 |
By *oixos OP Man
over a year ago
London |
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today. "
It’s like they need someone to hold their hand
These are the people to claim to do “research” lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting. "
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oixos OP Man
over a year ago
London |
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting.
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say."
If you go on the link and read it, you’ll be able to work it out all by yourself |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting.
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say."
It does say. It's reactions to the vaccine or what people have developed after taking the Pfizer vaccine. Also interesting because of the source, which is the gov.co.uk website. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oixos OP Man
over a year ago
London |
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting.
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say.
It does say. It's reactions to the vaccine or what people have developed after taking the Pfizer vaccine. Also interesting because of the source, which is the gov.co.uk website. "
I’ve posted a thread up of the Astra zeneca one too |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting.
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say.
If you go on the link and read it, you’ll be able to work it out all by yourself "
I know what it is, thanks. But many people on here will have no clue. That's why I'm asking the previous poster  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Data is good.
I'm looking forward to getting my jab  "
It's very interesting that's for sure and is actually a great way to inform yourself wether to have the vaccine.
Early days but from this data its a yes from me. OP do they also have one of these for the astrazeneca vaccine. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting.
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say.
If you go on the link and read it, you’ll be able to work it out all by yourself
I know what it is, thanks. But many people on here will have no clue. That's why I'm asking the previous poster "
Are you trying to say I'm thick :o. Ugly fair enough but I'm not thick haha. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How about you just look at the link and then decide to comment or not. People are so lazy today.
Oooo that is interesting.
Because the document makes absolutely no sense on its own. That's why.
What was interesting to you? Do you think this is data from trials or after approval? Because the document doesn't say.
It does say. It's reactions to the vaccine or what people have developed after taking the Pfizer vaccine. Also interesting because of the source, which is the gov.co.uk website.
I’ve posted a thread up of the Astra zeneca one too "
Thank you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Data is good.
I'm looking forward to getting my jab
It's very interesting that's for sure and is actually a great way to inform yourself wether to have the vaccine.
Early days but from this data its a yes from me. OP do they also have one of these for the astrazeneca vaccine. "
I have a couple of reasons to worry on a personal level about vaccines (family history/ my medical history). But I'll tell my doctor/ the people and trust them to point me in the direction of the one with the lowest risk for me, same as I do for antibiotics or other medications where more than one type is available. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
In summary it's a list of what side effects people have reported after receiving the vaccine. There are some scary sounding medical terms in there, but if you Google what they mean (I had too) they are less intimidating. I love the fact the OP is using data and not opinion though. When the clubs reopen (and this gives me hope they will) I'm buying you a pint. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"She said it’s only a little prick
I said it’s what god gave me
See my location?  your profile is blocked
Can see your status
Lol"
Oh, it's on my forum messages. Where you've got Preston, I've got "waiting for a little prick" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I don't understand it. Or find it helpful as it s the interpretation that is more meaningful to me.
How is that data gathered and by whom and who has verified it?
As an example it says there has been one fatal case of diarrhoea. Over what time period? Did they have it before being vaccinated? How many have been administered?
Is the implication or conclusion that they have been caused by the jab. Perforated intestine?
Reports normally have guidance notes with them that help the uneducated like myself.
But if some of you understand it maybe its helpful. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't understand it. Or find it helpful as it s the interpretation that is more meaningful to me.
How is that data gathered and by whom and who has verified it?
As an example it says there has been one fatal case of diarrhoea. Over what time period? Did they have it before being vaccinated? How many have been administered?
Is the implication or conclusion that they have been caused by the jab. Perforated intestine?
Reports normally have guidance notes with them that help the uneducated like myself.
But if some of you understand it maybe its helpful. "
Have a look at the link I posted above, which provides a bit of context.
It's data gathered via the MHRA Yellow Card reporting scheme. It will include any medical conditions experienced by reportees in the period after their vaccine. What cannot be confirmed is if the medical condition is as a result of the vaccine or not.
