called 'facts'....

fortune.com/2016/08/18/uk-economy-brexit-jobless-confidence/

"At the same time, the new government under Theresa May has all but abandoned its plan for balancing the budget, heading off fears that an ideologically driven austerity would compound the effects of Brexit.

What May’s government hasn’t done yet, however, is to send a clear signal on its own willingness to sustain investment through the coming weak patch. Its signals have been decidedly mixed: May slammed the brakes on the massively expensive new, part-Chinese owned Hinkley Point nuclear power station, potentially jeopardizing other inward Chinese investment.

Oh dear. Again an interesting article whose Headline reads:

"The first hard data have been better than expected"

An article that was a very positive about the UK economy post Brexit and echoed what I have been saying aboput the 'forecasts' by 'experts' saying:

"The GfK consumer confidence barometer had had its biggest drop in over 26 years in July. Reality bore no resemblance."

An article that does not link Brexit in any way with the delay in Hinckley Point.

Oops No 4

www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/21/brexit-could-force-multibillion-pound-projects-to-be-scrapped-says-nao-chief

"Britain’s most senior auditor gave his alarming verdict on Whitehall’s readiness as the prime minister comes under increasing pressure from European leaders to start talks on the UK’s exit from the EU as soon as possible.

“It’s a tidal wave coming up the beach,” he said. “It is an emergency. If we don’t get it right, it will affect our economy and standards of life in this country. To say we are going to carry on and do everything we did before – I just don’t think that’s going to be sustainable.

Ah yes The Guardian. Always worth a smile. So this is a man who is 'warning', 'forecasting' and otherwise casting doom and gloom about absolutely everything. He was part of 'Project Fear' pre the Referendum and is now trying to fulfil his prophecies. I guess his theory is if you say every major capital project like:

Hinckley

Heathrow

HS2

Refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster

Crossrail 2

The Northern Powerhouse

are going to be cancelled you may just get something right. He may indeed be right but judging by what the PM and Chancellor have said so far he is stupidly wrong.

Oops No 5

These are just a handful of stories from a whole flood of them saying the same thing. Are you really saying yet again that the UK media have got it wrong, foreign policy experts have got it wrong, international media have got it wrong, the auditor general of the National Audit Offuce has got it wrong, but that you know what's Really going on? That you are smarter than all of them combinded?

No I am not saying I am smarter than them. Just smarter than you. And I have just shown you why ... "

You are quite simply delusional.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear.

You really are clutching at straws now aren't you

Obviously I am. Me, the media, think tanks, the Chinese, the national audit office, all clutching at straws, but You know whats REALLY going on don't you?

Yes REALLY I'm living in a parallel Brexit utopia

It's a lovely place x

I'm loving. The leaving feeling xxx"

"We've got that Leaving feeling

Oh Oh that Leaving feeling.."

Sung to the music of that great Righteous Brothers classic.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Re Hinckley Point - I've heard some bizarre accusations about the effect of Brexit but yours has to be one of the most ridiculous! Are you really serious?!

What on earth are you talking about? Of course I'm serious. Cameron approved the plan and started the whole thing so would have signed the contracts.

If the referendum had been Remain, then Cameron would have still been PM and signed.

What the hell do you think happened with Hinckley Point?

You Brexiters are living in a parallel world I swear. "

You're living in a parallel world. I thought you was against Hinckley Point as there are, in your opinion, cheaper and greener options.

Yet here you are saying Brexit is bad because you believe it is the cause of Hinckley Point being postponed and potentially cancelled.

Surely that would be a possitive of Brexit in your parallel universe

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You are quite simply delusional."

Well OK lets see now:

Hinckley Point? I already showed that the delay is absolutely nothing to do with Brexit and that your own links have been proved totally wrong.

Heathrow? (Actually airport expansion). A decision on which airport could expand was delayed while the new PM and the new Transport Secretary (Grayling) took office. An announcement is expected when parliament returns. Now this may come as a surprise but the new runways are being paid for by the airports not the Government. More precisely, Gatwick Airport Ltd have stated: ‘We anticipate that investment in a second runway at Gatwick would be financeable without recourse to public

funds'.

http://www.aef.org.uk/uploads/Who-would-pay-for-a-new-runway.pdf

HS2? New Transport secretary Grayling said back in July he was backing it and it would continue. Once again another dire 'forecast' from the NAO chairman proved wrong so quickly.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/17/hs2-go-ahead-transport-secretary-chris-grayling

Northern Powerhouse? Well the Prime Minister said two days ago it will go ahead as planned.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37129381

Etc etc etc .. it goes on and on ... every one of your 'forecasts' of doom and gloom has been proved either wrong, biased or just crap. It is you who is pursuing a delusional path of a failed Brexit and some idea of a return to the EU.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You can say goodbye to human rights when the 2 years are up.

Human rights are protected by a complex collection of laws and treaties. The treaties which the uk signed up to by being part of the eu ensured a minimum standard of protection for various rights - for example, employment rights

Right not to be tortured

Right not to be enslaved

Right to family and private life

Will we ever see a british bill of rights?

Details of the proposals for a bill of rights have not yet been published. Time will tell, if there will be one, one said that china comes to mind.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

we have had a pensions crisis for years... that's hardly recent news. most of that was triggered by Gordon Browns rush to sell off as much of our gold reserve as possible

and didn't we have a major recession and banking crisis in 2008, while we still in the EU? had we been tied into the EU currency we still would be in it like most of southern Europe

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can say goodbye to human rights when the 2 years are up.

