FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Does Sunak have the balls…
Does Sunak have the balls…
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *oo hot OP Couple 51 weeks ago
North West |
To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan 51 weeks ago
Grantham |
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards."
What will he be bottling next week? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hot OP Couple 51 weeks ago
North West |
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
What will he be bottling next week?"
On Monday, the House will vote on the Orivilige Report. The aftermath of that will illustrate just how much support Johnson has left in the Conservative Party and Sunak will need to deal with the Johnson fanboys and fangirls decisively or risk an internal meltdown.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 51 weeks ago
|
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards."
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hot OP Couple 51 weeks ago
North West |
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee "
As the vote will be open and free, it will be very interesting to see how many are still believers in Boris. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 51 weeks ago
|
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee
As the vote will be open and free, it will be very interesting to see how many are still believers in Boris."
Not many, maybe 20 , most Tory MPs will abstain, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hot OP Couple 51 weeks ago
North West |
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee
As the vote will be open and free, it will be very interesting to see how many are still believers in Boris.
Not many, maybe 20 , most Tory MPs will abstain, "
They should at least be whipped to vote - one way or the other. Get them to show their cards. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 51 weeks ago
|
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee
As the vote will be open and free, it will be very interesting to see how many are still believers in Boris.
Not many, maybe 20 , most Tory MPs will abstain,
They should at least be whipped to vote - one way or the other. Get them to show their cards."
I agree, but most wont have the courage , it will be a heavily one sided vote in favour of the committee’s recommendations, Alexander isn’t very popular |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Unless someone shouts "no" after the debate, then there won't be a vote.
I'm guessing that a member of the Opposition, is going to do exactly that, so that others can see who is voting which way."
Absolutely agree, as would happen if the Tories were in opposition at this point with Labour tearing themselves apart..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eavenNhellCouple 50 weeks ago
carrbrook stalybridge |
And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee
As the vote will be open and free, it will be very interesting to see how many are still believers in Boris.
Not many, maybe 20 , most Tory MPs will abstain,
They should at least be whipped to vote - one way or the other. Get them to show their cards.
I agree, but most wont have the courage , it will be a heavily one sided vote in favour of the committee’s recommendations, Alexander isn’t very popular "
And in a similar situation the labour party would behave any differently? Of course not |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"To capitalise on the Priviliges Report and finally be strong and assertive?
If he bottles it next week, I reckon the Conservative Parliamentary Party will split into open hostilities and an Autumn General Election will be on the cards.
Tbh, I don’t think Alexander has that much support anymore, but I agree that Sunak needs to ‘punish’ any MPs who are openly criticising the Privileges Committee
As the vote will be open and free, it will be very interesting to see how many are still believers in Boris.
Not many, maybe 20 , most Tory MPs will abstain,
They should at least be whipped to vote - one way or the other. Get them to show their cards.
I agree, but most wont have the courage , it will be a heavily one sided vote in favour of the committee’s recommendations, Alexander isn’t very popular
And in a similar situation the labour party would behave any differently? Of course not"
What about  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man 50 weeks ago
Terra Firma |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered "
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
"
Something that has no meaning? You’re sure? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
Something that has no meaning? You’re sure?"
Out in the real world I cannot see many people being concerned about what a privileges committee have to say. Just seven people with an inflated opinion of their own self importance.
Ordinary people are concerned about the cost of living , the war in Ukraine and the younger generation with housing costs. What Boris did during lockdown is irrelevant to them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
Something that has no meaning? You’re sure? Out in the real world I cannot see many people being concerned about what a privileges committee have to say. Just seven people with an inflated opinion of their own self importance.
Ordinary people are concerned about the cost of living , the war in Ukraine and the younger generation with housing costs. What Boris did during lockdown is irrelevant to them. "
Do you think an apathetic electorate is good, or bad for the country.
Kinda sounds like you're happy about it. My view is that an engaged electorate would be good for the UK. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan 50 weeks ago
Grantham |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
"
He's actually had a meeting with the Swedish PM, then has a long standing engagement at a charity fundraiser.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
"
Beat him with whatever stick you can find...
It made no difference whether he was there or not but that doesn't really matter. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
Something that has no meaning? You’re sure? Out in the real world I cannot see many people being concerned about what a privileges committee have to say. Just seven people with an inflated opinion of their own self importance.
Ordinary people are concerned about the cost of living , the war in Ukraine and the younger generation with housing costs. What Boris did during lockdown is irrelevant to them.
Do you think an apathetic electorate is good, or bad for the country.
Kinda sounds like you're happy about it. My view is that an engaged electorate would be good for the UK."