They're all conditions that occur in people who have not received a vaccination. E.g. lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph glands) - happens in many illnesses. Mr KC had a swollen lymph gland removed it November (query cancer). He's not had any vaccines in the past twelve months plus.
One condition mentioned is premature menarche (1 case). This means an unusually early onset of the first menstrual period in women. The usual definition is a period occuring before the age of 9 or 10 (ish). I'm not clear how a vaccine currently approved for over 16s (Pfizer-BioNTech) or 18s (Oxford-AZ) can possibly cause premature menarche.......
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't understand it. Or find it helpful as it s the interpretation that is more meaningful to me.
How is that data gathered and by whom and who has verified it?
As an example it says there has been one fatal case of diarrhoea. Over what time period? Did they have it before being vaccinated? How many have been administered?
Is the implication or conclusion that they have been caused by the jab. Perforated intestine?
Reports normally have guidance notes with them that help the uneducated like myself.
But if some of you understand it maybe its helpful.
Have a look at the link I posted above, which provides a bit of context.
It's data gathered via the MHRA Yellow Card reporting scheme. It will include any medical conditions experienced by reportees in the period after their vaccine. What cannot be confirmed is if the medical condition is as a result of the vaccine or not.
They're all conditions that occur in people who have not received a vaccination. E.g. lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph glands) - happens in many illnesses. Mr KC had a swollen lymph gland removed it November (query cancer). He's not had any vaccines in the past twelve months plus.
One condition mentioned is premature menarche (1 case). This means an unusually early onset of the first menstrual period in women. The usual definition is a period occuring before the age of 9 or 10 (ish). I'm not clear how a vaccine currently approved for over 16s (Pfizer-BioNTech) or 18s (Oxford-AZ) can possibly cause premature menarche.......
"
Coronary artery disease? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't understand it. Or find it helpful as it s the interpretation that is more meaningful to me.
How is that data gathered and by whom and who has verified it?
As an example it says there has been one fatal case of diarrhoea. Over what time period? Did they have it before being vaccinated? How many have been administered?
Is the implication or conclusion that they have been caused by the jab. Perforated intestine?
Reports normally have guidance notes with them that help the uneducated like myself.
But if some of you understand it maybe its helpful.
Have a look at the link I posted above, which provides a bit of context.
It's data gathered via the MHRA Yellow Card reporting scheme. It will include any medical conditions experienced by reportees in the period after their vaccine. What cannot be confirmed is if the medical condition is as a result of the vaccine or not.
They're all conditions that occur in people who have not received a vaccination. E.g. lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph glands) - happens in many illnesses. Mr KC had a swollen lymph gland removed it November (query cancer). He's not had any vaccines in the past twelve months plus.
One condition mentioned is premature menarche (1 case). This means an unusually early onset of the first menstrual period in women. The usual definition is a period occuring before the age of 9 or 10 (ish). I'm not clear how a vaccine currently approved for over 16s (Pfizer-BioNTech) or 18s (Oxford-AZ) can possibly cause premature menarche.......
Coronary artery disease? "
An immensely common diagnosis in the general population.
From the British Heart Foundation fact sheet:
There are around 7.6 million people living with heart and circulatory diseases in the UK -
an ageing and growing population and improved survival rates from heart and
circulatory events could see these numbers rise still further.
• Around 4 million males and 3.6 million females are living with heart and circulatory
diseases in the UK.
• Around twice as many people are living with heart and circulatory diseases in the UK
than with cancer and Alzheimer’s disease combined.
• Heart and circulatory diseases cause more than a quarter (27 per cent) of all deaths in
the UK; that's more than 160,000 deaths each year – or one death every three minutes.
• Around 43,000 people under the age of 75 in the UK die from heart and circulatory
diseases each year.
• Since the BHF was established the annual number of deaths from heart and circulatory
diseases in the UK has fallen by around a half.
• In 1961, more than half of all deaths in the UK were attributed
to heart and circulatory diseases (320,000 deaths) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
