 |
By *mmmMaybeCouple
over a year ago
West Wales |
No, They can make one innocuous private pic public, send the message & then make pic private again.
Complete waste of time. Be good if a time limit could be set on it maybe?
But basically any message you get will be from someone purposely getting around filters to be deceitful, so any message it worth no more than an instant delete & block in our eyes.
S |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"No, They can make one innocuous private pic public, send the message & then make pic private again.
Complete waste of time. Be good if a time limit could be set on it maybe?
But basically any message you get will be from someone purposely getting around filters to be deceitful, so any message it worth no more than an instant delete & block in our eyes.
S"
Thanks for this, that makes perfect sense! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Just out of interest why would you want to eliminate messages from people with no public photos ? Using that filter would mean somone who thinks it's a good idea to have a photo that would look better in Gynaecology text book is a better potential Fab partner than someone with a nice clear face photo in a private folder that they may send you at a later point once you have established contact?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Just out of interest why would you want to eliminate messages from people with no public photos ? Using that filter would mean somone who thinks it's a good idea to have a photo that would look better in Gynaecology text book is a better potential Fab partner than someone with a nice clear face photo in a private folder that they may send you at a later point once you have established contact?
"
It's a filter we choose to use |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just out of interest why would you want to eliminate messages from people with no public photos ? Using that filter would mean somone who thinks it's a good idea to have a photo that would look better in Gynaecology text book is a better potential Fab partner than someone with a nice clear face photo in a private folder that they may send you at a later point once you have established contact?
"
We all use filters for various personal reasons. Some like me use additional filters as some fab ones don't work too well. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
When you contact someone whose filters block you are you told why? Such as "no public pics"?
If so maybe it would be better if they don't know why they're filtered?
We've been getting contacted more recently by profiles with no pics at all despite our filters. If they know what they are they are easy to circumvent
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just out of interest why would you want to eliminate messages from people with no public photos ? Using that filter would mean somone who thinks it's a good idea to have a photo that would look better in Gynaecology text book is a better potential Fab partner than someone with a nice clear face photo in a private folder that they may send you at a later point once you have established contact?
"
I can accept that people may want to keep face pics in private to send in a message but I am afraid there is no reason not to have avatar/public photos. Bodies are big enough to show something other than face/genitals.
It's a personal choice yes but as the profile is a basically a shop window why limit options on people viewing ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
