FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > 4th jab = 3rd booster.
4th jab = 3rd booster.
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For the bivalent, I only had a sore arm. Sorry you've had worse" I had a sore arm and had the spike one.. lol I felt a little unwell after 12 hours and had all my glands come up for a few days. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For the bivalent, I only had a sore arm. Sorry you've had worse I had a sore arm and had the spike one.. lol I felt a little unwell after 12 hours and had all my glands come up for a few days." Yeah, I had Comirnaty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What's the difference between the first jab and the 4th "booster" is it the same stuff? " No it's not the same stuff, it is a vaccine that has been produced to take into account the newer variants of the virus. Hopefully it will come to the point where it is treated the same as the flu vaccine and given annually to those at the most risk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Can now book for 4th one along with my flu one .. is it beat not to have them done together then ? " Some people seem to be fine having them both together, personally I booked mine separately as the flu vaccine sometimes knocks me on my arse but it seems to have been ok this time as all I have had is a slight sore arm and am due my covid annual vaccine on the 26th now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Can now book for 4th one along with my flu one .. is it beat not to have them done together then ? " It is safe to have them both done together. Personally I had mine a week apart, my thinking was that if I do have a reaction, I want to know what caused it. I've been fine after my 4th Covid, flu jab is tomorrow. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Update on the after effects of the booster. I generally feel drained & everything aches or is sensative to the touch. Except for my head which is clear & fresh. That is annoying" Is it worth just doing a test?? Not saying it is covid but worth eliminating it. Hope you feel better soon xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 never go sick for work but unless it gets better I don't know if I can go in tomorrow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I know a few people not bothering with the fourth one now" I refused 4th jab and flu jab 3weks ago. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I know a few people not bothering with the fourth one now" they might aswell get the full set they had 3 of the poison ffs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I had a headache and very heavy legs and arms. But it passed in a few hours" I had that but only with my first jab x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. " Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had covid back in 2019 right at the start of it all. Never had any vaccines or boosters and I've been fine ever since. The human body is a wonderful thing." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?" but it's not experimental  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow, I can't believe there is still so many gullible people around. What is it going to take for people to wake up? Look at the facts : The jabs don't stop transmission The list of serious side effects is ever increasing The spike protein of the vax is toxic to the human body. The spike protein does not stay local to injection site, it floats around the body settling in major organs. 93% of covid related deaths this year are vaccinated. (70% population vaccinated) Covid has a fatality rate similar to flu at around 0.15% The Absolute Risk Reduction of the jabs is 0.84% A healthy immune system is far better for you than injecting toxins into your body every few months. The jabs are still experimental, you are taking part in a medical trial. No other vaccine has ever required 4 doses in under 2 years. Many countries have stopped vaccinating certain demographics as the risks outweigh the benefits. Just think & do your own research before rolling up your sleeve. " Research done sleeve rolled up triple jabbed and going in for the 4th next week and surprise surprise I am still here and quite happy with the choices that I have made | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental "Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow, I can't believe there is still so many gullible people around. What is it going to take for people to wake up? Look at the facts : The jabs don't stop transmission The list of serious side effects is ever increasing The spike protein of the vax is toxic to the human body. The spike protein does not stay local to injection site, it floats around the body settling in major organs. 93% of covid related deaths this year are vaccinated. (70% population vaccinated) Covid has a fatality rate similar to flu at around 0.15% The Absolute Risk Reduction of the jabs is 0.84% A healthy immune system is far better for you than injecting toxins into your body every few months. The jabs are still experimental, you are taking part in a medical trial. No other vaccine has ever required 4 doses in under 2 years. Many countries have stopped vaccinating certain demographics as the risks outweigh the benefits. Just think & do your own research before rolling up your sleeve. Research done sleeve rolled up triple jabbed and going in for the 4th next week and surprise surprise I am still here and quite happy with the choices that I have made"Good for you, I hope you stay fit & healthy for many years, if you've genuinely done your research & think it's right for you fair enough. All I'm trying to do is make people aware that it's not as safe & effective as made out and that for many the risks are greater than the benefits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow, I can't believe there is still so many gullible people around. What is it going to take for people to wake up? Look at the facts : The jabs don't stop transmission The list of serious side effects is ever increasing The spike protein of the vax is toxic to the human body. The spike protein does not stay local to injection site, it floats around the body settling in major organs. 93% of covid related deaths this year are vaccinated. (70% population vaccinated) Covid has a fatality rate similar to flu at around 0.15% The Absolute Risk Reduction of the jabs is 0.84% A healthy immune system is far better for you than injecting toxins into your body every few months. The jabs are still experimental, you are taking part in a medical trial. No other vaccine has ever required 4 doses in under 2 years. Many countries have stopped vaccinating certain demographics as the risks outweigh the benefits. Just think & do your own research before rolling up your sleeve. Research done sleeve rolled up triple jabbed and going in for the 4th next week and surprise surprise I am still here and quite happy with the choices that I have made
Good for you, I hope you stay fit & healthy for many years, if you've genuinely done your research & think it's right for you fair enough. All I'm trying to do is make people aware that it's not as safe & effective as made out and that for many the risks are greater than the benefits. "I suggest that people look into the claims for themselves. A lot of what you've said has come from very dubious sources. A big problem with the information out there is that it's the loudest promoters who get the most attention, not those with accurate information. And unfortunately a lot of innocent people have fallen for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental
Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023.
"the only people taking part in trials are those that took it willingly as part of a trial. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental
Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023.
the only people taking part in trials are those that took it willingly as part of a trial.
"As someone who was on a vaccine trial... quite  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had my 4th jab last week no problem wasn't sure about having another one after the third injection but in meantime been diagnosed with cronic leukaemia so didn't have a choice " All the best for your health | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental
Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023.
the only people taking part in trials are those that took it willingly as part of a trial.
"You haven't answered the question..when did the phase 3 trials end ? If all trials were complete before the public roll out why were they only administered under EUA ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental
Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023.
the only people taking part in trials are those that took it willingly as part of a trial.
You haven't answered the question..when did the phase 3 trials end ?
If all trials were complete before the public roll out why were they only administered under EUA ? "March 2021 I believe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon " Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then 
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol"Debunked by who? Lol. Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Debunked by who? Lol.
Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences.
The vaccine is 98% effective
At what exactly, And how did they measure it?
They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "Pfizer said they didn't test that it stopped transmission because it was not developed to do that. It was tested to prevent serious illness death because that is what it was developed for. That it did reduce transmission was a happy accident. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental
Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023.
the only people taking part in trials are those that took it willingly as part of a trial.
