FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Chat room feedback/discussion > Web cam only room

Web cam only room

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *andAuk OP   Couple  over a year ago

leeds

We think this would be good if possible to stop all of the lurkers. It would need to be moderated closely though to work.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *crumdiddlyumptiousMan  over a year ago

.

A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscreettongueMan  over a year ago

blackburn

Morning all I have not used chat rooms for camming is this where people organise that kind of stuff please

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *andAuk OP   Couple  over a year ago

leeds


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc"

That’s why it would need moderating.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *andAuk OP   Couple  over a year ago

leeds


"Morning all I have not used chat rooms for camming is this where people organise that kind of stuff please "

Some do.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *crumdiddlyumptiousMan  over a year ago

.


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating. "

So mods would have to continually watch the cams, I can't see them doing that

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating. "

What would they moderate against ? You're in a cam room ... your cam is on ...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *andAuk OP   Couple  over a year ago

leeds


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating.

What would they moderate against ? You're in a cam room ... your cam is on ... "

Ensuring that you are actually on cam and not just a blank wall.

It was only a suggestion and all we get are pedantic responses.

We were on a site some years ago and if you had cam pointing at a wall or the likes you were kicked. Also if you labelled as mf and only one or the other was on cam your cam status was changed accordingly. We're not saying to go this far but it did help a lot with keeping the fake profiles in check. Yes there always were mods in the room but it worked well. If folk have nothing to hide and are genuine don't see what the issue would be. If you don't want to be on cam don't use the room, simples!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *edGMan  over a year ago

Daventry


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating.

What would they moderate against ? You're in a cam room ... your cam is on ...

Ensuring that you are actually on cam and not just a blank wall.

It was only a suggestion and all we get are pedantic responses.

Totally agree with these comments. I used to cam quite a bit but just got fed up with MF profiles clearly being men only and " females" wanting to view but not being able to cam for a variety of excuses although the real excuse, that it was actually a guy, didn't come up too often.

We were on a site some years ago and if you had cam pointing at a wall or the likes you were kicked. Also if you labelled as mf and only one or the other was on cam your cam status was changed accordingly. We're not saying to go this far but it did help a lot with keeping the fake profiles in check. Yes there always were mods in the room but it worked well. If folk have nothing to hide and are genuine don't see what the issue would be. If you don't want to be on cam don't use the room, simples! "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating.

So mods would have to continually watch the cams, I can't see them doing that"

It wouldn't be possible to watch every cam at the same time. You can only dock a few cams even with silver and gold mrmbership, no way could you dock 175 cams if a room is full.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating.

What would they moderate against ? You're in a cam room ... your cam is on ...

Ensuring that you are actually on cam and not just a blank wall.

It was only a suggestion and all we get are pedantic responses.

We were on a site some years ago and if you had cam pointing at a wall or the likes you were kicked. Also if you labelled as mf and only one or the other was on cam your cam status was changed accordingly. We're not saying to go this far but it did help a lot with keeping the fake profiles in check. Yes there always were mods in the room but it worked well. If folk have nothing to hide and are genuine don't see what the issue would be. If you don't want to be on cam don't use the room, simples! "

They aren't pedantic responses, just people pointing out issues that can occur with this idea.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Morning all I have not used chat rooms for camming is this where people organise that kind of stuff please "

If you go to the chat tab it will take you there, have fun. X

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *crumdiddlyumptiousMan  over a year ago

.


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating.

So mods would have to continually watch the cams, I can't see them doing that

It wouldn't be possible to watch every cam at the same time. You can only dock a few cams even with silver and gold mrmbership, no way could you dock 175 cams if a room is full. "

I know, Even changing cams all the time to check on them wouldn't work, People move away from cams for genuine reasons, The room would need a mod/mods in the room at all times day/night and it would be like a job for them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Sorry didnt mean my response to sound pedantic. It's just a really tough one for us to mod. Please keep the ideas flowing though

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *andAuk OP   Couple  over a year ago

leeds


"Sorry didnt mean my response to sound pedantic. It's just a really tough one for us to mod. Please keep the ideas flowing though "

No worries, we understand.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"A lot of people would just turn their cam on and point it a a wall/ceiling etc

That’s why it would need moderating.

So mods would have to continually watch the cams, I can't see them doing that

It wouldn't be possible to watch every cam at the same time. You can only dock a few cams even with silver and gold mrmbership, no way could you dock 175 cams if a room is full.

I know, Even changing cams all the time to check on them wouldn't work, People move away from cams for genuine reasons, The room would need a mod/mods in the room at all times day/night and it would be like a job for them "

We do it in our spare time to help out, agreed as it would be quite a hefty task lol.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *ourplusCouple  over a year ago

Near Irvine

I enjoy watching the cams with mine off, but if i'm asked nicely i'll switch it on, but some people don't want to see a small cock

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.1405

0