FabSwingers.com > Forums > Site help > Rejected photos "too rude"
Rejected photos "too rude"
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *oxxy OP TV/TS 11 weeks ago
Nr Kettering |
Posted this in site feedback as something clearly needs updating on the rules, but I'll try here. I keep getting photos rejected and I can't see why. Just poses in fetishwear outfits, and not particularly good ones. Certainly nothing too rude, scary and absolutely nowhere near lots of apparently allowed content such as hard anal etc! I'm at a loss as to what I'm doing wrong, and if there's a rule being broken then surely that should be in the rules? Is fetishwear banned? |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *oxxy OP TV/TS 11 weeks ago
Nr Kettering |
And now someone has gone and rejected my older photos too?
Surely Fab, isn't *that* closed minded? |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
Apparently some types of fetish wear is banned. I believe gimp masks, for example, are not allowed. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *oxxy OP TV/TS 11 weeks ago
Nr Kettering |
That's good to know, although that's absolutely something that should be made clear - we are after all, not mind readers. Happy to abide by rules, after all it's their site, but if we don't know them... |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"And now someone has gone and rejected my older photos too?
Surely Fab, isn't *that* closed minded?"
Remember this is a swinging site not a fetish site. They are quite strict on where they draw the lines. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *oxxy OP TV/TS 11 weeks ago
Nr Kettering |
Agree, but catering for one fetish but not another is just odd.
Needs documenting of course, hence the original post in the feedback section.
Would any moderator like to elaborate, for instance if the images were cropped to remove the head (that sounds wrong, sorry! ) or it "blurred" out, would that satisfy requirements please?
Thanks for the responses so far by the way, appreciated. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
