FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Site improvements
Site improvements
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *rewpie OP Man 17 weeks ago
dumfries |
Hi all,
My subscription recently has ran out on here, and i am feeling reluctant to renewing, as there doesn't seem to be much investment to the untrained eye at least to the site.
Its looking extremely dated and in some cases there are features added and highlighted as new, which were initiated over 4 years ago.
Is there any plans to improve the site? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All that is definitely true, you might get more traction posting in the site feedback forum."
Or you might just get a temporary ban from the forums as often happens when folks criticise the site lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 17 weeks ago
|
"Hi all,
My subscription recently has ran out on here, and i am feeling reluctant to renewing, as there doesn't seem to be much investment to the untrained eye at least to the site.
Its looking extremely dated and in some cases there are features added and highlighted as new, which were initiated over 4 years ago.
Is there any plans to improve the site?"
What more do you want for a fiver? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple 17 weeks ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"All that is definitely true, you might get more traction posting in the site feedback forum.
Or you might just get a temporary ban from the forums as often happens when folks criticise the site lol "
That's not true. If a person break rules when giving the feedback they might though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rewpie OP Man 17 weeks ago
dumfries |
I just think it could benefit from a bit of modernisation, it seems to function fine, but its appearance gives of early 2000s forum vibes. Im not complaining about the cost at all. I am just stating for the number of paying users, it could benefit from a sprucing up, then again, i dont know what the cost of running such a site are. Just thinking out loud |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Best to be very specific about what you'd like improving.
Many of us are fine with what may appear dated, as it's simple to use. It's the lack of just a few features that should be standard, that really holds it back, like being able to search by body type.
There are tens of thousands of men here and those who may be interested in them, then have a much tougher job of trying to filter out the unsuitable ones, because filtering and search options are so limited.
Site tools should make it easier to sort the wheat from the chaff. Fab is shooting itself in its foot by making it harder. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rewpie OP Man 17 weeks ago
dumfries |
"Best to be very specific about what you'd like improving.
Many of us are fine with what may appear dated, as it's simple to use. It's the lack of just a few features that should be standard, that really holds it back, like being able to search by body type.
There are tens of thousands of men here and those who may be interested in them, then have a much tougher job of trying to filter out the unsuitable ones, because filtering and search options are so limited.
Site tools should make it easier to sort the wheat from the chaff. Fab is shooting itself in its foot by making it harder. "
Great points |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amoanMan 17 weeks ago
st peter port |
The one thing that does need improvement is if you send someone a friend request, they can wait until you are offline, accept it, check out all your pix and then delete you from their friend list.
Its a bit naughty, but has happened, a few times. If a request is sent, and accepted, both parties should have access to the friends only pix when they come back on line, just my observation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 17 weeks ago
|
quite simply fab works for most swinger mainly couples and women but thats always been the case across the scene ...
fab is not glossy and false and its free nobody ask for anyone to pay its just a option that gives you a few other tools..
fab and any other swinger site and kink sites and even casual sex sites will never work for all men simply because of the huge amounts of men compared to women couples..
so site improvement might make it pretty and more user friendly but it wont help men get better odds of a meet or into swinging .... fab works very well for those who use it properly ..
fab is uk number one swingers site for a reason and its because it works
#justmyopinion |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rewpie OP Man 17 weeks ago
dumfries |
"quite simply fab works for most swinger mainly couples and women but thats always been the case across the scene ...
fab is not glossy and false and its free nobody ask for anyone to pay its just a option that gives you a few other tools..
fab and any other swinger site and kink sites and even casual sex sites will never work for all men simply because of the huge amounts of men compared to women couples..
so site improvement might make it pretty and more user friendly but it wont help men get better odds of a meet or into swinging .... fab works very well for those who use it properly ..
fab is uk number one swingers site for a reason and its because it works
#justmyopinion"
I never mentioned it not working for me as a man, i dont know, maybe this was a response to another comment. But i totally get where you are coming from. Its sort of like if its not broken then why fix it. Maybe its me just expecting things to be shiny and new these days. Ive become spoiled 😂 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple 17 weeks ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"I just think it could benefit from a bit of modernisation, it seems to function fine, but its appearance gives of early 2000s forum vibes. Im not complaining about the cost at all. I am just stating for the number of paying users, it could benefit from a sprucing up, then again, i dont know what the cost of running such a site are. Just thinking out loud
"
So you mean different logos etc rather than new additions? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Personally here are some improvements I think would be good.
