FabSwingers.com > Forums > Introductions > no meets argh
no meets argh
Jump to: Newest in thread
 | |||
"Seem to message a lot of ladys but don't seem to get any where at all ? Think my text might be a little to forward sometimes it just nerves cause am really shy .ps help "You have bigger problems than that search the forums for advice on you profile  | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
"Seem to message a lot of ladys but don't seem to get any where at all ? Think my text might be a little to forward sometimes it just nerves cause am really shy .ps help "Is this guy winding us up? | |||
"Seem to message a lot of ladys but don't seem to get any where at all ? Think my text might be a little to forward sometimes it just nerves cause am really shy .ps help "a wink and a friends request is a tad lame when you havent read a profile | |||
"Send me a message like you would for a woman your interested in and I'll pick it apart for you.. I'll do it privately "ohh that sweet  | |||
| |||
"bigger problems well 1st your profile is rubbish testing the water but you have been a member for over a year ??? also if you study the forums its full of guys complaining about this very subject what sorta messages are you sending " Here, here....  | |||
"Seem to message a lot of ladys but don't seem to get any where at all ? Think my text might be a little to forward sometimes it just nerves cause am really shy .ps help
Is this guy winding us up?"Sadly, no, l don't think he is. Maybe he thinks he signed up for a dating site with guaranteed results! | |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
"it dont matter what you do, women dont search profiles or view you, out of my few hundred views 90% are men, its virtually impossible here to find some fun, and when the men out weigh the women by 1 to 20 your messages barely get read, and women who are below your own standards are so fussy, im not kidding but there are some women here who are not much to look at all want brad pitt lookalikes lol, and women want face pix of men when they havnt got face pix, so what difference does it make what you put in your profile?? lol "well said | |||
| |||
"it dont matter what you do, women dont search profiles or view you, out of my few hundred views 90% are men, its virtually impossible here to find some fun, and when the men out weigh the women by 1 to 20 your messages barely get read, and women who are below your own standards are so fussy, im not kidding but there are some women here who are not much to look at all want brad pitt lookalikes lol, and women want face pix of men when they havnt got face pix, so what difference does it make what you put in your profile?? lol "Bollocks. In the main at least as actually there are some grains of truth in this statement; blokes do massively outnumber women, though its probably more around the 100 to 1 mark. And plenty of men do look at your profile, I'd say about half the people who view mine are probably male. For the gay men the reasoning is obvious, but the straight ones view it normally (I'd imagine) if you've had a meet with a lady or couple who appeal to them and they want to see what their "type" is. But the rest of the statement if you don't mind me saying is utter nonsense. If you put the effort in it pays dividends. I had a two line profile with no pics for the first three weeks or so on here and got bugger all in the way of attention. Once I let my imagination loose and actually put some pics up I began to reap the rewards! And I've never pretended to be Brad Pitt either? Now I just respond to messages more than I send them which makes things simpler. Also by a lady being ugly by your standards not anyone else's how can she not aspire to fancy muscular traditionally good looking men? Some ladies prefer blokes with a bit of fat on them, some prefer boyish types, some prefer gym trained adonises, we're all different. I have my own preferences, while a lady's body type doesn't put me off, stupidity, poor hygeine, double standards and a lack of care about their appearance would, so I'd rule out any fitting these descriptions. A prime example of double standards being a lady who contacted me with text on her profile stating she wanted fit and good looking guys only, not a problem, she was a bbw again not a problem, everyone has preferences, but then accusing those who she didn't appeal to by saying, "No SHALLOW types! Jog on!" That for me said straight to bin, not her body type or the fact that she preferred athletic men. In short mate, yeah there's loads more men on here than women, but so what it just means we have to market ourselves differently. And in my opinion I'd rather be receiving a dozen messages a day than having a thousand to trawl through with most of them being shit. Wouldn't you? | |||
"it dont matter what you do, women dont search profiles or view you, out of my few hundred views 90% are men, its virtually impossible here to find some fun, and when the men out weigh the women by 1 to 20 your messages barely get read, and women who are below your own standards are so fussy, im not kidding but there are some women here who are not much to look at all want brad pitt lookalikes lol, and women want face pix of men when they havnt got face pix, so what difference does it make what you put in your profile?? lol
Bollocks.
