FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Blocking new profiles

Blocking new profiles

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

How long are newbies blocked for, if you tick the box?

How many days?

I ask because I have them blocked but still get mail from profiles less than a week old?

Surely it should be more than that?

Or is there a glitch in the Matrix!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lirty-CoupleCouple  over a year ago

Bexley

They may be new but are they site supporters? If so, you can't stop them from messaging you unless you are a site supporter too.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iberty RedWoman  over a year ago

Cheltenham

Think its about three days, noticed it's after the 'new' logo on their profile disappears

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS  over a year ago

doncaster

MTC will be along shortly to furnish you with the factoids

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

I am not sure how long for but I doubt if it would be weeks.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Found this on the filters page if you block newbies from mailing

" Active filters People must be all the following to message you:

Can't be newbies (must have been on site for a few days)"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS  over a year ago

doncaster

I think users are newbies for 72 hours so selecting the newbies can not msg would last for 72 hrs

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eyond PurityCouple  over a year ago

Laceby

If you do an Advanced Search, newbies are down there as having the 'new' status for 5 days, so I assume it's this.

C

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Dont many people and couples insist that the newbie needs to show that he/she has a badge of verification, explaining, that the newbie has been as dirty as to meet the standard, self imposed by the "hierarchy"?? Or have I misread the initiation process incorrectly, I don't know, and furthermore I don't care. Hope that helps, if not, then I need to address the narrative of this fabulous"platform.... Really?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eyond PurityCouple  over a year ago

Laceby


"Dont many people and couples insist that the newbie needs to show that he/she has a badge of verification, explaining, that the newbie has been as dirty as to meet the standard, self imposed by the "hierarchy"?? Or have I misread the initiation process incorrectly, I don't know, and furthermore I don't care. Hope that helps, if not, then I need to address the narrative of this fabulous"platform.... Really? "

Personally, I like to break 'em in err I mean induct them

C

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone

5 days

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ancelot1633Man  over a year ago

margate


"Dont many people and couples insist that the newbie needs to show that he/she has a badge of verification, explaining, that the newbie has been as dirty as to meet the standard, self imposed by the "hierarchy"?? Or have I misread the initiation process incorrectly, I don't know, and furthermore I don't care. Hope that helps, if not, then I need to address the narrative of this fabulous"platform.... Really?

Personally, I like to break 'em in err I mean induct them

C"

It’s a dirty job but someone has to do it. Fabulous profile btw x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"5 days"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0