FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Small breasts = paedo apparently

Small breasts = paedo apparently

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Nicked from a site called The Register. As linking is not allowed I'll let you figure out the .com address for yourself

"The proposed Australian Government clampdown on smut just got a whole lot broader, as news emerged of a ban on small breasts and female ejaculation in adult material.

The end result of this widening of the censor’s net could be the addition of millions of websites to the internet filter now being proposed.

Breasts came under the spotlight a year ago, as Senators Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett commenced a campaign against publicly available porn. Rounding up magazines from corner shops and filling stations, Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia."

Thats a shortened version

I'm curious as to whether this means anyone married to a woman with small breasts should on the sex offenders register so they can be monitored

Arc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Forgot to add that the story also claims that the aussies are banning movies containing female ejaculation as it is "abhorent"

There's a lot of abhorent women on here if it is

Arc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *atisfy janeWoman  over a year ago

Torquay

Or indeed any woman married to a man with a small manhood?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Oh not me arcy...

i dont do mucky stuff, im a good gal with big knockers

phewwwwww.

Always knew tham ozzies were kin barmy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The way some of these pictures/videos are put across I believe can certainly encourage it, not the breast themselves, but the advertising of it, like small titted teen gets analised for first time, and all that crap, fact that many of these 'teens' are not actually teens shows the 'market' they are trying to target, personally I do prefer smaller breasts (doesn't mean I don't also like larger by the way) but these type of pics/vids put me off looking as I'm certainly not into young girls.

I think, small boobies are good, and it's silly to stop them being viewed, as the next problem will be that women don't feel they measure up if they're not big breasted, but the way the pics/vids are pushed should be monitored.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Oh not me arcy...

i dont do mucky stuff, im a good gal "

*is disappointed*

Arc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

lmao..

I think they equate small boobs with looking manly and or childlike.

hence the label.

told ya.they strange people over there

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Is it just my deviant mind that noticed the Senators initials are BJ and GB

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If it's a small breat ban that's simply ridiculous. Guess we should call it the John McCririck Law!!

If it's a ban on women posing as little girls to get around illegalities then it should be banned.

Incidentally I don't think it encourages a liking for little girls. The need is already there. This kind of porn just caters for it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If it's a small breat ban that's simply ridiculous. Guess we should call it the John McCririck Law!!

If it's a ban on women posing as little girls to get around illegalities then it should be banned.

Incidentally I don't think it encourages a liking for little girls. The need is already there. This kind of porn just caters for it. "

What I'm trying to say, lol.

However, I do believe that the more of this women posing as young girls the more likely it is it will be seen as acceptable an encourage it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ickmealloverWoman  over a year ago

a very plush appartment off junt 7 M5

I am not saying I agree with it BUT

Just my opinion

This is why I DO NOT like guys that like school uniform nor girls that use school uniform to initiate sex.

I do think its sending out a very negative message

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If it's a small breat ban that's simply ridiculous. Guess we should call it the John McCririck Law!!

If it's a ban on women posing as little girls to get around illegalities then it should be banned.

Incidentally I don't think it encourages a liking for little girls. The need is already there. This kind of porn just caters for it.

What I'm trying to say, lol.

However, I do believe that the more of this women posing as young girls the more likely it is it will be seen as acceptable an encourage it."

OR the more MEN that hit those type of sites the MORE the porn sites will KEEP making them.

Once MEN STOP the demand the DEMAND will drop.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

whoops ..... drop demand = less production

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Seems a bit strange that one, take it they don't shave over there then

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Forgot to add that the story also claims that the aussies are banning movies containing female ejaculation as it is "abhorent"

There's a lot of abhorent women on here if it is

Arc"

If it's a 'true' ejaculation then nothing finer, but I have seen films where the women squirt milk beer and objects for miles across a room! I'd feel an inadequate to attempt to emulate that...ban it for wasting drinks alone!! xx

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *emmefataleWoman  over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville


"Forgot to add that the story also claims that the aussies are banning movies containing female ejaculation as it is "abhorent"

There's a lot of abhorent women on here if it is

Arc

If it's a 'true' ejaculation then nothing finer, but I have seen films where the women squirt milk beer and objects for miles across a room! I'd feel an inadequate to attempt to emulate that...ban it for wasting drinks alone!! xx "

LMFAO

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *i 1 Get 1 FreeCouple (MM)  over a year ago

birmingham


"Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia."