Human rights are protected by a complex collection of laws and treaties. The treaties which the uk signed up to by being part of the eu ensured a minimum standard of protection for various rights - for example, employment rights

Right not to be tortured

Right not to be enslaved

Right to family and private life

Will we ever see a british bill of rights?

Details of the proposals for a bill of rights have not yet been published. Time will tell, if there will be one, one said that china comes to mind."

Nice try mate. Except that the Human Rights Act and the ECHR is nothing to do with the EU. The UK wrote that Charter before even the EEC was formed.

And all those employment rights? We had Medical and Unemployment rights in 1911. like Holiday Pay and Maternity Rights brought in in 1938? We had them all before the EU 'Directed' on it.

But hey why let some basic facts get in the way of a Brexit bashing?

And whats with the two years thing? We could leave in 3 months. Its the Trade deal that will take time. Not from us but because the EU is so useless it has to get 27 countries to agree...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andS66Couple  over a year ago

Derby


"On the 23rd June I went into the voting booth and put my cross into the leave box. I did this with around a 60% feeling of certainty that I was doing the right thing. Given everything that has happened since, political turmoil, Cameron resigning, labour in meltdown, weeping and hysteria from remainers. I now feel that if asked to vote again, I would vote leave again this time with a feeling of 90% certainty that it is the right thing to do.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I however have a different opinion. I would vote leave again and I would have a feeling of 100% certainty it is the right thing to do "

Is it not the same opinion?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andS66Couple  over a year ago

Derby


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?"

In which case could you agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slashing off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get please?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can say goodbye to human rights when the 2 years are up.

Human rights are protected by a complex collection of laws and treaties. The treaties which the uk signed up to by being part of the eu ensured a minimum standard of protection for various rights - for example, employment rights

Right not to be tortured

Right not to be enslaved

Right to family and private life

Will we ever see a british bill of rights?

Details of the proposals for a bill of rights have not yet been published. Time will tell, if there will be one, one said that china comes to mind.

Nice try mate. Except that the Human Rights Act and the ECHR is nothing to do with the EU. The UK wrote that Charter before even the EEC was formed.

And all those employment rights? We had Medical and Unemployment rights in 1911. like Holiday Pay and Maternity Rights brought in in 1938? We had them all before the EU 'Directed' on it.

But hey why let some basic facts get in the way of a Brexit bashing?

And whats with the two years thing? We could leave in 3 months. Its the Trade deal that will take time. Not from us but because the EU is so useless it has to get 27 countries to agree..."

Bloody Hell, its not often I agree with Chris, but he is spot on

and as he says, everyone gets tied up with this 2 year nonsense, quite rightly we could leave in 3 months, or indeed 3 years, 4 years or longer, hopefully its 3 months

Lets refresh article 50 section 3 again, so others don't get would up with this 2 year shite

3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

In which case could you agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slashing off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get please? "

Well I tried to extend the olive branch and all I got back was "I want Brexit to look like this". You have quoted my post, but do you agree that we don't yet know what the result of the negotiations will be?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"I voted to remain and im still steadfast that to leave was the wrong decision i dont believe the economy will collapse i dont believe the world will end i simply believe that we will end up like all the other european non member states and continue to adopt EU rule and regulation without the ability to vito or influence change and to be frank anyone who truly believes we wont have to concede to free movement and payments in are clearly deluded

I am deluded then

You, me and over 17 million others apparently.

Can you not accept a percentage of that 17,000,000 were coerced or simply ignorant to that what they were voting for, given what you now know. Or are you still as adamant in your belief to being right. "

And we're non of the remainers coerced or bribed bullied in to the vote that they cast, or are all the remainers more intelligent and have a better take on what is best

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"You can say goodbye to human rights when the 2 years are up.

Human rights are protected by a complex collection of laws and treaties. The treaties which the uk signed up to by being part of the eu ensured a minimum standard of protection for various rights - for example, employment rights

Right not to be tortured

Right not to be enslaved

Right to family and private life

Will we ever see a british bill of rights?

Details of the proposals for a bill of rights have not yet been published. Time will tell, if there will be one, one said that china comes to mind.

Nice try mate. Except that the Human Rights Act and the ECHR is nothing to do with the EU. The UK wrote that Charter before even the EEC was formed.

And all those employment rights? We had Medical and Unemployment rights in 1911. like Holiday Pay and Maternity Rights brought in in 1938? We had them all before the EU 'Directed' on it.

But hey why let some basic facts get in the way of a Brexit bashing?

And whats with the two years thing? We could leave in 3 months. Its the Trade deal that will take time. Not from us but because the EU is so useless it has to get 27 countries to agree..."

Well said yet again, it's amazing how many peeps think we had no rights and were a country of slaves before the existence of the bureaucratic EU, and it's over paid non representing elite told us how to live our lives

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"You can say goodbye to human rights when the 2 years are up.

Human rights are protected by a complex collection of laws and treaties. The treaties which the uk signed up to by being part of the eu ensured a minimum standard of protection for various rights - for example, employment rights

Right not to be tortured

Right not to be enslaved

Right to family and private life

Will we ever see a british bill of rights?

Details of the proposals for a bill of rights have not yet been published. Time will tell, if there will be one, one said that china comes to mind.

Nice try mate. Except that the Human Rights Act and the ECHR is nothing to do with the EU. The UK wrote that Charter before even the EEC was formed.

And all those employment rights? We had Medical and Unemployment rights in 1911. like Holiday Pay and Maternity Rights brought in in 1938? We had them all before the EU 'Directed' on it.

But hey why let some basic facts get in the way of a Brexit bashing?

And whats with the two years thing? We could leave in 3 months. Its the Trade deal that will take time. Not from us but because the EU is so useless it has to get 27 countries to agree...

