FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > America
America
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " Haven't we already done this discussion? Didn't we all decide that it's your country, and you can do whatever you feel like? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " Protection from whom? Your epic defence budget could definitely go towards things that would benefit the population. Seeing as the defence and weapons industry sponsors both your political parties. There is absolute zero chance of a reduction in defence budget. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " Where's the protection for American women and girls forced to give birth against their will? Where's the protection for American people bankrupted paying for healthcare? Where's the protection for American primary school kids shot down by gun fiends? Is America the 'great' cuntry so many believe it to be....? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " What is our way of life? You know, you should visit some parts of the UK and Europe. You might be surprised about the diversity and the differences. I'm not sure what protection you mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Where's the protection for American women and girls forced to give birth against their will? Where's the protection for American people bankrupted paying for healthcare? Where's the protection for American primary school kids shot down by gun fiends? Is America the 'great' cuntry so many believe it to be....? " As a proud European I’m not a huge fan. However, the USA has a lot going for it, we have a lot of shared values. There is more that unites than divides and right now more than ever we need to unite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I should think the protection they give is military might in their interests aswell as ours,because we all want freedom of speech,democacy and the right to be free,we have to unite against any other influence that other countries try to impose on us.On the diversity of europe,yes we are different in many ways but the us has a lot of european immigrants in their dna and races,im wondering which american pops into your mind when you slag them off" The US war machine offers no real protection. It's single purpose, to make money. It's extremely effective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I should think the protection they give is military might in their interests aswell as ours,because we all want freedom of speech,democacy and the right to be free,we have to unite against any other influence that other countries try to impose on us.On the diversity of europe,yes we are different in many ways but the us has a lot of european immigrants in their dna and races,im wondering which american pops into your mind when you slag them off The US war machine offers no real protection. It's single purpose, to make money. It's extremely effective." Yeah. We should of told them to fuck off back in the 40s | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I should think the protection they give is military might in their interests aswell as ours,because we all want freedom of speech,democacy and the right to be free,we have to unite against any other influence that other countries try to impose on us.On the diversity of europe,yes we are different in many ways but the us has a lot of european immigrants in their dna and races,im wondering which american pops into your mind when you slag them off The US war machine offers no real protection. It's single purpose, to make money. It's extremely effective. Yeah. We should of told them to fuck off back in the 40s " Oh Seb that was 80 years ago. The world has changed. Although we only recently finished paying back (with interest) the USA for their support in WW2. Do you know that is roughly the same amount of time as there was between the American Civil War and WW2. Do we ever draw parallels between them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe it's me but no one here screaming Boris. It's strange from my point of view. Some changed my mind in certain values on these forums. Odd world. " I've read this 3 times. I still don't know what you're trying to say. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If it wasnt for the us war machine europe would be speaking german,and for making money war comes with a price,and the billion pound aircraft,ships subs missiles keep russia ,china away from taking over the world.So why would financially broke russia spend so much on military and china is also comming to the front.You know its a game like the rest of us,as long as its working fine by me" You're happy with war for profit. Fair play for your honesty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe it's me but no one here screaming Boris. It's strange from my point of view. Some changed my mind in certain values on these forums. Odd world. " What do you mean "screaming Boris"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Alot of people love the American first policy and you can see why in the forums here. Yes you all said it's your country do what we want but that want would never happen. " Yeah, the US defence and arms corporations make billions and billions from war. Why would they allow the US to reduce its defence budget? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Alot of people love the American first policy and you can see why in the forums here. Yes you all said it's your country do what we want but that want would never happen. Yeah, the US defence and arms corporations make billions and billions from war. Why would they allow the US to reduce its defence budget?" Last administration tried did it? Pulling US troops out of other countries would greatly reduce the budget wouldn't it ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Alot of people love the American first policy and you can see why in the forums here. Yes you all said it's your country do what we want but that want would never happen. Yeah, the US defence and arms corporations make billions and billions from war. Why would they allow the US to reduce its defence budget? Last administration tried did it? Pulling US troops out of other countries would greatly reduce the budget wouldn't it ? " Trump increased it every year he was in office. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I should think the protection they give is military might in their interests aswell as ours,because we all want freedom of speech,democacy and the right to be free,we have to unite against any other influence that other countries try to impose on us.On the diversity of europe,yes we are different in many ways but the us has a lot of european immigrants in their dna and races,im wondering which american pops into your mind when you slag them off The US war machine offers no real protection. It's single purpose, to make money. It's extremely effective. Yeah. We should of told them to fuck off back in the 40s Oh Seb that was 80 years ago. The world has changed. Although we only recently finished paying back (with interest) the USA for their support in WW2. Do you know that is roughly the same amount of time as there was between the American Civil War and WW2. Do we ever draw parallels between them?" As I said , I’m not pro American and always thought the special relationship was one sided. It annoys me that every PM feels the need to suck up to America. Where’s High Grant when he’s needed? We needed them badly in WW2. For sure we paid the price as the US saw it as a chance to end the empire, they saw us as a trading enemy. It wasn’t that long ago as my fathers oldest brother died in it, ironically, killed by the Americans. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I should think the protection they give is military might in their interests aswell as ours,because we all want freedom of speech,democacy and the right to be free,we have to unite against any other influence that other countries try to impose on us.On the diversity of europe,yes we are different in many ways but the us has a lot of european immigrants in their dna and races,im wondering which american pops into your mind when you slag them off The US war machine offers no real protection. It's single purpose, to make money. It's extremely effective. Yeah. We should of told them to fuck off back in the 40s Oh Seb that was 80 years ago. The world has changed. Although we only recently finished paying back (with interest) the USA for their support in WW2. Do you know that is roughly the same amount of time as there was between the American Civil War and WW2. Do we ever draw parallels between them? As I said , I’m not pro American and always thought the special relationship was one sided. It annoys me that every PM feels the need to suck up to America. Where’s High Grant when he’s needed? We needed them badly in WW2. For sure we paid the price as the US saw it as a chance to end the empire, they saw us as a trading enemy. It wasn’t that long ago as my fathers oldest brother died in it, ironically, killed by the Americans. " Hugh no high! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Theres no friends in business is there,who were our trading enemies now,france germany,italy even spain any thanks off them no,yeh iv had uncles iv never seen killed by germans,we just lucky usa picked our side to end all that suffering,so stop flippantly slaggin them off as if you know better,talk about immigrants you cant even like friendly countrymen " I find it tricky to understand your posts, and indeed who it’s aimed at? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. " . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations." There is an exodus of people to Texas and Florida, will this end with only like minded people living in like minded states? If that happens, what comes next? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations. There is an exodus of people to Texas and Florida, will this end with only like minded people living in like minded states? If that happens, what comes next?" . Don't know but trying to force states to listen to what the federal government imposes on them is not good. Take the immigration for instance. Texas border towns are getting overwhelmed. Texas governor sends immigrants by bus to NYC and DC then blame Texas for the issue. It's crazy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations. There is an exodus of people to Texas and Florida, will this end with only like minded people living in like minded states? If that happens, what comes next?. Don't know but trying to force states to listen to what the federal government imposes on them is not good. Take the immigration for instance. Texas border towns are getting overwhelmed. Texas governor sends immigrants by bus to NYC and DC then blame Texas for the issue. It's crazy. " Going back to your original question, with the amount of change happening in the USA, do you think the US government needs to focus in on its own impending collapse under breakaway states or play police man on the world stage? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations. There is an exodus of people to Texas and Florida, will this end with only like minded people living in like minded states? If that happens, what comes next?. Don't know but trying to force states to listen to what the federal government imposes on them is not good. Take the immigration for instance. Texas border towns are getting overwhelmed. Texas governor sends immigrants by bus to NYC and DC then blame Texas for the issue. It's crazy. Going back to your original question, with the amount of change happening in the USA, do you think the US government needs to focus in on its own impending collapse under breakaway states or play police man on the world stage? " concentrate on people needs first quit restricting the private sectors. We spend too much on global projections no need to anymore. We are not Europeans. I wish the UK would take that step to global dominance. But you won't people there would lose their minds. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Theres no friends in business is there,who were our trading enemies now,france germany,italy even spain any thanks off them no,yeh iv had uncles iv never seen killed by germans,we just lucky usa picked our side to end all that suffering,so stop flippantly slaggin them off as if you know better,talk about immigrants you cant even like friendly countrymen " You might want to use reply+quote so we know who you are talking to  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations. There is an exodus of people to Texas and Florida, will this end with only like minded people living in like minded states? If that happens, what comes next?" Welcome to Gilead! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Whether you like it or not, the USA needs Europe as much as Europe needs the USA. Western Europe has many countries that speak different languages, different cultures but manage to get along, most of the time. The USA has states, they speak the same language, have different cultures but are getting along less now than ever. What is the future of the USA? Breakaway states such as California, could that happen? Texas is drawing in lots of people at the moment, what is going on in that state? My question to you, should the people of the USA be more concerned about its own future, than its policing the world role? The self appointed role feels a little redundant right now.. . California is a huge liberal state hence the exit of people to Texas and Florida. They do not like the restrictions government is imposing . It's odd the 2 biggest red states are seeing the influx in population. They pretty much fleeing blue states were life is more twords American values. It's strange. California has too many regulations. There is an exodus of people to Texas and Florida, will this end with only like minded people living in like minded states? If that happens, what comes next?. Don't know but trying to force states to listen to what the federal government imposes on them is not good. Take the immigration for instance. Texas border towns are getting overwhelmed. Texas governor sends immigrants by bus to NYC and DC then blame Texas for the issue. It's crazy. Going back to your original question, with the amount of change happening in the USA, do you think the US government needs to focus in on its own impending collapse under breakaway states or play police man on the world stage? concentrate on people needs first quit restricting the private sectors. We spend too much on global projections no need to anymore. We are not Europeans. I wish the UK would take that step to global dominance. But you won't people there would lose their minds." The UK being the dominant global influencer? Is that what you mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " America going back to being protectionist and withdrawing from global infrastructure and the global economy would see the USA poverty stricken in about 20 years. What you suggest is suicide. America has been expansionist for 100 years and entirely relies on expansion oversees from an economic perspective - opening markets, importing cheaply against the dollar etc... Without access to african and middle eastern mineral deposits, america wouldnt be able to make up thea manufacturing deficit. Without some well gamed military strategy backing up economic might you would lose influence and access to rare earth minerals. Afghanistan has fallen to the chinese and russians in terms of mining. Russia has influence in a lot of places the USA no longer can properly access. The issue of oil will become huge in the next 50 years. By all means stop the military spending but the result will be poverty and decline for Americans. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. " . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2." you didn't really have a choice after pearl harbour did you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2." America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?" . If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. " not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten" Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. " You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job?" Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.." Do you own the pharmacy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. Do you own the pharmacy?" how is the relevant? No it's a private owned company. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. Do you own the pharmacy? how is the relevant? No it's a private owned company." I was thinking about your role as a pharmacist and how that relates to a pharmacist here in the UK. What qualifications would I need to have achieved to do your role? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. Do you own the pharmacy? how is the relevant? No it's a private owned company. I was thinking about your role as a pharmacist and how that relates to a pharmacist here in the UK. What qualifications would I need to have achieved to do your role? " I graduated Wilkes university you can look up the pre requisites. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Where's the protection for American women and girls forced to give birth against their will? Where's the protection for American people bankrupted paying for healthcare? Where's the protection for American primary school kids shot down by gun fiends? Is America the 'great' cuntry so many believe it to be....? As a proud European I’m not a huge fan. However, the USA has a lot going for it, we have a lot of shared values. There is more that unites than divides and right now more than ever we need to unite." Wow... 
Blu, your input please? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. Do you own the pharmacy? how is the relevant? No it's a private owned company. I was thinking about your role as a pharmacist and how that relates to a pharmacist here in the UK. What qualifications would I need to have achieved to do your role? I graduated Wilkes university you can look up the pre requisites." I have viewed the pharmacy programs, what did you sit, was it on campus or online while you worked? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. Do you own the pharmacy? how is the relevant? No it's a private owned company. I was thinking about your role as a pharmacist and how that relates to a pharmacist here in the UK. What qualifications would I need to have achieved to do your role? I graduated Wilkes university you can look up the pre requisites. I have viewed the pharmacy programs, what did you sit, was it on campus or online while you worked? " campus it's literally 20 minutes away. Across the bridge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Where's the protection for American women and girls forced to give birth against their will? Where's the protection for American people bankrupted paying for healthcare? Where's the protection for American primary school kids shot down by gun fiends? Is America the 'great' cuntry so many believe it to be....? As a proud European I’m not a huge fan. However, the USA has a lot going for it, we have a lot of shared values. There is more that unites than divides and right now more than ever we need to unite. Wow...
