FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Wales > Fab Shut Down

Fab Shut Down

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *oyo1972 OP   Man 2 days ago

Cardiff

With the latest hit piece on the BBC about the site it is reported that Jess Phillips wants it pulled down. What is the likelihood of this happening?

What has been reported is shocking beyond belief but is it a small minority or is this coercive behaviour more prevalent than any of us know?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *wanseafun888Man 2 days ago

swansea

I missed it. What happened?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *adcowWoman 2 days ago

kirkcaldy

Some women claiming that they were forced to go along with swinging by their partners using Fab.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *reamcaramelWoman 2 days ago

Port Talbot

I have always said that there should be the ability to name someone if something has happened that one feels uncomfortable with or didn't agree with.. I'm not saying publicly but with in the fab structure.. and if names kept reappearing then they should be removed.

I have had a few encounters when guys don't understand the word No..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *erviceHerMan 2 days ago

Nr Cardiff

Imaging if it was the lgbtq community that was being reported on like this. Would censor or ban their websites

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *picy couple 300Couple 2 days ago

Plymouth

Just heard on the radio apparently the government is looking into shutting down fabswingers

And possibly all swinging sites... Fetlife .... Killing kittens... UK swingers. Com etc

The irony is we've met at least two MPs a mass swinging party in London and we've swung with a couple counsellors

These are the same people that will stand up and demand the government shut the side down and possibly the clubs

It reminds me of the time the government tried to get back to family values turns out half the male Ministers were gay

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ersephone500Woman 2 days ago

Bridgend

I don't think it will be shut down but I do hope it's forced to have a better duty of care. You can report a profile using a person's pictures without their knowledge etc and the site does nothing about it. They should take some responsibility for the online interactions even if they can't do anything about the meets.

I am someone who does enjoy the hotwife/cuckold dynamic but I have seen a lot of couples where it's clearly the guy pushing it along and at least encouraging the woman to do it unfortunately.

The BBC sounds podcast said that up to 40% of women in couples don't want to be here, I don't believe it's that high a number myself

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *3xymamaWoman 2 days ago

...., Wales

If they shut sites like this down, activities will still go on but it will be kind of "underground"

I wouldn't say fab is the problem. The site facilitates people meeting. The majority of people take things to other platform once initial contact is made here

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *3xymamaWoman 20 hours ago

...., Wales

There are some very interesting points made about this and the BBC investigation on the swinging support and advice thread.

Personally I think profiles should be checked better too. If it's a couple's profile then it should have pictures of both people.

And likewise single persons should only have that person's pictures. Has consent been obtained to display another person in profile pictures?

"Single" guys who want to show pictures of their wives..and want guys to w*ank over the pictures certainly aren't asking their wives if they are OK with it..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icked-GameCouple 18 hours ago

Antarctica

This is basically book of face for Swingers and it's not fault of this site.

They going to shut down all social media? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ucky-PierreMan 18 hours ago

North London

What id imagine will happen is lots of pressure will is/is being applied to the web hosts and the payment processors. If the admins are smart they will commit to more safeguarding measures to satisfy those corporations and regulators.

I dont think its at the stage of worrying about fab being shut down, but theyve got to play the game if possible and find a way forward that has more resourced protections.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hiskasMan 18 hours ago

Llanelli

They would not be able to stop the site being used as so many countries use it, a block in the UK maybe but im sure a vpn would bypass that anyway, im not a tech savy person but sure this would work as it bypasses age restrictions due to using a foreign server or something like that lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *atherdougal106Man 17 hours ago

swansea

Yup. Easy to bypass

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allerthanaverage79Man 16 hours ago

Ayrshire


"Some women claiming that they were forced to go along with swinging by their partners using Fab."
not the sites fault of their partners are nuts!!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *he MonkeysCouple 16 hours ago

caerphilly

The issue is between the actual couple involved and not a fault of the site!

I do understand there was coercive behaviour involved but the site didn’t tell him to do that! They met people!

I do feel though that the site can learn from this. It need more security procedures.

We joined another site and we couldn’t have a profile unless you followed the prompts. One was to do a Live Photo there and then of each person in the profile. If you didn’t do the prompts then no profile.