Bloody Hell, its not often I agree with Chris, but he is spot on

and as he says, everyone gets tied up with this 2 year nonsense, quite rightly we could leave in 3 months, or indeed 3 years, 4 years or longer, hopefully its 3 months

Lets refresh article 50 section 3 again, so others don't get would up with this 2 year shite

3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

."

The trade deal is not part of the article 50 negotiations. We will have to leave, and then once we have left, we can then enter negotiations about a trade deal.

You're right, technically the negotiations could happen more quickly than two years, however I don't expect that to happen. I think that anything short of two years would look like a rushed job. I also dont think that we have the capacity within the civil service to deal with something so complex as leaving the EU in a shorter time period.

We have been in the EU (and predecessor orgs) for 40+ years and it was never envisioned that we would leave. With any political decision, there are inevitably unintended consequences. I think that there are going to be a huge number of important questions raised, and tough decisions to be made, about things that we haven't even considered yet. Only once we start going through the negotiations will these arise, and so thats why I think it will take at least 2 years.

As mentioned above, it could also go the other way, with the UK and other member states agreeing that actually two years isn't enough, and that so many questions have been thrown up, that we need longer. The feeling that I get is that both sides won't want it to grag on for too long as that leads to uncertainty.

The other variable in the equation is when we will actually trigger article 50. I know that the Leave camp are wanting it to happen as quickly as possible, however the longer its delayed, the longer we have to try to get our ducks in a row and try to think about issues that might come up. But the obvious caveat to that is that we can't delay it inevitably because again that leads to uncertainty.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andS66Couple  over a year ago

Derby


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

In which case could you agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slashing off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get please?

Well I tried to extend the olive branch and all I got back was "I want Brexit to look like this". You have quoted my post, but do you agree that we don't yet know what the result of the negotiations will be? "

Yes, I agree entirely. Now, can you please agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slagging off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get? That includes starting off posts with a clearly anti-brexit theme.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ELLONS AND CREAMWoman  over a year ago

stourbridge area

Can u all stop talking about brexit now please

...its happend .... so move on ... que sera..... and no were not going to Wembley ..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ... "

Interesting the Gaurdian online today carrying several Brexit related articles, all of which appearing to acknowledge that Brexit is a fact and we are leaving the EU. No attempts to pretend that leavers who feel they were mislead about the consequences of Brexit want a second plebiscite or that the result of a second vote would deliver victory to the Remainiacs. Good news indeed!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can u all stop talking about brexit now please

...its happend .... so move on ... que sera..... and no were not going to Wembley .."

Noooo, it's funny

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

In which case could you agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slashing off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get please?

Well I tried to extend the olive branch and all I got back was "I want Brexit to look like this". You have quoted my post, but do you agree that we don't yet know what the result of the negotiations will be?

Yes, I agree entirely. Now, can you please agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slagging off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get? That includes starting off posts with a clearly anti-brexit theme."

Why are you asking me to stop slagging off Brexiters when you are not asking others to stop slagging off "remoaners" or "remaniacs", both of which have negative/offensive connotations?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can u all stop talking about brexit now please

...its happend .... so move on ... que sera..... and no were not going to Wembley .."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ... "

A) We could, but we would be rushing the most important negotiations of the last 40 years rather than taking the time to make sure we get the best deal for Britain.

B) We could enter new trade negotiations, which as you say would have no time limit, it might take the same length of time as Canada, 7 years, but then again they have more negotiators, less trade with the EU than we do, and I don't think that it covered services (could be wrong) which are extremely important to the UK. So it will probably take us longer. With regards to the £13bn in savings, its a drop in the ocean compared to the £70bn of monetary policy measures that have just been spent, and you also have to take into account the loss of tax revenue from the 4% hit to GDP.

C) We can't just maintain the status quo, we would have to trade under WTO rules, which means that whatever traffifs we apply to other countries, to the EU. The EU would also have to apply traffifs to us that they currently apply to other countries.

D) This really depends on who needs who more, one group of 435 million people or another group of 65 million people. It's usually the smaller needs the bigger, but who knows in this case. I would say though that if the UK is willing to take a 4% hit to our GDP for our principles, that its likely that the EU would be happy to take a much much smaller hit to their GDP to stick to their principles.

E) Germany and other countries will want a quick and friendly trade deal, ideally they would like it so friendly and so quick that we never actually trigger article 50. But as I said I think (just my humble opinion this time) its unlikely that the uk will want to spend less than 2 years negotiating article 50, and any subsequent trade deal will still take years to sort out, probably longer than Canada's as its bigger, more complex, and hopefully more comprehensive (services) than theirs. Plus after the deal has been negotiated, it will need to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states which will likely take another two years again if we are looking at the Canadian example.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ...

A) We could, but we would be rushing the most important negotiations of the last 40 years rather than taking the time to make sure we get the best deal for Britain.

B) We could enter new trade negotiations, which as you say would have no time limit, it might take the same length of time as Canada, 7 years, but then again they have more negotiators, less trade with the EU than we do, and I don't think that it covered services (could be wrong) which are extremely important to the UK. So it will probably take us longer. With regards to the £13bn in savings, its a drop in the ocean compared to the £70bn of monetary policy measures that have just been spent, and you also have to take into account the loss of tax revenue from the 4% hit to GDP.

C) We can't just maintain the status quo, we would have to trade under WTO rules, which means that whatever traffifs we apply to other countries, to the EU. The EU would also have to apply traffifs to us that they currently apply to other countries.

