FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Stories and Fantasies > Hidden Histories of Cuckolding: When Kings Shared Beds and Power Was Never Monogamous

Hidden Histories of Cuckolding: When Kings Shared Beds and Power Was Never Monogamous

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *heDevilsGentleman OP   Man 13 weeks ago

Bangor

People love to pretend cuckolding is a modern sickness. Porn-brain. Internet rot. Something that crawled out of a comment section sometime after broadband arrived in Northern Ireland. It’s a tidy story, comforting in its simplicity, and completely untrue. Because long before Fetlife and Fabswinger profiles, before Shakespeare’s knowing smirks, before anyone had language for kink, power and sex were already sharing space in ways that would make modern men deeply uncomfortable. Crowns, bloodlines, treaties, and survival are all braided together. Sitting late at night reading this stuff, I realised something that shifted me: cuckolding wasn’t the scandal. Pretending exclusivity clearly was.

In medieval and early modern Europe, marriage among the ruling classes had little to do with desire. It was a contract: land, alliances, ceasefires. You married who you were told to, and then you found ways to live within that arrangement. Kings, lords, and nobles openly kept favourites, mistresses, and companions. Queens did too, though history prefers to call theirs rumours rather than records. What struck me wasn’t the affairs themselves; it was how often the husband knew, allowed it, and even benefited from it. Power didn’t always mean exclusivity. Sometimes, power meant endurance.

Take Henry II of England and Eleanor of Aquitaine. Their marriage was political, brilliant, combustible. He slept around freely, and when whispers followed her, he didn’t react like a jealous husband from a modern drama. He reacted like a ruler calculating leverage. What mattered wasn’t fidelity; it was control of the situation. Reading that, something clicked for me. Jealousy, as we understand it now, is a luxury emotion. It belongs to a world where love is treated like private property. Back then, power was collective. Sexual access was negotiated. Masculinity was measured by how well you managed the fallout.

As I dug deeper, the pattern kept repeating. In Ireland and Britain, there are half-buried customs that feel uncomfortably familiar once you strip away the romance. Fostering, for example, children raised in other households to strengthen alliances between families. Sexuality wasn’t always sealed behind doors; it was woven into social glue. There are also those quiet folk stories about “strong men” being invited into a household when an heir was needed. It’s never written plainly. It’s couched in jokes, euphemisms, and raised eyebrows. But the implication is clear: the husband’s role wasn’t always to perform. Sometimes it was to sanction.

When I first read that, I didn’t feel shame at all; it was recognition. Because the role of the man who knows, who consents, who stays, has been dragged through modern ridicule. We call him weak. We strip him of agency. We pretend he’s losing something. But history doesn’t agree. History shows men who understood their value weren’t erased by another man’s presence. If anything, it was confirmed by their ability to hold the structure together.

Being from Northern Ireland sharpens this for me. Small place. Long memory. Everyone knows everyone’s business, or pretends they do. We grew up learning what to show and what to swallow. Appearances mattered because safety depended on them. So when I examine my own pull toward cuckolding not just sexually, but psychologically, I don’t see pathology anymore. I see inheritance. A pattern that survived because it worked. It worked for alliances. It worked for honesty. It worked for keeping households intact when desire refused to behave.

The modern insult version of “cuck” wants me to believe I’m losing status, masculinity, and ground. The hidden history tells me something else entirely. Men like me have always existed. We were just quieter. More strategic. Less interested in posturing and more interested in staying present. Yes, there’s arousal in that, but beneath it there’s something older and steadier: relief. Relief from pretending I have to be everything. Relief from guarding what doesn’t belong to me. Relief from the lie that love is ownership.

When I read these histories, I don’t feel small. I feel aligned, like stepping into a current that was flowing long before I arrived. If you’re reading this and wondering why it resonates when you’ve been told it shouldn’t, maybe the answer isn’t that you’re broken. Maybe you’re remembering something that was buried under centuries of moral panic and performance masculinity. Hidden histories don’t stay hidden forever. They leak. They surface. They show up in our fantasies, our kinks, our quiet thoughts late at night. I’ve stopped apologising for listening.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *DFriendly FolkCouple 12 weeks ago

Redditch

What a great read thank you. As said on another history post. The lord of the manor enforcing his rights to take the virginity of a young bride within his domain enforces your statement of sexual power over others.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *w_cuckCouple 12 weeks ago

Cambridgeshire

Very interesting read, thanks for sharing

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0