FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > More granular message filtering?

More granular message filtering?

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *ir_Lord_Frog OP   Couple 22 weeks ago

Fermoy

Hi, just a bit of feedback regarding message filtering. I'm aware you can automatically reject messages from unverified profiles, those witn no public pics, not supporters, etc

And also by profile type: males, females, TV/TS, couples of various composition

I'm confused you can't filter by orientation? For example you can either blanket allow or disallow messages from Males. No distinction between straight, bi, bi-curious and gay.

Is there a reason for this or is it a feature the site could implement?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xposedInTheMaleMan 22 weeks ago

Cambridgeshire

Think about what would happen.

At the moment you get a message, which one look at their profile will tell you is a waste of time because they're straight.

With your suggested system they'd get a warning that you were only interested in bi people. So they'd change their profile to bi and try again. And that will take much more time to out.

So your suggested change would make your life worse.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xposedInTheMaleMan 22 weeks ago

Cambridgeshire

Well that's strange... The site removed a single word from my posting without warning. Something describing the act of removing a plant that had seeded itself in an inappropriate location...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eyeYCouple 22 weeks ago

Nr Leicester


"Hi, just a bit of feedback regarding message filtering. I'm aware you can automatically reject messages from unverified profiles, those witn no public pics, not supporters, etc

And also by profile type: males, females, TV/TS, couples of various composition

I'm confused you can't filter by orientation? For example you can either blanket allow or disallow messages from Males. No distinction between straight, bi, bi-curious and gay.

Is there a reason for this or is it a feature the site could implement?"

Whilst risking recourse there's a lot Fab could implement, your suggestion being one.

Personally hate the need to block all men as there's a number we're interested in as you guys..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *nebworthMan 22 weeks ago

Knebworth


"Well that's strange... The site removed a single word from my posting without warning. Something describing the act of removing a plant that had seeded itself in an inappropriate location... "
The president of the royal horticultural society is Keith Weed.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xposedInTheMaleMan 22 weeks ago

Cambridgeshire

Maybe you're only allowed to use that word with a capital letter????

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *apiophileMan 22 weeks ago

Lichfield


"Maybe you're only allowed to use that word with a capital letter???? "

Or possibly a reference to watersports in addition to The Devil's Lettuce?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0

0.0156