FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Sugar daddys
Sugar daddys
Jump to: Newest in thread
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person "I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex. "At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation ! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex. "Who said anything about paying for sex | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I would rather fund my own lifestyle than have any man to thank for doing so." Yes and thats fair enough | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Block/report. "  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation ! "Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement."Your implication is clear, and you know that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex "You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can see how some people get off on it. If everyone is happy then it’s not my problem "I dint see what the problem is if both parts are happy | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue?" I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex
You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. "It's more about been controlled and stuff like that nothing to do with sex | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex ..exactly
You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why " Too many judgmental people | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex " Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex
You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. "The idea that the person wouldn't normally have sex with them is a huge assumption. It maybe that they both want to have sex but like the added kink of ownership via gifts. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people " Your right there is to many judgemental people | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people " It's against the rules of the site. There begins and ends my judgment. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people " Too true. I'm always amazed by the judgmental and those with a closed mind on a site that is about being the very opposite. A sugar daddy type scenario/relationship does not have to be about sex at all. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people It's against the rules of the site. There begins and ends my judgment. " Not only judgemental, but incorrect too.  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "Now that made me smile. With a good sugar daddy you shouldn't really need many toys lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "Great to see a light-hearted post. Mwah ! xxx | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people Too true. I'm always amazed by the judgmental and those with a closed mind on a site that is about being the very opposite. A sugar daddy type scenario/relationship does not have to be about sex at all. " You will always get judgemental people I just dont have time for people like that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people It's against the rules of the site. There begins and ends my judgment. " But it isn't really, he isn't paying for sex or exchanging money for services, he's looking for a particular style of relationship that involves giving gifts. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "People are just to judgemental then it comes to this kinda stuff its just like female led relationships people are just the same with that as well | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "This! And my lingerie / latex / shoe fetish. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish!
This!
And my lingerie / latex / shoe fetish. "See here comes the light hearted people that dont take things to seriously and it's good to see | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish!
Now that made me smile. With a good sugar daddy you shouldn't really need many toys lol"I want the toys though, I love experimenting. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction." It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. " It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. " And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... " Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. " As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. " But this isn't even the same thing lol. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that."Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet. It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that."Wow, he didn't even do that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that."Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers? So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain? People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. " Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that."You dont have a clue do you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that.
Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers?
So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain?
People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question.
"Eh, you can be a single swinger.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. " My husband takes me shopping in exchange for sex..... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. " I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that.
Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers?
So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain?
People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question.
Eh, you can be a single swinger.. "Swingers are couples who choose to have an open relationship, allowing their partners to have sex with other people. You can't have an open relationship if you're single. So no is the answer. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that.
Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers?
So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain?
People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question.
Eh, you can be a single swinger..
Swingers are couples who choose to have an open relationship, allowing their partners to have sex with other people. You can't have an open relationship if you're single. So no is the answer. "I’ll let you look it up first.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it " You’re the one that brought the subject up.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. " Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? " Do I also need to explain hypothetical.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. " And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all " Eh I didn’t, as you’re not a sugar daddy.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? Do I also need to explain hypothetical.. "'A sugar daddy is usually a generous older man who spends lavishly on his mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.' Tell me where it says exchanging gifts for sex. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all Eh I didn’t, as you’re not a sugar daddy.. " So now your saying if you take someone shopping and dont get sex after it you ain't a sugar daddy | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? Do I also need to explain hypothetical..
'A sugar daddy is usually a generous older man who spends lavishly on his mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.'
Tell me where it says exchanging gifts for sex.
"a rich and usually older man who buys presents for or gives money to a younger person, especially a woman, usually so that the younger person will spend time with him and have a sexual relationship with him. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? Do I also need to explain hypothetical..
'A sugar daddy is usually a generous older man who spends lavishly on his mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.'
Tell me where it says exchanging gifts for sex.
"" mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.'" These words indicate a sexual relationship of some sort. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"my partner jokes that if instead of meeting me he had gone with a prostitute it would of cost him less and he would have more sex "Now that made me laugh  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all Eh I didn’t, as you’re not a sugar daddy.. So now your saying if you take someone shopping and dont get sex after it you ain't a sugar daddy" Are you a fish and forget everything you write.. YOU said you’re not.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"op your 27 who would you be planning on being a sugar daddy for?" You can be a sugar daddy to anyone it's just a name for it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person "Are you wealthy?  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person Are you wealthy? "There you go, OP. Snagged one already.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
