FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > New Snapchat filter
New Snapchat filter
Jump to: Newest in thread
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So anybody else been noticing these photos on profiles now? Mainly done in jest but seeing some TV's & CD's with only public photo as these. Surely these photos should get rejected no? They are technically not photos of the real people "What about yours with rain clouds and devil head emojis over your faces? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So anybody else been noticing these photos on profiles now? Mainly done in jest but seeing some TV's & CD's with only public photo as these. Surely these photos should get rejected no? They are technically not photos of the real people
What about yours with rain clouds and devil head emojis over your faces? "Is that the same thing though? We are maintaining anonymity we havent altered our pictures to legitimately look like emoji people lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So anybody else been noticing these photos on profiles now? Mainly done in jest but seeing some TV's & CD's with only public photo as these. Surely these photos should get rejected no? They are technically not photos of the real people
What about yours with rain clouds and devil head emojis over your faces?
Is that the same thing though? We are maintaining anonymity we havent altered our pictures to legitimately look like emoji people lol"I don't think anyone uses snapchat to legitimately look like dogs and cartoons. It's a bit of fun. As long as there are still unfiltered photos in the public/friends album then I csnt see the harm in it or why you think yours is a more acceptable way of using such things. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So anybody else been noticing these photos on profiles now? Mainly done in jest but seeing some TV's & CD's with only public photo as these. Surely these photos should get rejected no? They are technically not photos of the real people
What about yours with rain clouds and devil head emojis over your faces?
Is that the same thing though? We are maintaining anonymity we havent altered our pictures to legitimately look like emoji people lol
I don't think anyone uses snapchat to legitimately look like dogs and cartoons. It's a bit of fun. As long as there are still unfiltered photos in the public/friends album then I csnt see the harm in it or why you think yours is a more acceptable way of using such things. "Sorry lol I have no issue with the animal ears or rosey cheek etc filters. I should have been more clear in OP I mean the new gender swapping filter they added, seen a few profiles with just those and idk how they havent been rejected as its not a photo of them anymore no? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So anybody else been noticing these photos on profiles now? Mainly done in jest but seeing some TV's & CD's with only public photo as these. Surely these photos should get rejected no? They are technically not photos of the real people
What about yours with rain clouds and devil head emojis over your faces?
Is that the same thing though? We are maintaining anonymity we havent altered our pictures to legitimately look like emoji people lol
I don't think anyone uses snapchat to legitimately look like dogs and cartoons. It's a bit of fun. As long as there are still unfiltered photos in the public/friends album then I csnt see the harm in it or why you think yours is a more acceptable way of using such things.
Sorry lol I have no issue with the animal ears or rosey cheek etc filters.
I should have been more clear in OP
I mean the new gender swapping filter they added, seen a few profiles with just those and idk how they havent been rejected as its not a photo of them anymore no? "I didn't know they did those..a ts with a gender swapping filter...that's seems... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" I didn't know they did those..a ts with a gender swapping filter...that's seems..." 
Back to original/square one. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" I didn't know they did those..a ts with a gender swapping filter...that's seems...
Back to original/square one."Whatever floats your boat lol theres all sorts of wonderful out there. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Sorry lol I have no issue with the animal ears or rosey cheek etc filters. I should have been more clear in OP I mean the new gender swapping filter they added, seen a few profiles with just those and idk how they havent been rejected as its not a photo of them anymore no? " I would report the pic for Admin to take a look please | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So anybody else been noticing these photos on profiles now? Mainly done in jest but seeing some TV's & CD's with only public photo as these. Surely these photos should get rejected no? They are technically not photos of the real people
What about yours with rain clouds and devil head emojis over your faces?
Is that the same thing though? We are maintaining anonymity we havent altered our pictures to legitimately look like emoji people lol
I don't think anyone uses snapchat to legitimately look like dogs and cartoons. It's a bit of fun. As long as there are still unfiltered photos in the public/friends album then I csnt see the harm in it or why you think yours is a more acceptable way of using such things.
Sorry lol I have no issue with the animal ears or rosey cheek etc filters.
I should have been more clear in OP
I mean the new gender swapping filter they added, seen a few profiles with just those and idk how they havent been rejected as its not a photo of them anymore no? "Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work." One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Going back to the OP's post, we would not meet with someone who had shown a pic we suspected as being along these lines. We would rather see the real person and decide from there. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Going back to the OP's post, we would not meet with someone who had shown a pic we suspected as being along these lines. We would rather see the real person and decide from there." Wow, that seems hard to believe. But obviously it exists, so how can you tell if someone is using it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Going back to the OP's post, we would not meet with someone who had shown a pic we suspected as being along these lines. We would rather see the real person and decide from there. Wow, that seems hard to believe. But obviously it exists, so how can you tell if someone is using it." I would think the admins who ok the photos should know they are by their verification photo and reject them, I've had photo's rejected because its unclear if its my own cock or not lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Going back to the OP's post, we would not meet with someone who had shown a pic we suspected as being along these lines. We would rather see the real person and decide from there. Wow, that seems hard to believe. But obviously it exists, so how can you tell if someone is using it. I would think the admins who ok the photos should know they are by their verification photo and reject them, I've had photo's rejected because its unclear if its my own cock or not lol" True,also you can probably tell by their lack of verifications. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Going back to the OP's post, we would not meet with someone who had shown a pic we suspected as being along these lines. We would rather see the real person and decide from there. Wow, that seems hard to believe. But obviously it exists, so how can you tell if someone is using it. I would think the admins who ok the photos should know they are by their verification photo and reject them, I've had photo's rejected because its unclear if its my own cock or not lol True,also you can probably tell by their lack of verifications." Thats just it though, I've noticed verified ones from before this that now have these pics up, just don't think they should be allowed up, its not a picture of that person or any other person lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Going back to the OP's post, we would not meet with someone who had shown a pic we suspected as being along these lines. We would rather see the real person and decide from there. Wow, that seems hard to believe. But obviously it exists, so how can you tell if someone is using it. I would think the admins who ok the photos should know they are by their verification photo and reject them, I've had photo's rejected because its unclear if its my own cock or not lol True,also you can probably tell by their lack of verifications. Thats just it though, I've noticed verified ones from before this that now have these pics up, just don't think they should be allowed up, its not a picture of that person or any other person lol" Well surely anybody they meet would report them if look nothing like their pics, seems a daft thing to do anyway. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Are you sure, never heard of one of them before and how does it work. One of the guys I work with took a pic of me yesterday and swapped it into a rather sexy female image. Wow, that seems hard to believe. But obviously it exists, so how can you tell if someone is using it."  I never know about it myself.
Oh thinking about all those hours trying to paste 3 inches of foundation to hide my stubbles for my pics....grr | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