Blu, your input please?". Lol our most trusted institution is small business.. the UK is the NHS. You know people being independent not government. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are an awful lot of countries around the world that would have loved America to have done "America first" and not interfered with them. The idea the US is this noble protector of the world and not already out for itself and its own power is really fucking funny. . Exactly we shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2. America really didn't want to get involved, you guys were happy manufacturing weapons to sell to Europe. Pearl Harbour sort of changed things though.... Germany declaring war on the US, pretty much took the choice out of your hands, wouldn't you agree? Now how did the end of the war come about?. If Japan didn't attack pearl do you think we would have gotten involved in European wars.No we were happy just making the weapons for Europe to use. The attack on pearl created the outcry for revenge. not quite right there,you was making ammunition for Britain to use,Europe's armies had all been beaten Ammunition is a weapon. All for having trade deals with other countries but to put American lives on the line unless we are attacked in any way serves no purpose. Why defend Europe? Democracy ? In all trueness we not a democracy. So why defend those interests? Surely the UK can just threaten nukes if some belligerent country invaded. Guess we should let Russia run rampant and wait and see the outcome. Everyone cries US did this US did that.. we are young plenty of European countries have done a hell of a lot worse. Europe is constantly a tinderbox of evil. Throughout history. Now we get the blame for European ignorance. When we fought against it.Why is the US to blame? Theoretically you all created us. You have mentioned you are you a Pharmacist in the US. What are your day to day tasks in that job? Advising people on medication.. filling prescriptions..dosage units ect.. giving out shots for various afflictions. Ect.. ect ect.. Do you own the pharmacy? how is the relevant? No it's a private owned company. I was thinking about your role as a pharmacist and how that relates to a pharmacist here in the UK. What qualifications would I need to have achieved to do your role? I graduated Wilkes university you can look up the pre requisites. I have viewed the pharmacy programs, what did you sit, was it on campus or online while you worked? campus it's literally 20 minutes away. Across the bridge." You have the qualifications that show you are adept at learning, you have a job that uses those skills and you are open with your views. I appreciate your input to the forums, however sometimes my expectations of your input based on what you have told me about your background doesn't seem to align. Do you know what I mean by this? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. " Please don't write or say "no offense" if that is exactly what you are going to be doing. The USA has placed it's military/defence border thousands of miles from its physical borders. That's why you have NATO and ANZUS and many other individual arrangements that allow you to place your forces globally to deal with threats to your business and national interests. Afghanistan was about revenge and the last Iraq war was about unfinished business between a father and a son, but still revenge. The USA is not spending money blindly on its military out of the goodness of its heart. It's spending money to never be attacked on its own soil again like Pearl Harbour and New York. It's placing its military assets a long way from home so that it can neutralise any threats where other people live. Europe, Japan and Taiwan also happen to be wealthy and good markets for US goods and services and a source of specialist knowledge and goods. Our interests happen to align in this instance, but if we were not of some use, you would be gone. You are somewhat naïve if you believe that you go to war or spend so much on your military for the general love of democracy or to protect others. It is all about "America First". It always has been. Just smarter than sitting at home with the curtains drawn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Please don't write or say "no offense" if that is exactly what you are going to be doing. The USA has placed it's military/defence border thousands of miles from its physical borders. That's why you have NATO and ANZUS and many other individual arrangements that allow you to place your forces globally to deal with threats to your business and national interests. Afghanistan was about revenge and the last Iraq war was about unfinished business between a father and a son, but still revenge. The USA is not spending money blindly on its military out of the goodness of its heart. It's spending money to never be attacked on its own soil again like Pearl Harbour and New York. It's placing its military assets a long way from home so that it can neutralise any threats where other people live. Europe, Japan and Taiwan also happen to be wealthy and good markets for US goods and services and a source of specialist knowledge and goods. Our interests happen to align in this instance, but if we were not of some use, you would be gone. You are somewhat naïve if you believe that you go to war or spend so much on your military for the general love of democracy or to protect others. It is all about "America First". It always has been. Just smarter than sitting at home with the curtains drawn." It's a waste of taxpayers money having to feed foreign bases to project. When today's technology allows to project from home. No more " boots" on forgien lands.Dont you agree? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Please don't write or say "no offense" if that is exactly what you are going to be doing. The USA has placed it's military/defence border thousands of miles from its physical borders. That's why you have NATO and ANZUS and many other individual arrangements that allow you to place your forces globally to deal with threats to your business and national interests. Afghanistan was about revenge and the last Iraq war was about unfinished business between a father and a son, but still revenge. The USA is not spending money blindly on its military out of the goodness of its heart. It's spending money to never be attacked on its own soil again like Pearl Harbour and New York. It's placing its military assets a long way from home so that it can neutralise any threats where other people live. Europe, Japan and Taiwan also happen to be wealthy and good markets for US goods and services and a source of specialist knowledge and goods. Our interests happen to align in this instance, but if we were not of some use, you would be gone. You are somewhat naïve if you believe that you go to war or spend so much on your military for the general love of democracy or to protect others. It is all about "America First". It always has been. Just smarter than sitting at home with the curtains drawn. It's a waste of taxpayers money having to feed foreign bases to project. When today's technology allows to project from home. No more " boots" on forgien lands.Dont you agree? " You have been told by almost everybody that your country can and should do whatever it wants as long as you don't deliberately cause us harm. Sometimes boots on the ground in foreign countries is the right thing to do for you and sometimes it is not. That is the point of independence and freedom. To make the right decision based on the circumstances. Long term and short term. You seem to want to prevent yourselves from having that option. Why would you so that? Reduce your options. You cannot "project" from the USA in the way that you seem to think. You are a long way from anywhere. Do you not know how fast things travel and what they can do on arrival? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" No offense we try we have our ignorance behavior twords your way of life. Yet you all rely on our protection. Our defense budget can go a long way to improve the basic needs of our population. Shall we go a American first policy to benefits us or do we global project to benefit others. Please don't write or say "no offense" if that is exactly what you are going to be doing. The USA has placed it's military/defence border thousands of miles from its physical borders. That's why you have NATO and ANZUS and many other individual arrangements that allow you to place your forces globally to deal with threats to your business and national interests. Afghanistan was about revenge and the last Iraq war was about unfinished business between a father and a son, but still revenge. The USA is not spending money blindly on its military out of the goodness of its heart. It's spending money to never be attacked on its own soil again like Pearl Harbour and New York. It's placing its military assets a long way from home so that it can neutralise any threats where other people live. Europe, Japan and Taiwan also happen to be wealthy and good markets for US goods and services and a source of specialist knowledge and goods. Our interests happen to align in this instance, but if we were not of some use, you would be gone. You are somewhat naïve if you believe that you go to war or spend so much on your military for the general love of democracy or to protect others. It is all about "America First". It always has been. Just smarter than sitting at home with the curtains drawn. It's a waste of taxpayers money having to feed foreign bases to project. When today's technology allows to project from home. No more " boots" on forgien lands.Dont you agree? " It goes deeper than that, literally. I have been driving by Lakenheath on and off for the last 35 years. Always signs of construction work going on but no new visible buildings. They’ve got a fucking city underground there. Can’t see them giving that up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us." So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? " one thing I can say about Bidens policy is that just gives the arms they need not send boots. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? " That's not the point is it. The US always claims it's humanitarian intervention, that it's protecting people from violence or war crimes, yet when it's own interests are not served then they couldn't care less. Look at what Israel is doing to the people of Palestine. Where's the US intervention. Look at what the Saudi government do to their people. The US actively back these states. The point is that the US is only intervening in Ukraine and Taiwan because it is in their own imperialist interests. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? That's not the point is it. The US always claims it's humanitarian intervention, that it's protecting people from violence or war crimes, yet when it's own interests are not served then they couldn't care less. Look at what Israel is doing to the people of Palestine. Where's the US intervention. Look at what the Saudi government do to their people. The US actively back these states. The point is that the US is only intervening in Ukraine and Taiwan because it is in their own imperialist interests." Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs? Is Iran the belligerent in the middle east? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? That's not the point is it. The US always claims it's humanitarian intervention, that it's protecting people from violence or war crimes, yet when it's own interests are not served then they couldn't care less. Look at what Israel is doing to the people of Palestine. Where's the US intervention. Look at what the Saudi government do to their people. The US actively back these states. The point is that the US is only intervening in Ukraine and Taiwan because it is in their own imperialist interests. Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs? Is Iran the belligerent in the middle east? " "Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs?" Why do you intervene in Ukrainian affairs? You claim for humanitarian reasons. Or for upholding International law. Well why don't the people of Palestine earn your protection when they are brutalised under an apartheid state? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? That's not the point is it. The US always claims it's humanitarian intervention, that it's protecting people from violence or war crimes, yet when it's own interests are not served then they couldn't care less. Look at what Israel is doing to the people of Palestine. Where's the US intervention. Look at what the Saudi government do to their people. The US actively back these states. The point is that the US is only intervening in Ukraine and Taiwan because it is in their own imperialist interests. Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs? Is Iran the belligerent in the middle east? "Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs?" Why do you intervene in Ukrainian affairs? You claim for humanitarian reasons. Or for upholding International law. Well why don't the people of Palestine earn your protection when they are brutalised under an apartheid state?" who supports the Hamas? Maybe you should look at Iran for that assumption.If you fine with Iran's values more power to you. I'll choose Israel values. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? That's not the point is it. The US always claims it's humanitarian intervention, that it's protecting people from violence or war crimes, yet when it's own interests are not served then they couldn't care less. Look at what Israel is doing to the people of Palestine. Where's the US intervention. Look at what the Saudi government do to their people. The US actively back these states. The point is that the US is only intervening in Ukraine and Taiwan because it is in their own imperialist interests. Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs? Is Iran the belligerent in the middle east? "Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs?" Why do you intervene in Ukrainian affairs? You claim for humanitarian reasons. Or for upholding International law. Well why don't the people of Palestine earn your protection when they are brutalised under an apartheid state?" Support for Hamas According to Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian National Authority, "Hamas is funded by Iran. It claims it is financed by donations, but the donations are nothing like what it receives from Iran. Iran also supplies Hamas with military weaponry. Soo if you like that regime maybe live there.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""You all rely on our protection". The US is an imperialist superpower. It has massive spending for one purpose only, to preserve and extend it's power and political/economic hegemony around the world. It was ever thus. The Romans didn't have huge armies to protect the world. The Mongol empire and the British Empire weren't about protecting people. For the US, were the wars in the Middle East about protecting people or protecting the US financial interests. What about the US/CIA sponsored overthrowing of countless Latin American governments. What about the coups encouraged and funded in places from Iran, Egypt and many others. What about the US interference in places such as Ukraine and Taiwan. It's about power and imperialism. No two ways about it. So don't try and kid yourselves or us that your massive spending on arms and death is somehow a gift to us. So you ok with Ukraine and Taiwan just not existing? That's not the point is it. The US always claims it's humanitarian intervention, that it's protecting people from violence or war crimes, yet when it's own interests are not served then they couldn't care less. Look at what Israel is doing to the people of Palestine. Where's the US intervention. Look at what the Saudi government do to their people. The US actively back these states. The point is that the US is only intervening in Ukraine and Taiwan because it is in their own imperialist interests. Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs? Is Iran the belligerent in the middle east? "Why do we need to intervene in Israel and Saudi affairs?" Why do you intervene in Ukrainian affairs? You claim for humanitarian reasons. Or for upholding International law. Well why don't the people of Palestine earn your protection when they are brutalised under an apartheid state?Support for Hamas According to Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian National Authority, "Hamas is funded by Iran. It claims it is financed by donations, but the donations are nothing like what it receives from Iran. Iran also supplies Hamas with military weaponry. Soo if you like that regime maybe live there. "Your profile claims Bi- Curious.. do your endeavors in the middle east and see how that plays out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world." who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. " LGBTQ is accepted in Israel is it in Palestine and Iran's ideology? No it is not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. LGBTQ is accepted in Israel is it in Palestine and Iran's ideology? No it is not." You can support that ideology all you want . But your values says different. Try being bi curious in Iran... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. " Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off." how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. " go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone ." "Israel supports everyone". Ha! Do they?!?! Tell that to the people who have had their homes stolen by settlers. People who've lived there for generations having their homes stolen. Tell that to those who aren't even allowed to walk the same streets as the Israelis. Tell that to the children of Gaza who were shelled whilst playing on the beach. Tell that to the people who regularly have their electricity and water turned off by the Israeli state. It is a brutal apartheid state. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . "Israel supports everyone". Ha! Do they?!?! Tell that to the people who have had their homes stolen by settlers. People who've lived there for generations having their homes stolen. Tell that to those who aren't even allowed to walk the same streets as the Israelis. Tell that to the children of Gaza who were shelled whilst playing on the beach. Tell that to the people who regularly have their electricity and water turned off by the Israeli state. It is a brutal apartheid state." Have you been? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . "Israel supports everyone". Ha! Do they?!?! Tell that to the people who have had their homes stolen by settlers. People who've lived there for generations having their homes stolen. Tell that to those who aren't even allowed to walk the same streets as the Israelis. Tell that to the children of Gaza who were shelled whilst playing on the beach. Tell that to the people who regularly have their electricity and water turned off by the Israeli state. It is a brutal apartheid state. Have you been? " Yes. And have friends who go regularly. You? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . "Israel supports everyone". Ha! Do they?!?! Tell that to the people who have had their homes stolen by settlers. People who've lived there for generations having their homes stolen. Tell that to those who aren't even allowed to walk the same streets as the Israelis. Tell that to the children of Gaza who were shelled whilst playing on the beach. Tell that to the people who regularly have their electricity and water turned off by the Israeli state. It is a brutal apartheid state. Have you been? Yes. And have friends who go regularly. You?" Yes. I found it fascinating. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. " I do understand. Your country is diverse. Not everyone there holds your personal views. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone ." Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip." Do something about it then it seems the Brits don't support Israel. Maybe go back with your troops and and enact the Palestine mandate again. Israel was created after your country gave up on Palestine with a UN vote. Can't blame the US when it was your country that created that mess in the first place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip." They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. Do something about it then it seems the Brits don't support Israel. Maybe go back with your troops and and enact the Palestine mandate again. Israel was created after your country gave up on Palestine with a UN vote. Can't blame the US when it was your country that created that mess in the first place." I'm not blaming the US. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. " I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies." There is no racism in my comment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it." How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. " Hahahahahahah. Good one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one." Why such a laugh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? " Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke." The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke." Then you assumed wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. " can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. " It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed." Yet you are unable to give a single example. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed. Yet you are unable to give a single example." 
You said this the last time I accused you of it. I proceeded to list many many examples. Can copy it here if you insist.
Constant racism and xenophobia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. " It’s a reference to the fragmented factions (tribal element) in the Arab world and their negotiating skills. Not an insult and I’m sure most Arabs would agree. We are still allowed to comment on other nationalities and races unless I’ve missed something? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. " Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed. Yet you are unable to give a single example.
You said this the last time I accused you of it. I proceeded to list many many examples. Can copy it here if you insist.
Constant racism and xenophobia. "Not one. Why are you so obsessed? Do you think it makes you look good or something? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed. Yet you are unable to give a single example.
You said this the last time I accused you of it. I proceeded to list many many examples. Can copy it here if you insist.
Constant racism and xenophobia.
Not one. Why are you so obsessed? Do you think it makes you look good or something? "Not at all. It just infuriates me that you are seemingly obsessed with attacking "foreigners" at every possible opportunity. When I see such racism and xenophobia being pushed so much by someone then it should be called out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. It’s a reference to the fragmented factions (tribal element) in the Arab world and their negotiating skills. Not an insult and I’m sure most Arabs would agree. We are still allowed to comment on other nationalities and races unless I’ve missed something? " what do you mean by tribal element ? Are negotiating skills? Examples would be useful. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none." Fuck me! How is it any form of racism? Is it racist for someone to say - “oh you English you have terrible food”. “You English stupid for going out in the midday sun”. “You Brits are so lazy and always getting d*unk”. What qualifies you to call out a racist comment? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed. Yet you are unable to give a single example.
You said this the last time I accused you of it. I proceeded to list many many examples. Can copy it here if you insist.
Constant racism and xenophobia.
Not one. Why are you so obsessed? Do you think it makes you look good or something?
Not at all. It just infuriates me that you are seemingly obsessed with attacking "foreigners" at every possible opportunity. When I see such racism and xenophobia being pushed so much by someone then it should be called out."I haven’t attacked anyone. Nothing to call out . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. Hahahahahahah. Good one. Why such a laugh? Your joke. I assumed it was a joke. The forum is a bit better than people just coming on and making incorrect accusations, then laughing. Strange behaviour indeed. It was a totally correct accusation I'm afraid. One borne of your posts on many many threads. Strange behaviour indeed. Yet you are unable to give a single example.
You said this the last time I accused you of it. I proceeded to list many many examples. Can copy it here if you insist.