"yeah you lot your the trial subjects | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I know a few people not bothering with the fourth one now" only had two def not having any more | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I know a few people not bothering with the fourth one now" I'm one of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had it around 12pm today. Felt fine for a couple of hours. Now feeling like I've got a raging hangover. What after effects are the loverly people in fab land experiencing? Oh & I'm so glad I chose to have the flu jab separately just over a week ago. " Had both flu and covid booster last night.. Sore arms - but OK... If you've a headache you should have been told to take paracetamol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The 1st 3 knocked me on my back for days so I expected that with the 4th... I even booked a couple of days off work. But apart from a sore arm for a couple of days I wouldn't have known I'd had it. I guess my body has adapted over the last couple of years. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am genuinely interested to know why you would go back for more when you've had such severe reactions previously. Has it not occurred to you that this experimental substance could be doing long-term harm to your immune system ?but it's not experimental
Isn't it ? When did the Phase 3 trials end ? From what I've seen results are due Dec 2022 or early 2023.
the only people taking part in trials are those that took it willingly as part of a trial.
yeah you lot your the trial subjects "Well... this medical expert has certainly convinced me... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? " "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow, I can't believe there is still so many gullible people around. What is it going to take for people to wake up? Look at the facts : The jabs don't stop transmission The list of serious side effects is ever increasing The spike protein of the vax is toxic to the human body. The spike protein does not stay local to injection site, it floats around the body settling in major organs. 93% of covid related deaths this year are vaccinated. (70% population vaccinated) Covid has a fatality rate similar to flu at around 0.15% The Absolute Risk Reduction of the jabs is 0.84% A healthy immune system is far better for you than injecting toxins into your body every few months. The jabs are still experimental, you are taking part in a medical trial. No other vaccine has ever required 4 doses in under 2 years. Many countries have stopped vaccinating certain demographics as the risks outweigh the benefits. Just think & do your own research before rolling up your sleeve. " Sorry, normally I would just sigh and block you but since I consider what you’re writing to be actually quite dangerous misinformation and for the benefit of everyone in this discussion. Please tell us ……. What exactly are your qualifications in relation vaccine science? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol"Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had it around 12pm today. Felt fine for a couple of hours. Now feeling like I've got a raging hangover. What after effects are the loverly people in fab land experiencing? Oh & I'm so glad I chose to have the flu jab separately just over a week ago. " Have had 6th jab 2 weeks ago.. organ transplant patient so topping up.. 4 doses, 2 boosters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal" Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? " Yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes" Well thats good then im completely re assured | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured " Good. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had it around 12pm today. Felt fine for a couple of hours. Now feeling like I've got a raging hangover. What after effects are the loverly people in fab land experiencing? Oh & I'm so glad I chose to have the flu jab separately just over a week ago. Have had 6th jab 2 weeks ago.. organ transplant patient so topping up.. 4 doses, 2 boosters. " Be well  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had it around 12pm today. Felt fine for a couple of hours. Now feeling like I've got a raging hangover. What after effects are the loverly people in fab land experiencing? Oh & I'm so glad I chose to have the flu jab separately just over a week ago. Have had 6th jab 2 weeks ago.. organ transplant patient so topping up.. 4 doses, 2 boosters. Be well "I am doing my best.... xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Funny I've never met anyone who regrets NOT having the jab" try those that end up with serious illness or long term issue from covid. Like my daughter who ended up getting covid badly and got a pulmonary embolism from covid. She wishes she had her vaccines | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ? "What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts. If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow, I can't believe there is still so many gullible people around. What is it going to take for people to wake up? Look at the facts : The jabs don't stop transmission The list of serious side effects is ever increasing The spike protein of the vax is toxic to the human body. The spike protein does not stay local to injection site, it floats around the body settling in major organs. 93% of covid related deaths this year are vaccinated. (70% population vaccinated) Covid has a fatality rate similar to flu at around 0.15% The Absolute Risk Reduction of the jabs is 0.84% A healthy immune system is far better for you than injecting toxins into your body every few months. The jabs are still experimental, you are taking part in a medical trial. No other vaccine has ever required 4 doses in under 2 years. Many countries have stopped vaccinating certain demographics as the risks outweigh the benefits. Just think & do your own research before rolling up your sleeve. Sorry, normally I would just sigh and block you but since I consider what you’re writing to be actually quite dangerous misinformation and for the benefit of everyone in this discussion. Please tell us ……. What exactly are your qualifications in relation vaccine science? " So nobody can relay facts if they are not a scientist? Crickey that's very Orwellian. I'll 2nd what was said before. The jabs don't stop transmission, we knew this all along and so did they but didn't stop every media outlet and Fauci etc saying it did. It's fine you've been duped just don't die on the hill of "we knew it didn't stop transmission" when people were being banished from society because you might give covid to my Nan. The list of side effects is ever growing there's about 7 pages realised by Pfizer so this isn't new info. Natural immunity is up to 4.1x better for protection then the jabs that only last about 7 weeks, after the 2 week bedding in period. I could go on but can't be bothered. Calling disinformation and science blah blah is straight from the MSM playbook. Do better | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data? "I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing. So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow) Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
"Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have a sore arm and felt a bit like I was coming down with a cold this morning. Better than being in ICU or passing it on to someone else. " So glad you've gotten the booster to protect yourself. Unfortunately it doesn't stop you from spreading it as it doesn't stop transmission. Stay safe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?"Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous. Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know) I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
"Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
"Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic. Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have a sore arm and felt a bit like I was coming down with a cold this morning. Better than being in ICU or passing it on to someone else. " There is absolutely nothing you can do to stop it spreading to anyone else, apart from staying at home. The jabs last between 3-4 months in your system, before becoming useless. Unless you have serious underlying issues, the virus with its current severity (no worse than flu) will not put you into ICU. The only reason for more and more jabs is clear and obvious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest."the thing with measles is that so many of us had the vaccine that there is no need.. and you do actually have multiple vaccines to build up the bodies natural response to measles. And actually due to vaccine resistance.... measles is spreading again xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest. the thing with measles is that so many of us had the vaccine that there is no need.. and you do actually have multiple vaccines to build up the bodies natural response to measles.
