FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > The mango monster
The mango monster
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Is set to steal $1.7 billion from US taxpayers yet he claims he doesn't get paid That's on top of his family profit from market manipulation What a cunt " do you ever post anything else other than about trump? He must be living rent free in your head, is he ripping you off or his own people? | |||
"Is set to steal $1.7 billion from US taxpayers yet he claims he doesn't get paid That's on top of his family profit from market manipulation What a cunt " The IRS is a branch of the government Trump is currently running the government It's not like he's set this aside for himself and allies Let me ask you WHY is there a $1.77B fund being set aside? Was it because the previous administration weaponized the system to attack political opponents, discrediting and smearing their names? We have a name for that Do you support the action and tactics the democratics used when in power and attacking the republicans? Or are you in support of due process and reparations cause that's what the $1.77B is for Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the maths on how they got to 1.77 | |||
"Is set to steal $1.7 billion from US taxpayers yet he claims he doesn't get paid That's on top of his family profit from market manipulation What a cunt The IRS is a branch of the government Trump is currently running the government It's not like he's set this aside for himself and allies Let me ask you WHY is there a $1.77B fund being set aside? Was it because the previous administration weaponized the system to attack political opponents, discrediting and smearing their names? We have a name for that Do you support the action and tactics the democratics used when in power and attacking the republicans? Or are you in support of due process and reparations cause that's what the $1.77B is for Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the maths on how they got to 1.77 " So instead of the people he accused of wrong doing being punished, he steals $1.7billion of taxpayers money. Justify that .... What a cunt | |||
"Is set to steal $1.7 billion from US taxpayers yet he claims he doesn't get paid That's on top of his family profit from market manipulation What a cunt do you ever post anything else other than about trump? He must be living rent free in your head, is he ripping you off or his own people? " There's an old saying, "if you've nothing useful to say, say nothing" | |||
"Is set to steal $1.7 billion from US taxpayers yet he claims he doesn't get paid That's on top of his family profit from market manipulation What a cunt do you ever post anything else other than about trump? He must be living rent free in your head, is he ripping you off or his own people? There's an old saying, "if you've nothing useful to say, say nothing"" yet you constantly post in here  take your own advice | |||
"Is set to steal $1.7 billion from US taxpayers yet he claims he doesn't get paid That's on top of his family profit from market manipulation What a cunt do you ever post anything else other than about trump? He must be living rent free in your head, is he ripping you off or his own people? There's an old saying, "if you've nothing useful to say, say nothing"yet you constantly post in here take your own advice"Quote "Don't be nasty Abuse against other site users, mods or admin isn't tolerated. Don't be personal Personal attacks against other site users aren't allowed, even if you don't name them. If you've got a problem with someone on the site, block them. If you've got a problem with what someone writes on the forum just skip over their messages or report to admin if you think they need to take action." | |||
" So instead of the people he accused of wrong doing being punished, he steals $1.7billion of taxpayers money. Justify that .... What a cunt " Gladly... The IRS was weaponized under the previous administration and targeted political opponents to discredit them and find anything financial the Democratic party could use against them These 'Allies' were unfairly targeted and as such have raised legal cases against the IRS for this unfair treatment As such, the IRS knows it's messed up, knows it's going to lose in court and I preparing a pot of $1.7B in compensation to those affected Time and time again, one side of the political spectrum love to FAFO and keep finding out the hard way they are wrong. I think that should justify the amount, I don't agree with it but I also disagree even more when government entities are turned against the people. Also, no need to call me the C word | |||
| |||
"He lives a good life for is hard work " Steady on! That's sounding too much like the support he used to get on here before he fucked up our petrol prices! | |||
" So instead of the people he accused of wrong doing being punished, he steals $1.7billion of taxpayers money. Justify that .... What a cunt Gladly... The IRS was weaponized under the previous administration and targeted political opponents to discredit them and find anything financial the Democratic party could use against them These 'Allies' were unfairly targeted and as such have raised legal cases against the IRS for this unfair treatment As such, the IRS knows it's messed up, knows it's going to lose in court and I preparing a pot of $1.7B in compensation to those affected Time and time again, one side of the political spectrum love to FAFO and keep finding out the hard way they are wrong. I think that should justify the amount, I don't agree with it but I also disagree even more when government entities are turned against the people. Also, no need to call me the C word " Is t trump the cunt, not you ? Why should the IRS (taxpayers money) be used to settle with ( a claimed) multi billionaire who allegedly doesn't take a salary for being president? | |||
"Why should the IRS (taxpayers money) be used to settle with ( a claimed) multi billionaire who allegedly doesn't take a salary for being president?" It doesn't matter how much money a person has, if the government uses the legal system to persecute that person, they deserve compensation. But there's no suggestion that Trump personally will be claiming any of this fund. | |||
"Why should the IRS (taxpayers money) be used to settle with ( a claimed) multi billionaire who allegedly doesn't take a salary for being president? It doesn't matter how much money a person has, if the government uses the legal system to persecute that person, they deserve compensation. But there's no suggestion that Trump personally will be claiming any of this fund." No it's for rioters that stormed the capitol | |||
| |||
| |||
" So instead of the people he accused of wrong doing being punished, he steals $1.7billion of taxpayers money. Justify that .... What a cunt Gladly... The IRS was weaponized under the previous administration and targeted political opponents to discredit them and find anything financial the Democratic party could use against them These 'Allies' were unfairly targeted and as such have raised legal cases against the IRS for this unfair treatment As such, the IRS knows it's messed up, knows it's going to lose in court and I preparing a pot of $1.7B in compensation to those affected Time and time again, one side of the political spectrum love to FAFO and keep finding out the hard way they are wrong. I think that should justify the amount, I don't agree with it but I also disagree even more when government entities are turned against the people. Also, no need to call me the C word " Ooooh… so close to being right… and by so close.. I mean not really The reason why is that the courts were about to throw out his 10bn dollar lawsuit against the IRS… basically on the grounds that you really can’t sue yourself! So the “settlement” he agreed with himself… sorry the IRS ……was the 1.776bn dollar slush fund for himself.. sorry I meant for those wronged.. even though they were all found guilty by jury of piers… and a “amnesty agreement” in that the IRS would write off any investigations of the trump organisation for any circumvention of taxes owed over the past 15 years I mean… why would you specifically need that… hmmm….. And finally the republicans on congress finally grew a spine and said… not passing that!! Probably because the midterm elections attack ads basically write themselves, especially since the cost of living and price of gas goes through the roof because of his war | |||
"I hope in years to come, we look back at this time and history and acknowledgement the Trump derangement syndrome that seems to affect so many people in this day and age. Honestly, if you flipped the tables it wouldn't be an issue but cause Trumps involved it has to be bad No matter if he cured cancer, ended world hunger, achievement world peace, provide free energy etc it must be evil cause Trump did it" He didn't cure cancer, he suggested curing COVID by drinking bleach 🤷♂️ | |||
| |||
"What has he achieved US economy in tatters World economy set back years Ukraine war still ongoing Iran war possible deal which will result in concessions for Iran and security situation worse than 8 years ago before he cancelled the deal he's trying to reinstate. "Gas" process thought the roof Pool of reflection no longer reflective Oh ... He's building a golden ballroom 👍 " He's a slimy snake oil salesman totally out of his depth. Surrounds himself with sycophantic unskilled toadies more interested in feathering their own nest than trying to rein him in. He has created a cult with the followers incapable of critical analysis and too frightened to criticise the Dear Leader. | |||
"He's a slimy snake oil salesman totally out of his depth. Surrounds himself with sycophantic unskilled toadies more interested in feathering their own nest than trying to rein him in. He has created a cult with the followers incapable of critical analysis and too frightened to criticise the Dear Leader." He's also created a cult of people obsessed with criticizing his every thought, word, or deed. These people are so in thrall that they have to speak out against Trump at every opportunity, whether or not there's a reason to attack him. If he does nothing at all they just recap all of his previous shortcomings as if they were news to us all. | |||
"I hope in years to come, we look back at this time and history and acknowledgement the Trump derangement syndrome that seems to affect so many people in this day and age. Honestly, if you flipped the tables it wouldn't be an issue but cause Trumps involved it has to be bad No matter if he cured cancer, ended world hunger, achievement world peace, provide free energy etc it must be evil cause Trump did it He didn't cure cancer, he suggested curing COVID by drinking bleach 🤷♂️" ni he didnt say to drink bleach lol he said something about disenfecting blood, that they already do with uv. You trump haters are just as deranged as his maga supporters, he has dine olenty of shit things to be called out on but you chose to say he told people to drink bleach lol | |||
" He's also created a cult of people obsessed with criticizing his every thought, word, or deed. These people are so in thrall that they have to speak out against Trump at every opportunity, whether or not there's a reason to attack him. If he does nothing at all they just recap all of his previous shortcomings as if they were news to us all." To be fair… the stunt he has pulled this time round with the 1.776 billion dollar “weaponisation fund” is just so brazen even his own Republican senators are calling this one out The more you look into it… the more corrupt it seems…. To be honest if this was done in Cuba or Russia or any authoritarian regime, it’s basically what dictators do | |||
"He's a slimy snake oil salesman totally out of his depth. Surrounds himself with sycophantic unskilled toadies more interested in feathering their own nest than trying to rein him in. He has created a cult with the followers incapable of critical analysis and too frightened to criticise the Dear Leader. He's also created a cult of people obsessed with criticizing his every thought, word, or deed. These people are so in thrall that they have to speak out against Trump at every opportunity, whether or not there's a reason to attack him. If he does nothing at all they just recap all of his previous shortcomings as if they were news to us all." To be fair he didn't have to try hard to create a cult of people that hate him, he's really easy to hate | |||
"He's also created a cult of people obsessed with criticizing his every thought, word, or deed. These people are so in thrall that they have to speak out against Trump at every opportunity, whether or not there's a reason to attack him. If he does nothing at all they just recap all of his previous shortcomings as if they were news to us all." "To be fair… the stunt he has pulled this time round with the 1.776 billion dollar “weaponisation fund” is just so brazen even his own Republican senators are calling this one out The more you look into it… the more corrupt it seems…. To be honest if this was done in Cuba or Russia or any authoritarian regime, it’s basically what dictators do " Whatever the merits of the fund, the person I was responding to has only made one post here, and that was just a list of Trump failures without mentioning the fund at all. | |||