Constant racism and xenophobia.
Not one. Why are you so obsessed? Do you think it makes you look good or something?
Not at all. It just infuriates me that you are seemingly obsessed with attacking "foreigners" at every possible opportunity. When I see such racism and xenophobia being pushed so much by someone then it should be called out."I see the problem, it’s your miss placed sense of what constitutes racism. Try to consider that you could be wrong instead of shouting ‘racist’ ‘xenophobe’. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. It’s a reference to the fragmented factions (tribal element) in the Arab world and their negotiating skills. Not an insult and I’m sure most Arabs would agree. We are still allowed to comment on other nationalities and races unless I’ve missed something? what do you mean by tribal element ? Are negotiating skills? Examples would be useful. " The Arab world is made up of many nomadic tribes. Ever tried trading with them? Tough cookies indeed. They’ve been at it longer than us I guess? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none. Fuck me! How is it any form of racism? Is it racist for someone to say - “oh you English you have terrible food”. “You English stupid for going out in the midday sun”. “You Brits are so lazy and always getting d*unk”. What qualifies you to call out a racist comment? " Why do you post so much xenophobia and casual racism when you end up getting so upset when it gets pointed out? Seems weird. Just own your comments and points of view. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. It’s a reference to the fragmented factions (tribal element) in the Arab world and their negotiating skills. Not an insult and I’m sure most Arabs would agree. We are still allowed to comment on other nationalities and races unless I’ve missed something? what do you mean by tribal element ? Are negotiating skills? Examples would be useful. The Arab world is made up of many nomadic tribes. Ever tried trading with them? Tough cookies indeed. They’ve been at it longer than us I guess? " so Israel behave like they are made up of many normadoc tribes. However that presents itself. In what way ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none. Fuck me! How is it any form of racism? Is it racist for someone to say - “oh you English you have terrible food”. “You English stupid for going out in the midday sun”. “You Brits are so lazy and always getting d*unk”. What qualifies you to call out a racist comment? Why do you post so much xenophobia and casual racism when you end up getting so upset when it gets pointed out? Seems weird. Just own your comments and points of view." Simply because what you seem to regard as racist is wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well only since you ask for an example, a quick search shows: "Massive levels of immigration have seen a dramatic increase in most levels of crime, in particular violent crime & murder. "When you hear of crimes these days that are so ghastly, you just know that in almost every case it involves foreigners. "Really, I thought it was cos you hate our Polish neighbours that make our life hell "The guy that drove a car bomb to a maternity hospital in Liverpool- whoever thought that could happen? The Manchester concert bomb, the Westminster bridge attacks, the London Bridge attacks, the hacking to death in broad day of a young soldier in London." - (Most shown to be British Citizens) "I could also have included the numerous grooming gangs of Pakistani origin. "The massive crime increase in a small provincial market town, and a massive increase in foreigners in the area. Would this not cause you to raise an eyebrow? "Figures show that 40% of illegal migrants crossing the channel are Albanian. 1) where is Liam Neeson when we need him? 2) I can’t see them hanging around a detention centre or crappy hotel How do we stop this horrific exploitation of our border? Perhaps for every one landing from France we send ten back? "I would send ten people that arrived in boats from France. I wouldn’t ask where they are from. "They are a tough lot though. Even the Turks in my town are shit scared of them! "The impact on the indigenous population of uncontrolled mass immigration." - (P.s. only the fascist groups tend to regularly use this term) "Should we worry that the number one baby male name last year was Mohammed? "What worries me is tens of thousands of young men moving from another continent, as we are led to believe without documentation. We have no idea if they are great people or just mad or bad. There are many aspects of the multi culti world that I like & enjoy. Should we be concerned of colonisation? "Iranian asylum seeker murders "Left wingers & foreigners. Do they represent a threat to British values? Particularly those in a position of some power, perhaps not always having what’s best for the country in mind. Almost like ‘fifth columnists’? "Illegal migrants crossing the channel yesterday. It’s an invasion !" "Is it time to say “no more, we are full”. A total immigration ban for say 20 years?" This is just a few." Explain why you think any single one of the above is racist. We are allowed to discuss these things you know. Just shouting “ooh racist “ doesn’t make it so. ‘Foreigner’ is not a naughty word you know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none. Fuck me! How is it any form of racism? Is it racist for someone to say - “oh you English you have terrible food”. “You English stupid for going out in the midday sun”. “You Brits are so lazy and always getting d*unk”. What qualifies you to call out a racist comment? Why do you post so much xenophobia and casual racism when you end up getting so upset when it gets pointed out? Seems weird. Just own your comments and points of view. Simply because what you seem to regard as racist is wrong. " Racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. Casual Racism: refers to the practice of passing off-hand comments and jokes infused with stereotypes Xenophobia: dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries. Hopefully this helps you to recognise your own behaviour and views. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. " I’m going to ignore you in future as you add nothing to the debate. I’ve tried to right a wrong and get you to think but alas, no success. I’m starting to think you need to get out a bit more. Talk to people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none. Fuck me! How is it any form of racism? Is it racist for someone to say - “oh you English you have terrible food”. “You English stupid for going out in the midday sun”. “You Brits are so lazy and always getting d*unk”. What qualifies you to call out a racist comment? Why do you post so much xenophobia and casual racism when you end up getting so upset when it gets pointed out? Seems weird. Just own your comments and points of view. Simply because what you seem to regard as racist is wrong. Racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. Casual Racism: refers to the practice of passing off-hand comments and jokes infused with stereotypes Xenophobia: dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries. Hopefully this helps you to recognise your own behaviour and views. " Well aware what constitutes racism etc. you have no idea of my behaviour or views. As I said to the guy above, get out more, talk to people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. It’s a reference to the fragmented factions (tribal element) in the Arab world and their negotiating skills. Not an insult and I’m sure most Arabs would agree. We are still allowed to comment on other nationalities and races unless I’ve missed something? what do you mean by tribal element ? Are negotiating skills? Examples would be useful. The Arab world is made up of many nomadic tribes. Ever tried trading with them? Tough cookies indeed. They’ve been at it longer than us I guess? so Israel behave like they are made up of many normadoc tribes. However that presents itself. In what way ? " No but there are similarities in how they trade and the way they have had to fight to claim land. Pretty sure most Arabs would see it as a compliment. But then they are more in the real world than the well meaning but wrong Guardian reader ‘sandalistas’ . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. " I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You are constantly posting racist comments and then become offended when someone calls you out on it. How dare you make an unsubstantiated claim like this. I have never made a racist comment and never will. can you expand on what you mean by more Arab than the Arabs? I don't think that's full on racist. But it could be missinterpreted. It’s a reference to the fragmented factions (tribal element) in the Arab world and their negotiating skills. Not an insult and I’m sure most Arabs would agree. We are still allowed to comment on other nationalities and races unless I’ve missed something? what do you mean by tribal element ? Are negotiating skills? Examples would be useful. The Arab world is made up of many nomadic tribes. Ever tried trading with them? Tough cookies indeed. They’ve been at it longer than us I guess? so Israel behave like they are made up of many normadoc tribes. However that presents itself. In what way ? No but there are similarities in how they trade and the way they have had to fight to claim land. Pretty sure most Arabs would see it as a compliment. But then they are more in the real world than the well meaning but wrong Guardian reader ‘sandalistas’ ." okay, so the tribal element isnt where Israel are more Arabs by arabs. What is the Arabic trading styles that israel are like (but more so). I'm trying to understand the phrase you used. Because without context and detail it can ambiguous. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. I'll ignore the casual racism and agree with you on the toughness. They'd need to be pretty darn tough to take a Delilah missile to the face. Especially the babies. There is no racism in my comment. Aside from the casual racism you posted, there was none. Fuck me! How is it any form of racism? Is it racist for someone to say - “oh you English you have terrible food”. “You English stupid for going out in the midday sun”. “You Brits are so lazy and always getting d*unk”. What qualifies you to call out a racist comment? Why do you post so much xenophobia and casual racism when you end up getting so upset when it gets pointed out? Seems weird. Just own your comments and points of view. Simply because what you seem to regard as racist is wrong. Racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. Casual Racism: refers to the practice of passing off-hand comments and jokes infused with stereotypes Xenophobia: dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries. Hopefully this helps you to recognise your own behaviour and views. Well aware what constitutes racism etc. you have no idea of my behaviour or views. As I said to the guy above, get out more, talk to people. " Do your view differ from what you post on here? If not, I am well aware of your abhorrent views. Which people would you recommend I talk to when I get out more? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. " Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia." I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? " We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues." I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. " Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. " This is kind of surrealism you both arguing about xenophobia and racist behavior on a American thread. But if you can't express a opinion like seb does what the fucking point of opening dialogue and instantly it's your a racist xenophobe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. This is kind of surrealism you both arguing about xenophobia and racist behavior on a American thread. But if you can't express a opinion like seb does what the fucking point of opening dialogue and instantly it's your a racist xenophobe. " He opens himself up to it with constant posts of a racist and xenophobic nature. Can't help then if he gets called out on it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. This is kind of surrealism you both arguing about xenophobia and racist behavior on a American thread. But if you can't express a opinion like seb does what the fucking point of opening dialogue and instantly it's your a racist xenophobe. He opens himself up to it with constant posts of a racist and xenophobic nature. Can't help then if he gets called out on it." he has a opinion doesn't he? Just like you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. This is kind of surrealism you both arguing about xenophobia and racist behavior on a American thread. But if you can't express a opinion like seb does what the fucking point of opening dialogue and instantly it's your a racist xenophobe. He opens himself up to it with constant posts of a racist and xenophobic nature. Can't help then if he gets called out on it. he has a opinion doesn't he? Just like you. " just because you misconstrued his perceptions and you went on a personal attack it's his fault. You instantly took offense to his posts and not realizing his underlying issue. Then you "labelled" . Then you wonder why there is such a huge division. Expressing a opinion does not warrant a insult. Yet you constantly do that to serve your own agenda. What about his ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I posted "America" now it went to xenophobia racist who has the bigger dick here and I get called insane.. take a breather and look in the mirror. " who called you insane ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As ever, you don't answer my point. This isn't about Hamas. This is about Israel. Israel are clearly brutalising the Palestinian people, subjecting them to a patently apartheid regime. If the US was a genuinely humanitarian regime and power then surely they would intervene to stop their mistreatment. They do the exact opposite because it is in their economic and political interest. You choose Israeli apartheid, and unfortunately so does the US, and this creates more conflict in the wider region and world. who generally launches aggression twords Israel? Iran supported Hamas do they not ? Iran want Israel not to exist. Maybe the people of Palestine should be on Israeli interests over Iran's .. You know people's right to choose not a caliphate. Erm. What! I'm usually interested in what you post. But this is way way off. how so if you can't understand culture and ideology for the population of said states it's not my fault for your ignorance. go look up up shia and sunni values and get back to me. Israel supports everyone . Israel is a brutality state. You should read up about the atrocities committed and about the state of life in the Gaza Strip. They have to be tough to survive I guess? I always found them almost impossible to trade with. “More Arab than the Arabs” was a quote that struck home. " I expect they had to learn a lot and learn it very quickly. Who better to learn from I guess. Where does the quote come from May I ask? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I posted "America" now it went to xenophobia racist who has the bigger dick here and I get called insane.. take a breather and look in the mirror. who called you insane ?" I have received plenty of nasty personal messages. I consider cowards voicing a option matters but taking it to a personal insult is ridiculously ignorant. Some people think analytical others use their emotions. Seb for instance thinks long term for his and his countries well being. CD thinking they are refugees at this time it is not a issue. Then seb gets called out as a racist because he thinking long term for the benefit of others. So who is right here? I don't think either is racist I think it's more beneficial to take care of you own at all costs. Friends family in the end run someone 200 km away not going to give fuck all about you in dire situations. That's just my opinion. Call me racist fascist Nazi xenophobic bitch. Your reliance is your loved ones no matter race religion sexual preference or political views. They are your village not the social aspect of the internet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I posted "America" now it went to xenophobia racist who has the bigger dick here and I get called insane.. take a breather and look in the mirror. who called you insane ? I have received plenty of nasty personal messages. I consider cowards voicing a option matters but taking it to a personal insult is ridiculously ignorant. Some people think analytical others use their emotions. Seb for instance thinks long term for his and his countries well being. CD thinking they are refugees at this time it is not a issue. Then seb gets called out as a racist because he thinking long term for the benefit of others. So who is right here? I don't think either is racist I think it's more beneficial to take care of you own at all costs. Friends family in the end run someone 200 km away not going to give fuck all about you in dire situations. That's just my opinion. Call me racist fascist Nazi xenophobic bitch. Your reliance is your loved ones no matter race religion sexual preference or political views. They are your village not the social aspect of the internet. " okay. DMs are uncalled for. Especially offensive ones. I'm sorry you receive these. I have no idea what sebs views are. He couches everything in too wooly language and leading questions for me to know what he is thinking or what he is feeling. But unfortunately when many if your posts are like this, people start to see patterns. Now, as in your other thread, people will seek data to support their views and see patterns when not there. You don't see him as racist it seems because your views allign with Seb and you don't see yourself as racist. Others see the number or semi ambiguous data points and start to draw different conclusions maybe because they all tilt towards being worried about foreigners. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I posted "America" now it went to xenophobia racist who has the bigger dick here and I get called insane.. take a breather and look in the mirror. who called you insane ? I have received plenty of nasty personal messages. I consider cowards voicing a option matters but taking it to a personal insult is ridiculously ignorant. Some people think analytical others use their emotions. Seb for instance thinks long term for his and his countries well being. CD thinking they are refugees at this time it is not a issue. Then seb gets called out as a racist because he thinking long term for the benefit of others. So who is right here? I don't think either is racist I think it's more beneficial to take care of you own at all costs. Friends family in the end run someone 200 km away not going to give fuck all about you in dire situations. That's just my opinion. Call me racist fascist Nazi xenophobic bitch. Your reliance is your loved ones no matter race religion sexual preference or political views. They are your village not the social aspect of the internet. okay. DMs are uncalled for. Especially offensive ones. I'm sorry you receive these. I have no idea what sebs views are. He couches everything in too wooly language and leading questions for me to know what he is thinking or what he is feeling. But unfortunately when many if your posts are like this, people start to see patterns. Now, as in your other thread, people will seek data to support their views and see patterns when not there. You don't see him as racist it seems because your views allign with Seb and you don't see yourself as racist. Others see the number or semi ambiguous data points and start to draw different conclusions maybe because they all tilt towards being worried about foreigners. " How can I consider him racist when people here all colors all sexual preferences all political views and sexual preferences and religions that have my back no matter the circumstances if I call on them they are all there for me. Now allowing foreigners in that do not have that those values but self gratification for what you believe in someone else is label a racist over that? Since when does values equate racism. It's a card everyone plays now a days to back out of a valid assumption. It's the your wrong I read it on the internet and the news. Yet I have brothers vs and sisters of all walks of life. That