D) This really depends on who needs who more, one group of 435 million people or another group of 65 million people. It's usually the smaller needs the bigger, but who knows in this case. I would say though that if the UK is willing to take a 4% hit to our GDP for our principles, that its likely that the EU would be happy to take a much much smaller hit to their GDP to stick to their principles.

E) Germany and other countries will want a quick and friendly trade deal, ideally they would like it so friendly and so quick that we never actually trigger article 50. But as I said I think (just my humble opinion this time) its unlikely that the uk will want to spend less than 2 years negotiating article 50, and any subsequent trade deal will still take years to sort out, probably longer than Canada's as its bigger, more complex, and hopefully more comprehensive (services) than theirs. Plus after the deal has been negotiated, it will need to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states which will likely take another two years again if we are looking at the Canadian example."

Yeah but we aren't Canada. We are far more strategically important to the EU than Canada, Norway or Switzerland for many reasons.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ...

A) We could, but we would be rushing the most important negotiations of the last 40 years rather than taking the time to make sure we get the best deal for Britain.

B) We could enter new trade negotiations, which as you say would have no time limit, it might take the same length of time as Canada, 7 years, but then again they have more negotiators, less trade with the EU than we do, and I don't think that it covered services (could be wrong) which are extremely important to the UK. So it will probably take us longer. With regards to the £13bn in savings, its a drop in the ocean compared to the £70bn of monetary policy measures that have just been spent, and you also have to take into account the loss of tax revenue from the 4% hit to GDP.

C) We can't just maintain the status quo, we would have to trade under WTO rules, which means that whatever traffifs we apply to other countries, to the EU. The EU would also have to apply traffifs to us that they currently apply to other countries.

D) This really depends on who needs who more, one group of 435 million people or another group of 65 million people. It's usually the smaller needs the bigger, but who knows in this case. I would say though that if the UK is willing to take a 4% hit to our GDP for our principles, that its likely that the EU would be happy to take a much much smaller hit to their GDP to stick to their principles.

E) Germany and other countries will want a quick and friendly trade deal, ideally they would like it so friendly and so quick that we never actually trigger article 50. But as I said I think (just my humble opinion this time) its unlikely that the uk will want to spend less than 2 years negotiating article 50, and any subsequent trade deal will still take years to sort out, probably longer than Canada's as its bigger, more complex, and hopefully more comprehensive (services) than theirs. Plus after the deal has been negotiated, it will need to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states which will likely take another two years again if we are looking at the Canadian example."

You just don't get it do you? I tried to lay out the very separate and logical steps but to you 'Remoaners' its just '2 years for this' and '7 years for that'. Utterly unbelievable!

Leaving:

What on earth is to negotiate to leave the EU apart from making sure Brits abroad are safeguarded? Please do enlighten us what on earth can take two years? What 'deal' do you think we need to leave? We just bloody leave...

Trade:

As I said that is what will take time. Not from the UK but because the EU is hamstrung by 27 countries. We already have a trade deal with the EU. All that is needed is to find out where the EU wish to play silly beggars. After all we just want zero tariff trading with no strings. Similar to what every other country has with the EU. No 'free movement', no 'membership fee', no laws no Directives no more bullshit. Just like everyone else. And if the EU want to take 7 years so what? The Status quo remains because that is how it has to be played out. And you really don't understand 'WTO Rules' either do you?

Your QE bullshit:

You drop in, yet again, the £70 Billion of QE that hasn't actually been spent and probably will not be as there is a huge demand for Government Bonds (GILTS) with the lowest yields known for years. And whatever is spent on those Bonds will provide interest payments (yields) and eventually a profit just as the QE from 2009 did. And there is a huge difference between the £13 Billion a year we ship off to the EU and QE money spent internally on bonds that are secure and can be traded. You are not too good at finance are you?

Your 4% GDP Bullshit:

So is this yet another 'forecast' from your 'experts' that we regularly show to be wastes of space? when did we lose 4% GDP then? I must have had a snooze and missed it. The other day you were spouting off about how all the infrastructure projects were going top be cancelled and yet days after your 'experts' gave their 'forecasts' the real world kicked in and everything was guaranteed. Hinckley Point, HS2, Northern Powerhouse ring a bell? Oh and you sort of slipped up on Airport expansion as its not even a Government funded project wherever its built!! Magic!

Trade Deficit:

Dear oh dear.. it is not the number of people involved. That is just you grabbing at straws to stop your argument sinking. It is the amount of MONEY involved. And currently the EU earns £61 Bn a year more from the UK than we earn from the EU. We are actually better off not trading with the EU at all as we have to BORROW £61 Bn a year to fund that Foreign Currency deficit. So we get into more debt to trade with the EU... And what was our Government Deficit last year? £72 Bn. Its that bloody simple. Sod how many people... There are 360 odd million people in the USA and 64 million here but we manage to make a profit out of US trade. I know which I prefer.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ...

A) We could, but we would be rushing the most important negotiations of the last 40 years rather than taking the time to make sure we get the best deal for Britain.

B) We could enter new trade negotiations, which as you say would have no time limit, it might take the same length of time as Canada, 7 years, but then again they have more negotiators, less trade with the EU than we do, and I don't think that it covered services (could be wrong) which are extremely important to the UK. So it will probably take us longer. With regards to the £13bn in savings, its a drop in the ocean compared to the £70bn of monetary policy measures that have just been spent, and you also have to take into account the loss of tax revenue from the 4% hit to GDP.

C) We can't just maintain the status quo, we would have to trade under WTO rules, which means that whatever traffifs we apply to other countries, to the EU. The EU would also have to apply traffifs to us that they currently apply to other countries.