"He's a slimy snake oil salesman totally out of his depth. Surrounds himself with sycophantic unskilled toadies more interested in feathering their own nest than trying to rein him in. He has created a cult with the followers incapable of critical analysis and too frightened to criticise the Dear Leader." "He's also created a cult of people obsessed with criticizing his every thought, word, or deed. These people are so in thrall that they have to speak out against Trump at every opportunity, whether or not there's a reason to attack him. If he does nothing at all they just recap all of his previous shortcomings as if they were news to us all." "To be fair he didn't have to try hard to create a cult of people that hate him, he's really easy to hate " That is a good point. | |||
"He's also created a cult of people obsessed with criticizing his every thought, word, or deed. These people are so in thrall that they have to speak out against Trump at every opportunity, whether or not there's a reason to attack him. If he does nothing at all they just recap all of his previous shortcomings as if they were news to us all. To be fair… the stunt he has pulled this time round with the 1.776 billion dollar “weaponisation fund” is just so brazen even his own Republican senators are calling this one out The more you look into it… the more corrupt it seems…. To be honest if this was done in Cuba or Russia or any authoritarian regime, it’s basically what dictators do Whatever the merits of the fund, the person I was responding to has only made one post here, and that was just a list of Trump failures without mentioning the fund at all." Well you are the one who accused everyone of always having TDS and it was the OP who specifically mentioned the fund in the very first post ….. The fund is basically a slush fund where he controls who the money goes to and has little oversight… plus giving himself and his family tax immunity is a corker! | |||
"Well you are the one who accused everyone of always having TDS ..." I didn't accuse *everyone* of *always* having TDS, I sarcastically responded to one post. But if you are trying to get back the thread back on track ... "The fund is basically a slush fund where he controls who the money goes to and has little oversight…" Trump doesn't control who the money goes to, there's a five member panel (not appointed by Trump) who report to the Attorney General. "... plus giving himself and his family tax immunity is a corker! " Given that prominent Democrats have openly said that when they get into power they will put all efforts into examining Trump's and his family's tax affairs, that seems like a reasonable move. The Democrats are threatening to make what's left of his life miserable just because they hate him. Trump is using exactly the same reasoning that was used by Biden when he claimed that his son had to be given immunity otherwise the Republicans would persecute him when they got into power. | |||
"… Trump doesn't control who the money goes to, there's a five member panel (not appointed by Trump) who report to the Attorney General. " And who pulls the strings of the (acting) attorney general? | |||
"Trump doesn't control who the money goes to, there's a five member panel (not appointed by Trump) who report to the Attorney General." "And who pulls the strings of the (acting) attorney general?" If you're going to start introducing conspiracy theories, you can blame Trump for anything. | |||
"Trump doesn't control who the money goes to, there's a five member panel (not appointed by Trump) who report to the Attorney General. And who pulls the strings of the (acting) attorney general? If you're going to start introducing conspiracy theories, you can blame Trump for anything." Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role I mean, what a coincidence…. Hmmmmm | |||
"Trump doesn't control who the money goes to, there's a five member panel (not appointed by Trump) who report to the Attorney General. And who pulls the strings of the (acting) attorney general? If you're going to start introducing conspiracy theories, you can blame Trump for anything."  ?.. ! | |||
" Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role " and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role" "and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes " You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client. | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client." no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer  | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role" "and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes" "You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client." "no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer" Are you basing that on some knowledge of his abilities? Or is it just that he's associated with Trump, and therefore must be a bad person? | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client. no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer Are you basing that on some knowledge of his abilities? Or is it just that he's associated with Trump, and therefore must be a bad person?" it's based on facts | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role" "and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes" "You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client." "no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer" "Are you basing that on some knowledge of his abilities? Or is it just that he's associated with Trump, and therefore must be a bad person?" "it's based on facts" And what are these facts? | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client. no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer Are you basing that on some knowledge of his abilities? Or is it just that he's associated with Trump, and therefore must be a bad person? it's based on facts And what are these facts?" that he's a shit lawyer | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role" "and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes" "You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client." "no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer" "Are you basing that on some knowledge of his abilities? Or is it just that he's associated with Trump, and therefore must be a bad person?" "it's based on facts" "And what are these facts?" "that he's a shit lawyer" Beautifully circular reasoning. But without you being able to produce any actual facts, I don't think your argument is going to be considered persuasive. | |||
"Well the acting attorney general is Todd Blanche…. Who just happened to be Trump’s personal lawyer before accepting that role and very useles lawer he was too considering he represented trump in the case that found him guilty of 34 crimes You can't say that for sure based on one case. He might be a great lawyer, just with a very guilty client. no, the fact is he's a shit lawyer "So a shit lawyer with a very guilt client lol | |||
