https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL1OgSl2YQU
I noticed they turned the comments off...
Also, 4 minutes and 52 seconds in... Oooohhh the swingers are gonna get ya! 
What a load of utter shite!
As others said in the locked thread, this is probably a hit piece to help justify the government blocking access to websites. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why are you trying so hard not to actually listen to what's being highlighted?"
What is being highlighted?
Husbands forcing their wives to have sex with other men. 100 in a 15 month period all from this site? (You're a single woman, how easy could you set that up for yourself?) 
Or...
Maybe the government are trying to convince folk that they need to have more control over what can be accessed online?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why are you trying so hard not to actually listen to what's being highlighted?
What is being highlighted?
Husbands forcing their wives to have sex with other men. 100 in a 15 month period all from this site? (You're a single woman, how easy could you set that up for yourself?)
Or...
Maybe the government are trying to convince folk that they need to have more control over what can be accessed online? "
Is this Mr sandwich? Be truthful... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is this Mr sandwich? Be truthful..."
Come on now, you're smart enough to know its mainly blokes who manage couples profiles.
You don't honestly believe this rubbish that 'consent is discussed and often presumed before a meeting'? Have you ever come across this yourself? Other threads are full of knee jerk sympathy yet nobody else has shared a similar experience?
On a side note, we hold off on presumptions until the clothes are actually off and folk are interacting. Not that myself, or Madam Sandwich, need to justify how we conduct ourselves to anybody else bar folk we actually meet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
So "Martin" slept with 25-30 women from Fab that he knew weren't into it but did it anyway?
What have the government blocked? They added ages verification but that isn't blocking and besides it's a total waste of time as people know how to get around it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I must say the article, video, and the podcast are utterly ridiculous. Once again the mainstream media are outraged that anything other than standard monogamous relationships dare to exist.
This is a rough situation but it sounds like the police determined there weren't any crimes to answer. Why then does the BBC see fit to push the narrative there is?
The podcast is hilariously aggressive towards the site too. Repeatedly noting how many times the site is mentioned in crime reports - yes, obviously? A site this size is obviously going to be mentioned, but as they only quietly clarify once a "mention" could be practically anything and doesn't mean ANY wrongdoing has took place here - it could be that the site was found in someone's history but not at all relevant, that someone was on their way to a meet when something else happens, or literally any number of innocuous reasons.
They then set up an account and choose not to block single men and are then surprised & upset that they get messaged by... single men? And the tone of voice when someone sends a shirtless picture or a dick pic - as if they haven't signed up to an adult site which is literally designed for it. It almost feels like they signed up expecting this to be Tinder or something like that, when it's unapologetically not. Insanity.
Not to mention that a huge number of people don't use this site for any kind of swinging whatsoever. Single men & women simply looking to meet other singles - although I'm sure they would find something wrong with that too if they had an agenda to push. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
