FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Verification system poll
Verification system poll
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Which would you prefer and why?
A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.
B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Which would you prefer and why?
A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.
B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "
A. I thinking putting some context to a meet, gives you a better idea of who they are. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I like reading some of the verifications as you can get good insight into what the person is like sometimes. On occaision it can speak more than what's said in the profile |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I quite like it as it is."
Sorry, forgot the why.
I enjoy writing interesting verifications that I hope give a flavour of that person to others reading them. And yes I like reading a veri I've received after a great meet or event. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Both are good, would be good to havd the tick box option for those who don't know what to write.
A limit on words would be better, as some veris could fill a piece of A4 paper!
Sarah |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Which would you prefer and why?
A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.
B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "
B definitely for me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I would quite like the option to differentiate between meet (play) and meet (social); gets away from the ambiguous ones which insinuate more than reality. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Im quite happy how it is. People can just type as basic as they want. Plus i dont necessarily want people to know if ive had sex on a meet. Ive turned into a prude  "
Sometimes I really like the nice personal things people write in them. It's special in a way and you don't need to share those with everyone. Having tick boxes feels clinical. People who only want a tick can just not show the veris. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Both are good, would be good to havd the tick box option for those who don't know what to write.
A limit on words would be better, as some veris could fill a piece of A4 paper!
Sarah "
This... a combination of the current system with tick boxes would be perfect. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Both are good, would be good to havd the tick box option for those who don't know what to write.
A limit on words would be better, as some veris could fill a piece of A4 paper!
Sarah "
This. 140 limit idea. Like Twitter.
Some folk have verifications from some nut bags that would have me avoiding them as I don't fancy being stalked by former conquests (it happens) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ENDAROOSCouple
over a year ago
South West London / Surrey |
"Which would you prefer and why?
A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.
B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "
A) but with a word limit, some are like a novel.
Like the idea further up about different colours for social & sex meets. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Current system. I read them when really bored they can be quite funny
But to achieve the aim of proving a person is real, ticks would suffice."
This for me too.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *odareyouMan
over a year ago
not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds) |
I like the current system, it allows me to be creative and hopefully give an idea of what I found the person(s) to be like,...
Rather than (tick) she / he exists. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Currently people can put what they want and there are some good funny and imaginative veris out there.
A set of tick boxes just sounds grey and regimented to be honest |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iffraffMan
over a year ago
Gloucester |
Some interesting ideas put forward. I do think it needs a overhaul tho as many, pretty much say the same things and some can be descriptive beyond necessary.
Adding the tick box and limiting the word count tho seem good ideas. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Which would you prefer and why?
A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.
B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "
C) Neither, abolish them altogether. I'm always grateful for a nice verification, but imo the system is at best meaningless, and at worst divisive and potentially misleading. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