matter to me not the mobs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I posted "America" now it went to xenophobia racist who has the bigger dick here and I get called insane.. take a breather and look in the mirror. who called you insane ? I have received plenty of nasty personal messages. I consider cowards voicing a option matters but taking it to a personal insult is ridiculously ignorant. Some people think analytical others use their emotions. Seb for instance thinks long term for his and his countries well being. CD thinking they are refugees at this time it is not a issue. Then seb gets called out as a racist because he thinking long term for the benefit of others. So who is right here? I don't think either is racist I think it's more beneficial to take care of you own at all costs. Friends family in the end run someone 200 km away not going to give fuck all about you in dire situations. That's just my opinion. Call me racist fascist Nazi xenophobic bitch. Your reliance is your loved ones no matter race religion sexual preference or political views. They are your village not the social aspect of the internet. okay. DMs are uncalled for. Especially offensive ones. I'm sorry you receive these. I have no idea what sebs views are. He couches everything in too wooly language and leading questions for me to know what he is thinking or what he is feeling. But unfortunately when many if your posts are like this, people start to see patterns. Now, as in your other thread, people will seek data to support their views and see patterns when not there. You don't see him as racist it seems because your views allign with Seb and you don't see yourself as racist. Others see the number or semi ambiguous data points and start to draw different conclusions maybe because they all tilt towards being worried about foreigners. How can I consider him racist when people here all colors all sexual preferences all political views and sexual preferences and religions that have my back no matter the circumstances if I call on them they are all there for me. Now allowing foreigners in that do not have that those values but self gratification for what you believe in someone else is label a racist over that? Since when does values equate racism. It's a card everyone plays now a days to back out of a valid assumption. It's the your wrong I read it on the internet and the news. Yet I have brothers vs and sisters of all walks of life. That matter to me not the mobs. " no idea how your experiences make seb racist or not racist. It's interesting how many of the people you know (many of whom I assume have heritage outside of the US) are good eggs, but those who want to come to the country have different values. I wonder when that flipped ? It sounds like you are a fan of a community coming together and supporting itself through thick and thin. And don't like those who simply want what's best for them. And feel new immigrants are more of the latter ... Is that fair ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I posted "America" now it went to xenophobia racist who has the bigger dick here and I get called insane.. take a breather and look in the mirror. who called you insane ? I have received plenty of nasty personal messages. I consider cowards voicing a option matters but taking it to a personal insult is ridiculously ignorant. Some people think analytical others use their emotions. Seb for instance thinks long term for his and his countries well being. CD thinking they are refugees at this time it is not a issue. Then seb gets called out as a racist because he thinking long term for the benefit of others. So who is right here? I don't think either is racist I think it's more beneficial to take care of you own at all costs. Friends family in the end run someone 200 km away not going to give fuck all about you in dire situations. That's just my opinion. Call me racist fascist Nazi xenophobic bitch. Your reliance is your loved ones no matter race religion sexual preference or political views. They are your village not the social aspect of the internet. okay. DMs are uncalled for. Especially offensive ones. I'm sorry you receive these. I have no idea what sebs views are. He couches everything in too wooly language and leading questions for me to know what he is thinking or what he is feeling. But unfortunately when many if your posts are like this, people start to see patterns. Now, as in your other thread, people will seek data to support their views and see patterns when not there. You don't see him as racist it seems because your views allign with Seb and you don't see yourself as racist. Others see the number or semi ambiguous data points and start to draw different conclusions maybe because they all tilt towards being worried about foreigners. How can I consider him racist when people here all colors all sexual preferences all political views and sexual preferences and religions that have my back no matter the circumstances if I call on them they are all there for me. Now allowing foreigners in that do not have that those values but self gratification for what you believe in someone else is label a racist over that? Since when does values equate racism. It's a card everyone plays now a days to back out of a valid assumption. It's the your wrong I read it on the internet and the news. Yet I have brothers vs and sisters of all walks of life. That matter to me not the mobs. no idea how your experiences make seb racist or not racist. It's interesting how many of the people you know (many of whom I assume have heritage outside of the US) are good eggs, but those who want to come to the country have different values. I wonder when that flipped ? It sounds like you are a fan of a community coming together and supporting itself through thick and thin. And don't like those who simply want what's best for them. And feel new immigrants are more of the latter ... Is that fair ? " does anything matter if you can't accept the ones you love in your inner circle? I'll take a black Islamic trans democrat that has my love for them no matter in indifferences that society dictates if they have my 6, I definitely have thiers. It's a common bond. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. This is kind of surrealism you both arguing about xenophobia and racist behavior on a American thread. But if you can't express a opinion like seb does what the fucking point of opening dialogue and instantly it's your a racist xenophobe. " Only as he constantly posts xenophobia and casual racism. How are we supposed to take that seriously? His points are so ridiculous there is literally nothing meaningful to debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Seb's been up to his old tricks again I see. I truly can't decide if he's an out and out troll on here or if he really can't see the clear pattern in his many, many, many posts about foreigners." we are the melting.pot but sebs statements have nothing racist as some assume. They try to just interject thief personal feelings not understanding that people they try to champion for have sometimes the same values as the ones they hate. Soo who is wrong.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Seb's been up to his old tricks again I see. I truly can't decide if he's an out and out troll on here or if he really can't see the clear pattern in his many, many, many posts about foreigners. we are the melting.pot but sebs statements have nothing racist as some assume. They try to just interject thief personal feelings not understanding that people they try to champion for have sometimes the same values as the ones they hate. Soo who is wrong.." His values are that foreigners are lesser people than Brits. He posts about this nearly constantly. Is he allowed to express these moronic views and everyone else has to remain silent? Personally I am happy for him to express his opinions, and have them challenged. Free speech is supposed to apply to ordinary people as well as xenophobes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Seb's been up to his old tricks again I see. I truly can't decide if he's an out and out troll on here or if he really can't see the clear pattern in his many, many, many posts about foreigners. we are the melting.pot but sebs statements have nothing racist as some assume. They try to just interject thief personal feelings not understanding that people they try to champion for have sometimes the same values as the ones they hate. Soo who is wrong.." Seb. Seb is wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I going to be the typical American you hate . It's his fucking choice. Your " pretend understanding on others is ridiculous ". You claim fame on being a American regal understanding.. yet I have the better perceptions than your lame attempts on righteousness. Wake up.." No offence meant, but could you write a bit clearer? I rarely understand what you're trying to say. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I going to be the typical American you hate . It's his fucking choice. Your " pretend understanding on others is ridiculous ". You claim fame on being a American regal understanding.. yet I have the better perceptions than your lame attempts on righteousness. Wake up.." I have literally no idea what you mean. Is it a translation thing? Is English a second language? I don't mean to be rude, just wondering. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I going to be the typical American you hate . It's his fucking choice. Your " pretend understanding on others is ridiculous ". You claim fame on being a American regal understanding.. yet I have the better perceptions than your lame attempts on righteousness. Wake up.. I have literally no idea what you mean. Is it a translation thing? Is English a second language? I don't mean to be rude, just wondering." be of course you don't you will deflect from the issue. It's a standard you fall back on. Maybe be more accepting.and quit blaming others for your ineptitude. .. but I assure you going to have all of the other is idiots attempt t ok bail you out. Seb said fuck all to anything racist yet you can't conform to that why is that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I going to be the typical American you hate . It's his fucking choice. Your " pretend understanding on others is ridiculous ". You claim fame on being a American regal understanding.. yet I have the better perceptions than your lame attempts on righteousness. Wake up.. I have literally no idea what you mean. Is it a translation thing? Is English a second language? I don't mean to be rude, just wondering. be of course you don't you will deflect from the issue. It's a standard you fall back on. Maybe be more accepting.and quit blaming others for your ineptitude. .. but I assure you going to have all of the other is idiots attempt t ok bail you out. Seb said fuck all to anything racist yet you can't conform to that why is that? " I'm not deflecting. I truly struggle to understand most of your posts. To the point I rarely reply to them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. " If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply." Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being." Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear." And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps." Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic???" nothing problematic if everyone in my life is in agreement with subtle variations not the extreme you portray constantly how am I wrong ? I take everyone iny own personal sphere into account not the majority because that majority usually feels entitlement aka.. you.. so excuse me I choose a more balanced balanceed Perception. Blacks whites | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic??? nothing problematic if everyone in my life is in agreement with subtle variations not the extreme you portray constantly how am I wrong ? I take everyone iny own personal sphere into account not the majority because that majority usually feels entitlement aka.. you.. so excuse me I choose a more balanced balanceed Perception. Blacks whites " I literally have no idea what you're trying to say. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic??? nothing problematic if everyone in my life is in agreement with subtle variations not the extreme you portray constantly how am I wrong ? I take everyone iny own personal sphere into account not the majority because that majority usually feels entitlement aka.. you.. so excuse me I choose a more balanced balanceed Perception. Blacks whites I literally have no idea what you're trying to say." and that is the issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic??? nothing problematic if everyone in my life is in agreement with subtle variations not the extreme you portray constantly how am I wrong ? I take everyone iny own personal sphere into account not the majority because that majority usually feels entitlement aka.. you.. so excuse me I choose a more balanced balanceed Perception. Blacks whites I literally have no idea what you're trying to say." I can translate for you. He's okay with concentration camps. Was I right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic??? nothing problematic if everyone in my life is in agreement with subtle variations not the extreme you portray constantly how am I wrong ? I take everyone iny own personal sphere into account not the majority because that majority usually feels entitlement aka.. you.. so excuse me I choose a more balanced balanceed Perception. Blacks whites I literally have no idea what you're trying to say. and that is the issue." Possibly. But since I often can't decipher your posts, I have no idea if that's the issue or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Yes he asked why. Yes we pointed out some of his many, many questionable comments. If it were just one, you'd give the benefit of the doubt. But it's relentless. I posted about 20 of his comments above. It's absolutely clear. And I don't think you even posted the comment where he said we should put immigrants in heavily guarded camps. Wow. I missed that one. Come on Blu. You must see that as problematic??? nothing problematic if everyone in my life is in agreement with subtle variations not the extreme you portray constantly how am I wrong ? I take everyone iny own personal sphere into account not the majority because that majority usually feels entitlement aka.. you.. so excuse me I choose a more balanced balanceed Perception. Blacks whites I literally have no idea what you're trying to say. and that is the issue. Possibly. But since I often can't decipher your posts, I have no idea if that's the issue or not." typical . I choose people's integrity not skin color race religion or sexuality. You can scroll up and see the idiots trying to justify their racist xenophobic asshole stances. Yet here I am wondering why they such dickheads twords one another when my approach to life is totally different. Yet they try and make us to mimic the European standards. So far from what I see I am not impressed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"sigh. Believe or think whatever you want. I can't be bothered to even try to decipher these posts any more." then don't I do not need your acceptance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being." Why not make fun? He posts nothing worthy of debate, no actual points, no reasoned argument, just a load of bollocks about "foreigners". This forum is mostly people posting ridiculous crap, and others poking fun at them. Occasionally there is an interesting discussion. But it's rare. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"l . I choose people's integrit You can scroll up and see the idiots trying to justify their racist xenophobic asshole stances. " Then you're on our side. Why are you defending the guy who constantly posts up xenophobic opinions? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say you the racist on your ideology point . Your acceptance is based on your own assumptions about others. Let's label. Same thing different Webster dictionary definition. You read you don't take the person . You accept the societal assumptions. You are black arab asian Indian you need my support . No the fuck they don't. They are individually indifferent. Yet some p people want to shove that shit down their throats and claim I am the righteous one. If the person we're talking about doesn't want his xenophobia discussed, why does he keep posting it on the forums? I maintain that freedom of speech includes the right to reply. IE. People can say xenophobic and casually racist stuff. And others can reply. Yet you and others want to belittle his standpoint to give yourself some form of self gratification. literally you were relentless and he asked why. You had a blanketed statement over and over and.. guess what.. fucking.. over.. you labeled . So in your quandary episodes is he a racist no or is he just asking cultural benefits to your well being. Why not make fun? He posts nothing worthy of debate, no actual points, no reasoned argument, just a load of bollocks about "foreigners". This forum is mostly people posting ridiculous crap, and others poking fun at them. Occasionally there is an interesting discussion. But it's rare." Yet he posts because of a valid opinion and you run to instant labels. Why is that? Name once he called you anything derogatory? He could have played so many derogatory cards yet you labeled. He did not. I one the other hand have a big mouth that others can't accept without running to someone because I broke a Eula. It's a habitual habit for some people. You disagree and it's I can't get my opinion through let's ban them . It's a crutch for the issues that they can not comprehend. So they go the best route available to silence instead of listening. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Racist. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. I’m sure you are a nice guy that means well, your heart is in the right place. You are simply wrong. You have failed to explain why a single post from me is racist. I’m sure there are plenty of black people that would roll their eyes in despair or have a huge belly laugh at a couple of white guys debating racism. What an odd world we live in. Why do you want randomers on the internet to explain further the definition of racism and how your comments fall into this bracket. This is really bizarre behaviour. I don't understand why you're upset with people calling you out in it. Just defend your position, argue your case, instead of pretending your casual racism and xenophobia isn't casual racism and xenophobia. I don’t, and I don’t get upset. I’m just puzzled that people that feel the need (white people only BTW) that feel the need to cry ‘racist’ but can never explain why. Don’t just cry ‘racist’ as a matter of course, if you disagree with my post, try at least to explain why, and if you can, put in a counter point. Can you do that? We do disagree with your posts. That's what is happening here. Right now. You post casual racism and xenophobia. We call it out. You're get upset/angry/confused, post most xenophobia, and the cycle continues. I’m starting to sense we won’t get on. Again you make a daft accusation but nothing to substantiate it. If you don’t like what I post don’t just go ‘racist’ make your objections known. Why do you post if you can't deal with people disagreeing? I agree, we wouldn't get on. I would never choose to spend time with someone who has abhorrent views like the ones you post here. So that's a hard agree. This is kind of surrealism you both arguing about xenophobia and racist behavior on a American thread. But if you can't express a opinion like seb does what the fucking point of opening dialogue and instantly it's your a racist xenophobe. Only as he constantly posts xenophobia and casual racism. How are we supposed to take that seriously? His points are so ridiculous there is literally nothing meaningful to debate." To me one of the problems is some do not want to debate awkward topics so it's far easier to just claim racism to avoid it. One of the biggest problems is people trying to shut down discussion. Yes if course you have the right to disagree and give your thoughts but by not engaging with the subject and trying to stop others you just make it worse. As far as I am aware there is no limit to the amount of threads on any given subject regardless if it suits or not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
