FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Fireman Sam for prime minster
Fireman Sam for prime minster
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *on12xx OP Man
over a year ago
leeds |
Don't trust any political leaders and may corbny a disgrace therefore I believe fireman Sam would do a better Job
I would vote fireman Sam
As protest vote would you vote sam send reply if u would |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'd vote for the Non vote party. This gang of shadowy voters has infiltrated our political system recently and are now claiming a share of the vote. At this rate they will become a no pressure group, offering free peace and Lurve and no commitment to anything. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
A cunning plan would be for any Brexit negotiators to adopt the Python Ministry of funny walks gait, this would cunningly confuse the oppositions negotiators into thinking ours were sillier than Silly Seb the elected mayor of silly ville..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Don't trust any political leaders and may corbny a disgrace therefore I believe fireman Sam would do a better Job
I would vote fireman Sam
As protest vote would you vote sam send reply if u would"
Fireman Sam may already be a member of the monster raving loony party. Other Monster raving loony party candidates include The Incredible flying brick and Screaming Lord Sutch (now deceased). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It was wasn't a protest vote people wanted to leave please accept that!!
Postman pat for pm always delivers !!!"
I’ll correct you there, people were convinced to leave purely to benefit a rich few. Not all leavers are bad people “who wanted to leave”, that’s very judgemental. Some are just confused and easily lead. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *on12xx OP Man
over a year ago
leeds |
That's the probable accept vote.
You offend leavers .
People wanted to leave and still as we don't want to be governed by Europe
all leavers I know offended democracy ignored .
We vote to leave were not on 29th democracy dead in this country!!!!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"That's the probable accept vote.
You offend leavers .
People wanted to leave and still as we don't want to be governed by Europe
all leavers I know offended democracy ignored .
We vote to leave were not on 29th democracy dead in this country!!!!
"
No where on the advisory referendum did it say anything about 29th March 2019. As you may remember at the time, it was mentioned that withdrawal would take around five years if done properly.
So democracy is dead because? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oodmessMan
over a year ago
yumsville |
"That's the probable accept vote.
You offend leavers .
People wanted to leave and still as we don't want to be governed by Europe
all leavers I know offended democracy ignored .
We vote to leave were not on 29th democracy dead in this country!!!!
No where on the advisory referendum did it say anything about 29th March 2019. As you may remember at the time, it was mentioned that withdrawal would take around five years if done properly.
So democracy is dead because?"
If it was advisory, then any any all (future) referenda will be treated as advisory. They should be either scrapped altogether or will have absolute apathy.
The time frame was set due to A50 rules - two years from us triggering it.
The period after is then then trade deal that comes from the contents of legal agreement negotiated.
As I remember, the EU said if there were reason enough a country could withdraw A50 (or something like it) but it seems too simplistic to say the referendum was advisory so lets all forget about it.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"That's the probable accept vote.
You offend leavers .
People wanted to leave and still as we don't want to be governed by Europe
all leavers I know offended democracy ignored .
We vote to leave were not on 29th democracy dead in this country!!!!
No where on the advisory referendum did it say anything about 29th March 2019. As you may remember at the time, it was mentioned that withdrawal would take around five years if done properly.
So democracy is dead because?
If it was advisory, then any any all (future) referenda will be treated as advisory. They should be either scrapped altogether or will have absolute apathy.
The time frame was set due to A50 rules - two years from us triggering it.
The period after is then then trade deal that comes from the contents of legal agreement negotiated.
As I remember, the EU said if there were reason enough a country could withdraw A50 (or something like it) but it seems too simplistic to say the referendum was advisory so lets all forget about it.
"
Well I agree, this entire debacle could have been avoided by not having a referendum in the first place. They’re a terrible way to make such important choices for the country.
“The time frame was set due to A50 rules - two years from us triggering it.”. The date with which we triggered article 50 was not mentioned in the referendum. It was clearly triggered several years too early, before a detailed clear plan was formed. We arrived at the inevitable end point, which is that Westminster is nowhere near ready, to even know what they want, never mind negotiate any trade deals. They should have figured out what the deal would look like before triggering article 50.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oodmessMan
over a year ago
yumsville |
"That's the probable accept vote.
You offend leavers .
People wanted to leave and still as we don't want to be governed by Europe
all leavers I know offended democracy ignored .
We vote to leave were not on 29th democracy dead in this country!!!!
No where on the advisory referendum did it say anything about 29th March 2019. As you may remember at the time, it was mentioned that withdrawal would take around five years if done properly.
So democracy is dead because?
If it was advisory, then any any all (future) referenda will be treated as advisory. They should be either scrapped altogether or will have absolute apathy.
The time frame was set due to A50 rules - two years from us triggering it.
The period after is then then trade deal that comes from the contents of legal agreement negotiated.
As I remember, the EU said if there were reason enough a country could withdraw A50 (or something like it) but it seems too simplistic to say the referendum was advisory so lets all forget about it.
Well I agree, this entire debacle could have been avoided by not having a referendum in the first place. They’re a terrible way to make such important choices for the country.
“The time frame was set due to A50 rules - two years from us triggering it.”. The date with which we triggered article 50 was not mentioned in the referendum. It was clearly triggered several years too early, before a detailed clear plan was formed. We arrived at the inevitable end point, which is that Westminster is nowhere near ready, to even know what they want, never mind negotiate any trade deals. They should have figured out what the deal would look like before triggering article 50.
"
Then you go back to the argument of a government was elected and there is an opposition to oppose.
There is no winning outcome. Plus the government did wait when it was being told to trigger - Labour would have trigger immediate... and on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time to emigrate
We have sold our country out.
We have destoyed a great country"
Less of the we.. I voted remain and it was all going lovely until brexiters fucked it all up . .. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The argument is I'm British and don't want to be governed by Europe that's very clear!!"
We aren’t and haven’t ever been governed by “Europe”.
It’s very clear that you’ve believed some misinformation along the way and now it’s stuck with you for some reason.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oodmessMan
over a year ago
yumsville |
Looks like this may be a possibility as May has received a no confidence motion from 70 association chiefs. The threshold is 65 and now 800 officers will take part in a vote on her leadership of the party due to her handling of Brexit. It is the first time a sitting PM has received a challenge to their leadership from their grassroot campaigners.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48011201 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