And actually due to vaccine resistance.... measles is spreading again xx""The thing with measles is many of us have had the vaccine that there is no need" "And due to vaccine resistance it's spreading again" Word salad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate"Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country. 2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you. Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets. Plot spoiler - You are the reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
"Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless. But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about. A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that. "Oh dear. Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’. I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though. "Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example.. I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself."From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't."What part is ignorance? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?"I told you above. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself." Siri, ask me how this is going in five years. *Popcorn emoji* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above. "So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine? I'm all ears. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears."Yes it is ignorance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance. "Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance. Did well with that one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one."I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one.
I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered."Haven't got any issues with vaccines thanks. I've taken them all of my life and will continue to do so. Doesn't change the fact that the covid vaccines are not great, especially for fit and healthy people. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided new research showing that, during the recent Delta wave, individuals who had previously contracted COVID-19 had more protection against the virus than those who had been vaccinated. Science. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one.
I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered.
Haven't got any issues with vaccines thanks. I've taken them all of my life and will continue to do so.
Doesn't change the fact that the covid vaccines are not great, especially for fit and healthy people.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided new research showing that, during the recent Delta wave, individuals who had previously contracted COVID-19 had more protection against the virus than those who had been vaccinated.
Science."Misunderstanding of how vaccines work. Vaccines effectively train your immune system to fight off the nasty stuff without actually giving you the illness. If you have to get the illness 1st, you risk dying or getting various long ailments. That's why vaccines are better. It's also why I recommended you read up on how vaccines work. Sadly, you couldn't be bothered... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself."Ahem, let school begin. You said:- “Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest”. Well, It’s called ‘the flu jab’. Now, I know this is difficult for you Russel Brand and Joe Rogan to process this but thats actually a vaccine - people get it every year. Do you need us to call an ambulance for you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one.
I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered.
Haven't got any issues with vaccines thanks. I've taken them all of my life and will continue to do so.
Doesn't change the fact that the covid vaccines are not great, especially for fit and healthy people.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided new research showing that, during the recent Delta wave, individuals who had previously contracted COVID-19 had more protection against the virus than those who had been vaccinated.
Science.
Misunderstanding of how vaccines work. Vaccines effectively train your immune system to fight off the nasty stuff without actually giving you the illness.
If you have to get the illness 1st, you risk dying or getting various long ailments.
That's why vaccines are better. It's also why I recommended you read up on how vaccines work. Sadly, you couldn't be bothered..."Correct. Finally an answer. I've never given an opinion on how vaccines work so your projecting is a little strange. Yes to gain natural immunity you have to catch the virus. Basically everyone has had covid so that's a non issue. This works when the disease is highly deadly but we know covid isn't to most. Usually you take a vaccine to stop it spreading but this doesn't do that unfortunately. We bloody wish it did or we'd all be having it. You also risk major issues by having the vaccine too so to not take that into account is pretty ignorant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one.
I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered.
Haven't got any issues with vaccines thanks. I've taken them all of my life and will continue to do so.
Doesn't change the fact that the covid vaccines are not great, especially for fit and healthy people.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided new research showing that, during the recent Delta wave, individuals who had previously contracted COVID-19 had more protection against the virus than those who had been vaccinated.
Science.
Misunderstanding of how vaccines work. Vaccines effectively train your immune system to fight off the nasty stuff without actually giving you the illness.
If you have to get the illness 1st, you risk dying or getting various long ailments.
That's why vaccines are better. It's also why I recommended you read up on how vaccines work. Sadly, you couldn't be bothered...
Correct. Finally an answer. I've never given an opinion on how vaccines work so your projecting is a little strange.
Yes to gain natural immunity you have to catch the virus. Basically everyone has had covid so that's a non issue. This works when the disease is highly deadly but we know covid isn't to most.
Usually you take a vaccine to stop it spreading but this doesn't do that unfortunately. We bloody wish it did or we'd all be having it. You also risk major issues by having the vaccine too so to not take that into account is pretty ignorant "Ironically, you seem immune to science. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one.
I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered.
Haven't got any issues with vaccines thanks. I've taken them all of my life and will continue to do so.
Doesn't change the fact that the covid vaccines are not great, especially for fit and healthy people.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided new research showing that, during the recent Delta wave, individuals who had previously contracted COVID-19 had more protection against the virus than those who had been vaccinated.
Science.
Misunderstanding of how vaccines work. Vaccines effectively train your immune system to fight off the nasty stuff without actually giving you the illness.
If you have to get the illness 1st, you risk dying or getting various long ailments.
That's why vaccines are better. It's also why I recommended you read up on how vaccines work. Sadly, you couldn't be bothered...
Correct. Finally an answer. I've never given an opinion on how vaccines work so your projecting is a little strange.
Yes to gain natural immunity you have to catch the virus. Basically everyone has had covid so that's a non issue. This works when the disease is highly deadly but we know covid isn't to most.
Usually you take a vaccine to stop it spreading but this doesn't do that unfortunately. We bloody wish it did or we'd all be having it. You also risk major issues by having the vaccine too so to not take that into account is pretty ignorant
Ironically, you seem immune to science."‘Basically everyone has had covid so that's a non issue’ Yet another factually incorrect and incredibly dangerous statement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
Ahem, let school begin.
You said:-
“Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest”.
Well, It’s called ‘the flu jab’.
Now, I know this is difficult for you Russel Brand and Joe Rogan to process this but thats actually a vaccine - people get it every year.
Do you need us to call an ambulance for you? "Ahaha this is classic. Just stating the obvious and believing you're better then everyone else. You get your 2 shots a year forever, be my guest but don't you dare say what I can and cannot say on a public forum. 30 seconds in public and you'd need the ambulance son. Enjoy your night | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
From the last paragraph, you're just shocking ignorant about vaccines. I'd suggest reading up on how they work somewhere factual. But I know you won't.
What part is ignorance?
I told you above.
So it's ignorant to think natural immunity provides better protection then the covid vaccine?
I'm all ears.
Yes it is ignorance.
Classic. Nothing to back it up just cry ignorance.
Did well with that one.
I suggested you read up on how vaccines work. It's hardly my fault if you can't be bothered.
Haven't got any issues with vaccines thanks. I've taken them all of my life and will continue to do so.
Doesn't change the fact that the covid vaccines are not great, especially for fit and healthy people.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided new research showing that, during the recent Delta wave, individuals who had previously contracted COVID-19 had more protection against the virus than those who had been vaccinated.
Science.
Misunderstanding of how vaccines work. Vaccines effectively train your immune system to fight off the nasty stuff without actually giving you the illness.
If you have to get the illness 1st, you risk dying or getting various long ailments.