"

I must be a peado then

I guess messers BJ & GD are of the opinion that most paedophiles are homosexual

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

i sort of agree with the small breast thing only because whilst i dont mind porn, i object to the very young girls and i think that is who they are referring to. Personally i love breasts whatever size just prefer them on someone of a respectable age.

As to squirting, what the hell is wrong with that, its marvellous gushing out all over a lovely cock lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orkieMan  over a year ago

Who knows


"Oh not me arcy...

i dont do mucky stuff, im a good gal with big knockers

phewwwwww.

Always knew tham ozzies were kin barmy "

And fabulous big knockers they are too hun xx

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Oh not me arcy...

i dont do mucky stuff, im a good gal with big knockers

phewwwwww.

Always knew tham ozzies were kin barmy

And fabulous big knockers they are too hun xx"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If it's a ban on women posing as little girls to get around illegalities then it should be banned."

I couldn't agree more, however...


"However, I do believe that the more of this women posing as young girls the more likely it is it will be seen as acceptable an encourage it.

OR the more MEN that hit those type of sites the MORE the porn sites will KEEP making them.

Once MEN STOP the demand the DEMAND will drop. "

I think you are being incredibly niave in thinking that it's men who fuel the demand for porn. For men to buy porn there has to be a willing woman ready to display her wares for cash.

What came first: The prostitute or her first punter?

One cannot exist without the other so to single out MEN in your argument is a little vindictive, as though there aren't any WOMEN at all who like to view porn?

As for the Aussie Govt's latest move on porn, well, it's irrelevant really isn't it, as anyone who is determined to view hardcore pornography knows exactly where to find it. I'm not talking paedo stuff here, just the adult porn we've all seen before. I could list a dozen sites from memory that show the things I like for free. (Some of them Siren introduced me to).

Let the Aussies do their thing if it appeases the religious vote. The porn lovers will still view porn and the casuals won't really give a toss anyway, pun intended.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ebzStarWoman  over a year ago

Notting

Women posing as younger girls is much better then seeing young girls for real surely????

A bit of porn cant turn one into a paedo - surely one is one already and then finds the material to suit ones taste??

And as for small boobs - humph, there are some very VERY sexy women on here that have NOT huge boobies, but that does not make them look childlike.

May just have to have another browse to make sure tho

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *he_original_poloWoman  over a year ago

a Primark shoebox in Leicester

Whilst I find banning images of boobs because of their size is a bit ridiculous really, there is some sense in addressing images ‘representing’ young girls as sexual objects (even if they are really 18+ pretending to be younger).

It’s not that seeing such images will ‘turn’ anyone into a paedophile… it’s more the fact the more accessible, commercial and accepted these images are… the more the paedo will believe their thoughts and desires are acceptable… and in turn become more likely to act on them.

It’s odd though how the paedophile is always imagined to be a man. You don’t hear much of a stink being kicked up about women wanting to simulate sex with an underage boy do you?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ensualfire88Man  over a year ago

Edinburgh

Pops head round door, thinks about commenting, decides against, pops head back out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women posing as younger girls is much better then seeing young girls for real surely????

A bit of porn cant turn one into a paedo - surely one is one already and then finds the material to suit ones taste??

And as for small boobs - humph, there are some very VERY sexy women on here that have NOT huge boobies, but that does not make them look childlike.

May just have to have another browse to make sure tho"

A bit of porn can't turn anyone into a sex offender, maybe, I'm not 100% sure on that, but I am sure that over time as these images become more accessible and more mainstream it will be deemed more acceptable, not the small boobies of course but the way those with small boobies are often portrayed in porn, the way things are portrayed in porn needs addressing, not the woman by the size of her boobs, but I guess the OZ government are looking for easy answers rather than the right answers, rather like our own government.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *amschwingerzCouple  over a year ago

West

I can understand where they are coming from with the samll breast thing..bit it seems like an overation knee jerk to me...beasts can find the real Macoy anywhere..they dont need to pretend.

What I do find alarming though is men who find older women dressed as school girls horny...im not talking St Trians stuff...but if small breast are presumed to be an indication of a younger femal then surely women dressed as school girls are the same?

Yeh plenty of people go to fancy dress parties etc dressed like that purely in the spirit of fun with no hidden meanings...and I reckon the majority do it as it is intended..Im not suggesting that all men who may have a giggle with their wifes dressed up are nonces..but in some instances, in my eye I think it could be a bit suss.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Forgot to add that the story also claims that the aussies are banning movies containing female ejaculation as it is "abhorent"

There's a lot of abhorent women on here if it is

Arc"

Love 'abhorent' women,just spent the night with one ,lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0