FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Prime Minister Questions
Prime Minister Questions
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Johnson was told to sit down by the Speaker
,well done MR Speaker."
Boris is awful at PMQs, waffle, waffle, never answers the questions, but it was good to see the speaker put him in his place |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect. "
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count."
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC. "
All that means is he can hide behind parliamentary language.
And no his retreats and U turns are not inconsequential.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC. "
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him."
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though. "
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked."
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant! "
Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again."
clearly you dont understand the speaker fucked up... but keep waffling... you could be boris.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
clearly you dont understand the speaker fucked up... but keep waffling... you could be boris...."
Yet again, you double down on your mistakes.
I'm sorry you struggle with precise language. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
clearly you dont understand the speaker fucked up... but keep waffling... you could be boris....
Yet again, you double down on your mistakes.
I'm sorry you struggle with precise language."
You need a life off here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
clearly you dont understand the speaker fucked up... but keep waffling... you could be boris....
Yet again, you double down on your mistakes.
I'm sorry you struggle with precise language.
You need a life off here "
So rather than actually respond to the issue you try another diversion?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think SKS covered himself in glory, with his "coward" remark at BJ.
The Speaker was constantly warning all parties to show respect.
Are you trying to say BoZo Johnson isn't cowardly?
He's retreated and done so many U turns I've lost count.
What he is or isn't is inconsequential. You can't call someone that in the HoC.
Oh and by the way, the speaker of house did not object to calling BoZo Johnson a coward.
So it's a perfectly legitimate way to describe him.
You are not allowed to call another MP "a coward" in the HoC.
It is a parliamentary prohibited term.
SKS has since retracted the remark. Not sure if he's apologised though.
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
clearly you dont understand the speaker fucked up... but keep waffling... you could be boris....
Yet again, you double down on your mistakes.
I'm sorry you struggle with precise language.
You need a life off here
So rather than actually respond to the issue you try another diversion?
"
just dont have as much interest as you in playing dumb games, a mistake does not a precedent make... most people know that but not you it appears! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Youll ask for this in a minute...
you said...
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
I said...
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
You said...Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Youll ask for this in a minute...
you said...
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
I said...
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
You said...Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
"
Congratulations, you appear to have learned how to cut and paste. This is clearly a huge step forward  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Youll ask for this in a minute...
you said...
As I said the speaker didn't object, although to be fair he did have his hands full trying to get BoZo Johnson to actually answer the questions being asked.
I said...
so the fact the speaker failed to enforce a rule means now everyone can break the rule? brilliant!
You said...Clearly you don't understand the concept of setting precedents.
Try again.
Congratulations, you appear to have learned how to cut and paste. This is clearly a huge step forward "
are you around 14 years old, its the sort of thing i would expect from that age group... its just boring |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
Sounds like the speaker had an eventful day with the again. Good that SKS rose above and withdrew his coward comments. Not sure about these alleged outside earnings, though unless proven then it's just an accusation |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago
Bristol |
"Sounds like the speaker had an eventful day with the again. Good that SKS rose above and withdrew his coward comments. Not sure about these alleged outside earnings, though unless proven then it's just an accusation"
He did withdraw the comment but stuck a jibe in right at the end!
Just like kids in the playground not like adults at all.
A bit like here really  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
SKS doesn’t ask questions anymore as he knows Boris won’t answer. So now he points out how shit Boris is then has a glass of water while Boris waffles for a bit. When the droning stops he knows Boris has stopped talking so gets up to make another point.
I personally liked the way the speaker told Boris to be quiet and sit down but in the bigger picture reality it’s a very sad spectacle and does our Parliament no credit to see such a shambolic circus. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"SKS doesn’t ask questions anymore as he knows Boris won’t answer. So now he points out how shit Boris is then has a glass of water while Boris waffles for a bit. When the droning stops he knows Boris has stopped talking so gets up to make another point.