That's why vaccines are better. It's also why I recommended you read up on how vaccines work. Sadly, you couldn't be bothered...
Correct. Finally an answer. I've never given an opinion on how vaccines work so your projecting is a little strange.
Yes to gain natural immunity you have to catch the virus. Basically everyone has had covid so that's a non issue. This works when the disease is highly deadly but we know covid isn't to most.
Usually you take a vaccine to stop it spreading but this doesn't do that unfortunately. We bloody wish it did or we'd all be having it. You also risk major issues by having the vaccine too so to not take that into account is pretty ignorant
Ironically, you seem immune to science.
‘Basically everyone has had covid so that's a non issue’
Yet another factually incorrect and incredibly dangerous statement. "Incredibly dangerous loooool bet you're fun at parties. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
Ahem, let school begin.
You said:-
“Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest”.
Well, It’s called ‘the flu jab’.
Now, I know this is difficult for you Russel Brand and Joe Rogan to process this but thats actually a vaccine - people get it every year.
Do you need us to call an ambulance for you?
Ahaha this is classic. Just stating the obvious and believing you're better then everyone else. You get your 2 shots a year forever, be my guest but don't you dare say what I can and cannot say on a public forum.
30 seconds in public and you'd need the ambulance son. Enjoy your night"“but don't you dare say what I can and cannot say on a public forum” No one has tried to silence you. In fact we have all given you ample opportunities to evolve your dangerous narrative and listen to common sense but you have chosen to continue on and embarrass yourself this afternoon. Sadly, your fragile ego has now taken over …. and you want to argue a scientific point with threats of violence. Oh dear …. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yeah they're obviously not watching the Pfizer hearing and all the stuff they're admitting. Like the fact they knew it doesn't stop transmission yet the MSN and fauci and all their pals told everyone it did on MSN. I suggest you go watch it IF you can find it ... seems YouTube has blocked anyone posting it and removing it. Ps: I watched it on russel brands patreon Wow, the news according to Russell Brand, that'll be fully factual then
If people are going to put forward arguments one way or the other they could at least try to make it sound plausible and maybe choose an argument that wasn't debunked lol
Is this the well known and globally respected scientist Russel Brand or the high functioning drug / sex addict Russel Brand ?
What you're doing there is called shooting the messenger. Russell Brand only lays out the information that's available for everyone to see. He's never once said a single opinion of his he lays out the facts and let's you decide. Unfortunately there's a huge sum of people that could be smacked over the head with the facts but still choose to deny them. Every single thing Brand says is backed up by facts.
If we're going to use that kinda waffle do you trust Pfizer who created the opium crisis or Pfizer who've had the largest fine in history for forging data?
I think you simply have no idea what ‘We are’ doing.
So let me explain (I shall use small words so you can follow)
Dangerous information or indeed misinformation presented by unqualified and uneducated people in this case Russel Brand can lead to a whole host of issues such as ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination.
Sorry not sure I dumbed down what I said enough. If Pfizer say something and then it is repeated by a commentator is that misinformation?
Sadly you and your views including those of the morally bankrupt people you ‘follow’ are both incredibly ignorant and quite frankly very dangerous.
Do you also think measles, small pox, HPV vaccines are also ineffective and shouldn’t be permitted either. This is a rhetorical question requiring no response. (I already know)
I really don’t care about you and what you do or don’t do to yourself with regards vaccinations, but I do care about you sharing wildly incorrect information to other members of this community.
Still having a chuckle at "morally bankrupt" sound like a super far right dude sticking up for big pharma companies and against the working class. You have zero clue about people I follow. You claiming everything you don't like as being disinformation is quite frankly pathetic.
Also, bit weird calling out a guy for being a sex addict 20 years ago when you're sat on a swingers website. I reckon you spend way more time trying to get laid then he ever did and with about 2% of the success rate
Bless ‘I reckon’ you think the world is flat chem trails are real and Finland isn’t actually a country.
2% oh my, well l’m very confident that as a verified couple that would be a significant percentage increase over you.
Anyway, I look forward to your contribution to the thread … Why don’t single guys get meets.
Plot spoiler - You are the reason.
Oh the old classic "he thinks covid is being used to funnel public money into private hands so must think the word is flat" bless.
But nope. Wrong again. Who says Finland isn't a country? Ahaha never heard that one. I've slept with a few gorgeous Finnish girls so not sure what you're on about.
A lot of projection going on here. I'm the reason single guys don't get laid? That doesn't even make sense. You may be a "certified couple" on a swingers site but in the real world guys that are in shape, own successful businesses and have strong opinions, do very well thank you. Thankfully being masculine is still a sought after trait but you wouldn't know much about that.
Oh dear.
Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield , Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET - Get yourself booked in you’re covered in ‘burns’.
I would keep your dangerous and factually incorrect views to yourself though.
Ok big shot. Tell me one thing I've said that's factually incorrect? Not a projection or what you think I mean. Give me one example..
I'm sorry if you think the vaccine is better then natural immunity but if you had half a nut between those ears you'd work that out yourself.
Ahem, let school begin.
You said:-
“Can't remember the last time I had a measles vaccine 7 times and still got it over and over again to be honest”.
Well, It’s called ‘the flu jab’.
Now, I know this is difficult for you Russel Brand and Joe Rogan to process this but thats actually a vaccine - people get it every year.
Do you need us to call an ambulance for you?
Ahaha this is classic. Just stating the obvious and believing you're better then everyone else. You get your 2 shots a year forever, be my guest but don't you dare say what I can and cannot say on a public forum.
30 seconds in public and you'd need the ambulance son. Enjoy your night
“but don't you dare say what I can and cannot say on a public forum”
No one has tried to silence you. In fact we have all given you ample opportunities to evolve your dangerous narrative and listen to common sense but you have chosen to continue on and embarrass yourself this afternoon.
Sadly, your fragile ego has now taken over …. and you want to argue a scientific point with threats of violence.
Oh dear ….
