 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Among the many genuine men women and couples on the site that enjoy meeting people and really put an effort in to meet new people and just have fun together there are time wasters and fake accounts which is really off putting to new people on the site when they get messed around even for the veteran FABers we thaught a good way of combating these types of accounts would be a time scale in which the profile should get atleast photo verified at first because even if you don't want to show a pic yet you can still hide it we also think that if you don't get verified by webcam or meet after a length of time the account should be disabled the time scale should be decided by site by admins of course but we think that this could potentially make the site a lot less hassle,
This is just a suggestion so please don't be offended we just get hassled as do many other people by the few that put not effort in
Goooooo FABers!!!!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *dwalu2Couple
over a year ago
Bristol |
It wouldn't make any difference. A photo for verification is easy to fake, and is more likely to put unwelcome pressure on genuine people who are reticent about adding a photo.
Not everyone wants to send a photo to Fab admin, whether it will be made public or not. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Yeah I suppose but then the site just gets flooded with time wasters/ fakes but it was just a suggestion, we love this site anyways despite the idiots as we met some great people on here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It wouldn't make any difference. A photo for verification is easy to fake, and is more likely to put unwelcome pressure on genuine people who are reticent about adding a photo.
Not everyone wants to send a photo to Fab admin, whether it will be made public or not."
We aren't saying you need to send a photo within a week we mean a good amount of time so that people can get comfortable with the site and the people on here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Among the many genuine men women and couples on the site that enjoy meeting people and really put an effort in to meet new people and just have fun together there are time wasters and fake accounts which is really off putting to new people on the site when they get messed around even for the veteran FABers we thaught a good way of combating these types of accounts would be a time scale in which the profile should get atleast photo verified at first because even if you don't want to show a pic yet you can still hide it we also think that if you don't get verified by webcam or meet after a length of time the account should be disabled the time scale should be decided by site by admins of course but we think that this could potentially make the site a lot less hassle,
This is just a suggestion so please don't be offended we just get hassled as do many other people by the few that put not effort in
Goooooo FABers!!!! "
. Why worry about fakes or time wasters . You can usually use your intuition to work out quickly who is real . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I started to chat to a young lady on here up to 2weeks ago.
She was claiming to be here to meet tgirls like me.
She was a site supporter.Photo verified and verified by a tgirl...after agreeing to meet up at a club half way between us,messaging right up to club opening...then an hour after 'deadline'passed i messaged her to see if she was ok/lost etc...BLOCKED!!!
Really did think about why i was bothering to be here  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I have been on here four years, on and off and have never been photo verified. I would not want to be forced to send a pic to admin. Obviously meets with real people should count .... that should be enough, surely? Have not come across too many timewasters, can maybe spot them early? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
