FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Married/attached women : a survey
Married/attached women : a survey
Jump to: Newest in thread
As a follow up to the men survey I did a couple of days ago, here's one for women.
So, if you get a message from a married or attached woman whose partner is unaware they are on here, what's your position. Assume you are interested in meeting with a view to sex.
1. Definitely won't meet
2. Less likely to meet
3. Makes no difference
4. More likely to meet.
Just say a number. If you feel you don't fit into any of the four categories, please ignore the thread.
Anyone who is open to meeting, men, women or couples is welcome to respond.
We're a 3.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As a follow up to the men survey I did a couple of days ago, here's one for women.
So, if you get a message from a married or attached woman whose partner is unaware they are on here, what's your position. Assume you are interested in meeting with a view to sex.
1. Definitely won't meet
2. Less likely to meet
3. Makes no difference
4. More likely to meet.
Just say a number. If you feel you don't fit into any of the four categories, please ignore the thread.
Anyone who is open to meeting, men, women or couples is welcome to respond.
We're a 3.
"
I’m a 3 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"1 ... I'm not on this planet to conscientiously affect another person's life for the worse "
Apparently I am. I’m thinking of getting an Audi and driving really close to people on the motorway with my headlights on full beam too |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Defo a 3 for me.
As far as I’m concerned it’s none of my business but hers. This is a swinger/sex site right nothing more.
It does annoy me when others are opinionated on something that’s has nothing to do with them. There are more important issues to worry about like Brexit, Trump and climate change then people having fun!
Right, that’s put a cat amongst the pigeons lol
Cheeky x
Peace and love to all
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"1 ... I'm not on this planet to conscientiously affect another person's life for the worse
Apparently I am. I’m thinking of getting an Audi and driving really close to people on the motorway with my headlights on full beam too"
Hahahahahahaha |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a follow up to the men survey I did a couple of days ago, here's one for women.
So, if you get a message from a married or attached woman whose partner is unaware they are on here, what's your position. Assume you are interested in meeting with a view to sex.
1. Definitely won't meet
2. Less likely to meet
3. Makes no difference
4. More likely to meet.
Just say a number. If you feel you don't fit into any of the four categories, please ignore the thread.
Anyone who is open to meeting, men, women or couples is welcome to respond.
We're a 3.
"
Number 3 for me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Final score:
Overall
Wouldn't meet 7 = 15%
Less likely to meet 6 = 13%
No difference 31 = 67%
More likely to meet 2 = 5%
Replies of men
Wouldn't meet 0
Less likely to meet 2 = 7%
No difference 23 = 86%
More likely to meet, 2=7%
Women and couples
Wouldn't meet 7 = 36%
Less likely to meet 4= 21%
No difference 8 = 43%
More likely to meet 0
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So as everyone probably expected people are much more ready to meet attached women than attached men.
And do you see that as a positive or a negative?
Just for balance sake!!!"
I think it's a function of women being much rarer. People are thus more tolerant towards women than they are towards men.
The motto of fabs should be "supply and demand is everything" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So as everyone probably expected people are much more ready to meet attached women than attached men.
Great experiment. What's next? "
Maybe I can do "would you meet an fb couple if they were both married to other unknowing partners" ?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"So as everyone probably expected people are much more ready to meet attached women than attached men.
Great experiment. What's next?
Maybe I can do "would you meet an fb couple if they were both married to other unknowing partners" ??"
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So as everyone probably expected people are much more ready to meet attached women than attached men.
Great experiment. What's next?
Maybe I can do "would you meet an fb couple if they were both married to other unknowing partners" ??"
That would be a great one!
Or have a sub question of just 'would you meet a fb couple'. I know some couples won't meet fb's. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Well done for both surveys OP. I think the outcome was as predicted with one rule for meeting men and another for meeting women. x"
Another interpretation is that men have no morals
57% of couples/women wouldn't meet an attached woman or would be less likely to meet her compared to only 7% of men who take a similar negative view.
Actually I think it's a function of men having fewer options |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well done for both surveys OP. I think the outcome was as predicted with one rule for meeting men and another for meeting women. x
Another interpretation is that men have no morals
57% of couples/women wouldn't meet an attached woman or would be less likely to meet her compared to only 7% of men who take a similar negative view.
Actually I think it's a function of men having fewer options "
I didn't like the subject matter, I'm a STRONG number one in both surveys (more a reflection of the old me I hate, than anyone else who cheats). I did like both posts though OP Well done.
Not the results I was expecting, not results I'm that particularly happy about, but I feel like I've learnt something about other people's views as a group and as individuals. Learning something new can only be a good thing. Thankyou.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well done for both surveys OP. I think the outcome was as predicted with one rule for meeting men and another for meeting women. x
Another interpretation is that men have no morals
57% of couples/women wouldn't meet an attached woman or would be less likely to meet her compared to only 7% of men who take a similar negative view.
Actually I think it's a function of men having fewer options "
So by that token you’re saying I only get meets because men have fewer options available.... 
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Well done for both surveys OP. I think the outcome was as predicted with one rule for meeting men and another for meeting women. x
Another interpretation is that men have no morals
57% of couples/women wouldn't meet an attached woman or would be less likely to meet her compared to only 7% of men who take a similar negative view.
Actually I think it's a function of men having fewer options "
I'm not sure it's about options , I really do think the majority of men can compartmentalise in this way more efficiently and would see it as none of their concern the status of the woman they are boinking. And some actually find it a turn on to boink a mans wife behind her husbands back , whereas I don't think any women stated they actually got off on it, more that married men can be more convenient and less trouble seemed to be the deciding factors. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So as everyone probably expected people are much more ready to meet attached women than attached men. "
What do you mean by people - forum users, fab members in general or the wider population? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"1. I have absolutely no desire to help a lady cheat on her husband. "
You mean 'woman', not 'lady'.
Check the dictionary before anyone jumps..... not a judgement, just a fact. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abs..Woman
over a year ago
.. |
"1. I have absolutely no desire to help a lady cheat on her husband.
You mean 'woman', not 'lady'.
Check the dictionary before anyone jumps..... not a judgement, just a fact."
A woman is a female adult. A lady is a polite or formal way of referring to a woman. I don’t get your point. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"1. I have absolutely no desire to help a lady cheat on her husband.
You mean 'woman', not 'lady'.
Check the dictionary before anyone jumps..... not a judgement, just a fact.
A woman is a female adult. A lady is a polite or formal way of referring to a woman. I don’t get your point. "
There is no polite way to refer to a man or woman who is cheating on their spouse. Therefore, 'lady' or 'gentleman' is not appropriate for those individuals.
Clearly, a lady or gentleman would conduct themselves with honour and respect (for others and themselves). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Being a married man who’s wife doesn’t know... I was thinking of giving up but after seeing the other post, I’ve got 11% chance ????
As for this post... 4 from me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