"Oh look a soy boy trying to hold the moral high ground. She ain't gonna shag you mate. Never threatened anyone again more projecting. This is tiresome. Now again, for the 5th time. Enjoy your night | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. " In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal" Who performed the studies? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal" Do you have a link or references as I would like to read up on it Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal Do you have a link or references as I would like to read up on it Thank you " Links to medical journals aren't allowed but Google is a search engine which you can use to search for BMJ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal Do you have a link or references as I would like to read up on it Thank you Links to medical journals aren't allowed but Google is a search engine which you can use to search for BMJ" I have done. Couldn't find the research reffered to thats why I'm asking | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had my 4th yesterday. Feel a bit shit today but otherwise fine. And I will keep having them thank you very much." I had mine on Wednesday along with a flu jab. It pretty much wiped me out yesterday but I'm fine today. When I had covid (8 months after my 2nd dose, no booster) I was ill for almost 2 weeks and took 2 months to fully recover. So I'll happily take a day feeling like shit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal Do you have a link or references as I would like to read up on it Thank you Links to medical journals aren't allowed but Google is a search engine which you can use to search for BMJ I have done. Couldn't find the research reffered to thats why I'm asking " Google for UKHSA review shows vaccinated less likely to have long COVID than unvaccinated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal Do you have a link or references as I would like to read up on it Thank you Links to medical journals aren't allowed but Google is a search engine which you can use to search for BMJ I have done. Couldn't find the research reffered to thats why I'm asking " One such article that came up through Google and on BMJand there's plenty more if you want to find them Toggle navigation The BMJ logo Toggle top menu covid-19 Research Education News & Views Campaigns Jobs Archive For authors Hosted CCBY Open access Research Trajectory of long covid symptoms after covid-19 vaccination: community based cohort study BMJ 2022; 377 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069676 (Published 18 May 2022) Cite this as: BMJ 2022;377:e069676 Linked Editorial Are vaccines a potential treatment for long covid? Article Metrics Responses Peer review Daniel Ayoubkhani, principal statistician12, Charlotte Bermingham, senior statistician1, Koen B Pouwels, senior researcher34, Myer Glickman, head of epidemiology, climate, and global health1, Vahé Nafilyan, lead statistician15, Francesco Zaccardi, clinical epidemiologist2, Kamlesh Khunti, professor of primary care diabetes and vascular medicine2, Nisreen A Alwan, associate professor in public health678, A Sarah Walker, professor of medical statistics and epidemiology39 Author affiliations Correspondence to: D Ayoubkhani daniel.ayoubkhani@ons.gov.uk Accepted 12 April 2022 Abstract Objective To estimate associations between covid-19 vaccination and long covid symptoms in adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination. Design Observational cohort study. Setting Community dwelling population, UK. Participants 28?356 participants in the Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey aged 18-69 years who received at least one dose of an adenovirus vector or mRNA covid-19 vaccine after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main outcome measure Presence of long covid symptoms at least 12 weeks after infection over the follow-up period 3 February to 5 September 2021. Results Mean age of participants was 46 years, 55.6% (n=15?760) were women, and 88.7% (n=25?141) were of white ethnicity. Median follow-up was 141 days from first vaccination (among all participants) and 67 days from second vaccination (83.8% of participants). 6729 participants (23.7%) reported long covid symptoms of any severity at least once during follow-up. A first vaccine dose was associated with an initial 12.8% decrease (95% confidence interval -18.6% to -6.6%, P0.001) in the odds of long covid, with subsequent data compatible with both increases and decreases in the trajectory (0.3% per week, 95% confidence interval -0.6% to 1.2% per week, P=0.51). A second dose was associated with an initial 8.8% decrease (95% confidence interval -14.1% to -3.1%, P=0.003) in the odds of long covid, with a subsequent decrease by 0.8% per week (-1.2% to -0.4% per week, P0.001). Heterogeneity was not found in associations between vaccination and long covid by sociodemographic characteristics, health status, hospital admission with acute covid-19, vaccine type (adenovirus vector or mRNA), or duration from SARS-CoV-2 infection to vaccination. Conclusions The likelihood of long covid symptoms was observed to decrease after covid-19 vaccination and evidence suggested sustained improvement after a second dose, at least over the median follow-up of 67 days. Vaccination may contribute to a reduction in the population health burden of long covid, although longer follow-up is needed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think everyone accepts scientific research. Lazy argument that. There's plenty of scientists that have way more credentials then any governing bodies but unfortunately only some of the science gets the spotlight. Preventative measures and early treatment were disregarded by some scientists which seems odd to me. " Science isn't static, it's a process. I'd beware of any specialists who would not be interested in preventative measures, or treatment to reduce the severity of the disease which can, after all, be fatal. Many researchers investigated treatments, including repurposing of existing drugs, or preventative steps, including ventilation, barriers etc. Significant progress was made in the UK, helping the world, via identification of drugs already out of patent etc, that were cheap and readily available. Certainly, thousands of people were treated with meds in the early stages of infection, where evidence had shown high value in mitigation of the worst outcomes. The vaccines to date have also been good preventative measures, reducing disease severity, preventing some infections and saving many thousands of lives. A comprehensive, multi-layered strategy will often be better than just a single tactic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Its not just Russel Brand. Irs all over the news. Oh yes of course that's just spread by people wanting to get rich quick by spreading false rumours unlike pfizer who have a history of honest business practices and have never committed criminal offences. The vaccine is 98% effective At what exactly, And how did they measure it? They told us it would stop you from passing it on. They didn't know that because they hadn't tested for it. How many more lies need to be uncovered before people start questioning? "A vaccine's efficacy is measured in a controlled clinical trial and is based on how many people who got vaccinated developed the 'outcome of interest' (usually disease) compared with how many people who got the placebo (dummy vaccine) developed the same outcome." The reduction of transmission is simple logic. If you are infected for a shorter time, you will infect fewer others. Cal Is there any evidence to show vaccinated were infected for less time than unvaccinated? Yes Well thats good then im completely re assured Good. In studies published in the British Medical Journal after the initial vaccine rollout, Stated infected people who were fully vaccinated (2 jabs) were infectious for 30% less time than those who were partially vaccinated (1 jab) and 50% less than those unvaccinated. New studies have also shown that those who are fully vaccinated are 50-60% less likely to develop "Long Covid" Cal Do you have a link or references as I would like to read up on it Thank you Links to medical journals aren't allowed but Google is a search engine which you can use to search for BMJ I have done. Couldn't find the research reffered to thats why I'm asking " There's so much published evidence that's peer-reviewed, out there, I wonder how on earth you could miss it . Global research has been at a phenomenal level. It's astounding how much that there is available. I don't use Google and find the internet flooded with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Isn't Long covid self diagnosed? " Yes and no. Obviously some symptoms like headaches, sense of smell are self diagnosed. In my case I had a severe drop in lung function which is obviously not self diagnosed. After 3 months the NHS recognized this as long covid. Took me 6 or 7 months to get nearly