FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Men:women:couples:trans ratios
Men:women:couples:trans ratios
Jump to: Newest in thread
Do you think the fab experience would be fairer and better for all if fab admins controlled the ratios of people allowed on the site?
Let’s say, for example, on a ‘one in one out’ basis they allowed 30% men, 30% women, 20% couples, 20% trans (and the verification process for that was robust); do you think there would be less grief and more fabulous sexy sex with fabulous sexy sexers? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ee04Man 6 weeks ago
Essex |
Put the work in, just accept if someone says no it’s no and move on. If I ever get told you’re not for me I thank them for their time replying and move on. No point flogging a dead horse so to speak. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It’s all about member payments not fairness……"
Compared to most other sites, I don't think they your being forced into buying a "membership"
I was part of another site a few years back, and I was always getting messages saying "you have received a message from..." ( pay $xx to read and send a reply...)
Let's hope I don't give someone an idea  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Even if they only allowed a certain amount of people in I don't see how that would make the experience any better nor easier.
We are all searching for different things and I personally like variety. It's one of the reasons why I stay. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
No. The idea falls apart as soon as it is read.
Where are the bi people ?
What happens to the couple when one of them leaves ?
What happens to the woman who discovers she's a lesbian?
Where do the gay couples fit in and what if there are more lesbian couples than homosexual couples ?
How come there are 40% men and 40% women and 20% trans?
Will the trans be fully trans or chicks with dicks?
How many of the trans will be short hair or bits removed ?
How many of the trans will be men or women ....... prob 19% men and 1% women.
Do we all send pics of our genitals for proof ?
What if one of the trans has had an epiphany and changes back, Can they still be a member ?
Where do we put the toilets and how many would be needed ?
I think no. The whole thing sounds like a day out at Brighton.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asoMan 3 weeks ago
Sheffield |
"Do you think the fab experience would be fairer and better for all if fab admins controlled the ratios of people allowed on the site?
Let’s say, for example, on a ‘one in one out’ basis they allowed 30% men, 30% women, 20% couples, 20% trans (and the verification process for that was robust); do you think there would be less grief and more fabulous sexy sex with fabulous sexy sexers?"
that’s Orwellian! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *vaRoseWoman 3 weeks ago
Ankh-Morpork |
"Do you think the fab experience would be fairer and better for all if fab admins controlled the ratios of people allowed on the site?
Let’s say, for example, on a ‘one in one out’ basis they allowed 30% men, 30% women, 20% couples, 20% trans (and the verification process for that was robust); do you think there would be less grief and more fabulous sexy sex with fabulous sexy sexers?"
How would you verify?
Fairer and better in what way? For who? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Having every person pay for the site to use the features would make it less populated and give them more money to make the verification process better.
It wouldn’t make any difference if they limited people - it would still be the same percent that would be attractive to us…
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Do you think the fab experience would be fairer and better for all if fab admins controlled the ratios of people allowed on the site?
Let’s say, for example, on a ‘one in one out’ basis they allowed 30% men, 30% women, 20% couples, 20% trans (and the verification process for that was robust); do you think there would be less grief and more fabulous sexy sex with fabulous sexy sexers?
How would you verify?
Fairer and better in what way? For who?"
I think that 'robust verification' means they have to send in a pic of them all at it. Only then can you use the word 'genuine' or 'sucks like a Dyson'
Personally I think a snapshot of their curtains should be enough proof. ( no not beef curtains ) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The diversity is what keeps this site mostly a pleasant site to spend time on, it creates some checks and balances on how people behave. By comparison, in the fabguys forum the default setting is hostile mixed with wanking chat, and that’s a ray of sunshine compared to a certain gay hook up app. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Having every person pay for the site to use the features would make it less populated and give them more money to make the verification process better.
It wouldn’t make any difference if they limited people - it would still be the same percent that would be attractive to us…
"
Agree. That would leave behind at least kids pretending they are adults and d*unks signing up for a quick wank |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Controlling ratios doesn't affect your success rate (which I'm guessing is what the post is really about). By allowing all in allows the maximum number of people to be involved and therefore the maximum number of people in your preferred category. It's then up to you to filter / select.
Yes, there will be potentially more competition (e.g. single guys), but it's up to you to bring your A game and stand out. Cream rises to the top!
Choice is key, not limiting it!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Having every person pay for the site to use the features would make it less populated and give them more money to make the verification process better.
It wouldn’t make any difference if they limited people - it would still be the same percent that would be attractive to us…
Agree. That would leave behind at least kids pretending they are adults and d*unks signing up for a quick wank "
Day 2 out at Brighton |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Having every person pay for the site to use the features would make it less populated and give them more money to make the verification process better.
It wouldn’t make any difference if they limited people - it would still be the same percent that would be attractive to us…
Agree. That would leave behind at least kids pretending they are adults and d*unks signing up for a quick wank
Day 2 out at Brighton"
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeNKayCouple 3 weeks ago
Stockport |
"Having every person pay for the site to use the features would make it less populated and give them more money to make the verification process better.
It wouldn’t make any difference if they limited people - it would still be the same percent that would be attractive to us…
Agree. That would leave behind at least kids pretending they are adults and d*unks signing up for a quick wank
Day 2 out at Brighton"
Today I learned that Brighton is an ... _Interesting_ night out ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
