FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Village bike
Village bike
Jump to: Newest in thread
I just love the local lady who is a total slut and owns it. Not using that word in a derogatory sense. More in admiration. Really attracted to that type. Would like to know other's views. DM and I can post any confessions anonymously if you like. Keen to hear both sides and any stories.
I am sure we all know one. Some examples that I recall are the unremarkable girl who discovered boys and was with a different one every weekend. Changed the way she dresses, drops her friends and is really focussed on cock. Manageress in a factory who was fucking (at work) a lucky teen builder half her age. Bar maid at local pub who sleeps with guys on fishing trips 3 or 4 at a time. Girl at work who stands inappropriately close and rubs herself against you under the desk when others are there. Huge display of cleavage and innuendo.
Really turns me on how open and direct they are. The hungry look. Blatant eye contact. It's the clothes, the behaviour. The attitude. They know everyone knows but don't care. They could be discrete and lose themselves on this site or travel away but they do it at home, on their doorstep.
Possibly not liked by other women but they dress and act for men, and themselves.
Love that age difference is often no barrier. Either older or younger. She might not be conventionally attractive but has an aura or energy, to me.
Possibly the outward confidence is hiding an inner insecurity. A need to prove herself and feel wanted. I have heard ladies like this find sex unfulfilling. But on the face of it, what a fun life they lead. Interested to hear views on this.
For avoidance of doubt... would love to know if any ladies like this in my area want to meet!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
As relevant as your fetish is as to the type of woman you go for, using the terminology of "village bike" is utterly disgusting. A sexually liberated woman who does as she pleases should not be referred to in such a derogatory way. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Apologies. No offence was intended but I can understand that I have caused it. I appreciate the term is outdated, and has connotations and shows disrespect which is not how I think or wanted people to feel. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As relevant as your fetish is as to the type of woman you go for, using the terminology of "village bike" is utterly disgusting. A sexually liberated woman who does as she pleases should not be referred to in such a derogatory way. "
100% this!
Donna |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ornycougaWoman 5 weeks ago
SOMEWHERE IN AFRICA |
"As relevant as your fetish is as to the type of woman you go for, using the terminology of "village bike" is utterly disgusting. A sexually liberated woman who does as she pleases should not be referred to in such a derogatory way. "
This. I am a self confessed slut but this is so offensive 🤢 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention."
Well, well said. Deserves a round of applause imo. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention.
Well, well said. Deserves a round of applause imo."
Meh, disagree,he knows what he meant. You don't type a long winded OP apologize for the thread title and means it, could have easily changed the title to something like
Less patronising and insulting. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention.
Well, well said. Deserves a round of applause imo.
Meh, disagree,he knows what he meant. You don't type a long winded OP apologize for the thread title and means it, could have easily changed the title to something like
Less patronising and insulting."
Agree |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention.
Well, well said. Deserves a round of applause imo.
Meh, disagree,he knows what he meant. You don't type a long winded OP apologize for the thread title and means it, could have easily changed the title to something like
Less patronising and insulting."
I think there are other possible explanations. I don't think the criticisms you make, are wrong. I just don't think they justify shaming or that shaming is conducive to positive change.
But I'm fine with you disagreeing with me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention."
This is exactly how I read it.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Apologies. No offence was intended but I can understand that I have caused it. I appreciate the term is outdated, and has connotations and shows disrespect which is not how I think or wanted people to feel."
I’ve heard this phrase before.
What make of bike are you thinking of? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As relevant as your fetish is as to the type of woman you go for, using the terminology of "village bike" is utterly disgusting. A sexually liberated woman who does as she pleases should not be referred to in such a derogatory way. "
We fully agree |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention.
Well, well said. Deserves a round of applause imo.
Meh, disagree,he knows what he meant. You don't type a long winded OP apologize for the thread title and means it, could have easily changed the title to something like
Less patronising and insulting.
I think there are other possible explanations. I don't think the criticisms you make, are wrong. I just don't think they justify shaming or that shaming is conducive to positive change.
But I'm fine with you disagreeing with me."
Maybe women are just a bit tired of having to deal with disrespectful language and constantly having to correct/educate people who should know better? It's exasperating.
When has calling someone a "village bike" ever not been derogatory? It was a wilful choice to use that language. Women have a right to be offended, and to express their displeasure. I don't see it as shaming. But we can agree to disagree.
I appreciate the OP apologised, but as I said he should have known what response calling women "bikes" would receive. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think the ethos or intention of your story, was one of empowerment, fascinating and admiration.
You also acknowledged that the language you used at times was archaic and not appropriate, without being defensive.
That's a healthy and progressive process in my eyes and people shouldn't be shamed for it. Intention is important and times change with regards to language.
The means have to be consistent with the ends we hope to achieve. Shaming people for using shaming language - perpetuates shaming as a viable way to communicate.
I acknowledge your ownership and say I fully believe it was not your intention.
Well, well said. Deserves a round of applause imo.
Meh, disagree,he knows what he meant. You don't type a long winded OP apologize for the thread title and means it, could have easily changed the title to something like
Less patronising and insulting.
I think there are other possible explanations. I don't think the criticisms you make, are wrong. I just don't think they justify shaming or that shaming is conducive to positive change.
But I'm fine with you disagreeing with me.
Maybe women are just a bit tired of having to deal with disrespectful language and constantly having to correct/educate people who should know better? It's exasperating.
When has calling someone a "village bike" ever not been derogatory? It was a wilful choice to use that language. Women have a right to be offended, and to express their displeasure. I don't see it as shaming. But we can agree to disagree.
