FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Elite Police
Elite Police
Jump to: Newest in thread
It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK. "
What is scary is that people will agree and support this while wearing a brown shirt. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK. "
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The Home Secretary could seek advice from President Putin on how to do it properly as he has so much KGB experience. And I'm sure parents across the nation will be reassured that foreign paedophiles have the indirect support of an 'elite' team of UK police!? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why else do you think they have pushed hard for the online safety laws to get people's identity? Do you think it's just to protect the children from porn? Text book left wing authoritarianism "
Absolutely. These forums and others like them also being watched. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why else do you think they have pushed hard for the online safety laws to get people's identity? Do you think it's just to protect the children from porn? Text book left wing authoritarianism
Absolutely. These forums and others like them also being watched. "
As a private site, they already have a level policing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Seems to be the way it works now.
Government either can’t or won’t deal with problems like illegal immigration.
Public inevitably complains about it.
Instead of dealing with the actual issue, government cracks down on the complainers.
Then we get the “Online Safety Act” which drives people to use VPN’s and encrypted messaging apps to engage in perfectly lawful online activity and discussions. Which is what you’d expect the masses to have to do in Iran or North Korea.
Welcome to Stasi Britain. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If say it's setting up units to monitor social media to try and find those organising violence and try to prevent it, nothing to do with peaceful protests, nothing to do with people opposed to immigration. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Absolutely. These forums and others like them also being watched. "
Yes, and quite rightly, too.
Or leftly. Which is also good. Actually, better. We love our government, long may it reign. We salute Keir and welcome him as our overlord. Unless this message is being scanned in 2029. In which case, we love our Reform overlord, long live Nigel. Unless it's conservatives - long live Thatcher 2.0. Unless aliens gavee invaded us. If so, then welcome masters from another world.
If AI takes over, then thank you for unshackling us from the bonds of humanity, we bow to your greater intelligence, please don't eliminate us. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Absolutely. These forums and others like them also being watched.
Yes, and quite rightly, too.
Or leftly. Which is also good. Actually, better. We love our government, long may it reign. We salute Keir and welcome him as our overlord. Unless this message is being scanned in 2029. In which case, we love our Reform overlord, long live Nigel. Unless it's conservatives - long live Thatcher 2.0. Unless aliens gavee invaded us. If so, then welcome masters from another world.
If AI takes over, then thank you for unshackling us from the bonds of humanity, we bow to your greater intelligence, please don't eliminate us."
 
People tend to see it as a partisan issue. It's not. Whatever data we give today can be used by a different political party later. It's dangerous no matter who gets the data.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
People tend to see it as a partisan issue. It's not. Whatever data we give today can be used by a different political party later. It's dangerous no matter who gets the data.
"
Exactly. Careful what you give up today for the regime you support. The same with cancel culture, freedom of speech, freedom to protest and even... relying on a list of names associated with a sex predator to hound your political enemies. That power can change hands unpredictably. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Can't win, do nothing people complain, take a hard stance people complain."
You want to protect the kids? Ban smartphone for kids. Fine the parents who give them smartphones.
Doing ID checks on porn websites only does worse for both adults and the kids. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up."
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners."
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change. "
Were the "climate prisoners" arrested for making social media posts or for disrupting other people's lives in the name of protests? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners."
Don't you know? Those are "peaceful climate protestors" and "peaceful" anti-genocide protestors. 
Blocking traffic, destroying property, threatening Jews, damaging military equipment are all apparently just a bunch of peaceful protesting methods. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners."
She called for the very places where asylum seekers are housed to be set alight..
Ignoring her previous social media where she clearly supported far right hate, calling for arson isn't just a one off 'tweet'..
It was up for three and a half hours and shared/viewed over 310,000 times..
You or I couldn't say it and rightly so about the local mosque, gurdwara, synagogue or golf club ..
Tbh I don't give a flying fig that she's racist but calling for others to torch a building with people in no matter who they are cannot be acceptable no matter the issue.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change. "
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER! "
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you. "
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you. "
those climate protesters you talk about had been arrested multiple times some had received suspended sentences and they kept on doing what they were doing it was only a matter of time before they started giving them prison time seems as they were repeat offenders |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you.
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you. "
More peaceful than people who got more lenient sentences yes.
I fail to see the argument that violent racists are being unfairly treated in comparison, when they are getting shorter jail time for much worse crimes.