D) This really depends on who needs who more, one group of 435 million people or another group of 65 million people. It's usually the smaller needs the bigger, but who knows in this case. I would say though that if the UK is willing to take a 4% hit to our GDP for our principles, that its likely that the EU would be happy to take a much much smaller hit to their GDP to stick to their principles.

E) Germany and other countries will want a quick and friendly trade deal, ideally they would like it so friendly and so quick that we never actually trigger article 50. But as I said I think (just my humble opinion this time) its unlikely that the uk will want to spend less than 2 years negotiating article 50, and any subsequent trade deal will still take years to sort out, probably longer than Canada's as its bigger, more complex, and hopefully more comprehensive (services) than theirs. Plus after the deal has been negotiated, it will need to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states which will likely take another two years again if we are looking at the Canadian example."

like I said, it's funny

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andS66Couple  over a year ago

Derby


"The usual suspects have done the Brexit Punch and Judy with each other for a few months now, and as fun as that as been, it would be nice if we could try and find some consensus on some issues.

So let's see if there are at least somethings that we can agree on?

Do you think that we can agree that we don't know exactly what Brexit will look like yet? I know I don't.

I'm hoping that that isn't too controversial a statement and is something we can agree on?

In which case could you agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slashing off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get please?

Well I tried to extend the olive branch and all I got back was "I want Brexit to look like this". You have quoted my post, but do you agree that we don't yet know what the result of the negotiations will be?

Yes, I agree entirely. Now, can you please agree to stop bleating about Brexit, or slagging off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get? That includes starting off posts with a clearly anti-brexit theme.

Why are you asking me to stop slagging off Brexiters when you are not asking others to stop slagging off "remoaners" or "remaniacs", both of which have negative/offensive connotations? "

That's simple... because it's you that I'm conversing with. And maybe, just maybe, if you stopped bleating about Brexit, or slagging off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get, then others, from either side, would do the same. I'm asking you because I'm conversing with you, and also because you just can't drop it.

So, once again, will you stop bleating about Brexit, or slagging off 'Brexiters', at every single opportunity you get?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

A couple of interesting and very relative news items given the Thread is about staying or leaving and the consequences.

"Housebuilder Persimmon has reported a 29% jump in first-half profits and said customer interest since the Brexit vote has been "robust".

The company said its private sale reservation rate since 1 July was 17% higher than at the same time last year.

The result of the EU referendum had increased economic uncertainty, it added, but since then visitors to its sites were up 20% year on year compared to 8% ahead in the first six months of the year against the same period in 2015."

Persimmon was one of the firms quoted by 'Remoaners' here in a 'forecast' that the country was heading for economic ruin in the first weeks post Brexit.

And car sales:

"Just over 4.18 million vehicles were sold in the first half of the year. That was an 8% increase on second-hand sales in the first half of 2015, and the first time that any half-year sales have risen above the four million mark.

The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said the increase mirrored the rising number of new cars sold in the past few years.

Mike Hawes, chief executive of the SMMT, said: 'The UK's used car market is at its strongest ever."

Car sales are widely seen as a key indicator of economic activity and consumers' willingness to spend money.

The half-year rise in second-hand sales was far in excess of the growth of the wider economy, or of people's incomes.

And Banking:

US investment Bank J P Morgan who funded 'Remain' and were major players in the 'Project Fear' effort talking down the UK have now had to admit they were wrong 'forecasting' a major fall in UK stocks. CEO Jamie Dimon had also 'forecast' the loss of 4,000 jobs at JPM. In a U Turn it now says the UK is a great place to invest! Their Equity Strategist Mislav Matejka now says UK shares are 'bullish' and will outperform their European counterparts and any political uncertainty will hit them rather than UK shares. He also cited the fall in the value of the £ a significant benefit to UK Equities.

Contrary to what some Remoaners have kept droning on about.

And those 'Treasury Forecasts' that showed we would all be £4,300 worse off and a deep recession? The latest Treasury Analysis of 'Forecasts by City Economists' is now expecting the UK economy to grow by 1.6% in 2016. Barclays is upping its 'forecast' from 1.1%, Citigroup is upping it from 1.3% to 1.7% and Commerzbank upping it from 1.2% to 1.6%. Overall that is an increase of some 30%.

In July unemployment remained at 4.9%, The Government ran a £1 Bn surplus and Retail sales were up 1.4%.

Some Positivity to cheer people up ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You forgot to mention the boom in tourism, partly from staycations and partly from Johnny Foreigner. Now I'm sure it has something to do with the lower pound but the UK aint cheap and the country is full of racists so it does seem strange.

.

NOT!

The UK is the place to be and to invest in right now and after the autumn budget when taxes are lowered, businesses and entrepreneurs will flood here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

This has without doubt been the best political debate I have seen in a long time.

The arguments and facts stated on both sides have been very informative and I have learnt a great deal.

I did vote to leave and non of the arguments posted here to remain have changed my mind, in fact it has only strengthened my resolve.

People far more intelligent than me on both sides have taken time to study both sides of the coin and at times has amazed me with the factual knowledge you have.

All I can add to this debate is this,

I travel all over the UK with my job from city to city, town to town, village to village, and the amount of construction going on is amazing, from schools to hospitals to medical centers to housing,

This in my mind tells me we are a booming economy I might be wrong but I don't think so.

Now is the time to pull together, the referendum has been won, lets move on and help the UK as best as we can, support your local shopkeeper buy British if possible.

The time for argument is over.

Ok that's me done thanks again ....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ...

A) We could, but we would be rushing the most important negotiations of the last 40 years rather than taking the time to make sure we get the best deal for Britain.

