FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Being a site supporter?
Being a site supporter?
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just that really, how many of you pay to be a site supporter? Is it worth it? "
As a woman ? No. I was a site supporter when I first joined and to be honest I don't see much differenr in the amount of interaction whether you're a site supporter or not. The only thing that's annoying is the inability to see the whole email thread. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Eh, mostly no.
Sure, you get to see who viewed your profile, which for me would signal "They arent interested since they didnt message/wink/fab my pics after viewing", but in general it doesn't help one way or the other.
The only real benefit IMO is the ability to filter 'nearby' on mobile.
For a fiver its not the worst thing to waste your money on though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion "
No objections to helping to support the site as present which is good value. Go down this route and you just become one of the myriad of others that sting men for monthly membership and ladies go free. I haven't found one yet that really gives value for money other than Fabs. I'TS A FIVER.
Jusy my opinion. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion "
There seem to be plenty of fakes and time wasters who are also site supporters so I doubt this would help. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion "
In my experience the most fake profiles are female or couple profiles..
They’re are usually men in disguise... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion "
No, I don't like that idea. Guys would feel even more entitled to get laid than they do now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion
In my experience the most fake profiles are female or couple profiles..
They’re are usually men in disguise..."
Indeed. That too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion "
For many, £25 and submitting a pic is a small price to pay for a year’s access to ‘free real porn’ with the potential to meet if they ever decide to take that step. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *itty9899Man
over a year ago
Craggy Island |
"Just that really, how many of you pay to be a site supporter? Is it worth it? "
I used to be one but have changed my mind recently and will no longer be doing it. I only lose the view me list, more pages on the hot photos and access to the full rooms in the chat section, but the only negative is looking at old message and since most ain't worth keeping and they disappear over time it not worth the £5 per month. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion
For many, £25 and submitting a pic is a small price to pay for a year’s access to ‘free real porn’ with the potential to meet if they ever decide to take that step. "
Or entertainment winding people up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion
For many, £25 and submitting a pic is a small price to pay for a year’s access to ‘free real porn’ with the potential to meet if they ever decide to take that step.
Or entertainment winding people up. "
Sadly that too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ilkenWoman
over a year ago
Manchester |
"I was thinking a way to get rid of fakes would be that single men should have to pay a premium example £25 and all users must be photo verified to use the site. Just my opinion "
Men and couples would be better. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Are times really that hard lol
Jeez