back to normal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think everyone accepts scientific research. Lazy argument that. There's plenty of scientists that have way more credentials then any governing bodies but unfortunately only some of the science gets the spotlight. Preventative measures and early treatment were disregarded by some scientists which seems odd to me. Many researchers investigated treatments, including repurposing of existing drugs, or preventative steps, including ventilation, barriers etc. Significant progress was made in the UK, helping the world, via identification of drugs already out of patent etc, that were cheap and readily available. Certainly, thousands of people were treated with meds in the early stages of infection, where evidence had shown high value in mitigation of the worst outcomes. " That simply isn't true, it was known from very early on , through the research of Dr Pierre Kory, Dr Peter McCullough, the FLCCC & others that Ivermectin & HCY were safe & effective treatments yet many countries outlawed their use & even now they are not approved treatments in the UK. Instead drugs like Remdesivir were approved despite it being known they could cause breathing difficulties.. just what you need when treating a respiratory infection ! The importance of Vitamins C & D & Zinc was also known but not conveyed to the public, instead the advice in many countries was merely to stay at home until you felt so unwell you needed hospital treatment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think everyone accepts scientific research. Lazy argument that. There's plenty of scientists that have way more credentials then any governing bodies but unfortunately only some of the science gets the spotlight. Preventative measures and early treatment were disregarded by some scientists which seems odd to me. Many researchers investigated treatments, including repurposing of existing drugs, or preventative steps, including ventilation, barriers etc. Significant progress was made in the UK, helping the world, via identification of drugs already out of patent etc, that were cheap and readily available. Certainly, thousands of people were treated with meds in the early stages of infection, where evidence had shown high value in mitigation of the worst outcomes. That simply isn't true, it was known from very early on , through the research of Dr Pierre Kory, Dr Peter McCullough, the FLCCC & others that Ivermectin & HCY were safe & effective treatments yet many countries outlawed their use & even now they are not approved treatments in the UK. Instead drugs like Remdesivir were approved despite it being known they could cause breathing difficulties.. just what you need when treating a respiratory infection ! The importance of Vitamins C & D & Zinc was also known but not conveyed to the public, instead the advice in many countries was merely to stay at home until you felt so unwell you needed hospital treatment. " Be careful here mate you might be called anti-science for mentioning the world's leading cardiologist ahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think everyone accepts scientific research. Lazy argument that. There's plenty of scientists that have way more credentials then any governing bodies but unfortunately only some of the science gets the spotlight. Preventative measures and early treatment were disregarded by some scientists which seems odd to me. Many researchers investigated treatments, including repurposing of existing drugs, or preventative steps, including ventilation, barriers etc. Significant progress was made in the UK, helping the world, via identification of drugs already out of patent etc, that were cheap and readily available. Certainly, thousands of people were treated with meds in the early stages of infection, where evidence had shown high value in mitigation of the worst outcomes. That simply isn't true, it was known from very early on , through the research of Dr Pierre Kory, Dr Peter McCullough, the FLCCC & others that Ivermectin & HCY were safe & effective treatments yet many countries outlawed their use & even now they are not approved treatments in the UK. Instead drugs like Remdesivir were approved despite it being known they could cause breathing difficulties.. just what you need when treating a respiratory infection ! The importance of Vitamins C & D & Zinc was also known but not conveyed to the public, instead the advice in many countries was merely to stay at home until you felt so unwell you needed hospital treatment. Be careful here mate you might be called anti-science for mentioning the world's leading cardiologist ahaha" Or threatened to be put in an ambulance inside 30s …… Apparently not a threat though 
Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years!
The importance of vitamins has never not been conveyed to the public ….Unless you live in a place without NHS, chemists, Boots, Holland&Barratt or the internet.
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! " Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is to the two guys in the handbag fight. Just because you don't like the media or the presenter (for the record, Brand is an asshole) does not make the information presented any less valid, it just means you check it via additional sources. The C19 vax, as admitted by Pfizer and confirmed by the evidence does not prevent transmission, infection (yes they are different things), developing the disease, nor does it prevent onwards transmission. The jab is at best, symptom mitigation for the one who has taken it and them alone. The jabs that use the spike protein alone are not vaccines, they are genetic therapy (or at least have the potential to be once properly developed). Use of the spike protein alone is one of the biggest problems with it as the body is being taught to recognise the protein, NOT the full virus. Fun fact, people exposed to the original SARS-Cov1 have a better immune response to SARS-cov2 than takers of the current jabs. Just because you personally have had, or have not had a reaction to either the illness or the jab, does not mean anyone else will react the same. The human body, while fragile is also a hell of a lot more resilient than people realise. Oh and, the earth is slightly flattened at the poles, chemtrails only exist in cloud seeding and crop dusting and Finland doesnt exist, a Finnish guy told me so it must be true. " You forgot to drop your mic ahah. Nicely explained. Way better with words then I could ever be. Shame you think that of Brand. I was his opening act on one of his comedy tours and he was always very lovely. Sadly stopped all that when I moved out to Australia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. " Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is to the two guys in the handbag fight. Just because you don't like the media or the presenter (for the record, Brand is an asshole) does not make the information presented any less valid, it just means you check it via additional sources. The C19 vax, as admitted by Pfizer and confirmed by the evidence does not prevent transmission, infection (yes they are different things), developing the disease, nor does it prevent onwards transmission. The jab is at best, symptom mitigation for the one who has taken it and them alone. The jabs that use the spike protein alone are not vaccines, they are genetic therapy (or at least have the potential to be once properly developed). Use of the spike protein alone is one of the biggest problems with it as the body is being taught to recognise the protein, NOT the full virus. Fun fact, people exposed to the original SARS-Cov1 have a better immune response to SARS-cov2 than takers of the current jabs. Just because you personally have had, or have not had a reaction to either the illness or the jab, does not mean anyone else will react the same. The human body, while fragile is also a hell of a lot more resilient than people realise. Oh and, the earth is slightly flattened at the poles, chemtrails only exist in cloud seeding and crop dusting and Finland doesnt exist, a Finnish guy told me so it must be true. You forgot to drop your mic ahah. Nicely explained. Way better with words then I could ever be. Shame you think that of Brand. I was his opening act on one of his comedy tours and he was always very lovely. Sadly stopped all that when I moved out to Australia. " No mic was dropped, just like you have never slept with any Finnish girls or opened a comedy show for renowned scientist and vaccine expert Russel Brand. Take some sheep de-wormer and relax