B) We could enter new trade negotiations, which as you say would have no time limit, it might take the same length of time as Canada, 7 years, but then again they have more negotiators, less trade with the EU than we do, and I don't think that it covered services (could be wrong) which are extremely important to the UK. So it will probably take us longer. With regards to the £13bn in savings, its a drop in the ocean compared to the £70bn of monetary policy measures that have just been spent, and you also have to take into account the loss of tax revenue from the 4% hit to GDP.

C) We can't just maintain the status quo, we would have to trade under WTO rules, which means that whatever traffifs we apply to other countries, to the EU. The EU would also have to apply traffifs to us that they currently apply to other countries.

D) This really depends on who needs who more, one group of 435 million people or another group of 65 million people. It's usually the smaller needs the bigger, but who knows in this case. I would say though that if the UK is willing to take a 4% hit to our GDP for our principles, that its likely that the EU would be happy to take a much much smaller hit to their GDP to stick to their principles.

E) Germany and other countries will want a quick and friendly trade deal, ideally they would like it so friendly and so quick that we never actually trigger article 50. But as I said I think (just my humble opinion this time) its unlikely that the uk will want to spend less than 2 years negotiating article 50, and any subsequent trade deal will still take years to sort out, probably longer than Canada's as its bigger, more complex, and hopefully more comprehensive (services) than theirs. Plus after the deal has been negotiated, it will need to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states which will likely take another two years again if we are looking at the Canadian example.

You just don't get it do you? I tried to lay out the very separate and logical steps but to you 'Remoaners' its just '2 years for this' and '7 years for that'. Utterly unbelievable!

Leaving:

What on earth is to negotiate to leave the EU apart from making sure Brits abroad are safeguarded? Please do enlighten us what on earth can take two years? What 'deal' do you think we need to leave? We just bloody leave...

Trade:

As I said that is what will take time. Not from the UK but because the EU is hamstrung by 27 countries. We already have a trade deal with the EU. All that is needed is to find out where the EU wish to play silly beggars. After all we just want zero tariff trading with no strings. Similar to what every other country has with the EU. No 'free movement', no 'membership fee', no laws no Directives no more bullshit. Just like everyone else. And if the EU want to take 7 years so what? The Status quo remains because that is how it has to be played out. And you really don't understand 'WTO Rules' either do you?

Your QE bullshit:

You drop in, yet again, the £70 Billion of QE that hasn't actually been spent and probably will not be as there is a huge demand for Government Bonds (GILTS) with the lowest yields known for years. And whatever is spent on those Bonds will provide interest payments (yields) and eventually a profit just as the QE from 2009 did. And there is a huge difference between the £13 Billion a year we ship off to the EU and QE money spent internally on bonds that are secure and can be traded. You are not too good at finance are you?

Your 4% GDP Bullshit:

So is this yet another 'forecast' from your 'experts' that we regularly show to be wastes of space? when did we lose 4% GDP then? I must have had a snooze and missed it. The other day you were spouting off about how all the infrastructure projects were going top be cancelled and yet days after your 'experts' gave their 'forecasts' the real world kicked in and everything was guaranteed. Hinckley Point, HS2, Northern Powerhouse ring a bell? Oh and you sort of slipped up on Airport expansion as its not even a Government funded project wherever its built!! Magic!

Trade Deficit:

Dear oh dear.. it is not the number of people involved. That is just you grabbing at straws to stop your argument sinking. It is the amount of MONEY involved. And currently the EU earns £61 Bn a year more from the UK than we earn from the EU. We are actually better off not trading with the EU at all as we have to BORROW £61 Bn a year to fund that Foreign Currency deficit. So we get into more debt to trade with the EU... And what was our Government Deficit last year? £72 Bn. Its that bloody simple. Sod how many people... There are 360 odd million people in the USA and 64 million here but we manage to make a profit out of US trade. I know which I prefer."

I do get it, there is plenty to negotiate, I know you want to rush out of Europe and you don’t care if we make mistakes along the way, or that we don’t get the best deal for Britain, but I haven’t heard any credible sources calling for less than the two year time period.

Zero tariff trading without free movement or a contribution or any of the things that you dislike does not happen. NO country on Earth has what you think that we will get. I seem to understand the WTO rules better than you do. The QE money HAS been spent (see p6 of The Economist August 13-19th), and the bank of England think that they will have spent £100 billion by the end of the year. That completely negates years worth of savings from leaving the EU, and obviously any further QE needed to prop up the economy will continue to cost us money, rather than saving it.

Just because you don’t like experts, that doesn’t stop them from being experts in their field. The option for people on this forum is who know more about the economy? The Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Bank of England, or a van driver? Who knows more about Defence and Security? The National Security Strategy Joint Committee of Parliament, or a van driver? Who knows more about infrastructure projects, the Auditor General of the National Audit Office, or a van driver? These experts said that these projects, like HP would be delayed, and then guess what? HP has been delayed! I know YOU say that they haven’t been delayed, and it doesn’t matter how many quotes or articles I post proving beyond doubt that HP has been delayed, but the reality is it has been delayed. If it hadn’t been delayed, then why were there so many stories in the press? Why do the documents not have signatures on them? And why are the Chinese making statements about it?

