FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > The Home Office
The Home Office
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?"
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference."
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference."
The Perm Sec is a civil servant.....  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
"
He's pretty clearly referring to Tory politicians, not Tory voters.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *V-Alice OP TV/TS
over a year ago
Ayr |
"Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference."
I care. Since we're stuck with this Government for at least the next five years, I'd like a smoothly functioning Home Office.
Personally, I reckon replacing her with Rory Stuart might be worth a go - and would make a difference.
In any case, Boris has a decision to make. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
I care. Since we're stuck with this Government for at least the next five years, I'd like a smoothly functioning Home Office.
Personally, I reckon replacing her with Rory Stuart might be worth a go - and would make a difference.
In any case, Boris has a decision to make."
Don't get me wrong. I do care. I just can't see any of the options being in any way useful. The least worst option is still horrific at best. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference."
Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first "
Lolz
Some quality comedy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
I care. Since we're stuck with this Government for at least the next five years, I'd like a smoothly functioning Home Office.
Personally, I reckon replacing her with Rory Stuart might be worth a go - and would make a difference.
In any case, Boris has a decision to make."
Rory Stewart isn't even an MP.
He's now running for London Mayor |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *V-Alice OP TV/TS
over a year ago
Ayr |
"The Home Secratary should resign
"
I doubt very much if she will. Her problem here seems to be that she doesn't like being told "no", or contradicted, by someone who understands the intricacies of her job very much more than she does. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first "
lol you believe that? Really? Wow.
The Tories won because they made the election all about Brexit. And because Corbyn failed as an effective leader. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago
North West |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy "
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference."
All parties are the same grow up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought."
However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners ."
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ony 2016Man
over a year ago
Huddersfield /derby cinemas |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive."
. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy "
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol "
If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ? "
Mobile phones , mobile phones for kids, Xbox , Xbox games , alcohol, cigarettes , sky tv, Netflix , carry outs, nights out, drugs..... oh wait, we’ve no food. Ah well let’s just pop down the food bank. Now, what’s a good box set to watch ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ? "
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, "
Be fair. How could he believe anything that's not in a Daily Mail rant? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ? "
Now we're hitting reality.
Thank you for demonstrating the standard Tory view of poor people.
Normality is restored. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, "
Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food ."
Why do people not have enough money to buy food? It's almost as if wages for many people are too low. Or food is too expensive. Or the benefits system is fucked up.
As for your other statement: "if a food bank exists, there will be a demand for it." Wow. That's like saying if there's a hospital, there will be demand for it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
Now we're hitting reality.
Thank you for demonstrating the standard Tory view of poor people.
Normality is restored."
My understanding is that charities exist to help a wide variety of good causes. The annual reports give a detailed breakdown of their objectives and what they so to help people including the poor. Investment income and legacies donated to charities fund monies given to the poor and less well off
.Are you objecting to charities using investment income from those who have made generous legacies assisting the less well off in society ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food ."
They probably spend their ‘existing money’ on housing, heating, clothing , travel , children etc etc basic living requirements. What if a person has no family or friends, what if a persons family and friends can’t afford to help? Are you suggesting that they get rid of food banks? Why don’t they get rid of all benefits then ? if they don’t exist there won’t be a need for it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food .
Why do people not have enough money to buy food? It's almost as if wages for many people are too low. Or food is too expensive. Or the benefits system is fucked up.
As for your other statement: "if a food bank exists, there will be a demand for it." Wow. That's like saying if there's a hospital, there will be demand for it."
If people taught themselves how to do things like boil and egg instead of ordering pizza they might have more cash |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food .
Why do people not have enough money to buy food? It's almost as if wages for many people are too low. Or food is too expensive. Or the benefits system is fucked up.
As for your other statement: "if a food bank exists, there will be a demand for it." Wow. That's like saying if there's a hospital, there will be demand for it.
If people taught themselves how to do things like boil and egg instead of ordering pizza they might have more cash "
I heard they were all secretly living on caviar and roast swan. No wonder they're broke! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food .
Why do people not have enough money to buy food? It's almost as if wages for many people are too low. Or food is too expensive. Or the benefits system is fucked up.
As for your other statement: "if a food bank exists, there will be a demand for it." Wow. That's like saying if there's a hospital, there will be demand for it.
If people taught themselves how to do things like boil and egg instead of ordering pizza they might have more cash
I heard they were all secretly living on caviar and roast swan. No wonder they're broke! "
Exactly my point... lumpfish roe is so much cheaper than Beluga. And roast duck is much cheaper per 100g than Swan. Bit of a black market for Swan and can be difficult to source |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference. Luckily the electorate do not agree with your opinion . Many of these MPs to whom you refer work night and day to make the UK a better place for their constituents.
By adopting policies which will ensure that there is a prosperous society, we will have more more available to help the poor and needy.
There is nothing wrong in showing some compassion towards the less well off . That is why the Conservatives were returned with a massive majority.
MPs with a vision of the future and putting the country first
Lolz
Some quality comedy
He had another profile (one of many lol) not that long ago that was dedicated to sycophantic drooling over Theresa May and how wonderful and absolutely outstandingly correct she was about everything.
