Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well.
But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate.
It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people.
If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency.
It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”.
There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc.
Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ermbiMan 3 days ago
Ballyshannon |
"Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well.
But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate.
It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people.
If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency.
It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”.
There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc.
Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are?
"
You forgot to cite all the evidence you mention. Please enlighten us |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
People do deserve some privacy and the public shouldn't have a right to total intrusion into someone's life.
Here we vote for local representatives, not leaders.
Biden no longer is President and we should let him manage his final time with his loved ones. Laws have dedicated responsibility to others, should they no longer be able to perform their role, that's what's important.
Be more concerned with those who try to deny their election losses and who abuse use of their power, to circumvent law |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well.
But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate.
It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people.
If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency.
It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”.
There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc.
Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are?
"
Is this thread really about Biden or is it just another reason to have a dig at Starmer? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well.
But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate.
It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people.
If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency.
It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”.
There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc.
Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are?
Is this thread really about Biden or is it just another reason to have a dig at Starmer?"
Starmer’s popularity rating is -46 last time I looked.
If you don’t want to hear criticism of Starmer you probably need to leave the country until 2029. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *d4ugirlsMan 21 hours ago
Green Cove Springs |
More to it than eluded to do far.
When you look back at joeys 2020 run for president, everyone in else did his campaigning for him. joey made very few appearances and when he did show up, there were obvious signs he was mentally in trouble.
Unfortunate part to this is the media went all out to cover this up.
Someone brought up the point of a candidates right to privacy.
Believe if you step into run for political office then you are giving up that right.
joey is a perfect case in point, from the outset he was not fit. During his tenure, he spent a lot of time on holiday and in a state of being unable to function that was played off by the media. Such as falling down the steps on several occasions of Air Force One to the point of using the little boy steps. Falling on stage. Use of cue cards at speeches. Shaking hands with someone that is not there etc.
By people not getting the full story on the candidate, and people being to caught up with voting for a party instead of looking at evidence right in front of themselves we got a vegetable for president. Leaves the question as to who actually ran the country.
I say dig up all the dirty laundry and prosecuted, including joey.
Seems people feel that it is off topic to talk about starmer. There are a number of parallels between the support the media and the few people in the public that still swoon over starmer hide the identity of the man and his party. This is dangerous as the English people are being taken down a dangerous path at a greater speed than what joey took the US down. This includes laundering money through Ukraine, immigration, climate change, such as trying to filter light in the atmosphere ( for the naysayers. https://www.bbc.com/weather/articles/c5ygydeqq08o ) trying to take away local farming and changing it to big business so government can have more control.
Yep, bring out all the dirty laundry, pet the heads fall. We all need to make wise choices when voting, but we also need to have the clear and concise truth. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