I appreciate the OP apologised, but as I said he should have known what response calling women "bikes" would receive."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
There was a WPC who was referred to as a bike. I never liked the term and she was a perfectly pleasant lady, and good police officer. I spent time off and on duty with her.
I respected her, unfortunately over time she found it nessarary to be more selective. She never miss led anyone as to her intentions.
I did find myself losing respect for lots of men, who fucked her and trumpetted their conquest over the 'station bike.' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There was a WPC who was referred to as a bike. I never liked the term and she was a perfectly pleasant lady, and good police officer. I spent time off and on duty with her.
I respected her, unfortunately over time she found it nessarary to be more selective. She never miss led anyone as to her intentions.
I did find myself losing respect for lots of men, who fucked her and trumpetted their conquest over the 'station bike.'"
It does seem to be that a lot of men will happily fuck a woman, enjoy it, move on to their next encounter then criticise the woman for doing the same thing. Are they aware if the hypocrisy or do the genuinely have no respect for women who enjoy multiple partners?
I was talking to a really attractive guy at a social once and seriously considering making an exception to our lower age limit when he said something along the lines of "I would never do this with a partner, I have too much respect for them"  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There was a WPC who was referred to as a bike. I never liked the term and she was a perfectly pleasant lady, and good police officer. I spent time off and on duty with her.
I respected her, unfortunately over time she found it nessarary to be more selective. She never miss led anyone as to her intentions.
I did find myself losing respect for lots of men, who fucked her and trumpetted their conquest over the 'station bike.'
It does seem to be that a lot of men will happily fuck a woman, enjoy it, move on to their next encounter then criticise the woman for doing the same thing. Are they aware if the hypocrisy or do the genuinely have no respect for women who enjoy multiple partners?
I was talking to a really attractive guy at a social once and seriously considering making an exception to our lower age limit when he said something along the lines of "I would never do this with a partner, I have too much respect for them" "
Yes..was just writing something to a similar end but you've put it better.
There is nothing more fantasised about and sought after by many men than a sexually forthright woman who knows what they want and goes out and gets it.
Yet when they find one they shame them and label them with deregatory terms...
Madness |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As relevant as your fetish is as to the type of woman you go for, using the terminology of "village bike" is utterly disgusting. A sexually liberated woman who does as she pleases should not be referred to in such a derogatory way. "
I kind of agree but then I would also have the same initial reaction to the word slut and plenty sexually liberated women are happy to be referred to as such in some scenarios/context |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As relevant as your fetish is as to the type of woman you go for, using the terminology of "village bike" is utterly disgusting. A sexually liberated woman who does as she pleases should not be referred to in such a derogatory way.
I kind of agree but then I would also have the same initial reaction to the word slut and plenty sexually liberated women are happy to be referred to as such in some scenarios/context"
And this, for me, is why I can't get on board with women 'reclaiming ' such words as empowering |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Raleigh bad idea.
👏🏻 very good.
Maybe you spoke too soon. I’m 2 tyre’d to think of jokes for this. 
Borderline thread derailleur.
Well you certainly stepped this thread up a gear "
These are all going downhill from here.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There was a WPC who was referred to as a bike. I never liked the term and she was a perfectly pleasant lady, and good police officer. I spent time off and on duty with her.
I respected her, unfortunately over time she found it nessarary to be more selective. She never miss led anyone as to her intentions.
I did find myself losing respect for lots of men, who fucked her and trumpetted their conquest over the 'station bike.'
It does seem to be that a lot of men will happily fuck a woman, enjoy it, move on to their next encounter then criticise the woman for doing the same thing. Are they aware if the hypocrisy or do the genuinely have no respect for women who enjoy multiple partners?
I was talking to a really attractive guy at a social once and seriously considering making an exception to our lower age limit when he said something along the lines of "I would never do this with a partner, I have too much respect for them" "
'To much respect for them', more like it's ok for the guy to fuck around, but nor his wife. That does not sound like respect to me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There was a WPC who was referred to as a bike. I never liked the term and she was a perfectly pleasant lady, and good police officer. I spent time off and on duty with her.
I respected her, unfortunately over time she found it nessarary to be more selective. She never miss led anyone as to her intentions.
I did find myself losing respect for lots of men, who fucked her and trumpetted their conquest over the 'station bike.'
It does seem to be that a lot of men will happily fuck a woman, enjoy it, move on to their next encounter then criticise the woman for doing the same thing. Are they aware if the hypocrisy or do the genuinely have no respect for women who enjoy multiple partners?
I was talking to a really attractive guy at a social once and seriously considering making an exception to our lower age limit when he said something along the lines of "I would never do this with a partner, I have too much respect for them"
'To much respect for them', more like it's ok for the guy to fuck around, but nor his wife. That does not sound like respect to me."
I think he was saying that he had no respect for me or us as a couple. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There was a WPC who was referred to as a bike. I never liked the term and she was a perfectly pleasant lady, and good police officer. I spent time off and on duty with her.
I respected her, unfortunately over time she found it nessarary to be more selective. She never miss led anyone as to her intentions.
I did find myself losing respect for lots of men, who fucked her and trumpetted their conquest over the 'station bike.'
It does seem to be that a lot of men will happily fuck a woman, enjoy it, move on to their next encounter then criticise the woman for doing the same thing. Are they aware if the hypocrisy or do the genuinely have no respect for women who enjoy multiple partners?
I was talking to a really attractive guy at a social once and seriously considering making an exception to our lower age limit when he said something along the lines of "I would never do this with a partner, I have too much respect for them"
'To much respect for them', more like it's ok for the guy to fuck around, but nor his wife. That does not sound like respect to me.
I think he was saying that he had no respect for me or us as a couple. "
I think he was, but what he said indicates he would have no respect for his wife. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