Talking about the 65m vs 430m people is about the relative size of their economy! The Single Market is worth 4% of the UK GDP compared to WTO rules, so about £72bn of trade. You are willing to give that up, but don’t think that Europe would give up the smaller figure of £61bn, which only represents 0.37% of their economy. So you think that they won’t want to lose 0.37% of their economy, when you think that the UK is happy to throw away 4% of their economy? So we stand to lose both the bigger amount, and the bigger percentage of our economy.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Can I just state the real world situation here:

a) We could present our Article 50 letter to the Council of Ministers meeting on October 20th and tell them that, subject to UK citizens status being safeguarded in EU countries, we intend to leave the EU formally on April 4th 2017.

b) From 5th April we would enter into negotiations for a new trade relationship. There is no time limit whatsoever on those negotiations. We would also start a new Financial Year with an extra £13 Bn available to carry out the replacement funding already guaranteed by the Chancellor.

c) During those negotiations it could be argued that the 'Status Quo' should remain to retain certainty and continuity given under WTO rules the EU could not take a detrimental position towards the UK. That would put pressure on both parties to reach an amicable permanent agreement.

d) Whatever hard ball the EU wish to play against us we would return that ball just as hard and that would harm EU countries more than the UK due to the £61 Bn trade deficit that exists.

e) Germany has already stated it wants a quick UK exit and a friendly trade result and as they are now the only big paymaster within the EU it is Merkel not Juncker that will play the game.

Oh and I gues the 'f)' is there will be no 2nd Referendum ...

A) We could, but we would be rushing the most important negotiations of the last 40 years rather than taking the time to make sure we get the best deal for Britain.

B) We could enter new trade negotiations, which as you say would have no time limit, it might take the same length of time as Canada, 7 years, but then again they have more negotiators, less trade with the EU than we do, and I don't think that it covered services (could be wrong) which are extremely important to the UK. So it will probably take us longer. With regards to the £13bn in savings, its a drop in the ocean compared to the £70bn of monetary policy measures that have just been spent, and you also have to take into account the loss of tax revenue from the 4% hit to GDP.

C) We can't just maintain the status quo, we would have to trade under WTO rules, which means that whatever traffifs we apply to other countries, to the EU. The EU would also have to apply traffifs to us that they currently apply to other countries.

D) This really depends on who needs who more, one group of 435 million people or another group of 65 million people. It's usually the smaller needs the bigger, but who knows in this case. I would say though that if the UK is willing to take a 4% hit to our GDP for our principles, that its likely that the EU would be happy to take a much much smaller hit to their GDP to stick to their principles.

E) Germany and other countries will want a quick and friendly trade deal, ideally they would like it so friendly and so quick that we never actually trigger article 50. But as I said I think (just my humble opinion this time) its unlikely that the uk will want to spend less than 2 years negotiating article 50, and any subsequent trade deal will still take years to sort out, probably longer than Canada's as its bigger, more complex, and hopefully more comprehensive (services) than theirs. Plus after the deal has been negotiated, it will need to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states which will likely take another two years again if we are looking at the Canadian example.

You just don't get it do you? I tried to lay out the very separate and logical steps but to you 'Remoaners' its just '2 years for this' and '7 years for that'. Utterly unbelievable!

Leaving:

What on earth is to negotiate to leave the EU apart from making sure Brits abroad are safeguarded? Please do enlighten us what on earth can take two years? What 'deal' do you think we need to leave? We just bloody leave...

Trade:

As I said that is what will take time. Not from the UK but because the EU is hamstrung by 27 countries. We already have a trade deal with the EU. All that is needed is to find out where the EU wish to play silly beggars. After all we just want zero tariff trading with no strings. Similar to what every other country has with the EU. No 'free movement', no 'membership fee', no laws no Directives no more bullshit. Just like everyone else. And if the EU want to take 7 years so what? The Status quo remains because that is how it has to be played out. And you really don't understand 'WTO Rules' either do you?

Your QE bullshit:

You drop in, yet again, the £70 Billion of QE that hasn't actually been spent and probably will not be as there is a huge demand for Government Bonds (GILTS) with the lowest yields known for years. And whatever is spent on those Bonds will provide interest payments (yields) and eventually a profit just as the QE from 2009 did. And there is a huge difference between the £13 Billion a year we ship off to the EU and QE money spent internally on bonds that are secure and can be traded. You are not too good at finance are you?

Your 4% GDP Bullshit:

So is this yet another 'forecast' from your 'experts' that we regularly show to be wastes of space? when did we lose 4% GDP then? I must have had a snooze and missed it. The other day you were spouting off about how all the infrastructure projects were going top be cancelled and yet days after your 'experts' gave their 'forecasts' the real world kicked in and everything was guaranteed. Hinckley Point, HS2, Northern Powerhouse ring a bell? Oh and you sort of slipped up on Airport expansion as its not even a Government funded project wherever its built!! Magic!

Trade Deficit:

Dear oh dear.. it is not the number of people involved. That is just you grabbing at straws to stop your argument sinking. It is the amount of MONEY involved. And currently the EU earns £61 Bn a year more from the UK than we earn from the EU. We are actually better off not trading with the EU at all as we have to BORROW £61 Bn a year to fund that Foreign Currency deficit. So we get into more debt to trade with the EU... And what was our Government Deficit last year? £72 Bn. Its that bloody simple. Sod how many people... There are 360 odd million people in the USA and 64 million here but we manage to make a profit out of US trade. I know which I prefer.

I do get it, there is plenty to negotiate, I know you want to rush out of Europe and you don’t care if we make mistakes along the way, or that we don’t get the best deal for Britain, but I haven’t heard any credible sources calling for less than the two year time period.

Zero tariff trading without free movement or a contribution or any of the things that you dislike does not happen. NO country on Earth has what you think that we will get. I seem to understand the WTO rules better than you do. The QE money HAS been spent (see p6 of The Economist August 13-19th), and the bank of England think that they will have spent £100 billion by the end of the year. That completely negates years worth of savings from leaving the EU, and obviously any further QE needed to prop up the economy will continue to cost us money, rather than saving it.