No surprise then, that as the old profile went out of the window, the new one new espouses the same slavishly drooling nonsense about the new Emperor.
Fanatical regurgitation of the Party line and it’s paid media outlets is what sets this alter ego and its other incarnations apart from other posters who (no matter how misguided they may be) do at least demonstrate some originality of thought. However the only result that matters is that which you achieve on the day of the election. Any rational person would recognise that the 80 seat majority indicates uncondonditional support of the Conservative Pary and Boris Johnson.
Had Boris lost by 80 seats a lot of people would have then questioned whether his policies were the correct ones .
It would appear that not only do a very substantial proportion of the electorate back Boris , the substantial rise in the stock market after the result was also an endorsement of his campaign and policies . This is good news for both charities who rely on investment income and pensioners .
Your posts are genuinely funny. Nobody can be so naive.. I am not sure I would use the phrase " good news for charities " but I expect the food banks to be kept busy
Food banks have had their busiest winter ever.
We can make fun of this guy. Because his posts are funny. As mentioned by others, I too assume he's in on the joke. Not even the most out there Tory voter thinks that Boris gives half a shit about anyone. Nevermind poor people. Lol If food banks have had their busiest week ever we need to investigate why. What have people spent their money on that they need to resort to the use of them ? What have their family and friends done to help them or so they just expect a charity to pick up the tab. ? To state the blatantly obvious if food banks exist people will use them.
Have you examined the accounts of any charities recently and looked at their investment income and expenses ?
You do realise that you can’t just turn up and start taking from a food bank? You have to meet certain criteria, be referred by an agency and get vouchers, Hi. I was fully aware of the fact that you had to be referred. The issue that I was trying to address or understand was what those who are referred to food banks had spent their existing money on and why they had no other family members who could help. To state the blatantly obvious, if a food bank exists there will be a demand for it.
The issue is why do people not have enough money to buy food .
Why do people not have enough money to buy food? It's almost as if wages for many people are too low. Or food is too expensive. Or the benefits system is fucked up.
As for your other statement: "if a food bank exists, there will be a demand for it." Wow. That's like saying if there's a hospital, there will be demand for it.
If people taught themselves how to do things like boil and egg instead of ordering pizza they might have more cash
I heard they were all secretly living on caviar and roast swan. No wonder they're broke!
Exactly my point... lumpfish roe is so much cheaper than Beluga. And roast duck is much cheaper per 100g than Swan. Bit of a black market for Swan and can be difficult to source "
Hmmm maybe they should just eat gravel. That's free.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lex46TV/TS
over a year ago
Near Wells |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
"
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely? "
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one ."
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? "
There's no denying the tories are good at winning elections. If only they were actually good in government... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? "
2ppl in 130 yrs wtf that’s is a joke surely not lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? 2ppl in 130 yrs wtf that’s is a joke surely not lol"
It's a fact, but it's misleading. It just refers to birth dates. There have been more than 2 Labour leaders who won elections in that time frame. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? 2ppl in 130 yrs wtf that’s is a joke surely not lol"
Check it. Only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election. Harold Wilson and Tony Blair |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? 2ppl in 130 yrs wtf that’s is a joke surely not lol
It's a fact, but it's misleading. It just refers to birth dates. There have been more than 2 Labour leaders who won elections in that time frame."
It’s a FACT |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ?
There's no denying the tories are good at winning elections. If only they were actually good in government..."
Coming into government undoing gigantic national debt and loony policies hasn’t helped |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ? 2ppl in 130 yrs wtf that’s is a joke surely not lol
It's a fact, but it's misleading. It just refers to birth dates. There have been more than 2 Labour leaders who won elections in that time frame.
It’s a FACT"
I just said it was a fact. I simply explained some context. And typing things in caps doesn't alter their validity. FACT lol. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ?
There's no denying the tories are good at winning elections. If only they were actually good in government...
Coming into government undoing gigantic national debt and loony policies hasn’t helped"
I agree. Johnson has a difficult job undoing the awful policies of the last pm and government...  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ?
There's no denying the tories are good at winning elections. If only they were actually good in government...
Coming into government undoing gigantic national debt and loony policies hasn’t helped
I agree. Johnson has a difficult job undoing the awful policies of the last pm and government... "
Ha hA |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who should go? The Home Secretary or her Permanent Secretary?
Clearly, they have trouble working together. Which would be the greater loss to the Government?
Who cares. All the Tories are self serving pricks. One out and one in. Will make no difference.
Keep believing and repeating that. Maybe it will work better for you at the next general election than it did at the last.
You meant the last 4 elections, surely?
Or my favourite factoid; only 2 people born in the last 130 years have won a labour general election . Luv that one .
It’s funny - this is the second time I’ve quoted that FACT, and the left wing extremists / remainers haven’t come along with some other whataboutery. Why not ?. Hmmm ?
There's no denying the tories are good at winning elections. If only they were actually good in government...
Coming into government undoing gigantic national debt and loony policies hasn’t helped
I agree. Johnson has a difficult job undoing the awful policies of the last pm and government...
Ha hA"
It's a FACT! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