In the main at least as actually there are some grains of truth in this statement; blokes do massively outnumber women, though its probably more around the 100 to 1 mark.
And plenty of men do look at your profile, I'd say about half the people who view mine are probably male. For the gay men the reasoning is obvious, but the straight ones view it normally (I'd imagine) if you've had a meet with a lady or couple who appeal to them and they want to see what their "type" is.
But the rest of the statement if you don't mind me saying is utter nonsense. If you put the effort in it pays dividends. I had a two line profile with no pics for the first three weeks or so on here and got bugger all in the way of attention. Once I let my imagination loose and actually put some pics up I began to reap the rewards! And I've never pretended to be Brad Pitt either? Now I just respond to messages more than I send them which makes things simpler.
Also by a lady being ugly by your standards not anyone else's how can she not aspire to fancy muscular traditionally good looking men? Some ladies prefer blokes with a bit of fat on them, some prefer boyish types, some prefer gym trained adonises, we're all different. I have my own preferences, while a lady's body type doesn't put me off, stupidity, poor hygeine, double standards and a lack of care about their appearance would, so I'd rule out any fitting these descriptions. A prime example of double standards being a lady who contacted me with text on her profile stating she wanted fit and good looking guys only, not a problem, she was a bbw again not a problem, everyone has preferences, but then accusing those who she didn't appeal to by saying, "No SHALLOW types! Jog on!" That for me said straight to bin, not her body type or the fact that she preferred athletic men.
In short mate, yeah there's loads more men on here than women, but so what it just means we have to market ourselves differently. And in my opinion I'd rather be receiving a dozen messages a day than having a thousand to trawl through with most of them being shit. Wouldn't you?"Well said. Couldn't have put it better myself | |||
"it dont matter what you do, women dont search profiles or view you, out of my few hundred views 90% are men, its virtually impossible here to find some fun, and when the men out weigh the women by 1 to 20 your messages barely get read, and women who are below your own standards are so fussy, im not kidding but there are some women here who are not much to look at all want brad pitt lookalikes lol, and women want face pix of men when they havnt got face pix, so what difference does it make what you put in your profile?? lol
Bollocks.
In the main at least as actually there are some grains of truth in this statement; blokes do massively outnumber women, though its probably more around the 100 to 1 mark.
And plenty of men do look at your profile, I'd say about half the people who view mine are probably male. For the gay men the reasoning is obvious, but the straight ones view it normally (I'd imagine) if you've had a meet with a lady or couple who appeal to them and they want to see what their "type" is.
But the rest of the statement if you don't mind me saying is utter nonsense. If you put the effort in it pays dividends. I had a two line profile with no pics for the first three weeks or so on here and got bugger all in the way of attention. Once I let my imagination loose and actually put some pics up I began to reap the rewards! And I've never pretended to be Brad Pitt either? Now I just respond to messages more than I send them which makes things simpler.
Also by a lady being ugly by your standards not anyone else's how can she not aspire to fancy muscular traditionally good looking men? Some ladies prefer blokes with a bit of fat on them, some prefer boyish types, some prefer gym trained adonises, we're all different. I have my own preferences, while a lady's body type doesn't put me off, stupidity, poor hygeine, double standards and a lack of care about their appearance would, so I'd rule out any fitting these descriptions. A prime example of double standards being a lady who contacted me with text on her profile stating she wanted fit and good looking guys only, not a problem, she was a bbw again not a problem, everyone has preferences, but then accusing those who she didn't appeal to by saying, "No SHALLOW types! Jog on!" That for me said straight to bin, not her body type or the fact that she preferred athletic men.
In short mate, yeah there's loads more men on here than women, but so what it just means we have to market ourselves differently. And in my opinion I'd rather be receiving a dozen messages a day than having a thousand to trawl through with most of them being shit. Wouldn't you?
Well said. Couldn't have put it better myself"+1 | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
