So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.
I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.
Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.
I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.
Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return."
Too late. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.
I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.
Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return.
Too late."
Never too late for a U turn |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *otMe66Man 18 weeks ago
Terra Firma |
"So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.
I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.
Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return.
Too late.
Never too late for a U turn "
Not now, the damage is done and there is no way back that wont cost the tax payer millions in legal fees to end up with a negative outcome.
The PM going online to welcome him, is the own goal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…
 "
Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.
That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.
Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…
Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.
That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.
Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case."
Did she specifically say children?
Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.
It is important to differentiate between fact and spin. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…
Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.
That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.
Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.
Did she specifically say children?
Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.
It is important to differentiate between fact and spin."
I dont think her tweet mentioned children, Mrs x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Looks like they are reviewing the situation.
"
U turn coming. Blame the advisers for lack of due diligence.
Farmers iht, pensioners WF, disabled, probable ZEM postponement. Not insignificant exodus of landlords and rising section 21 evictions so possibly unpicking of renter reform and some taxes |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Looks like they are reviewing the situation.
U turn coming. Blame the advisers for lack of due diligence.
Farmers iht, pensioners WF, disabled, probable ZEM postponement. Not insignificant exodus of landlords and rising section 21 evictions so possibly unpicking of renter reform and some taxes "
u turn? .... not possible considering priti patel granted the bloke citizenship while boris johnson was in charge ..... that was 3 tory prime ministers ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Looks like they are reviewing the situation.
"
Reviewing translates as kicking the can down the road.
The review will conclude either 6 weeks next bank holiday Tuesday or the day after Egypt cancels his passport.
Whichever comes first.
Get used to it. Britain is stuck with this evil twat and his scumbag family. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…
Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.
That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.
Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.
Did she specifically say children?
Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.
It is important to differentiate between fact and spin."
I take a different view in that those she wanted to set fire to included children. They are about 20% of those asylum seekers in hotels she wanted burnt to death.
She would have known that when she made her Tweets.
It's astonishing that Reform has promoted this vile child minder as some sort of political hero. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *CExeCouple 18 weeks ago
Hong-Kong/Exeter |
"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…
Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.
That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.
Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case."
Wes Streeting posted violent tweets calling for Jan Moir to be killed, yet he's in the running to take over from Starmer. The point being made in the comment you replied to is that the left are held to different standards. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…
Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.
That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.
Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.
Did she specifically say children?
Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.
It is important to differentiate between fact and spin.
I take a different view in that those she wanted to set fire to included children. They are about 20% of those asylum seekers in hotels she wanted burnt to death.
She would have known that when she made her Tweets.
It's astonishing that Reform has promoted this vile child minder as some sort of political hero."
So, as abhorrent as her tweet may have been, you think that she referred to children specifically?
The point is that spin to cosy up to a political narrative can be seen to be used to negate argument.
Put it this way. It's similar to planting a glove that doesn't fit into a murder case to ensure a conviction, which deflects from the actual facts in existence. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Read her tweet. Connelly specifically suggested setting fire to all hotels housing the "********"
Those hotels house children as well as adults. She was a Registered Child Minder.
Those are the facts and that is why she got a custodial sentence. The judgement also stated she showed no remorse.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Read her tweet. Connelly specifically suggested setting fire to all hotels housing the "********"
Those hotels house children as well as adults. She was a Registered Child Minder.
Those are the facts and that is why she got a custodial sentence. The judgement also stated she showed no remorse.
"
So, as abhorrent as the statement was, she didn't refer to children specifically. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) 17 weeks ago
|
"what we need is a stasi like approach to anyone preaching hate.
"
We already have that. But they are only interested in certain types of opinions, those that Starmer disagrees with. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