I personally liked the way the speaker told Boris to be quiet and sit down but in the bigger picture reality it’s a very sad spectacle and does our Parliament no credit to see such a shambolic circus. "
Yep, but like you said , Boris won’t answer the questions (it’s called PMQs) so SKS is doing the right thing, the coward remark was true , but he was right to retract it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
Yeah… that was a major shitshow today primarily because of all the leaks and the current issues we knew what starmer was going to ask .. and Johnson was going to not answer any questions or try to turn to deflect
I am glad the speaker finally told the pm off…. It was basically 5 deflection answers and one to get his pre rehearsed zinger off…. Which was lame!!!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bernathCouple
over a year ago
Gloucestershire |
"Johnson was told to sit down by the Speaker ,well done MR Speaker."
Never in all the time in PMQ’s seen a PM get the verbal smack down like that.
Tory MP’s must be wondering how they are going to get rid of him before the next election. Because I don’t see him winning a next term at this current time. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"sks spoke the truth regarding johnsons personal attributes and had the rules on his side as demonstrated by the speaker allowing the comments to stand. after all, sks was not only entirely correct in his language, he was clearly also entirely justified. "
Except he didn't. Following a point of order raised by Michael Fabricant, Speaker Hoyle asked SKS to withdraw the "coward" remark, opon which SKS conceded and withdrew the remark. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"sks spoke the truth regarding johnsons personal attributes and had the rules on his side as demonstrated by the speaker allowing the comments to stand. after all, sks was not only entirely correct in his language, he was clearly also entirely justified.
Except he didn't. Following a point of order raised by Michael Fabricant, Speaker Hoyle asked SKS to withdraw the "coward" remark, opon which SKS conceded and withdrew the remark. "
that's not what actually happened but you can continue in your belief if it makes you happy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"sks spoke the truth regarding johnsons personal attributes and had the rules on his side as demonstrated by the speaker allowing the comments to stand. after all, sks was not only entirely correct in his language, he was clearly also entirely justified.
Except he didn't. Following a point of order raised by Michael Fabricant, Speaker Hoyle asked SKS to withdraw the "coward" remark, opon which SKS conceded and withdrew the remark.
that's not what actually happened but you can continue in your belief if it makes you happy. "
Fabricant, another joke of a politician |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"sks spoke the truth regarding johnsons personal attributes and had the rules on his side as demonstrated by the speaker allowing the comments to stand. after all, sks was not only entirely correct in his language, he was clearly also entirely justified.
Except he didn't. Following a point of order raised by Michael Fabricant, Speaker Hoyle asked SKS to withdraw the "coward" remark, opon which SKS conceded and withdrew the remark.
that's not what actually happened but you can continue in your belief if it makes you happy. "
What did happen to convince SKS to withdraw the remarks? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"sks spoke the truth regarding johnsons personal attributes and had the rules on his side as demonstrated by the speaker allowing the comments to stand. after all, sks was not only entirely correct in his language, he was clearly also entirely justified.
Except he didn't. Following a point of order raised by Michael Fabricant, Speaker Hoyle asked SKS to withdraw the "coward" remark, opon which SKS conceded and withdrew the remark.
that's not what actually happened but you can continue in your belief if it makes you happy. "
He did… the original quote starmer used was that “Johnson was a coward and no leader”… fabricant said that coward was against parliamentry language… speaker said he didn’t hear it because of the noise but if he did say it then he suggested that starmer withdraw it… starmer then say he withdrew the coward but maintained he was no leader…. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"sks spoke the truth regarding johnsons personal attributes and had the rules on his side as demonstrated by the speaker allowing the comments to stand. after all, sks was not only entirely correct in his language, he was clearly also entirely justified.
Except he didn't. Following a point of order raised by Michael Fabricant, Speaker Hoyle asked SKS to withdraw the "coward" remark, opon which SKS conceded and withdrew the remark.
that's not what actually happened but you can continue in your belief if it makes you happy.
He did… the original quote starmer used was that “Johnson was a coward and no leader”… fabricant said that coward was against parliamentry language… speaker said he didn’t hear it because of the noise but if he did say it then he suggested that starmer withdraw it… starmer then say he withdrew the coward but maintained he was no leader…."
I think Starmer should have explained what the word coward meant then demonstrated how Johnson was, by definition, a coward. He could have listed the times Johnson has run away rather than face scrutiny. And said he'd love to withdraw the word, but it was sadly accurate for Johnson. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
