FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Advertising “paid for” parties
Advertising “paid for” parties
Jump to: Newest in thread
Is it against the rules for a profile to advertise meets that are “paid” orgies / gangbangs? Several popping up in my local feed with single guys being ask for £130. Not in the spirit of fab perhaps, but is it against the rules? |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
 |
By *ugby 123Couple 3 weeks ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
Yes that would be against rules to advertise paid parties for guaranteed sex or for an excessive amount to go to a party.
Can you report the profiles please
Thanks |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
[Removed by poster at 18/04/24 13:59:24] |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"Yes that would be against rules to advertise paid parties for guaranteed sex or for an excessive amount to go to a party.
Can you report the profiles please
Thanks"
I see the profile has now become UNLOS |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
[Removed by poster at 18/04/24 14:39:43] |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
I thought so to. There are a number of profiles who advertise meets whether it be a gangbang or party as if they're swingers parties, anyone can attend but most of the ladies that attend are paid working girls. It's misleading to people who are knew and may not be aware. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
Had similar happen, been chatting arranged to meet. then asked me to buy £100 of Amazon Cards.
Big red flag, blocked and reported |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
Seen a meet advertised when the wife was wanting gangbanged and looking for participants. All well and good till the final line "because of costs etc it will be £80 per guy"  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"Yes that would be against rules to advertise paid parties for guaranteed sex or for an excessive amount to go to a party.
Can you report the profiles please
Thanks"
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
