 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
When you read a profile you sometimes realise that even though they match your search criteria there are other preferences they have written in their profile that mean you aren't suitable for them e.g. no facial hair or some other physical attribute.
Would it be possible to add a feature so that you could flag that profile and prevent it from showing up in future searches? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When you read a profile you sometimes realise that even though they match your search criteria there are other preferences they have written in their profile that mean you aren't suitable for them e.g. no facial hair or some other physical attribute.
Would it be possible to add a feature so that you could flag that profile and prevent it from showing up in future searches?"
yes...just block them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I did try blocking to see if that worked, but the profile I tried it on still showed up in my search results."
Just pass it by and look at next profile lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I did try blocking to see if that worked, but the profile I tried it on still showed up in my search results.
Use the advanced search not basic and it won't show "
My search page does say Advanced Search, but the test profile still appears. Perhaps I am doing something wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Blocking might work after all, when I re-did the test some while later the profile didn't appear.
I will do a couple more tests and post results here.
Thanks for your help. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Done some more tests, and blocking is the answer. Doesn't seem to work straight away, but it does work not too long afterwards.
Thanks again for your help  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic