FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Dodgy Tory Donations
Dodgy Tory Donations
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
16k is paltry in the grand scheme of things.
What’s interesting about this one is where it came from? Defunct firms something smells fishy. I wonder how many other 16k donations have been made along these lines. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Agreed it isnt about the amount .
But how many other defunct companies may have
paid small amounts .
Rule breaking is STILL RULE Breaking though .
Good Old Tories .
Always looking after themselves first . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
Did Labour ever return donations from donor David Abrahams?
I'm assuming they've cleaned up their act on anonymous donations via a third party?
Any more "cash for peerages" scandals to be uncovered?
As I've said, let the investigation do its work, before starting with the shouting! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Did Labour ever return donations from donor David Abrahams?
I'm assuming they've cleaned up their act on anonymous donations via a third party?
Any more "cash for peerages" scandals to be uncovered?
As I've said, let the investigation do its work, before starting with the shouting! "
This is a Current Political News Story
Not ancient History in terms of politics
Accept that there is reason to be concerned |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Agreed it isnt about the amount .
But how many other defunct companies may have
paid small amounts .
Rule breaking is STILL RULE Breaking though .
Good Old Tories .
Always looking after themselves first ."
like they did with the 9 million of tax payers money on a leaflet to every household in the U.K. during the referendum |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Agreed it isnt about the amount .
But how many other defunct companies may have
paid small amounts .
Rule breaking is STILL RULE Breaking though .
Good Old Tories .
Always looking after themselves first .like they did with the 9 million of tax payers money on a leaflet to every household in the U.K. during the referendum "
That was under a Tory Government wasnt it ?
I mean it wasnt spent by Labour .
Sothanks for confirming the point made. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current. "
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"Did Labour ever return donations from donor David Abrahams?
I'm assuming they've cleaned up their act on anonymous donations via a third party?
Any more "cash for peerages" scandals to be uncovered?
As I've said, let the investigation do its work, before starting with the shouting!
This is a Current Political News Story
Not ancient History in terms of politics
Accept that there is reason to be concerned "
So David Abrahams hasn't made any donations to the Labour Party since Kier Starmer became leader?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
"
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Did Labour ever return donations from donor David Abrahams?
I'm assuming they've cleaned up their act on anonymous donations via a third party?
Any more "cash for peerages" scandals to be uncovered?
As I've said, let the investigation do its work, before starting with the shouting!
This is a Current Political News Story
Not ancient History in terms of politics
Accept that there is reason to be concerned
So David Abrahams hasn't made any donations to the Labour Party since Kier Starmer became leader?
"
Why is that relevant?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year) "
Its simple enough .
As i Stated the Tory Followers would ignore
The current Dodgy dealings of donations
In a News story
No Clarification is needed .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
Its simple enough .
As i Stated the Tory Followers would ignore
The current Dodgy dealings of donations
In a News story
No Clarification is needed .
"
Ah I see
I shall leave that to the Tory supporters then, I don't vote for them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
Its simple enough .
As i Stated the Tory Followers would ignore
The current Dodgy dealings of donations
In a News story
No Clarification is needed .
Ah I see
I shall leave that to the Tory supporters then, I don't vote for them. "
You are welcome to comment on the tariff charges
thread due to Br-Exit .
Shame you decided to makean original comment about Lavery
Instead if bowing out , being that you didnt vote Tory though.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
Its simple enough .
As i Stated the Tory Followers would ignore
The current Dodgy dealings of donations
In a News story
No Clarification is needed .
"
Except its "alleged" and not yet investigated or proven one way or the other. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
Its simple enough .
As i Stated the Tory Followers would ignore
The current Dodgy dealings of donations
In a News story
No Clarification is needed .
Except its "alleged" and not yet investigated or proven one way or the other. "
Alledged or not .
It is still being ignored by The Tory Followers .
Ignoring it does not make it less serious . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
"
Oh dear another one who doesnt understand what they read.
The story was about the claim that between 2.5and 3.5 billion of "EXPORTS" paid some tariffs, not 3.5 billion of tariffs paid, average tariffs are very low at about 3 %, so unless it was food or cars not a large amount, the story also said "some" was paid by mistake and by not filling out the correct form, also some was expected to be paid back.
Hey ho dont let simple things like fact get in the way of a good story though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Labour are always wanting probes or enquiries into something or other.
Guess who foots the bill for all of these enquiries.
As per usual, Labour are happy to keep on spending our money with no accountability whatsoever.
And they wonder why the electorate still doesn't trust them on the economy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Agreed it isnt about the amount .
But how many other defunct companies may have
paid small amounts .
Rule breaking is STILL RULE Breaking though .
Good Old Tories .
Always looking after themselves first .like they did with the 9 million of tax payers money on a leaflet to every household in the U.K. during the referendum
That was under a Tory Government wasnt it ?
I mean it wasnt spent by Labour .
Sothanks for confirming the point made."
exactly |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Agreed it isnt about the amount .
But how many other defunct companies may have
paid small amounts .
Rule breaking is STILL RULE Breaking though .
Good Old Tories .
Always looking after themselves first .like they did with the 9 million of tax payers money on a leaflet to every household in the U.K. during the referendum
That was under a Tory Government wasnt it ?
I mean it wasnt spent by Labour .
Sothanks for confirming the point made. exactly "
Dodgy Tories
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it ."
Well it is the tories!
they are what they are |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Well it is the tories!
they are what they are "
Ruining a Countey to service there own shims & needs .
Its not excusable by stating
Well its just the tories innit .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andy 1Couple
over a year ago
northeast |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Oh dear another one who doesnt understand what they read.
The story was about the claim that between 2.5and 3.5 billion of "EXPORTS" paid some tariffs, not 3.5 billion of tariffs paid, average tariffs are very low at about 3 %, so unless it was food or cars not a large amount, the story also said "some" was paid by mistake and by not filling out the correct form, also some was expected to be paid back.
Hey ho dont let simple things like fact get in the way of a good story though."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Labour are always wanting probes or enquiries into something or other.
Guess who foots the bill for all of these enquiries.
As per usual, Labour are happy to keep on spending our money with no accountability whatsoever.
And they wonder why the electorate still doesn't trust them on the economy "
Maybe it shouldnt cost money to.actually find out who is funding the gmnt? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Labour are always wanting probes or enquiries into something or other.
Guess who foots the bill for all of these enquiries.
As per usual, Labour are happy to keep on spending our money with no accountability whatsoever.
And they wonder why the electorate still doesn't trust them on the economy "
Your ok with the tories doing that though, plus giving taxpayers money to their chums rather than the country's best interests |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year) "
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Labour are always wanting probes or enquiries into something or other.
Guess who foots the bill for all of these enquiries.
As per usual, Labour are happy to keep on spending our money with no accountability whatsoever.
And they wonder why the electorate still doesn't trust them on the economy
Your ok with the tories doing that though, plus giving taxpayers money to their chums rather than the country's best interests "
You would think after the track and trace fiasco and £80b siphoned off in ppe contracts ,you would keep scthum on financial competence? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Labour are always wanting probes or enquiries into something or other.
Guess who foots the bill for all of these enquiries.
As per usual, Labour are happy to keep on spending our money with no accountability whatsoever.
And they wonder why the electorate still doesn't trust them on the economy
Your ok with the tories doing that though, plus giving taxpayers money to their chums rather than the country's best interests
You would think after the track and trace fiasco and £80b siphoned off in ppe contracts ,you would keep scthum on financial competence?"
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!! "
Do keep up please. We established six hours ago that the 3.5 billion figure claimed by a forum neophyte was total nonsense, and that was the initial premise for subsequent claims.
So let's keep to the facts ta |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Oh dear another one who doesnt understand what they read.
The story was about the claim that between 2.5and 3.5 billion of "EXPORTS" paid some tariffs, not 3.5 billion of tariffs paid, average tariffs are very low at about 3 %, so unless it was food or cars not a large amount, the story also said "some" was paid by mistake and by not filling out the correct form, also some was expected to be paid back.
Hey ho dont let simple things like fact get in the way of a good story though. "
Wow, 5 thumbs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!!
Do keep up please. We established six hours ago that the 3.5 billion figure claimed by a forum neophyte was total nonsense, and that was the initial premise for subsequent claims.
So let's keep to the facts ta "
You established nothing 6 hours ago
as was shown in the post you replied to above .
The hidden costs to such a catastrophic experiment
like br-exit are as yet unkown .
By the bye, One is not new just so you know .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!!
Do keep up please. We established six hours ago that the 3.5 billion figure claimed by a forum neophyte was total nonsense, and that was the initial premise for subsequent claims.
So let's keep to the facts ta "
You didn’t quantify how much the amount was so no fact.
You claims considerably less than £9b without knowing the number.
I gave you facts on how much worse off we are compared to your £9B saving.
Maths not your strong point I know.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!!
Do keep up please. We established six hours ago that the 3.5 billion figure claimed by a forum neophyte was total nonsense, and that was the initial premise for subsequent claims.
So let's keep to the facts ta
You didn’t quantify how much the amount was so no fact.
You claims considerably less than £9b without knowing the number.
I gave you facts on how much worse off we are compared to your £9B saving.
Maths not your strong point I know.
"
In another thread he keeps quoting about with me
He said are just more these estimates ?
It seems he was hoping it wasnt real figures &
real charges , once again he talks a good game
But the team keep letting him down . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!!
Do keep up please. We established six hours ago that the 3.5 billion figure claimed by a forum neophyte was total nonsense, and that was the initial premise for subsequent claims.
So let's keep to the facts ta
You didn’t quantify how much the amount was so no fact.
You claims considerably less than £9b without knowing the number.
I gave you facts on how much worse off we are compared to your £9B saving.
Maths not your strong point I know.
In another thread he keeps quoting about with me
He said are just more these estimates ?
It seems he was hoping it wasnt real figures &
real charges , once again he talks a good game
But the team keep letting him down ."
Says the man who claimed we had paid 3.5 billion in tariffs,which is completely untrue, you know that which is why you didnt reply to my text in the other thread.
I have no issue with people who are opposed to brexit, I find it very sad however that they make up figures or cant read news articles properly, either they do it deliberately or arent too bright, of course it cant be the latter its leave voters who are thick. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Current news would be hundreds of thousands of pounds spent on drinks by Unite and GMB officials on their union credit cards.
And dear old Ian Lavery hasn't paid the miners back yet either so that's current.
I suppose the 3.5 billion in Brexit Tariffs isnt a current News Story
As i havent seen you post about it .
Always happy to clarify anything fire away
(Is this 3.5 billion a forecast by any chance? It would appear to be considerably less than the net 9 billion we used to pay in every year)
So the lost £11Billion in tax revenue to HMRC due to £1Triilion in investment funds moving to Europe doesn’t count either? Earnest and Young analysis.
This is considerably higher than the £9 Billion savi g in how many years time?
Have you added the customs costs yet.? Minimum £7.5Billion according to HMRC . Then the increase in transport costs estimated to be four to six times the customs costs. So we are as a nation well out of pocket!!
We haven’t saved £9 Billion at all. Just a tragic joke!!
Do keep up please. We established six hours ago that the 3.5 billion figure claimed by a forum neophyte was total nonsense, and that was the initial premise for subsequent claims.
So let's keep to the facts ta
You didn’t quantify how much the amount was so no fact.
You claims considerably less than £9b without knowing the number.
I gave you facts on how much worse off we are compared to your £9B saving.
Maths not your strong point I know.
In another thread he keeps quoting about with me
He said are just more these estimates ?
It seems he was hoping it wasnt real figures &
real charges , once again he talks a good game
But the team keep letting him down .
Says the man who claimed we had paid 3.5 billion in tariffs,which is completely untrue, you know that which is why you didnt reply to my text in the other thread.
I have no issue with people who are opposed to brexit, I find it very sad however that they make up figures or cant read news articles properly, either they do it deliberately or arent too bright, of course it cant be the latter its leave voters who are thick."
I didnt reply in the other thread as i couldnt
remember which one it was .
I havent claimed we paid 3.5 billion
The News report claims independent buisnesses
Have done that which i copied & pasted .
So please enough of the insults that
I didnt read it properly !
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it ."
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least"
Stop .
Im going to wet myself |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself "
why, do you not agree? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it ."
Watch the clip of penny mordaunt replying to angela rayner. It will answer your question. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Watch the clip of penny mordaunt replying to angela rayner. It will answer your question."
It doesn’t answer anything, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?"
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Watch the clip of penny mordaunt replying to angela rayner. It will answer your question."
It didnt
Anything else you might consider we watch
To enlighten us with ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Watch the clip of penny mordaunt replying to angela rayner. It will answer your question.
It doesn’t answer anything, "
I've just watched it
She literally answered nothing.
She did the usual Alex trick of chatting shite whilst answering fuck all
But according to the mail she was brutal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
"
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?"
You
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
"
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put"
Stop please
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
"
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How many investigations have there been now?
I've genuinly lost track"
All we need now is an investigation to discover how many investigations there have been. Problem solved.
(And that investigation can quietly be released in 2050. And it can say there's nothing to see.) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How many investigations have there been now?
I've genuinly lost track
All we need now is an investigation to discover how many investigations there have been. Problem solved.
(And that investigation can quietly be released in 2050. And it can say there's nothing to see.)"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents"
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just "
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?"
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae ."
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?"
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
"
I know you did but when I replied you laughed, apparently so hard you wet yourself (your words). You also said it was my response that made you laugh so that's what makes me ask the question. Then you quote some scandles like Greenhill ect. So again can you bring yourself to agree with my post. A simple yes or no will suffice |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
I know you did but when I replied you laughed, apparently so hard you wet yourself (your words). You also said it was my response that made you laugh so that's what makes me ask the question. Then you quote some scandles like Greenhill ect. So again can you bring yourself to agree with my post. A simple yes or no will suffice"
These things are normally self explanatory arent they .
It was a Statement by me
Not a Question
Perhaps the laughing was because i knew
what was about to follow .
Numerous posts sent back & forth &
Eventually the realisation for you of what my view is .
If i had No View why would i post a thread about it . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
I know you did but when I replied you laughed, apparently so hard you wet yourself (your words). You also said it was my response that made you laugh so that's what makes me ask the question. Then you quote some scandles like Greenhill ect. So again can you bring yourself to agree with my post. A simple yes or no will suffice
These things are normally self explanatory arent they .
It was a Statement by me
Not a Question
Perhaps the laughing was because i knew
what was about to follow .
Numerous posts sent back & forth &
Eventually the realisation for you of what my view is .
If i had No View why would i post a thread about it ."
still cant bring yourself to saying yes or no then. is the thought I agree with you so bad |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
I know you did but when I replied you laughed, apparently so hard you wet yourself (your words). You also said it was my response that made you laugh so that's what makes me ask the question. Then you quote some scandles like Greenhill ect. So again can you bring yourself to agree with my post. A simple yes or no will suffice
These things are normally self explanatory arent they .
It was a Statement by me
Not a Question
Perhaps the laughing was because i knew
what was about to follow .
Numerous posts sent back & forth &
Eventually the realisation for you of what my view is .
If i had No View why would i post a thread about it .
still cant bring yourself to saying yes or no then. is the thought I agree with you so bad"
I dont really need to repeat myself
I said all i needed to in the OP.
Whether you agree with me or not is irrelevent .
Your need for respone is however rather
disturbing me . Im not sure how to deal with it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
I know you did but when I replied you laughed, apparently so hard you wet yourself (your words). You also said it was my response that made you laugh so that's what makes me ask the question. Then you quote some scandles like Greenhill ect. So again can you bring yourself to agree with my post. A simple yes or no will suffice
These things are normally self explanatory arent they .
It was a Statement by me
Not a Question
Perhaps the laughing was because i knew
what was about to follow .
Numerous posts sent back & forth &
Eventually the realisation for you of what my view is .
If i had No View why would i post a thread about it .
still cant bring yourself to saying yes or no then. is the thought I agree with you so bad
I dont really need to repeat myself
I said all i needed to in the OP.
Whether you agree with me or not is irrelevent .
Your need for respone is however rather
disturbing me . Im not sure how to deal with it "
looks like a step too far but the best I can hope for. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57325474
Labour urges probe into two donations to Tories
So it seems the amounts are small , but the rules
do seem to Have been broken .
Still I suppose there followers will just ignore it .
Nope, if the rules have been broken then there should be consequences. Whatever party it is and if in government or not should not make a difference. Does seem politicians have a history of creative accounting to say the least
Stop .
Im going to wet myself
why, do you not agree?
No i was laughing &
Literally wet myself .
Must be a vaccine reaction
Oh well maybe that reaction should be added to the list of side effects. What made you laugh so hard?
You
well thats a first for me
how did I manage it? was it my post? do you disagree with what I put
Stop please
Certainly, don't want you having any more accidents
That was the Vaccine .
Now im just
So to clarify, do you agree or disagree with my statement?
Greensill
PPE
TRACK & TRACE
Can you find me 1 single Labour M.P
In the news for such dodgy goverment transactions
Worth billions of tax payers money .
If you cant find a Labour 1 A Lib Dem a Green
An Independent . Better not include the D.U.P as
Arlene conned a billion out of the Tressamae .
Please 're read what I posted. You seem to be replying to someone that thinks there should not be consequences. I clearly said there should be consequences. I did not claim there has been, just what I think should happen. So do you agree or disagree?
As I started this particular thread with
An article about rules potentially being broken
I dont think you need me to agree or disagree .
The point made in the OP was about the followers
Of said Party Ignoring it .
I know you did but when I replied you laughed, apparently so hard you wet yourself (your words). You also said it was my response that made you laugh so that's what makes me ask the question. Then you quote some scandles like Greenhill ect. So again can you bring yourself to agree with my post. A simple yes or no will suffice
These things are normally self explanatory arent they .
It was a Statement by me
Not a Question
Perhaps the laughing was because i knew
what was about to follow .
Numerous posts sent back & forth &
Eventually the realisation for you of what my view is .
If i had No View why would i post a thread about it .
still cant bring yourself to saying yes or no then. is the thought I agree with you so bad
I dont really need to repeat myself
I said all i needed to in the OP.
Whether you agree with me or not is irrelevent .
Your need for respone is however rather
disturbing me . Im not sure how to deal with it
looks like a step too far but the best I can hope for."
It is in the politics forum !!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