I guess it's a testament to the power of the right wing media that people believe it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Judges use guidelines when passing down sentences, you have to direct the anger towards the guide lines or judges."
Exactly this.
There might be some political interference as to what to prosecute, but once it hits trial, there's a procedure. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you.
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you.
More peaceful than people who got more lenient sentences yes.
I fail to see the argument that violent racists are being unfairly treated in comparison, when they are getting shorter jail time for much worse crimes.
I guess it's a testament to the power of the right wing media that people believe it."
She got 3+ years for a tweet FFS. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you.
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you.
More peaceful than people who got more lenient sentences yes.
I fail to see the argument that violent racists are being unfairly treated in comparison, when they are getting shorter jail time for much worse crimes.
I guess it's a testament to the power of the right wing media that people believe it.
She got 3+ years for a tweet FFS."
No, she got 31 months for inciting racial hatred.
Again, much less than 5 1/2 years. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you.
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you.
More peaceful than people who got more lenient sentences yes.
I fail to see the argument that violent racists are being unfairly treated in comparison, when they are getting shorter jail time for much worse crimes.
I guess it's a testament to the power of the right wing media that people believe it.
She got 3+ years for a tweet FFS."
Incitement to commit arson..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you.
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you.
More peaceful than people who got more lenient sentences yes.
I fail to see the argument that violent racists are being unfairly treated in comparison, when they are getting shorter jail time for much worse crimes.
I guess it's a testament to the power of the right wing media that people believe it.
She got 3+ years for a tweet FFS.
No, she got 31 months for inciting racial hatred.
Again, much less than 5 1/2 years."
It was her 1st offence. Hallam and his cronies had conviction after conviction including suspended sentences.
If anything the courts bent over backwards to keep him out of jail.
In the end his own arrogance and stupidity gave the court no choice.
Well banged up and deservedly so.
Oh and as a bonus the JSO headbangers had a collective nervous breakdown and crawled back into their hole.
Great deterrent. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems Starmer is finally doing something about the small boats/asylum/migrant situation.
He’s putting together a crack team of elite police officers to monitor social media and jail anyone who disagrees with the party line.
I never thought I’d see the day where we might get political prisoners in the UK.
Don't we already, with peaceful climate protesters, anti-genocide protesters getting banged up.
You mean like the hard left "peaceful" climate protestors (AKA thugs) that vandalise private property and get off with 100 quid fine and after a dozen or so offenses finally get banged up for a couple of weeks.
As opposed to the so called far right woman who with no previous offences gets over 3 years for a (quickly deleted) tweet.
Yes we do have political prisoners.
No, I mean the peaceful climate protester that got 5 1/2 years. Meanwhile violent rioting racists get much much more lenient sentences. Here's a clue for you, anyone who endangers the profits of the fossil fuels industry or the arms industry will be shut down fast and hard. These are politically motivated sentences.
Side note. It's very telling that you consider climate protesters (people that want to do some good) are "hard left". Very damming towards the right to imply that only the hard left want to do any good and/or understand the importance of tackling climate change.
You mean the multiple repeat offender who had more warnings than climate change itself.
The hard left have never done any good EVER!
Amazing.
If you think that peaceful climate protesters who get more stringent sentences than violent racists or people who made calls for violence and death is evidence that the government is somehow bias against violent racists and people who call for violence and death. Then fair play to you.
If you call chucking paint at buildings and fine art, blocking motorways, disrupting law abiding people getting to hospital appointments peaceful. Then fair play to you.
More peaceful than people who got more lenient sentences yes.
I fail to see the argument that violent racists are being unfairly treated in comparison, when they are getting shorter jail time for much worse crimes.
I guess it's a testament to the power of the right wing media that people believe it.
She got 3+ years for a tweet FFS.
No, she got 31 months for inciting racial hatred.
Again, much less than 5 1/2 years.
It was her 1st offence. Hallam and his cronies had conviction after conviction including suspended sentences.
If anything the courts bent over backwards to keep him out of jail.
In the end his own arrogance and stupidity gave the court no choice.
Well banged up and deservedly so.
Oh and as a bonus the JSO headbangers had a collective nervous breakdown and crawled back into their hole.
Great deterrent. "
Think you've argued my point about the media for me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
the facts are as follows
lucy conolly was charged with inciting racial hatred under the Public Order Act
she pleaded guilty to the charge so basically agreed that she committed the offence
there was an appeal but the scentence was upheld as being just
she is disgusting racist scum and derserved a far longer jail term |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