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is to the two guys in the handbag fight. Just because you don't like the media or the presenter (for the record, Brand is an asshole) does not make the information presented any less valid, it just means you check it via additional sources. The C19 vax, as admitted by Pfizer and confirmed by the evidence does not prevent transmission, infection (yes they are different things), developing the disease, nor does it prevent onwards transmission. The jab is at best, symptom mitigation for the one who has taken it and them alone. The jabs that use the spike protein alone are not vaccines, they are genetic therapy (or at least have the potential to be once properly developed). Use of the spike protein alone is one of the biggest problems with it as the body is being taught to recognise the protein, NOT the full virus. Fun fact, people exposed to the original SARS-Cov1 have a better immune response to SARS-cov2 than takers of the current jabs. Just because you personally have had, or have not had a reaction to either the illness or the jab, does not mean anyone else will react the same. The human body, while fragile is also a hell of a lot more resilient than people realise. Oh and, the earth is slightly flattened at the poles, chemtrails only exist in cloud seeding and crop dusting and Finland doesnt exist, a Finnish guy told me so it must be true. You forgot to drop your mic ahah. Nicely explained. Way better with words then I could ever be. Shame you think that of Brand. I was his opening act on one of his comedy tours and he was always very lovely. Sadly stopped all that when I moved out to Australia. No mic was dropped, just like you have never slept with any Finnish girls or opened a comedy show for renowned scientist and vaccine expert Russel Brand. Take some sheep de-wormer and relax
"Hahaha you sound like you have some seriously deep issues. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think everyone accepts scientific research. Lazy argument that. There's plenty of scientists that have way more credentials then any governing bodies but unfortunately only some of the science gets the spotlight. Preventative measures and early treatment were disregarded by some scientists which seems odd to me. Many researchers investigated treatments, including repurposing of existing drugs, or preventative steps, including ventilation, barriers etc. Significant progress was made in the UK, helping the world, via identification of drugs already out of patent etc, that were cheap and readily available. Certainly, thousands of people were treated with meds in the early stages of infection, where evidence had shown high value in mitigation of the worst outcomes. That simply isn't true, it was known from very early on , through the research of Dr Pierre Kory, Dr Peter McCullough, the FLCCC & others that Ivermectin & HCY were safe & effective treatments yet many countries outlawed their use & even now they are not approved treatments in the UK. Instead drugs like Remdesivir were approved despite it being known they could cause breathing difficulties.. just what you need when treating a respiratory infection ! The importance of Vitamins C & D & Zinc was also known but not conveyed to the public, instead the advice in many countries was merely to stay at home until you felt so unwell you needed hospital treatment. " The most powerful meta-analyses of published evidence on Ivermectin don't find that the data supports its use. That's based on multiple studies worldwide, many thousands of people. The results have been fairly consistent, despite some outspoken individuals pushing the case for its use. Therw are lots of good messages that can be shared, from the peer-reviewed published evidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have my 4th Jab booked but not sure if I should have it. I have had heart attacks, strokes and have COPD and been full of cold and feeling rubbish for last month. So Im not sure if I will bother or not with so many adverse comments about the 4th" Get the opinion of a medical expert. That should be far more helpful than any online scare stories. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Funny I've never met anyone who regrets NOT having the jab" I have. 3 of them being my immediate family. 2 Christmases ruined because they were so ill. I actually caught it because my daughter needed help, so I went there Christmas Eve. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Funny I've never met anyone who regrets NOT having the jab I have. 3 of them being my immediate family. 2 Christmases ruined because they were so ill. I actually caught it because my daughter needed help, so I went there Christmas Eve. " How dare you contradict another forum user with facts & reality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" The most powerful meta-analyses of published evidence on Ivermectin don't find that the data supports its use. That's based on multiple studies worldwide, many thousands of people. The results have been fairly consistent, despite some outspoken individuals pushing the case for its use. " Wrong. I refer you to the meta analysis titled "Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of covid-19 infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines" (i know, a catchy title) Of particular interest is:- Ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average of 86%. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course reduces numbers progressing to severe disease. Evidence finds that large reductions in covid-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Also of note is, ivermectin is one of the World Health Organisation's essential medicines with known and documented antiparasitic, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" The most powerful meta-analyses of published evidence on Ivermectin don't find that the data supports its use. That's based on multiple studies worldwide, many thousands of people. The results have been fairly consistent, despite some outspoken individuals pushing the case for its use. Wrong. I refer you to the meta analysis titled "Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of covid-19 infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines" (i know, a catchy title) Of particular interest is:- Ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average of 86%. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course reduces numbers progressing to severe disease. Evidence finds that large reductions in covid-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Also of note is, ivermectin is one of the World Health Organisation's essential medicines with known and documented antiparasitic, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. " Where’s the face palm emojis when you need them. So …….. taken directly from WHO site and not edited or manipulated to suit a narrative. The current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive. Until more data is available, WHO recommends that the drug only be used within clinical trials. Of course, you can ignore all the advice and the fact no country IN THE WORLD uses this drug in the fight against COVID Anyway, crack on and take the sheep de-wormer until your hearts content, wash down with hydroxychloroquine whilst you’re at it or anything else that Russell Brand Alex Jones, Joe Rogan etc promotes. But, pack it in recommending treatments within this community that aren’t safe, sanctioned or actually any good for people with covid. As for you, well the ICU nurses will be pleased that you don’t have any worms in your intestines whilst they prep you for proning. (Look out for the eye rolling whilst you tell them) A lovely HCA will hold your hand and tell you everything is going to alright as you go under (it won’t) if you do make it out of proning ‘buckle’ up for months if not years of rehab! Still you will have clean guts
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have my 4th Jab booked but not sure if I should have it. I have had heart attacks, strokes and have COPD and been full of cold and feeling rubbish for last month. So Im not sure if I will bother or not with so many adverse comments about the 4th" It would appear that you are at the upper end of the at risk groups so unless you are going to protect yourself by self isolating for the winter you probably should get further advice from people who have access to your medical history about taking the 4th booster especially if it’s been offered to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm due mine, and the flu jab. I've been really lucky with my covid jabs, I haven't felt ill, just a bit of a sore arm for the day like I get with any injection. " Very similar here...both flu and covid booster booked on different days due to appointment availability. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" The most powerful meta-analyses of published evidence on Ivermectin don't find that the data supports its use. That's based on multiple studies worldwide, many thousands of people. The results have been fairly consistent, despite some outspoken individuals pushing the case for its use. Wrong. I refer you to the meta analysis titled "Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of covid-19 infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines" (i know, a catchy title) Of particular interest is:- Ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average of 86%. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course reduces numbers progressing to severe disease. Evidence finds that large reductions in covid-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Also of note is, ivermectin is one of the World Health Organisation's essential medicines with known and documented antiparasitic, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Where’s the face palm emojis when you need them. So …….. taken directly from WHO site and not edited or manipulated to suit a narrative. The current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive. Until more data is available, WHO recommends that the drug only be used within clinical trials. Of course, you can ignore all the advice and the fact no country IN THE WORLD uses this drug in the fight against COVID Anyway, crack on and take the sheep de-wormer until your hearts content, wash down with hydroxychloroquine whilst you’re at it or anything else that Russell Brand Alex Jones, Joe Rogan etc promotes. But, pack it in recommending treatments within this community that aren’t safe, sanctioned or actually any good for people with covid. As for you, well the ICU nurses will be pleased that you don’t have any worms in your intestines whilst they prep you for proning. (Look out for the eye rolling whilst you tell them) A lovely HCA will hold your hand and tell you everything is going to alright as you go under (it won’t) if you do make it out of proning ‘buckle’ up for months if not years of rehab! Still you will have clean guts
"How much are getting paid to spout such utter rubbish ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" The most powerful meta-analyses of published evidence on Ivermectin don't find that the data supports its use. That's based on multiple studies worldwide, many thousands of people. The results have been fairly consistent, despite some outspoken individuals pushing the case for its use. Wrong. I refer you to the meta analysis titled "Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of covid-19 infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines" (i know, a catchy title) Of particular interest is:- Ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average of 86%. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course reduces numbers progressing to severe disease. Evidence finds that large reductions in covid-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Also of note is, ivermectin is one of the World Health Organisation's essential medicines with known and documented antiparasitic, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. " Well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. " By constantly referring to Ivermectin as a sheep de wormer when you are fully aware that it has been approved for human use for decades shows how desperate you are to discredit it. The reason Ivermectin has not been approved for covid treatment is that it would invalidate the vaccines Emergency Use Approval. Big Pharma couldn't have a cheap. generic out of patent drug taking away their billions of profits they are making from the jabs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. By constantly referring to Ivermectin as a sheep de wormer when you are fully aware that it has been approved for human use for decades shows how desperate you are to discredit it. The reason Ivermectin has not been approved for covid treatment is that it would invalidate the vaccines Emergency Use Approval. Big Pharma couldn't have a cheap. generic out of patent drug taking away their billions of profits they are making from the jabs." Invermectin isn't a "vaccine substitute" it's a potential treatment. A patient would need to be VERY sick before it would be a clinical choice. It has however shown 80%+ success in reducing the death rates of covid patients who needing mechanical breathing assistance. Cal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. By constantly referring to Ivermectin as a sheep de wormer when you are fully aware that it has been approved for human use for decades shows how desperate you are to discredit it. The reason Ivermectin has not been approved for covid treatment is that it would invalidate the vaccines Emergency Use Approval. Big Pharma couldn't have a cheap. generic out of patent drug taking away their billions of profits they are making from the jabs." They use lots of generics to treat covid such as dexamethasone. They are one of the reasons the death rate of covid is tiny compared to what it was at the start. Not seen any evidence ivermectin is effective against covid,there have been quite a few trials, taking it on the hoof isn't recommended as the side effects are pretty nasty. Saying that pretty much any treatment has side effects that have to be balanced against its effectiveness | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. By constantly referring to Ivermectin as a sheep de wormer when you are fully aware that it has been approved for human use for decades shows how desperate you are to discredit it. The reason Ivermectin has not been approved for covid treatment is that it would invalidate the vaccines Emergency Use Approval. Big Pharma couldn't have a cheap. generic out of patent drug taking away their billions of profits they are making from the jabs." Ivermectin as a sheep de-wormer Yes, because that’s what it is. We can call it horse-de wormer if that makes you feel better. No one is stopping you from taking it though (feel free) but stop suggesting it to this community as a treatment for Covid when it is not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. By constantly referring to Ivermectin as a sheep de wormer when you are fully aware that it has been approved for human use for decades shows how desperate you are to discredit it. The reason Ivermectin has not been approved for covid treatment is that it would invalidate the vaccines Emergency Use Approval. Big Pharma couldn't have a cheap. generic out of patent drug taking away their billions of profits they are making from the jabs. Invermectin isn't a "vaccine substitute" it's a potential treatment. A patient would need to be VERY sick before it would be a clinical choice. It has however shown 80%+ success in reducing the death rates of covid patients who needing mechanical breathing assistance. Cal" Ivermectin is not used on ICU depts in the U.K. But it would appear to some that the whole NHS is in on this global conspiracy. Nurses across the U.K are eagerly waiting with baited breath their cut of all this Covid conspiracy money! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ivermectin Isn’t banned either we have been worming the sheep and horses with it for years! Thanks for confirming your ignorance. Like many other medications Ivermectin has both human & animal versions, the human version is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used to treat a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. There are also over 30 peer reviewed papers & numerous early treatment protocols proving it to be highly effective at reducing the symptoms of Covid. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. Let’s break this down : a range of conditions for over 40 years, it is also on the World Health Organisation's Essential Medicines of the World list. But not Covid and not a single country in the world has chosen to recommend Sheep de-wormer. I’m happy for you to take it though, each to their own. As for vitamins, I specifically referred to the benefits of Vit C, Vit D & Zinc in treating Covid, something that could easily have been incorporated into the Gov'ts Public Health messaging but wasn't. It’s been incorporated into every health message for the past 50-100 years seriously get a grip of yourself. By constantly referring to Ivermectin as a sheep de wormer when you are fully aware that it has been approved for human use for decades shows how desperate you are to discredit it. The reason Ivermectin has not been approved for covid treatment is that it would invalidate the vaccines Emergency Use Approval. Big Pharma couldn't have a cheap. generic out of patent drug taking away their billions of profits they are making from the jabs. They use lots of generics to treat covid such as dexamethasone. They are one of the reasons the death rate of covid is tiny compared to what it was at the start. Not seen any evidence ivermectin is effective against covid,there have been quite a few trials, taking it on the hoof isn't recommended as the side effects are pretty nasty. Saying that pretty much any treatment has side effects that have to be balanced against its effectiveness " dexamethasone is used on ICU - but, let’s imagine you are still aware of what’s happening on at this point. When you see this being prescribed and administered. Well unfortunately you had best ‘buckle’ up for bad news because your blood will be mostly likely turning like jelly and your lungs to mush. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
