FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Sir Jeremy Ferrar

Sir Jeremy Ferrar

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *eatrice Badinage OP   Woman  over a year ago

In a Sparkly Dress

Another interesting interview on the andrew marr show this morning about predicting the second wave and suggesting that some people are having symptoms but are not going to be tested for fear of being penalized from track and trace implications...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eatrice Badinage OP   Woman  over a year ago

In a Sparkly Dress

Apologies Sir Jeremy Farrar

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Think I will just be positive and pretend all these morons are still sticking to the rules and there won't be a second wave.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think, if it happens we won't know till we are deep in it. Our track and trace is not fit for purpose.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *mmabluTV/TS  over a year ago

upton wirral

Track and trace cannot be fully effective anyway as people do not have smart phones,not allways switched on etc.

We will never know the true figures as collecting the data is totally impossible.

We will never now how many will have had the virus or even how many died or did not die due to covid.

All we can do is interpred the figures available to us as best we can.The thing is different people will see the figures in the way that suits them.Being experts is less relevent than if they are optomists or pessamists maybe

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Track and trace cannot be fully effective anyway as people do not have smart phones,not allways switched on etc.

We will never know the true figures as collecting the data is totally impossible.

We will never now how many will have had the virus or even how many died or did not die due to covid.

All we can do is interpred the figures available to us as best we can.The thing is different people will see the figures in the way that suits them.Being experts is less relevent than if they are optomists or pessamists maybe"

Other countries are managing fairly well.

This article explains it well..

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2020/06/view-from-manchester-with-coronavirus-there-isnt-always-an-app-for-that/

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackformore100Man  over a year ago

Tin town


"Track and trace cannot be fully effective anyway as people do not have smart phones,not allways switched on etc.

We will never know the true figures as collecting the data is totally impossible.

We will never now how many will have had the virus or even how many died or did not die due to covid.

All we can do is interpred the figures available to us as best we can.The thing is different people will see the figures in the way that suits them.Being experts is less relevent than if they are optomists or pessamists maybe"

So are you suggesting that because some people may not have smart phones and may have them switched off, and because we don't have 100% accurate data capture, that people who have infection should not make any effort to restrict their movement and contacts?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Track and trace cannot be fully effective anyway as people do not have smart phones,not allways switched on etc.

We will never know the true figures as collecting the data is totally impossible.

We will never now how many will have had the virus or even how many died or did not die due to covid.

All we can do is interpred the figures available to us as best we can.The thing is different people will see the figures in the way that suits them.Being experts is less relevent than if they are optomists or pessamists maybe

So are you suggesting that because some people may not have smart phones and may have them switched off, and because we don't have 100% accurate data capture, that people who have infection should not make any effort to restrict their movement and contacts? "

that definitely not how i read it ... he merely said we will never have a complete and accurate view of the data

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Second wave, more MSM bulls#!+

There wasn't even a first wave & every death since lockdown has been recorded as a C-19 death regardless of contrary evidence.

Notice how it hasn't spiked while we've been having all these protests, but the first sign if people at the seaside and we're in deep peril?

The BBC work to an agenda, they wouldn't have a guest on who would argue against a second wave, that'd be 'wrong think' in the eyes of the Beeb.

As for track and trace?

Check your phones, it may already be on there.

Not by strength by stealth.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"Second wave, more MSM bulls#!+

There wasn't even a first wave & every death since lockdown has been recorded as a C-19 death regardless of contrary evidence.

Notice how it hasn't spiked while we've been having all these protests, but the first sign if people at the seaside and we're in deep peril?

The BBC work to an agenda, they wouldn't have a guest on who would argue against a second wave, that'd be 'wrong think' in the eyes of the Beeb.

As for track and trace?

Check your phones, it may already be on there.

Not by strength by stealth."

Tin hats to be ready.

Nah everyone knows about the phones and the fake news lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0