. What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
Something that has no meaning? You’re sure? Out in the real world I cannot see many people being concerned about what a privileges committee have to say. Just seven people with an inflated opinion of their own self importance.
Ordinary people are concerned about the cost of living , the war in Ukraine and the younger generation with housing costs. What Boris did during lockdown is irrelevant to them.
Do you think an apathetic electorate is good, or bad for the country.
Kinda sounds like you're happy about it. My view is that an engaged electorate would be good for the UK.. What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that? "
7 MPs agree with you, 7  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And sunak shows his true colours
Brave Sir Rishi ran away. Bravely ran away away. When danger reared it's ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled. Yes, brave Sir Rishi turned about And gallantly he chickened out. Swiftly taking to his feet, He beat a very brave retreat. Bravest of the brave, Sir Rishi
Were sunakered
What do you want the PM of the country to do. Attend something that has no meaning, because the mp has resigned, or get on with some real work on behalf of the country.
Something that has no meaning? You’re sure? Out in the real world I cannot see many people being concerned about what a privileges committee have to say. Just seven people with an inflated opinion of their own self importance.
Ordinary people are concerned about the cost of living , the war in Ukraine and the younger generation with housing costs. What Boris did during lockdown is irrelevant to them.
Do you think an apathetic electorate is good, or bad for the country.
Kinda sounds like you're happy about it. My view is that an engaged electorate would be good for the UK.. What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that? "
Imagine spending your life trawling through a swingers forum trying to find minor breaches of Tory worship. Would any successful person spend their time doing that?
But seriously. The Tories broke lots of rules while normal people had their loved ones dying along on hospital.
Also, what "results" matter to people?
By the way, in general, I agree with you, the electorate don't seem to care how badly the Tories fuck them over.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?"
"7 MPs agree with you, 7"
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up. "
7, and one of those was a labour whip , only 6 supported him |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple 50 weeks ago
Brighton |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up. "
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May."
. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row . "
Celebrating that MPs are too lazy and apathetic to vote is pretty funny.   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row . "
tbf, the will of the people was to be governed by a known liar, so they probably don't care that he's been lying. As long as he isn't lying about the stuff we like hearing.. does my brexit bum look big on this ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row . "
I’m 2019 Johnson won an 80 seat majority - that’s ordinarily at least two terms to overcome.
The very fact that we can even consider the possibility of labour winning the next election is testament to just how terrible this government has been. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row . "
6 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple 50 weeks ago
Brighton |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row . "
Pat I am worried. Your Top Tory Trolling is just so damn readable and amusing, I fear you will once again leave Fab if Johnson vanishes (like you did before)?
Promise us you will not be so partisan and turn your hand to some Lethal Labour Lampooning if they win the next general election (I know the material you have work with will not be such a rich vein to plunder, but I am sure you have it in you!) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 50 weeks ago
|
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row .
Pat I am worried. Your Top Tory Trolling is just so damn readable and amusing, I fear you will once again leave Fab if Johnson vanishes (like you did before)?
Promise us you will not be so partisan and turn your hand to some Lethal Labour Lampooning if they win the next general election (I know the material you have work with will not be such a rich vein to plunder
, but I am sure you have it in you!)"
I want to know if he will vote for Sunak at the next GE |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What I said was that any minor breach of rules is irrelevant to most people. What matters to the majority is results. Imagine spending your life trawling through videos trying to find minor breaches of lockdown rules . Would any successfull person spend their time doing that?
7 MPs agree with you, 7
No, 7 is the number that voted against the report (lord knows why). TnT above says that it's irrelevant, which means that he's with the 289 that abstained, or didn't turn up.
And...Some 118 Tory MPs voted to back the committee’s findings, including cabinet ministers Alex Chalk, Penny Mordaunt Gillian Keegan, and former PM Theresa May.. This vote is irrelevant. There is only one vote that counts and that is the one of the electorate on the day of the election. Opinion polls or votes in the House of Commons on trivial matters are irrelevant. Luckily on this occasion a lot of MPs exercised common sense and did not bother turning up to vote . They had better things to do with their lives.
Just as well the general public are not as vindictive as some MPs. Some people will be bitterly disappointed when the results of the next election are announced.
It will be five times in a row .
Pat I am worried. Your Top Tory Trolling is just so damn readable and amusing, I fear you will once again leave Fab if Johnson vanishes (like you did before)?
Promise us you will not be so partisan and turn your hand to some Lethal Labour Lampooning if they win the next general election (I know the material you have work with will not be such a rich vein to plunder
, but I am sure you have it in you!)
I want to know if he will vote for Sunak at the next GE"
Boris will be back then for his over time innings. Hasta la GE |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
