FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > I see Tinder has a ‘blue tick’ .. good idea
I see Tinder has a ‘blue tick’ .. good idea
Jump to: Newest in thread
In contrast to the Fabs photo-verification, the Tinder Blue Tick “promises” a cross-check against profile pictures. It looks to me like a similar option on Fabs would be a really good enhancement.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago
Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else |
"In contrast to the Fabs photo-verification, the Tinder Blue Tick “promises” a cross-check against profile pictures. It looks to me like a similar option on Fabs would be a really good enhancement. "
My photo veri pic is my face.
All but a couple of my others don't have my face in.
Which brings me to my question.
How is this "cross referencing" achieved?
Does my torso look appropriate for my leg? Imagine being told your body parts don't match...  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
What Tinder ask for is a series of real-time posed selfies, which are compared to existing profile photos using AI technology and then a human check too.
Verified profiles display a blue tick, so members know they can put extra trust those profiles.
You can chose not to take part, many will. So your profile maybe not getting authorised first time isn’t really gonna be a big deal. You just have to try adding some extra poses and pictures.
Fabs already gives you flexibility to control the privacy level of your pics so you can easily set the extra face pics to private if you want.
Like photo verification it’s s choice … I can’t see a downside, only the upside in making Fabs better.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What Tinder ask for is a series of real-time posed selfies, which are compared to existing profile photos using AI technology and then a human check too.
Verified profiles display a blue tick, so members know they can put extra trust those profiles.
You can chose not to take part, many will. So your profile maybe not getting authorised first time isn’t really gonna be a big deal. You just have to try adding some extra poses and pictures.
Fabs already gives you flexibility to control the privacy level of your pics so you can easily set the extra face pics to private if you want.
Like photo verification it’s s choice … I can’t see a downside, only the upside in making Fabs better.
"
I'm not sure it would work as well for a swinger's/sex site as it would a dating one.
I've never bothered with dating sites but I imagine most show their faces publicly. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
AI Technology isn't cheap.
I also don't think it's fair to say Fab could use similar Tech.
Last year Tinder reportedly made $1.6 Billion in revenue. I'm pretty sure Fabs revenue is not even remotely close to that.
Fab gives users the tools on here to make it easy to not interact with people if someone doesn't believe they are real. But in saying that, it's a matter of opinion really. Someone you may feel is fake could indeed be as real as they come.
"What Tinder ask for is a series of real-time posed selfies, which are compared to existing profile photos using AI technology and then a human check too.
Verified profiles display a blue tick, so members know they can put extra trust those profiles.
You can chose not to take part, many will. So your profile maybe not getting authorised first time isn’t really gonna be a big deal. You just have to try adding some extra poses and pictures.
Fabs already gives you flexibility to control the privacy level of your pics so you can easily set the extra face pics to private if you want.
Like photo verification it’s s choice … I can’t see a downside, only the upside in making Fabs better.
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
In my experience even 'blue tick' profiles on Tinder are still usually people trying to get Onlyfans subscribers etc, they're just more likely to be actual people than sock puppets with stolen photos. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why can't everyone just learn how to spot fakes, losers and time wasters "
Because everyone is different, some will spot then pretty quick, others are a little more vulnerable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