Gender options: currently people who crossdress but by no means identify as the opposite gender, are in the same category as transgender people who are transitioning.
Options for uploading pics/videos I'd suggest in addition to current:
TV/TS - M
TV/TS - F
TV/TS - TV/TS
Group (anything more than 2 people)
Or you could split it into
Group (straight)
Group (LGBTQ+)
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Its a platform/website, it works fine .
Folk use the forums , folk use the chatrooms , folk post pictures and use the chatrooms, whats to change , if it isnt broken dont fix it.
obviously the one problem that could be addressed is the folk that feel the need to have multiple accounts , or constantly join , leave a week later , then re open another account , and of course singles opening couples accounts purely to access profiles only looking for couples.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Evening...your right mate, the site is simply 'S**t*...it's the second time that I've been on here with women that simply block for no reason.....it's so much easier to pull on a normal dating site... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Evening...your right mate, the site is simply 'S**t*...it's the second time that I've been on here with women that simply block for no reason.....it's so much easier to pull on a normal dating site..."
Off you pop then 
Maybe they block because of the things you send to inboxes rather than putting on the forum. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The one thing that does need improvement is if you send someone a friend request, they can wait until you are offline, accept it, check out all your pix and then delete you from their friend list.
Its a bit naughty, but has happened, a few times. If a request is sent, and accepted, both parties should have access to the friends only pix when they come back on line, just my observation. "
Actually, it's one thing we would keep. We are inundated with friends requests from people who haven't even had the good grace to speak with us first. We even warn against it in our profile.
The alternative would be to put a ban on friends requests unless there is a message both ways first.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The one thing that does need improvement is if you send someone a friend request, they can wait until you are offline, accept it, check out all your pix and then delete you from their friend list.
Its a bit naughty, but has happened, a few times. If a request is sent, and accepted, both parties should have access to the friends only pix when they come back on line, just my observation.
Actually, it's one thing we would keep. We are inundated with friends requests from people who haven't even had the good grace to speak with us first. We even warn against it in our profile.
The alternative would be to put a ban on friends requests unless there is a message both ways first.
"
It would be a welcome addition, if friends requests weren't possible until there'd been 2 ways messaging! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Evening...your right mate, the site is simply 'S**t*...it's the second time that I've been on here with women that simply block for no reason.....it's so much easier to pull on a normal dating site..."
There's always a reason. But you don't need to know their reason. Bet your status updates don't help🙄🤣 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 16 weeks ago
|
"Evening...your right mate, the site is simply 'S**t*...it's the second time that I've been on here with women that simply block for no reason.....it's so much easier to pull on a normal dating site..."
its so shit that its the best site in the uk ... seems to be mainly men moaning i wonder why ...maybe they want more porn and sex on a plate where women only say yes ... 
ps women block because they want nothing to fo with that person its quite simple and affective men can do it too |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man 16 weeks ago
Newcastle |
"The one thing that does need improvement is if you send someone a friend request, they can wait until you are offline, accept it, check out all your pix and then delete you from their friend list.
Its a bit naughty, but has happened, a few times. If a request is sent, and accepted, both parties should have access to the friends only pix when they come back on line, just my observation.
Actually, it's one thing we would keep. We are inundated with friends requests from people who haven't even had the good grace to speak with us first. We even warn against it in our profile.
The alternative would be to put a ban on friends requests unless there is a message both ways first.
It would be a welcome addition, if friends requests weren't possible until there'd been 2 ways messaging! "
This sounds good  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Evening...your right mate, the site is simply 'S**t*...it's the second time that I've been on here with women that simply block for no reason.....it's so much easier to pull on a normal dating site..."
this is a swingers site tho not a normal dating site
Seems many people now think Fab is a hook up site were single guys go looking for a shag. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
