"just think how much insurance bills (whether car, home or business) will go up now following these stupid events 
now back to your usual programme  "
By all accounts, the vast majority aren't covered by insurance for civil unrest, so possibly not that much. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"just think how much insurance bills (whether car, home or business) will go up now following these stupid events
now back to your usual programme
By all accounts, the vast majority aren't covered by insurance for civil unrest, so possibly not that much."
That's not strictly true. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"just think how much insurance bills (whether car, home or business) will go up now following these stupid events
now back to your usual programme
By all accounts, the vast majority aren't covered by insurance for civil unrest, so possibly not that much.
That's not strictly true. "
Stictly not, no. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
half heard a radio news article on way home yday about Vince Cable meeting with insurers to determine whether the events were Riots or Civil Unrest as there is a legal difference which could mean insurers liable or the government
(am guessing that whilst he wants quick payouts - he's also expecting insurers to cough up rather than him) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Insurers are actually paying out if a polcy has cover for riot, alot do. It's whether it is classed a riot or not which determine if they can recover costs from the police. Either way we all lose somehow |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