Just because you don’t like experts, that doesn’t stop them from being experts in their field. The option for people on this forum is who know more about the economy? The Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Bank of England, or a van driver? Who knows more about Defence and Security? The National Security Strategy Joint Committee of Parliament, or a van driver? Who knows more about infrastructure projects, the Auditor General of the National Audit Office, or a van driver? These experts said that these projects, like HP would be delayed, and then guess what? HP has been delayed! I know YOU say that they haven’t been delayed, and it doesn’t matter how many quotes or articles I post proving beyond doubt that HP has been delayed, but the reality is it has been delayed. If it hadn’t been delayed, then why were there so many stories in the press? Why do the documents not have signatures on them? And why are the Chinese making statements about it?

Talking about the 65m vs 430m people is about the relative size of their economy! The Single Market is worth 4% of the UK GDP compared to WTO rules, so about £72bn of trade. You are willing to give that up, but don’t think that Europe would give up the smaller figure of £61bn, which only represents 0.37% of their economy. So you think that they won’t want to lose 0.37% of their economy, when you think that the UK is happy to throw away 4% of their economy? So we stand to lose both the bigger amount, and the bigger percentage of our economy."

You are very keen on quoting the "experts."

I prefer to rely on personal responsibility for my decisions, as I am sure do lowly "van drivers."

I assume that you have brought yourself up to date with the latest opinions from many of those companies and organisations which supported the Remain campaign, if you are that interested in expert opinion?

Sometimes common sense usurps expert opinion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"

You are very keen on quoting the "experts."

I prefer to rely on personal responsibility for my decisions, as I am sure do lowly "van drivers."

I assume that you have brought yourself up to date with the latest opinions from many of those companies and organisations which supported the Remain campaign, if you are that interested in expert opinion?

Sometimes common sense usurps expert opinion."

Yes I do listen to experts, like when I fly I like a qualified pilot, when I go to the hospital I want a qualified Dr, when I get my brakes changed I want a qualified technician. Don't you? Do you shun these experts too?

But I also listen to common sense. Immigrants fund and man our NHS, so its crazy to get rid of them or stop others coming when these leave. Its obvious that messing with such a big trading partner will negatively effect our economy. It's obvious that our farmer and scientists and researchers benefit from being in the EU. Its obvious that its better for UK citizens to have the right to work anywhere in the EU etc etc.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *igsteve43Man  over a year ago

derby


"

You are very keen on quoting the "experts."

I prefer to rely on personal responsibility for my decisions, as I am sure do lowly "van drivers."

I assume that you have brought yourself up to date with the latest opinions from many of those companies and organisations which supported the Remain campaign, if you are that interested in expert opinion?

Sometimes common sense usurps expert opinion.

Yes I do listen to experts, like when I fly I like a qualified pilot, when I go to the hospital I want a qualified Dr, when I get my brakes changed I want a qualified technician. Don't you? Do you shun these experts too?

But I also listen to common sense. Immigrants fund and man our NHS, so its crazy to get rid of them or stop others coming when these leave. Its obvious that messing with such a big trading partner will negatively effect our economy. It's obvious that our farmer and scientists and researchers benefit from being in the EU. Its obvious that its better for UK citizens to have the right to work anywhere in the EU etc etc."

Just to point out the majority of the farming community voted leave as they were being paid not to farm

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You are very keen on quoting the "experts."

I prefer to rely on personal responsibility for my decisions, as I am sure do lowly "van drivers."

I assume that you have brought yourself up to date with the latest opinions from many of those companies and organisations which supported the Remain campaign, if you are that interested in expert opinion?

Sometimes common sense usurps expert opinion.

Yes I do listen to experts, like when I fly I like a qualified pilot, when I go to the hospital I want a qualified Dr, when I get my brakes changed I want a qualified technician. Don't you? Do you shun these experts too?

But I also listen to common sense. Immigrants fund and man our NHS, so its crazy to get rid of them or stop others coming when these leave. Its obvious that messing with such a big trading partner will negatively effect our economy. It's obvious that our farmer and scientists and researchers benefit from being in the EU. Its obvious that its better for UK citizens to have the right to work anywhere in the EU etc etc."

Pretty much everything you say/repeat now is just hysterical nonsense. It is not obvious at all and completely untrue. Open your eyes and mind for once. In a few years time, or probably less, you will realise how silly and misguided you were

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By *entaur_UKMan  over a year ago

Cannock


"With worldwide uncertainty, need for QE and state intervention in staving off recession. Savers tightening their belts and several big businesses looking to Europe for their HQ's. The UK people realising they have been lied to on a mass scale. The realisation that Brexit is not an immediate trigger and 'project fear' was just a sound-bite. Immigration policy integral to the out campaign, not yet implemented but the jobs they do essential to our economy. The rewriting of our legal system and trade policies needing not only extended time but probably concessions on free movement contrary to the Brexit campaign?

Do you think Cameron's EU reforms would have put us in a better future position than what we are in now, would we still have had Boris, or would you still vote leave?

Camerons reforms were worthless, and both sides lied through their back teeth, and yes, I would still vote out."

First post on the thread and hit the nail on the head.

......and yeah I'd still vote leave again if there was another referendum, but there won't be, because Cameron said it was a once in a lifetime referendum on the EU, and the new Prime Minister Teresa May and her new cabinet in government are all committed to Brexit. Personally I can't wait till we trigger article 50, and the sooner we are out of the wretched EU the better.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.4999

0