I do hope the lady involved finds support from the correct people and is rid of the man who is responsible.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *elshguybiMan 14 hours ago

Carmarthen

Interesting

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hadowSirenWoman 58 minutes ago

Wales


"

And likewise single persons should only have that person's pictures. Has consent been obtained to display another person in profile pictures?

"

This has actually changed I’ve noticed when you try and upload a photo from your album to a message, but again, very easy to tick a box to say yes…

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *honddaboy1976Man 51 minutes ago

Tonyrefail

I think the majority on here are responsible adults in charge of their own lives and how they live them

But we all know there are probably people that don’t want to be on here but are

Not sure how you police that and make it safer

If FAB is shutdown I am sure we will go somewhere else

X

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oobie76Man 35 minutes ago

Cardiff

I completely understand why people want to make these platforms safer, and I think that's a goal we should all support. However, I don't believe it's fair or effective to blame, penalise, or shut down an entire platform because of the actions of a minority of individuals. The responsibility for abuse, coercion, or criminal behaviour lies with the people who commit those acts, not with the existence of the platform itself.

That doesn't mean platforms shouldn't do more. In fact, I think they should continue to strengthen safeguarding measures. Mandatory ID verification, payment verification, and stronger security checks would help create greater accountability and make it much harder for people to hide behind fake identities.

For couples' profiles, I think there could be an even better system. Rather than simply uploading a photo holding a piece of paper with a username, each person could be required to record a short video confirming their identity and stating that they are joining the platform voluntarily and consent to having the profile. It wouldn't prevent every situation, but it would be another meaningful step towards protecting users.

It's also important to remember that coercive or controlling relationships are real, and leaving them isn't always simple. That's why it's so important that people know support is available. There are charities, helplines, and the police for anyone experiencing abuse or coercion. No one should ever feel trapped or believe they have nowhere to turn.

At the same time, shutting down one platform doesn't remove the problem. Another website will almost certainly appear in its place. If we believe sites such as Fab or FetLife should be closed because some people misuse them, then where does that line end? Do we also close Tinder, Plenty of Fish, Grindr, Hinge, or every other dating app where bad actors exist? What about Facebook or Instagram, where people have also been victims of scams, grooming, harassment, and other crimes?

The issue isn't the platform itself—it's the behaviour of those who choose to misuse it. Our efforts should be focused on stronger safeguarding, better verification, educating users, supporting victims, and ensuring that those who break the law are identified and held accountable.

That's a solution that protects people without taking away platforms that millions of responsible adults use safely and consensually.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *elshPawgWoman 31 minutes ago

Brecon


"I completely understand why people want to make these platforms safer, and I think that's a goal we should all support. However, I don't believe it's fair or effective to blame, penalise, or shut down an entire platform because of the actions of a minority of individuals. The responsibility for abuse, coercion, or criminal behaviour lies with the people who commit those acts, not with the existence of the platform itself.

That doesn't mean platforms shouldn't do more. In fact, I think they should continue to strengthen safeguarding measures. Mandatory ID verification, payment verification, and stronger security checks would help create greater accountability and make it much harder for people to hide behind fake identities.

For couples' profiles, I think there could be an even better system. Rather than simply uploading a photo holding a piece of paper with a username, each person could be required to record a short video confirming their identity and stating that they are joining the platform voluntarily and consent to having the profile. It wouldn't prevent every situation, but it would be another meaningful step towards protecting users.

It's also important to remember that coercive or controlling relationships are real, and leaving them isn't always simple. That's why it's so important that people know support is available. There are charities, helplines, and the police for anyone experiencing abuse or coercion. No one should ever feel trapped or believe they have nowhere to turn.

At the same time, shutting down one platform doesn't remove the problem. Another website will almost certainly appear in its place. If we believe sites such as Fab or FetLife should be closed because some people misuse them, then where does that line end? Do we also close Tinder, Plenty of Fish, Grindr, Hinge, or every other dating app where bad actors exist? What about Facebook or Instagram, where people have also been victims of scams, grooming, harassment, and other crimes?

The issue isn't the platform itself—it's the behaviour of those who choose to misuse it. Our efforts should be focused on stronger safeguarding, better verification, educating users, supporting victims, and ensuring that those who break the law are identified and held accountable.

That's a solution that protects people without taking away platforms that millions of responsible adults use safely and consensually."

EXACTLY THIS!!!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0312

0